Contact Info for KinkyGFs.com??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Abbie
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2005
    • 1004

    #1

    Contact Info for KinkyGFs.com??

    These guys are being evasive and are using stolen content from http://onhercam.com on their site and within their site.



    They are using my content of my model, Evelyn (also a model from GodsGirls.com)...they went as far as to photoshop cum on her face.



    They're being evasive with the DMCA's and I know they post here.
    Last edited by Abbie; 04-19-2010, 10:39 PM.
  • Agent 488
    Registered User
    • Feb 2006
    • 22511

    #2
    maybe users uploaded them.

    Comment

    • Abbie
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2005
      • 1004

      #3
      EDIT: here's the image that was taken from her profile.

      Last edited by Abbie; 04-19-2010, 10:39 PM.

      Comment

      • Abbie
        Confirmed User
        • Aug 2005
        • 1004

        #4
        In fact the video below that pic of Evelyn: http://www.kinkygfs.com/t7/ is of Bree Lynn ... another OHC model and GodsGirls model. And I also see Eden from GodsGirls / OHC too.

        Comment

        • Abbie
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2005
          • 1004

          #5
          Hey Sickbucks, if you see this, I believe that the people behind http://www.punkbucks.com/ sold you that content. Can you hit me up at onhercam at gmail dot com ... I apologize to you if this is indeed the case.

          PunkBucks, if you read this... it seems I've managed to unravel something you don't want unraveled and you are selling content WE own. Several of our models are pretty angry right now ...

          _______________________

          From: Missy Starr <[email protected]>
          Date: April 19, 2010 9:27:35 PM PDT
          To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
          Subject: dangerous doll sets

          Hi sweetie. right now we are looking for diy sets as we have a shortage of them. if you are not familiar with what that is let me explain. a diy is a self shot, shot by a friend, or non staff photographer set. it is made of at least 40 photos and starts clothed and ends nude. right now diys are going up a lot faster. we do also enjoy pro sets if you have a staff photographer near you. no web cam shot sets, they must be done with an actual camera.

          i am also attaching a copy of our new release for you to fill out and email back to me.
          this must be done even if you have done one before. if you have any questions or concerns please let me know.

          You must PRINT and SIGN the NEW release.
          also send a picture of id exacty like girl on the left
          http://www.sickbucks.com/content-pro...quirements.htm

          No pay will be issued until these are recieved.

          and if you have not yet done so please update your profile information.

          if you have any questions please email me and i would be happy to answer any of them

          --
          Missy Starr
          Model Liaison
          thedangerousdolls.com
          Last edited by Abbie; 04-20-2010, 12:41 AM.

          Comment

          • TheDA
            Confirmed User
            • May 2006
            • 4665

            #6
            Maybe DMCA their other providers too?
            Sharleen Spiteri - 1989 - In The Ass

            Comment

            • OldSchoolJim
              Confirmed User
              • Nov 2004
              • 3117

              #7
              Hey Abbie...hit my ICQ.....i am sure i can get this sorted out for you

              Comment

              • Mutt
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Sep 2002
                • 34431

                #8
                there's nothing in that copy n pasted email from PunkBucks that suggests they are doing anything of the sort - PunkBucks as far as I know are very legit.

                SickBucks on the other hand are thieves, they don't buy content, they steal it. Old School Jim and X Rated J.
                I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

                Comment

                • OldSchoolJim
                  Confirmed User
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 3117

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Mutt
                  there's nothing in that copy n pasted email from PunkBucks that suggests they are doing anything of the sort - PunkBucks as far as I know are very legit.

                  SickBucks on the other hand are thieves, they don't buy content, they steal it. Old School Jim and X Rated J.

                  Well Mutt...once again you are wrong....we DO own the content on kinky 100% and are also the new (50%)owners of dangerousdolls....but i dont feel the need to go into interoffice politics with you
                  as all you do is try to stir the GFY pot with your nonsense....this is a simple mistake made on who owns what part of the site...nothing more....please do not try to read anything into it other than it is....

                  Comment

                  • Mutt
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Sep 2002
                    • 34431

                    #10
                    thanks for the info - now i know who to sue, watch what you say on a public messageboard, you have MY content as well.
                    I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

                    Comment

                    • fatfoo
                      ICQ:649699063
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 27763

                      #11
                      Stealing content sure is not good. People can take pictures from FHGs and use those pictures to link to FHGs, that's fine. If they take a photo and use it for purposes other than promoting the correct site, than it's not good. Stealing long 15-minute videos from a paid member's area of the site (not just 2 minute previews) is even worse. Lots of tube sites out there steal long quality videos that are only available in the paysite member's area if the user pays $30 or whatever amount to get inside. They could leave some words on the video which is the correct paysite name to get the sale, like "Kinky GFs."

                      Evelyn is a thin young woman with a colorful tattoo of a goose on her arm. She has a pierced nose and possibly her lips on her mouth had plastic surgery. She has black hair. Is it wrong to photoshop cum on her face? It is wrong if someone who does not own the content does it, or it is wrong if the person in the photo did not consent to it.

                      Maybe this problem got sorted out and there was no stealing content, but some transfers of ownership of the content with consent of Evelyn to have cum photoshopped on her face. No, I don't know any contact information for KinkyGFs.com. Just to steal photos or videos is one thing. To steal photos and videos and to put a completely different site logo on them is even worse. Of course, the content has to be used only by a person authorized to use the content. That is the way I think it is.

                      Now having said that, some TGPs out there are using photos from FHGs which link to the FHGs. However, they don't send 100% of the traffic from the photos to the FHGs. Sometimes they skim 50% or some other percentage of clicked traffic to go to the FHG from the photo. This is an acceptable thing. Some traffic goes to the FHG and some traffic goes to traffic trades from the content photo. However, to link the photo to a completely different site (with 100% traffic going to that site) is completely wrong. A photoshop of cum on her face is even more wrong.

                      The DMCA is a document which probably has some powers in court. Probably it is the document that proves that the models are 18+ and it proves who owns the content. Maybe it can also be used for tax purposes and perhaps you have to get some kind of licenses to do certain porn. In some areas, you have to get a stripper license to act like a stripper. Stealing and providing bad quality service (which is almost the same thing) is wrong. Good luck to GodsGirls.com and Abbie.
                      Send me an email: [email protected]

                      Comment

                      • Abbie
                        Confirmed User
                        • Aug 2005
                        • 1004

                        #12
                        So wait, Jim, forgive me because I dont know who u are. Are you the owner of sickbucks or another program? And you own kinkygfs.com and dangerousdolls both? I'm a bit lost and want to be sure I'm on the right page.

                        Also, does sickbucks or you own http://www.exgfsvids.com/ too? I'm told they do but I want to be sure.

                        Comment

                        • J. Falcon
                          www.AdultCopywriters.com
                          • May 2006
                          • 31645

                          #13
                          Originally posted by fatfoo
                          Stealing content sure is not good. People can take pictures from FHGs and use those pictures to link to FHGs, that's fine. If they take a photo and use it for purposes other than promoting the correct site, than it's not good. Stealing long 15-minute videos from a paid member's area of the site (not just 2 minute previews) is even worse. Lots of tube sites out there steal long quality videos that are only available in the paysite member's area if the user pays $30 or whatever amount to get inside. They could leave some words on the video which is the correct paysite name to get the sale, like "Kinky GFs."

                          Evelyn is a thin young woman with a colorful tattoo of a goose on her arm. She has a pierced nose and possibly her lips on her mouth had plastic surgery. She has black hair. Is it wrong to photoshop cum on her face? It is wrong if someone who does not own the content does it, or it is wrong if the person in the photo did not consent to it.

                          Maybe this problem got sorted out and there was no stealing content, but some transfers of ownership of the content with consent of Evelyn to have cum photoshopped on her face. No, I don't know any contact information for KinkyGFs.com. Just to steal photos or videos is one thing. To steal photos and videos and to put a completely different site logo on them is even worse. Of course, the content has to be used only by a person authorized to use the content. That is the way I think it is.

                          Now having said that, some TGPs out there are using photos from FHGs which link to the FHGs. However, they don't send 100% of the traffic from the photos to the FHGs. Sometimes they skim 50% or some other percentage of clicked traffic to go to the FHG from the photo. This is an acceptable thing. Some traffic goes to the FHG and some traffic goes to traffic trades from the content photo. However, to link the photo to a completely different site (with 100% traffic going to that site) is completely wrong. A photoshop of cum on her face is even more wrong.

                          The DMCA is a document which probably has some powers in court. Probably it is the document that proves that the models are 18+ and it proves who owns the content. Maybe it can also be used for tax purposes and perhaps you have to get some kind of licenses to do certain porn. In some areas, you have to get a stripper license to act like a stripper. Stealing and providing bad quality service (which is almost the same thing) is wrong. Good luck to GodsGirls.com and Abbie.

                          Adult Copywriters



                          SEO Content for Porn Sites
                          sales at adultcopywriters dot com

                          Comment

                          • Abbie
                            Confirmed User
                            • Aug 2005
                            • 1004

                            #14
                            Well I've spoken to Jim and matters have been cleared up and he's handling it. As I suspected I believe its DK aka Dragon of PunkBucks who's being deceitful.

                            Thanks to Jim for handling his end of things.

                            Comment

                            • DK
                              Confirmed User
                              • Nov 2001
                              • 1273

                              #15
                              Abbie careful what you say you have no idea what your talking about.
                              A bunch of Dolls were commissioned for side work by Jim for legal content in his sites. They were all paid and signed his releases. They new it was ex girlfriend content. How am I being deceitful?
                              skype: romeoblu

                              Comment

                              Working...