You're just as at fault if you're blaming the Bush Admin.
It pre-dated both administrations.
That is completely false and uniformed BULLSHIT of the WORST kind. The economy was on it's way in up in the most positive fashion every imaginable until the BUSH ELECTION and the BOMBING of the TOWERS. That's a fact.
What would have happened we can only speculate but there is no data to support anything but a climb if people hadn't voted for religion instead of sexual indescretion. That is a fact!
That is completely false and uniformed BULLSHIT of the WORST kind. The economy was on it's way in up in the most positive fashion every imaginable until the BUSH ELECTION and the BOMBING of the TOWERS. That's a fact.
What would have happened we can only speculate but there is no data to support anything but a climb if people hadn't voted for religion instead of sexual indescretion. That is a fact!
If you're looking to be run in a circle on the housing market and how it pre-dated both Obama and Bush, I'd be happy to oblige.
So as you can see from the nifty graph. Things were looking up and unemployment was steadily declining.
Then Bush happened ...
Yes Bush happened right around Sept 11th 2001 huh? Ridiculous to argue about as this guy is a one term pres. Look for a huge pendulum swing (its already started) in who controls what soon. Going to be a lot of turnover at the polls soon. lol
Yes Bush happened right around Sept 11th 2001 huh? Ridiculous to argue about as this guy is a one term pres. Look for a huge pendulum swing (its already started) in who controls what soon. Going to be a lot of turnover at the polls soon. lol
Yes Bush happened right around Sept 11th 2001 huh? Ridiculous to argue about as this guy is a one term pres. Look for a huge pendulum swing (its already started) in who controls what soon. Going to be a lot of turnover at the polls soon. lol
best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
If you're looking to be run in a circle on the housing market and how it pre-dated both Obama and Bush, I'd be happy to oblige.
Cut all that bullshit out. You don't really think that's what caused all the problems do you? And if so why didn't the Bush admin tackle it during their EIGHT FUCKING YEARS IN OFFICE! I mean shit he wasn't a one term president.
Cut all that bullshit out. You don't really think that's what caused all the problems do you? And if so why didn't the Bush admin tackle it during their EIGHT FUCKING YEARS IN OFFICE! I mean shit he wasn't a one term president.
Why didn't Bush fix it? The same reason Clinton extended the mandates and put even more pressure on the lenders during his "EIGHT FUCKING YEARS IN OFFICE!"
Why didn't Bush fix it? The same reason Clinton extended the mandates and put even more pressure on the lenders during his "EIGHT FUCKING YEARS IN OFFICE!"
Dude, I wish Clinton had SIXTEEN FUCKING YEARS IN OFFICE. Life might be a lot better for us little people, or worse, but I would have liked to have seen the results. I feel the cock tearing the shit out of my asshole the first day BUSH GOT IN OFFICE!
Dude, I wish Clinton had SIXTEEN FUCKING YEARS IN OFFICE. Life might be a lot better for us little people, or worse, but I would have liked to have seen the results. I feel the cock tearing the shit out of my asshole the first day BUSH GOT IN OFFICE!
Why didn't Bush fix it? The same reason Clinton extended the mandates and put even more pressure on the lenders during his "EIGHT FUCKING YEARS IN OFFICE!"
If you believe the Bush years were better than the Clinton years, then there is no debating with you - you are already too far gone.
And if you believe the GOP will beat Obama, simply by bashing everything he does, without offering anything worthwhile whatsoever, then best of luck to you on that as well.
Who do you think even has a CHANCE of beating Obama in 2012?
Watching McCain and Palin nowadays, shows anyone with a fucking brain in their head, just how horribly wrong the last election could have gone, had Obama not been elected. He is an intelligent, even tempered leader, and to switch him out for a right-wing lunatic in 2012 is highly unlikely.
If you believe the Bush years were better than the Clinton years, then there is no debating with you - you are already too far gone.
And if you believe the GOP will beat Obama, simply by bashing everything he does, without offering anything worthwhile whatsoever, then best of luck to you on that as well.
Who do you think even has a CHANCE of beating Obama in 2012?
Watching McCain and Palin nowadays, shows anyone with a fucking brain in their head, just how horribly wrong the last election could have gone, had Obama not been elected. He is an intelligent, even tempered leader, and to switch him out with a right-wing lunatic in 2012 is highly unlikely.
Mitt Romney.
To start, I never once claimed Bush was better than Clinton.
Again, many polls have Obama with a higher disapproval rate than an approval rate. To think Obama is untouchable is laughable.
You mean like Reagan or something? If you guys want to idolize someone it should really be Nixon cause he's the one who got us talking to the Chinese and Russians. Fuck Reagan, he was a fucking actor.
I'm not going back before this because there used to actually be good republicans back when.
You mean like Reagan or something? If you guys want to idolize someone it should really be Nixon cause he's the one who got us talking to the Chinese and Russians. Fuck Reagan, he was a fucking actor.
I'm not going back before this because there used to actually be good republicans back when.
Your first step is to understand the economic boom that Clinton was lucky to have while in office had NOTHING to do with him. You might take a look at the thing you are using to type responses to for a clue.
Does it really matter? You're against Clinton and Obama. It can be only worse than what I'm thinking. You're probably getting tea bagged or something. What's the difference? There's a limited number of agendas I'm VERY sad to say.
i love these threads - you have someone fuck up a country, an economy and a worldwide reputation in 8 years and then blame everything on the one who has to clean the shit up
Your first step is to understand the economic boom that Clinton was lucky to have while in office had NOTHING to do with him. You might take a look at the thing you are using to type responses to for a clue.
Your first step is to understand the economic boom that Clinton was lucky to have while in office had NOTHING to do with him. You might take a look at the thing you are using to type responses to for a clue.
Lucky is better than unlucky and stupid, right? I've already confessed to liking the Oliver Stone take on little Bush.
Does it really matter? You're against Clinton and Obama. It can be only worse than what I'm thinking. You're probably getting tea bagged or something. What's the difference? There's a limited number of agendas I'm VERY sad to say.
Show me where I drew the line on Obama and Clinton?
You know what they say about those who ASSume.
All I'm doing is simply correcting your ignorant remarks.
The worst part is, I wouldn't even really think OBAMA was anything at all and was even against him for a short spin when Bill Maher was slobbering his black cock, but think about it. There are people who actually voted for the other party after all the shit that happened. That's FUCKING SCARY!
Show me where I drew the line on Obama and Clinton?
You know what they say about those who ASSume.
All I'm doing is simply correcting your ignorant remarks.
Fine if it's about me, cool.
If you really think those aren't the best presidents so far (Obama still open to screw ups of course so he would be better off staying the course and doing nothing), you need to disown your affiliations.
I'm talking since like Eisenhower and Kennedy and shit.
If you really think those aren't the best presidents so far (Obama still open to screw ups of course so he would be better off staying the course and doing nothing), you need to disown your affiliations.
I'm talking since like Eisenhower and Kennedy and shit.
I've no idea what you just tried to say.
Are you saying Reagan and Nixon are the best presidents we've had, or Nixon and Obama?
Are you saying Reagan and Nixon are the best presidents we've had, or Nixon and Obama?
I'm saying Clinton is the best president we've had in our lifetime. I don't care if he went to the track and gambled it all on a good horse or not, which is complete bullshit. And half the shit that happened wouldn't have if the republicans had left him alone and let him go after Osama cause it was during the distractions of the impeachment that he wasn't able to focus on that and he had made attempts to get him.
Those towers went up because of the Republicans way more than it just being on their watch.
Presidents don't effect the economy... legislation and the fed fucking with interest rates effect the economy...
Edit: Well, more over... the entire market is what effects the economy. To say that president X or president Y was responsible for the economy is foolishness. WAAAAAY more involved than a figurehead.
I'm saying Clinton is the best president we've had in our lifetime. I don't care if he went to the track and gambled it all on a good horse or not, which is complete bullshit. And half the shit that happened wouldn't have if the republicans had left him alone and let him go after Osama cause it was during the distractions of the impeachment that he wasn't able to focus on that and he had made attempts to get him.
Those towers went up because of the Republicans way more than it just being on their watch.
i love these threads - you have someone fuck up a country, an economy and a worldwide reputation in 8 years and then blame everything on the one who has to clean the shit up
Comment