"If every state had its own laws, we wouldn't be one country; we'd be 50 different countries," said Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
-
-
Holy SHIT that is awesome, hahahahahahhah
And sad as it shows people have no fucking clue as to how this system of government is SUPPOSED to operate...ICQ: 258-202-811 | Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com -
I still can't decide if this AZ law is good or badComment
-
state rights are good.
and no doubt most here forget what the civil war was fought ACTUALLY over, it was NOT SLAVERY, it was state rights.
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com -
recent work - About meComment
-
It is a crime to be in this country illegally, so it is not a state by state law. AZ is just the first state to actually made a bill on it and actually act on the law. I am disappointed so many people think AZ is bad for trying to fight illegal aliens.Comment
-
Nice quote from a group that thinks illegals have the same rights as US citizens.Comment
-
I think you're misinterpreting what he's saying. Just remember federal supersedes state.Comment
-
I just wish california would be next to have that lawCarbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About meComment
-
I guess he never heard of the 10th amendment, what an idiot!
That is classic! Where did you find that quote?
.Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing
[email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/
ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperberComment
-
The Fed rarely takes action until it's far too late. Too much politics are involved.
Think of the vast array of federal laws that were first state laws, the fed fought them. In the current day... think about medicinal marijuana, gay rights, gay marriage, the list goes on and on. Now skip back a few decades and think about civil rights in general. That shit didn't start up in the roots of Alabama, LOL.
How many laws does the federal government trumpet today that it originally fought? I bet that list would never end.Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted
Windows VPS now available
Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
Click here for more details.Comment
-
Oh I almost forgot... states rights, for the win.Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted
Windows VPS now available
Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
Click here for more details.Comment
-
-
They don't because they don't want to. The dirty secret is that the cheap labor of undocumented workers alone offsets the added burden to the infrastructure. The cost of a lot of food you get from California (which is substantial for any American) is subsidized by the cheap cost of illegals. A good segment of the Los Angeles economy is driven by sales tax, goods, and services to undocumented aliens.
Everyone thinks this is a simple matter, but in fact remove the illegals and you'd immediately feel the effect in higher costs to business. This is why politicians don't really want to touch this problem. Do you really think these big food corporations want to see a clampdown on immigration?Comment
-
why don't you make all mexicans wear a yellow star on their clothes? or maybe in this case a yellow sombrero...Comment
-
Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted
Windows VPS now available
Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
Click here for more details.Comment
-
SIG TOO BIGComment
-
It's amazing how many people do not understand how our government is SUPPOSE to work. One law for New York is not going to work for CA or Florida. They are all different. Each state makes the laws that fit for that state. The executive branch should not be making 1 tell all law for the whole country. That is not how the system was set up...but thanks to so many clueless idiots the topic is coming up in the front so we can educate people on how it is suppose to be...~ loryn@loryntaylor . com ~
RIP TDComment
-
Comment
-
Hooray for AR.!
I mean, I grew up in North Dakota and I vividly remember all the problems we had from all those illegals crossing the boarder for our cheap prices. They would cross in buss loads, buy all our crap and do god knows what with it. This of course required us to restock our shelves with more stuff... it was a vicious circle.Http://www.extremehole.com
**** CLOSED ****
400 HOURS of exclusive custom extreme content, already on external HD in Raw DV ready to encode.
over 150,000 exclusive images and more.Comment
-
actually i don't understand what's going on there anyways - i don't know any other country where it's legal to be there without permit. when you enter the EU without visa or residency permit and they catch you, you are going to be arrested and deported. game overComment
-
ya know the ignorance around here never ceases. My wifes grandmother told us stories of waving flags so they German soldiers didnt shoot her as a child crossing street to go get food or something, and she always said, when you see people compare America to what the nazis did realize they are ignorant and never actually went though it. She told us how all her childhood friends were killed etc... when we start shooting hispanic kids in the street then we will be nazis, your country is prolly harsher than we are!
if you people really understood the nazi stuff you wouldnt throw accusations like this around.
Amazing. America is nothing like Nazi germany, god damn some of you people reach for anything to throw at America when you dont like what is happening here.
heres some advice, go talk to people who went through nazi treatment and ask them if we treat people like that.Last edited by Fletch XXX; 04-27-2010, 01:54 PM.
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About meComment
-
Careful what you ask for, you just might get it.
The reason I say this is that there are plenty of states (offhand, I'd say 50 of them) that would very much like to have their own independent obscenity standard, their own policies with regard to violent video games, their own policies regarding what materials can and can't be transported across their state, etc. etc. etc.
(Yes, I know: each state has its own obscenity laws, but if they make their standard more restrictive than the Miller Test, then that standard is invalid. Just ask the state of Georgia, which is currently without an enforceable state obscenity law by virtue of the This That and The Other case....)
There are areas where the supremacy clause and the dormant commerce clause are very, very good things. There's also unintended consequences to consider: what happens if/when one of the states that borders Mexico, Canada, or a coastal state, passes a law that says "we aren't going to enforce our border at all. It's WIDE open.... come on in." ?
Granted, in this case, Arizona is arguably just saying "me too!" on the enforcement of existing federal laws, and that might prove the difference between this law and my hypothetical of a state opening its border. I haven't done compare/contrast on this new state law and the relevant federal statutes involved (I'll leave that to the courts), but IME, state legislators ALWAYS believe their laws are perfectly written and legally sound, even if/when the legislation in question is flawed to the core.
For those laughing off the notion and calling everybody who believes this statute has some potential Supremacy Clause related problems with it "idiots".... well, what can I say? Knowledge is not purely a function of intelligence, and you might not know as much about these things as you think.
Q. BoyerComment
-
Comment
-
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About meComment
-
Comment
-
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About meComment
-
Do you have a link for this? LMAOOOOOOOOO
Edit: read over the post
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36778647Last edited by IllTestYourGirls; 04-27-2010, 02:09 PM.
Comment
-
TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.comComment
-
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
I had to look it up
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServe...suecenters4608The nation's school system faces the economic burden of providing services to the millions of children born to illegal immigrants. In a 2004 United States General Accounting Office report, three states submitted their annual cost estimates of educating illegal children. The estimates provided ranged from 50 million dollars to 87.5 million in Pennsylvania and 932 million to 1.04 billion dollars in Texas.[i]
FAIR estimates there are currently more than 425,000 children born to illegal aliens each year. This figure is based on the crude birth rate of the total foreign-born population (33 births per 1000) and the size of the illegal alien population (13 million in 2008). In 1994, California paid for 74,987 deliveries to illegal alien mothers, at a total cost of $215.2 million (an average of $2,842 per delivery). Illegal alien mothers accounted for 36 percent of all Medi-Cal funded births in California that year and now count substantially more than half.
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About meComment
-
The vast bulk of these "statistics - many of them quoted from a Lou Dobbs show in 2006 and then repeated in endless emails - have been long debunked. Or found to have no or inflated facts backing them up to begin with.
This is a good place to start if you're really serious about having a well-rounded education on the subject:
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/04/cos...al-immigrants/
NONE of this means the US should turn a blind eye to others breaking the law, but the subsidy of the undocumented worker class as a way to keep down production costs has long been fact. Unavoidable reality.
If it were not the case, there is really no reason the government would not have acted sooner. It would be to their benefit. Instead, they are protecting corporate profits. Not that I'm against that, but it's the gist of the matter.Comment
-
Just the "2% work on farms" is a lot of baloney. First off, some of the livestock industry stats I've read have pegged it at 25-50%. An AP story just last year talked about how Vermont dairy farmers count on illegal immigrants to hold down costs - even though noting they are anything but "cheap" (they are cheaper than documented workers).
Second, farm work itself is only a small portion of the labor required to bring food from its origination to your table.
Third, the Arizona bill comes at a time when illegal immigration is on the downswing. This past year there was a drop of some 800,000 illegals. The reason: the US economy is down all around so they're not being hired.
In review: ILLEGAL ALIENS COME TO THE US BECAUSE BUSINESS HERE HIRES THEM. THEY ARE HIRED BECAUSE THEY ARE CHEAPER THAN LEGALIZED WORKERS. THIS SAVES FOOD CORPORATIONS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS, IF NOT BILLIONS, OVERALL. EVEN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DOESN'T WANT TO STEP ON THOSE TOES.
Don't see how it could be any clearer than that.Comment
-
Let's look at the law:
1. Federal law already makes it illegal to be in the US without documentation. It merely adds an Arizona statue that doesn't actually do anything Federal law doesn't already provide for.
2. The Arizona law only allows police to validate a person's documentation during the regular course of some other lawful investigation - a citation for jaywalking maybe, or responding to a domestic dispute at some apartment. It doesn't allow police to just stop people for looking Mexican.
3. The law STILL doesn't address the root issue, which is business hiring illegal immigrants.
Ron Reagan understand the complex issues involved when he pushed the immigration amnesty in '86. The man wasn't dumb. He was a very shrewd politician. In the end, other pieces of the law actually increased illegal immigration, but the overall intent was to strike a balance between the tax subsidy of illegals and the cost benefits to corporations (and hopefully the American public).
The Arizona law is just as useful as 2257 is to us. Politicians trying to make a name for themselves. In the end it won't make a lick of difference.Last edited by VGeorgie; 04-27-2010, 03:43 PM.Comment
-
I think the obvious controversy with this law is the implementation and the costs for implementation as well:
Flaws:
-There are plenty of LEGAL residents of the US/AZ in AZ. Many of them have accents and are not white. What are the costs associated with wrongly arresting legal residents? What are the costs associated with all the lawsuits associated with that occurring?
-How come EVERYONE is not required to be carrying their proof of citizenship? Their social security card, birth certificate or what have you? That would then be fair game that anyone could be asked and not profiled. However, proof of citizenship is an important document that you don't want to have lost or stolen. So now Legal residents need to carry around very important, valuable, and private documentation that if lost or stolen is extremely difficult and costly to replace.
-What is this solving for? I live in AZ and have not been negatively impacted by anyone whether legal or illegal. Healthcare in AZ costs less then in other states that have less illegal immigrants. Whenever I go to the Dr. or hospital, I get in, it's not full of illegal immigrants (Actually, I'm pretty sure for the most part they'd prefer to get medical treatment in their own country). I have not met a single person who said they couldn't find a job b/c illegal immigrants were applying for the job they had. Maybe the only valid thing could be border drug violence, but this law does nothing with that, so I'm still at a loss.Allison
President
TopBucks.com| PinkVisual.com|
[email protected]
Follow Me on Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/PV_Alli
ICQ: 120353154
Check out PVLocker.com
Comment
-
if we didn't give them a job they wouldn't be herebest host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
Comment
-
Because the flood of illegal immigrants consists primarily of Hispanics, therefore everyone shouldn't need to carry proof of citizenship. Flawed argument.
-How come EVERYONE is not required to be carrying their proof of citizenship? Their social security card, birth certificate or what have you? That would then be fair game that anyone could be asked and not profiled. However, proof of citizenship is an important document that you don't want to have lost or stolen. So now Legal residents need to carry around very important, valuable, and private documentation that if lost or stolen is extremely difficult and costly to replace.Greed is Good
Comment
-
anchor babies has been in use for very long timeOriginally posted by Jesus H Christ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchor_babies
Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?
Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About meComment
Comment