Contact Info for KinkyGFs.com??

DK, i saw your communications with models and how deceitful you were about stuff. Sure they did content but you lied and deceived them about what it was for.

And no, Evelyn did not sign the sickbucks release. This came to our attention on April 7th. You didn't start demanding Sickbucks releases until April 19th from Evelyn ... yesterday. Her images (images WE OWN) have been up and live since at least April 7th and I never ever licensed or sold that content to you or anyone within your business.

It's clear that you are deceiving girls in order to get this content. I know of at least 4 girls who were on that site and had no clue they were on that site, much less with cum photoshopped on their faces nor having any clue about who sickbucks was until yesterday. And to say they won't get paid unless they sign the sickbucks release? wtf kinda blackmail tactics is that???

mmmmm, smexy

Abbie, your clueless

and you're caught.

Get your stories straight. You're saying one thing on here...told Evelyn another and told others yet another thing. Even your photographer (DangerNinja) was a bit peeved to see his work on this site.

I'm sure if you had been honest about things, girls would have done content for you, instead you were deceitful and now have a collection of angry models and webmasters/photographers to deal with.

We never approved evelyns photos or Adora's and a few others.
I contacted jim immediatly this morning when I was informed and he is removing them.
I'm sure Jim told you these were never approved so go look for some other witch to hunt.

jim has over a dozen legal sets by Dolls who are in full disclosure of what it was for, even instructed on how to take the sets to look like ex girlfriend sets.

as i said before your clueless so assume away.

Just DMCA the host, and the upstream including the registrar, seems to work with them.

This is a fairly simple situation to understand. For those that want the real story, here it is, for those who only seek drama and conspiracy, well I guess nothing I say will ever satisfy you.

As he mentioned above, Jim is indeed a part-owner in The Dangerous Dolls.

Some of our models/Dolls were contacted to provide content for his other sites; many agreed and signed his releases and were paid for their content for his ex-GF sites.

There was an apparent mis-communication with his staff, who believed as he was now an owner in the Dolls that they could take and use any and all content from the site for their sites. This is NOT the case.

As we were made aware of it, Jim has had the unlicensed content removed and I'm sure has clarified things to his staff.

As for asking the Dolls' to sign a new release form, that is due to the fact Jim wanted brand new releases signed and up to his standards, instead of using our old ones. Nothing too out of the ordinary with such a request. The release in question was still for Dolls, not a blanket release form for their content to be used anywhere and everywhere.

DK had absolutely nothing to do with this and is definitely not being deceitful with the models. The Dangerous Dolls is his passion and if any of you know him, you'd realize with all he has sacrificed this past year he wouldn't throw that all away on the few hundred bucks he could make selling the content.

You may now resume your regularly scheduled drama.

rogue employees

I was expecting that comment

However, in this case, as far as we know it is the case. Why contact and buy content from many of the models, to then only steal a set from 2-3? To save what, 200$-300$ ? The situation really was, IMO, that the designers/staff at SickBucks were not aware that Jim's investment into Dolls was a separate venture from their ex-GF sites and was not a full-access pass to the content.

SickBucks seems to have trouble paying affiliates so doubt they will be around much longer anyway.

I know all parties involved and talked to Dk this morning. Were working this out thanks!

http://serversiders.com/exgfsvids.com

I still call bullshit.

The content you guys had your model manager contact Evelyn about was quite obviously exgf content...and lead her to believe it was for DD as DIY sets in that same email from your model coordinator (who even tweeted herself she had no clue about this). Then you try to force her into signing that sickbucks release in the very same email and threaten to not pay her?

Yeah. Ok.

Call it whatever you like. You may as well take your models with you back to GodsGirls (which, may I add they were only too happy to drop for the Dolls due to payment issues - so stop accusing DK of poaching them) if it means we don't have to listen to your biased theories anymore.