murdered by George Bush
---
I always wondered this: why are people hating "terrorists" and not just bin Laden the same way that "we" hate Bush but not soldiers? I mean what we call terrorists are actually soldiers willing to sacrifice life for what is told to them - just like our soldiers. Why are people against the war hating Bush but not the actual people who do the act of killing (=soldiers) the same way we hate Bin Laden's soldiers who do their job?
Slutboat humors us once again with his stupidity and insanity.
I always wondered this: why are people hating "terrorists" and not just bin Laden the same way that "we" hate Bush but not soldiers? I mean what we call terrorists are actually soldiers willing to sacrifice life for what is told to them - just like our soldiers. Why are people against the war hating Bush but not the actual people who do the act of killing (=soldiers) the same way we hate Bin Laden's soldiers who do their job?
I would expect simple minded thinking like this from Slutboat. There are no similarities. Don't pull this "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" relativism bullshit because it's been debunked time and time again. There is a difference between a soldier in a "war", and a suicide bomber killing two thousand people driving a plane into a tower.
Slutboat humors us once again with his stupidity and insanity.
I would expect simple minded thinking like this from Slutboat. There are no similarities. Don't pull this "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" relativism bullshit because it's been debunked time and time again. There is a difference between a soldier in a "war", and a suicide bomber killing two thousand people driving a plane into a tower.
Anyways Iraq had nothing to do with 911!!! The invasion to Iraq it's a crime! And all people involved on it should be brought to justice
Slutboat humors us once again with his stupidity and insanity.
I would expect simple minded thinking like this from Slutboat. There are no similarities. Don't pull this "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" relativism bullshit because it's been debunked time and time again. There is a difference between a soldier in a "war", and a suicide bomber killing two thousand people driving a plane into a tower.
Where did you get this quote? - it certainly wasn't anything I have ever said...
The Slut Boat soon will be making another run
The Slut Boat promises something for everyone
Slutboat humors us once again with his stupidity and insanity.
I would expect simple minded thinking like this from Slutboat. There are no similarities. Don't pull this "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" relativism bullshit because it's been debunked time and time again. There is a difference between a soldier in a "war", and a suicide bomber killing two thousand people driving a plane into a tower.
that was adult-help's post, not slutboat's but you're right either way. (never thought i'd be saying that).
Slutboat humors us once again with his stupidity and insanity.
Slutboat humors us once again with his stupidity and insanity.
Quote:
I always wondered this: why are people hating "terrorists" and not just bin Laden the same way that "we" hate Bush but not soldiers? I mean what we call terrorists are actually soldiers willing to sacrifice life for what is told to them - just like our soldiers. Why are people against the war hating Bush but not the actual people who do the act of killing (=soldiers) the same way we hate Bin Laden's soldiers who do their job?
I would expect simple minded thinking like this from Slutboat. There are no similarities. Don't pull this "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" relativism bullshit because it's been debunked time and time again. There is a difference between a soldier in a "war", and a suicide bomber killing two thousand people driving a plane into a tower.
I would expect simple minded thinking like this from Slutboat. There are no similarities. Don't pull this "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" relativism bullshit because it's been debunked time and time again. There is a difference between a soldier in a "war", and a suicide bomber killing two thousand people driving a plane into a tower.
You quoted me with someone else' words that I TOTALLY DISAGREE with - and I'm a Moron?
The Slut Boat soon will be making another run
The Slut Boat promises something for everyone
Are you 12? That's a random, childish outburst lacking any substance.
To me is short an clear, Iraq had nothing to do with 911 neither they had any WMD, Iraq was one of the most open minded countries in the middle east where women had the right to go to school. Saddam had to rule with an iron fist because of Muslim extremists, I'm not saying he was a good guy but the Bush administration had no right to go there, the whole planet knows that
There is a difference between a soldier in a "war", and a suicide bomber killing two thousand people driving a plane into a tower.
what the hell man , where did I say I talk about suicide bombers that flew into twin towers? I strongly condemn that act. I mean the talibans and others who fight in Afghanistan and especially Iraq - they are soldiers under command following the orders defending their country. They fight against the foreign army and not some random civilians.
You quoted me with someone else' words that I TOTALLY DISAGREE with - and I'm a Moron?
I didn't quote you. The first sentence was about you, and then I quoted someone else after that. Because you continuously show your inability to read, reason, or even think, that is why you are a moron.
To me is short an clear, Iraq had nothing to do with 911 neither they had any WMD, Iraq was one of the most open minded countries in the middle east where women had the right to go to school. Saddam had to rule with an iron fist because of Muslim extremists, I'm not saying he was a good guy but the Bush administration had no right to go there, the whole planet knows that
Iraq was open minded? Wtf? Saddam ruled to combat Muslim extremists? I would LOVE to see your historical sources.
It is a shame that so many Iraqi civilians have died by the hands of their own neighbors.
Of course, muslims value and embrace death,where the west values life.
You might not be as anonymous as you think you are.
what the hell man , where did I say I talk about suicide bombers that flew into twin towers? I strongly condemn that act. I mean the talibans and others who fight in Afghanistan and especially Iraq - they are soldiers under command following the orders defending their country. They fight against the foreign army and not some random civilians.
The Taliban do not have a country to defend...and kill more Afghanistani's than they kill members of the NATO forces. In Iraq...Iraqi's killed more Iraqi's than they killed of the coalition forces and continue to kill Iraqi's almost daily.
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
is it that hard to admit you fucked up and quoted the wrong person Demon?
Apparently not as hard as it for you and slutboat to read properly
(Hint: If I was quoting slutboat, then I wouldn't mention "slutboat" as a comparison regarding stupidity, in that same quote)
Originally posted by theking
He actually did not quote the wrong person. He quoted the person that he intended to quote. Re-read it Amp.
I'm THRILLED we have another intelligent person on gfy. Thank you for bringing hope to those who are pessimistic about the intelligence of people in the adult industry (me).
Iraq was open minded? Wtf? Saddam ruled to combat Muslim extremists? I would LOVE to see your historical sources.
Do you know the difference between sunni and shiite ?? Google that bro, The main problem in Iraq is sunni vs shiite killing each other while fighting against US soldiers, all against all.
I quote Wikipedia:
Saddam focused on attaining stability in a nation riddled with profound tensions. Long before Saddam, Iraq had been split along social, ethnic, religious, and economic fault lines: Sunni versus Shi'ite, Arab versus Kurd, tribal chief versus urban merchant, nomad versus peasant.[26] Stable rule in a country rife with factionalism required both massive repression and the improvement of living standards.[26]
Saddam actively fostered the modernization of the Iraqi economy along with the creation of a strong security apparatus to prevent coups within the power structure and insurrections apart from it. Ever concerned with broadening his base of support among the diverse elements of Iraqi society and mobilizing mass support, he closely followed the administration of state welfare and development programs.
At the center of this strategy was Iraq's oil. On 1 June 1972, Saddam oversaw the seizure of international oil interests, which, at the time, dominated the country's oil sector. A year later, world oil prices rose dramatically as a result of the 1973 energy crisis, and skyrocketing revenues enabled Saddam to expand his agenda.
Within just a few years, Iraq was providing social services that were unprecedented among Middle Eastern countries. Saddam established and controlled the "National Campaign for the Eradication of Illiteracy" and the campaign for "Compulsory Free Education in Iraq," and largely under his auspices, the government established universal free schooling up to the highest education levels; hundreds of thousands learned to read in the years following the initiation of the program. The government also supported families of soldiers, granted free hospitalization to everyone, and gave subsidies to farmers. Iraq created one of the most modernized public-health systems in the Middle East, earning Saddam an award from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).[27][28]
He actually did not quote the wrong person. He quoted the person that he intended to quote. Re-read it Amp.
how the fuck do you know who he intended to quote? are you a mind reader? are you sitting next to him? are you guys on the phone discussing it?
he addressed Slutboat, then quoted adult-help's post without attributing a name to the quote, then referenced or addressed Slutboat yet again beneath the quote in a new paragraph. The way his post is formatted and written, it addresses Slutboat twice, first before the unsourced quote setting it up to appear as Slutboat's, then as reinforcement below the unsourced quote, and not adult-help in anyway, thereby creating the appearance that Slutboat was the quoted source.
I can read just fine. And maybe he did or didn't quote the person he intended to. But he addressed Slutboat while quoting someone else. You can't tell me he didn't because I'm looking at it with my own eyes right now. maybe he just has poor writing skills or a short attention span.
Iraq was open minded? Wtf? Saddam ruled to combat Muslim extremists? I would LOVE to see your historical sources.
ABSOLUTELY Saddam ruled to combat Muslim extremists...there were no car bombs going off, there was no insurrection, there was no carnage like that which our government has caused. There was no Al Qaeda in Iraq...there sure is now.
ABSOLUTELY Saddam ruled to combat Muslim extremists...there were no car bombs going off, there was no insurrection, there was no carnage like that which our government has caused. There was no Al Qaeda in Iraq...there sure is now.
how the fuck do you know who he intended to quote? are you a mind reader? are you sitting next to him? are you guys on the phone discussing it?
he addressed Slutboat, then quoted adult-help's post without attributing a name to the quote, then referenced or addressed Slutboat yet again beneath the quote in a new paragraph. The way his post is formatted and written, it addresses Slutboat twice, first before the unsourced quote setting it up to appear as Slutboat's, then as reinforcement below the unsourced quote, and not adult-help in anyway, thereby creating the appearance that Slutboat was the quoted source.
I can read just fine. And maybe he did or didn't quote the person he intended to. But he addressed Slutboat while quoting someone else. You can't tell me he didn't because I'm looking at it with my own eyes right now. maybe he just has poor writing skills or a short attention span.
This is what you get when you deal with an insecure moron (most morons are insecure). It's alright amputate, I've always known that you weren't too bright and that you lacked reading comprehension skills. I know admitting that you're wrong would take too much out of you so I'll let it slide. However, I'll post the "hint" one more time and I'll bold it so even YOU can understand it.
HINT: IF I WAS ADDRESSING SLUTBOAT I WOULDN'T POST HIS USERNAME IN THE QUOTE AS AN EXPECTATION OF SIMPLE MINDEDNESS FROM ONLY ONE USER WHICH WOULD BE SLUTBOAT
Don't think I can be any more clear than that pumpkin, but please continue lying to yourself instead of admitting that you are as usual, wrong.
how the fuck do you know who he intended to quote? are you a mind reader? are you sitting next to him? are you guys on the phone discussing it?
he addressed Slutboat, then quoted adult-help's post without attributing a name to the quote, then referenced or addressed Slutboat yet again beneath the quote in a new paragraph. The way his post is formatted and written, it addresses Slutboat twice, first before the unsourced quote setting it up to appear as Slutboat's, then as reinforcement below the unsourced quote, and not adult-help in anyway, thereby creating the appearance that Slutboat was the quoted source.
I can read just fine. And maybe he did or didn't quote the person he intended to. But he addressed Slutboat while quoting someone else. You can't tell me he didn't because I'm looking at it with my own eyes right now. maybe he just has poor writing skills or a short attention span.
I immediately knew who he was quoting and who he was referring to from the post he made. He was simply stating that the quote he posted was something ignorant like Slutboat would say.
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
This is what you get when you deal with an insecure moron (most morons are insecure). It's alright amputate, I've always known that you weren't too bright and that you lacked reading comprehension skills. I know admitting that you're wrong would take too much out of you so I'll let it slide. However, I'll post the "hint" one more time and I'll bold it so even YOU can understand it.
HINT: IF I WAS ADDRESSING SLUTBOAT I WOULDN'T POST HIS USERNAME IN THE QUOTE AS A COMPARISON
Don't think I can be any more clear than that pumpkin, but please continue lying to yourself instead of admitting that you are as usual, wrong.
a comparison to what Demon? You made no comparisons to anything in that post.
I immediately knew who he was quoting and who he was referring to from the post he made. He was simply stating that the quote he posted was something ignorant like Slutboat would say.
Once again, logic apparently DOES exist on this forum.
The Taliban do not have a country to defend...and kill more Afghanistani's than they kill members of the NATO forces. In Iraq...Iraqi's killed more Iraqi's than they killed of the coalition forces and continue to kill Iraqi's almost daily.
pigshit !
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Slutboat humors us once again with his stupidity and insanity.
I always wondered this: why are people hating "terrorists" and not just bin Laden the same way that "we" hate Bush but not soldiers? I mean what we call terrorists are actually soldiers willing to sacrifice life for what is told to them - just like our soldiers. Why are people against the war hating Bush but not the actual people who do the act of killing (=soldiers) the same way we hate Bin Laden's soldiers who do their job?
I would expect simple minded thinking like this from Slutboat. There are no similarities. Don't pull this "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" relativism bullshit because it's been debunked time and time again. There is a difference between a soldier in a "war", and a suicide bomber killing two thousand people driving a plane into a tower.
Clearly it addresses Slutboat from go, follwed by an unsourced quote (adult-help's), followed by Demon's opinion that Slutboat's thinking is simple-minded, followed by his opinion that there are no similarities between terrorists & soldiers, followed by a demand to stop posting opinions that disagree with his own, followed by a final opinion again about the differences or lack thereof between terrorists & soldiers.
There are no comparisons to anything in there anywhere as Demon claims, nor any indication of his intent to speak to adult-help versus Slutboat.
Clearly it addresses Slutboat from go, follwed by an unsourced quote (adult-help's), followed by Demon's opinion that Slutboat's thinking is simple-minded, followed by his opinion that there are no similarities between terrorists & soldiers, followed by a demand to stop posting opinions that disagree with his own, followed by a final opinion again about the differences or lack thereof between terrorists & soldiers.
There are no comparisons to anything in there anywhere as Demon claims, nor any indication of his intent to speak to adult-help versus Slutboat.
Well, I expect Amputate is going to spend the rest of the day trying to either convince us that he's not wrong, or deflect attention from the fact that he's wrong most of the time and that he lacks reading comprehension skills. Put on a good show for us amputate, it's much funnier than just admitting you're wrong.
differences or lack thereof between terrorists & soldiers.
I found this mindly amusing considering you agreed with my viewpoint and are just now foolishly backpeddling. See how easy it is to make fun of the intellectually inferior?
wow ..... get treatment ... urgently!
He would, but you're hogging all the treatment centers with your mental problems.
Well, I expect Amputate is going to spend the rest of the day trying to either convince us that he's not wrong, or deflect attention to the fact that he's wrong most of the time and that he lacks reading comprehension skills. Put on a good show for us amputate, it's much funnier than just admitting you're wrong.
I rest my case. Please continue arguing this to death and proving my point.
FACT: Iraq is now a theocracy. They won't be building monuments to anything except Islam in the future.
We all know you don't know what a theocracy is. Amusing though.
Originally posted by Emil
And here is "theking". A sad old man that need a bloodymary before he wants to get out of his bed in his rotten depressing house.
Always talking about how proud he is about the US army and the soldiers. Making up lies to feel good about himself.
Fuck you.
Another buffoon who posts something without any common sense, rationale, or substance.
And here is "theking". A sad old man that need a bloodymary before he wants to get out of his bed in his rotten depressing house.
Always talking about how proud he is about the US army and the soldiers. Making up lies to feel good about himself.
I immediately knew who he was quoting and who he was referring to from the post he made. He was simply stating that the quote he posted was something ignorant like Slutboat would say.
the guy falsely said that i was talking about the terrorist who flew into towers and killed civilians as their only and primary target...which is totally false and i condemn what they did. Actually the way he put it (and i didnt say it so he didn't quote me) - I agree with him...
the guy falsely said that i was talking about the terrorist who flew into towers and killed civilians as their only and primary target...which is totally false and i condemn what they did. Actually the way he put it (and i didnt say it so he didn't quote me) - I agree with him...
I didn't "say" anything of the sort. I hinted at it because of this:
I mean what we call terrorists are actually soldiers willing to sacrifice life for what is told to them
This is an example of the retarded liberal relativism argument. Hence the "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" quote I posted to rebut what you were saying. So either your meaning was unclear, or you contradicted yourself.
While I never supported the war in Iraq, I don't think the people died in vain. In the end we got rid of an evil dictator and provided a country and its population with the potential of becoming a democratic and tolerant country.
The Middle East isn't that much different than Europe and America was a few hundred years ago. 500 years ago the Protestants and Catholics were killing each other in England. 300 years ago we burned "witches" in Salem, and 100 years ago Lynchings in America weren't uncommon. The only difference is that we progressed and evolved further than they have. And if this invasion helps the area catch up to where we are now then that's definitely a good thing.
Comment