Pink Visual, how will your Content Protection Retreat go now that you folded to Mansef?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Cool Ice
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2006
    • 1289

    #1

    Pink Visual, how will your Content Protection Retreat go now that you folded to Mansef?

    You just set a fine example by buckling to Mansef in your piracy suit. Why would anyone want to come to your Content Protection Retreat now?

    If anything, true anti-piracy companies should come just to throw tomatoes at you.
    NUR COOL UND GEIL
  • Allison
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2001
    • 2068

    #2
    The Xbiz article is inaccurate. No further comments will be made.
    Allison
    President
    TopBucks.com| PinkVisual.com|
    [email protected]
    Follow Me on Twitter:
    http://www.twitter.com/PV_Alli

    ICQ: 120353154

    Check out PVLocker.com

    Comment

    • Mr. Cool Ice
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2006
      • 1289

      #3
      You won't correct the inaccurate story?
      NUR COOL UND GEIL

      Comment

      • Far-L
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2002
        • 6065

        #4
        What is specifically innacurate? Settling lawsuits and dropping complaints is like pregnancy... you can't be "kind of settled".
        HomegrownCash.com, the affiliate program of Homegrown Video - The Largest Collection of Amateur XXX - Est. 1982.
        Contact
        - Email: farrell AT homegrownvideo D com Skype: hgfarl
        Newsweek Magazine - "Homegrown Video, the longest running series in the history of porn."

        Comment

        • Mr. Cool Ice
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2006
          • 1289

          #5
          Originally posted by Far-L
          What is specifically innacurate? Settling lawsuits and dropping complaints is like pregnancy... you can't be "kind of settled".
          NUR COOL UND GEIL

          Comment

          • Adam X
            Now Giving 1 Fuck Daily
            • Apr 2002
            • 2493

            #6
            Originally posted by Far-L
            What is specifically innacurate? Settling lawsuits and dropping complaints is like pregnancy... you can't be "kind of settled".
            lol

            Anyone, bueller? How much did it take?

            oh the dirty dollar...
            Cronfund - Buy CRON now and earn 4% plus coin value. The best of DEFI!

            Comment

            • Domain Broker
              So Fucking Banned
              • Oct 2004
              • 2427

              #7
              Originally posted by Allison
              The Xbiz article is inaccurate. No further comments will be made.

              Comment

              • Nick_Merlot
                Confirmed User
                • Mar 2008
                • 232

                #8
                Money talks.

                Comment

                • BIGTYMER
                  Junior Achiever
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 17066

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Nick_Merlot
                  Money talks.
                  And bullshit walks.

                  Comment

                  • Caligari
                    Confirmed User
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 5414

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mr. Cool Ice
                    You just set a fine example by buckling to Mansef in your piracy suit. Why would anyone want to come to your Content Protection Retreat now?

                    If anything, true anti-piracy companies should come just to throw tomatoes at you.
                    damn that sucks. seems like no one is willing to hang in there when the green is waved.
                    ATTN Webmasters Cruel Bucks - LIVE Gonzo Does Not Pay
                    ------------------------------------------------
                    Animal Rescue Click Here to Feed An Animal for Free

                    Comment

                    • PR_Sebas
                      Confirmed User
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 2825

                      #11
                      Seems like maybe they got scared by the counter-suit and decided to settle?

                      Comment

                      • Choker
                        Confirmed User
                        • Apr 2001
                        • 9024

                        #12
                        All the keyboard lawyers here have obviously never been in a court of law other than a traffic court. Going to trial is risky for both parties. A settlement is almost always the best outcome for any lawsuit.
                        ICQ me lets make a deal 116894466

                        Need dating, cam, or tube traffic? I got it.http://http://www.chokertraffic.com

                        The Original http://www.chokertraffic.com/

                        Premium country pop-unders from $1.50 per k. I challenge you to compare this traffic to any other brokers.
                        http://www.chokertraffic.com/public/tabs.php?t=o

                        Comment

                        • bloggerz
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Dec 2006
                          • 16253

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Choker
                          All the keyboard lawyers here have obviously never been in a court of law other than a traffic court. Going to trial is risky for both parties. A settlement is almost always the best outcome for any lawsuit.
                          my thoughts exactly. $6.75M is not too shabby
                          I SELL ADULT BACKLINKS! Email: eroticweb>gmail SKYPE: gfybloggerz

                          $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

                          Comment

                          • tony286
                            lurker
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 57021

                            #14
                            I think Far-L has been in court. He fought acacia.

                            Comment

                            • EZRhino
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 6258

                              #15
                              Talking from experience. If you dont have the money to throw away avoid court. Even if you win on principle you lose a lot of money doing it.

                              Comment

                              • Paul Markham
                                Too old to care
                                • Jun 2001
                                • 52942

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Choker
                                All the keyboard lawyers here have obviously never been in a court of law other than a traffic court. Going to trial is risky for both parties. A settlement is almost always the best outcome for any lawsuit.
                                Good posts.

                                Think positively, if a good case is built and Mansef will settle this could be a cash cow. It needs the Titans of the industry to sit up and take notice. AND affiliates to step up and back companies who are pro active in the fight against pirates.

                                It's cost Mansef money to fight and money to settle and left them open to others.

                                Posts on GFY are not going to bring down many pirates, action will.
                                Last edited by Paul Markham; 09-25-2010, 12:10 AM.



                                Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                Comment

                                • Mr. Cool Ice
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2006
                                  • 1289

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Choker
                                  Going to trial is risky for both parties. A settlement is almost always the best outcome for any lawsuit.
                                  No shit Sherlock.

                                  However, they did take them to court and they knew the risks going in.

                                  What was the settlement? Was it money because Mansef was in the wrong and they knew it, or was it so Mansef would drop the counter suit? This could potentially be a game changer but they are not talking about it or correcting a report they claim is inaccurate.

                                  Furthermore, the very company holding a Content Protection Retreat who gave the illusion of getting tough on piracy, now won't even release a statement about any of this?
                                  NUR COOL UND GEIL

                                  Comment

                                  • will76
                                    Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash
                                    • May 2003
                                    • 18037

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Choker
                                    All the keyboard lawyers here have obviously never been in a court of law other than a traffic court. Going to trial is risky for both parties. A settlement is almost always the best outcome for any lawsuit.
                                    A settlement was the main objective from the start anyway. Their only objective. Why people here thought this would really go through a full blown trial to a verdict is beyond me.

                                    I didn't read the latest, but if they settled, that means mansef is (was) open for business, meaning everyone else in similar situation could go "tax" them for settlements via the bluff of a lawsuit.
                                    Last edited by will76; 09-25-2010, 07:31 AM.
                                    ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com

                                    PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread)
                                    FNCash | Media Revenue

                                    Comment

                                    • lazerbunny
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Nov 2007
                                      • 442

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Choker
                                      All the keyboard lawyers here have obviously never been in a court of law other than a traffic court. Going to trial is risky for both parties. A settlement is almost always the best outcome for any lawsuit.
                                      Finally someone talks some sense around this thread. LOL.
                                      Maybe the people taht think all the MAJOR studios should get together and WASTE their money on setting variable case law "non standards" should get their money together and wage WAR! GO ! We're rooting for YOU!
                                      Make it happen big talkers!
                                      Lets see you put your money where your mouth is
                                      Awesome Show, Great Job!
                                      icq- 414 975 541
                                      LazerBunny.com - Indie AltPorn
                                      bunnybuxxx.com - The Alternative Affiliate Program
                                      TrafficHolder.com - Buy/Sell Adult Traffic

                                      Comment

                                      • Fbomb - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                        So Fucking Banned
                                        • May 2010
                                        • 970

                                        #20
                                        They should have asked Robbie. Guy has few free sites and a TGP. He knows the shit.

                                        Comment

                                        • Mr. Cool Ice
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Aug 2006
                                          • 1289

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by will76
                                          A settlement was the main objective from the start anyway. Their only objective. Why people here thought this would really go through a full blown trial to a verdict is beyond me.

                                          I didn't read the latest, but if they settled, that means mansef is (was) open for business, meaning everyone else in similar situation could go "tax" them for settlements via the bluff of a lawsuit.
                                          You guys are missing the point.

                                          Mansef was also suing THEM. So what was the settlement?

                                          Was it to drop the counter suit, or was it for an actual monetary settlement? If it is the latter, than I think they should let us all know so we can line up and go after them as well.

                                          How are they going to host an anti Piracy meeting if they didn't kick Mansef's balls in?
                                          NUR COOL UND GEIL

                                          Comment

                                          • TheDoc
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Jul 2001
                                            • 13827

                                            #22
                                            Did a search and found this which found this at avn, which contains a link to the actual Order of Discontinuance, thanks AVN.

                                            From the OoD:
                                            The parties having notified the Court that they have reached a resolution of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above captioned action be, and the same hereby is, discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, counsel for either side may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned if the settlement is not effected, in which event the action will be restored.

                                            A conference is schedu1ed for October 7,2010, at 5:00 p.m. Any party seeking to raise an issue at this conference, shall (1) apply for restoration of the action no later than October 4,2010, and (2) in such letter, specific the issues to be addressed.
                                            First thing to note is how short and undefined this is. This is basically a letter telling both parties that if they want to continue with whatever this action relates to, like a complaint for example or something the court asked for (see definition below) they need to file for restoration. Because they both agreed on something or didn't fulfill the requirements on something, this action is being discontinued to proceed on with something else. If they don't agree with that, they can file for restoration as long as the 'settlement, ie: whatever the terms are agreed on so far' are not modified in direct relation to this action.

                                            The other thing to note is what an actual "Order of Discontinuance" is. It does not mean discontinue a court case. It means the stopping of legal action prior to trial, either voluntarily by the plaintiff or by order of the court. Source.

                                            Other thing to note.. Trial is scheduled for March 2011 as per Allison.

                                            ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                                            It's all disambiguation

                                            Comment

                                            • lazerbunny
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Nov 2007
                                              • 442

                                              #23
                                              If they are winning monetary compensation for the theft, isn't that winning?
                                              aka- kicking balls in!

                                              Originally posted by Mr. Cool Ice
                                              You guys are missing the point.

                                              Mansef was also suing THEM. So what was the settlement?

                                              Was it to drop the counter suit, or was it for an actual monetary settlement? If it is the latter, than I think they should let us all know so we can line up and go after them as well.

                                              How are they going to host an anti Piracy meeting if they didn't kick Mansef's balls in?
                                              Awesome Show, Great Job!
                                              icq- 414 975 541
                                              LazerBunny.com - Indie AltPorn
                                              bunnybuxxx.com - The Alternative Affiliate Program
                                              TrafficHolder.com - Buy/Sell Adult Traffic

                                              Comment

                                              Working...