|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
03-23-2010, 07:51 AM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,344
|
Man could face prison over six second 'extreme porn' clip
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03...x_second_clip/
is this absurd or what? from when is having porn on your HD (even if it's 'Extreme') illegal ? |
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 07:51 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Choice is an Illusion
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
|
Quote:
 |
|
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 07:57 AM
|
#3 |
|
The People's Post
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 66,293
|
did anyone besides me find it ironic that this pic was an advert next to the story?
 |
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 08:13 AM
|
#4 | |
|
She is ugly, bad luck.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,177
|
Quote:
from when is having porn on your HD (even if it's 'Extreme') illegal Since before Gary Glitter went to prison for being a kiddie fiddler after taking his computer to PC World to be repaired. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 08:24 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22,511
|
Quote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01...pron_law_live/ |
|
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 08:27 AM
|
#6 |
|
Content Producer
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,148
|
It seems the UK sucks even more than I remember it sucking.
|
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 08:41 AM
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 25
|
That's crazy as hell. How much time can would a jury give you for 6 seconds?
|
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 08:44 AM
|
#8 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,277
|
This is what happens when laws are created based solely on interpretation... Yet more proof that man is placing emotions and feelings above logic and reason.
The idea that something is "extreme" is completely fucking subjective. You might say jumping out of a plane is extreme, I'll tell you it's not that base jumping is, the base jumper will tell you low altitude pulls are extreme... Some stuck up prudes will tell you a BJ is extreme and inappropriate, Australia will tell you that small tits are inappropriate on a 30 year old... People need to stop thinking with their emotions and only define laws based on FACTS and provable evidence... you know, how law is supposed to work...
__________________
ICQ: 258-202-811 | Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com |
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 08:51 AM
|
#9 |
|
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
This guy who clearly is not collecting extreme porn if all her has is one 6 second clip. The judge is fucked up.
|
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 09:01 AM
|
#10 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 174
|
I think they were pissed off because they looked like idiots over the cartoon tiger charge, so decided to get him for the other charge instead.
But yes, it's a fucked up law. |
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 09:02 AM
|
#11 | |
|
She is ugly, bad luck.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,177
|
Quote:
the extreme porn law is very subjective though. something I would look at and think nothing of could be presented to someone else on a jury panel who would decide it's nasty. Equally something they might think nothing of I might find quite distasteful. Running a law on the opinions of 12 randomly selected idiots finding something grossly offensive is a bit iffy anyway as you could find yourself in front of a jury full of catholic priests that let you off straight away so they can get back to bumming choirboys or a jury full of easily offended little old ladies that want to have you locked up for life. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 09:18 AM
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 25
|
Quote:
 Wouldn't hurt, huh?
__________________
Check out the site, www.thuglicious.com Constantly seeking affiliates, come say hello!!! www.legalpimpz.com email: [email protected] |
|
|
|
|
