-
- Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
- For Sale: Obscenity.com
-
Comment
-
RYC kicks ass.
DMCA'ing stuff off of Google is a tricky thing. You have to ask yourself the question: "Do I want it off Google, or do I want it down off the offending site"
If you take it off the site then you can't dmca google for something that doesn't exist.
So you have to first get it off google and then get it off the offending site. Eric and RYC have done a great job for us coordinating that task and helping me make sales by keeping piracy in check for me.-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.ComComment
-
Obviously not if you think that Google doesn't respond to fake DMCA claims.
The DMCA provisions are pretty clear cut.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_...ack_provisions
Takedown example
Here's an example of how the takedown procedures would work:
Alice puts a copy of Bob's song on her AOL-hosted website.
Bob, searching the Internet, finds Alice's copy.
Charlie, Bob's lawyer, sends a letter to AOL's designated agent (registered with the Copyright Office) including:contact information
the name of the song that was copied
the address of the copied song
a statement that he has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
a statement that the information in the notification is accurate
a statement that, under penalty of perjury, Charlie is authorized to act for the copyright holder
his signature
AOL takes the song down.
AOL tells Alice that they have taken the song down.
Alice now has the option of sending a counter-notice to AOL, if she feels the song was taken down unfairly. The notice includescontact information
identification of the removed song
a statement under penalty of perjury that Alice has a good faith belief the material was mistakenly taken down
a statement consenting to the jurisdiction of Alice's local US Federal District Court, or, if outside the US, to a US Federal District Court in any jurisdiction in which AOL is found.
her signature
If Alice does file a valid counter-notice, AOL notifies Bob, then waits 10-14 business days for a lawsuit to be filed by Bob.
If Bob does not file a lawsuit, then AOL must put the material back up.- Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
- For Sale: Obscenity.com
Comment
-
I'm wondering which content they are talking about and even when the biggest tube sites are owned by the biggest sponsors themselves, who has asked them to remove the content?????Comment
-
-
-
Hey Robbie, I know they won't work for anyone without money. What I wanted to say is tubes are full of content from biggest sponsors and they do nothing to remove it. If the industry has to get back on track, big sponsors must take action but they won't as long as they are making money.Comment
-
I would love to see pornhub and keezemovies from google,but seems google doesnt care for some reason.And there is a plently of valid reason to remove them according to google rules,starting from copyright infrigment,lack of 2257 documentation,and buying hardlinks.Comment
-
You are absolutely right. It's killing affiliate sales to those particular sponsors. But you have to realize that a lot of them make their money in ways other than selling a membership to a surfer. It's a numbers game for the ones you are referring to and they don't give a damn about the actual "porn business"
It's just the reality of the situation. All I can do is make sure my stuff stays in the members area as much as I can so that when somebody joins up they have a membership that is actually worth something.
And if there are any affiliates left, they can at least know that if they send traffic to us they have a fighting chance of making a sale.-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.ComComment
-
That comes down to WHO holds the copyright per licensing agreement.
Not all companies license exclusively, nor do they all shoot their own content. So it would come down to the license and who hold the copyright for each individual production. Which a lot of times, not always, would be the original producer. So it would be up to them to enforce it.
If you shoot exclusively for a company, and they hold all rights including copyright. Then it would be up to THEM to enforce it. To understand why a lot of enforcement is not done, you actually have to understand the back end of content production and licensing.
Comment
-
I just wish all the copyright owners of the content take some action to bring all the tubes down. Those motherfuckers have almost killed the biz...Comment
Comment