Healthcare - A Privilege Or A Right?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Demon
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2003
    • 7336

    #241
    Originally posted by u-Bob
    That had nothing to do with the free market but with government interference.


    The invisible hand doesn't need regulation (gov interference). A true free market regulates itself. And there's no such thing as "a bit of regulation". To put it in the words of Ludwig von Mises; "there is no third option". There's the market or government.
    Finally, another fan of the Austrian School.


    and where are you gonna find those angels to watch over us? Yes, mortal men do make mistakes, we all do... and some of us learn from them, some learn from them after a long time and some of us never learn... Uncertainty and entrepreneurial error are part of the economy and at times cause small recessions, but the (free) market always corrects itself. The real danger is caused by mortal men (who make mistakes) who think they can regulate a very complex system and by trying to do so cause more problems. Just compare the depression of 1920-21 to the depression of 1929-...
    I wish these mainstream keynesian morons understood that the more government interference in the markets, the more fuckups. The market should be 100% free of political influence.

    We are all human beings, we are all born, we are all masters/owners of our own body, we live in a world of scarcity (there's a limited supply of resources) and we all have different goals/wants. The only thing we get for free every day until we die, is time. In a free market world, people are free to use their body and their property (the fruits of their own labour) as they see fit. They are free to do what they deem necessary to accomplish their goals as long as they respect other people's right to do the same: So people can do whatever they want as long as they don't cause damage to other people's body or property. So people have the right to free speech (= the right to use their own ink and paper as they see fit = the right to use their own property). They have the right to sleep all day long they if the want, they have the right to work all day if they want. They have the right to start a bakery if the want and they have the right to sell their products (bread in the case of the baker), but they don't have the right to a guaranteed income. If your bread tastes like sh*t, nobody will buy it. If you don't change your recipe or increase the quality of your bread, you will go out of business even if "making a living as a baker" is what you really wanted to do in life. In a free market you have the right to try to accomplish your dreams, but you don't have a right to get whatever you want for free. You have the right to work hard and try to save a lot of money and buy an Aston Martin, but you don't have the right to wish for an Aston Martin and have it magically appear just because you wanted one. In a free market, the products people produce or services people offer will always benefit society, because if people produced products nobody wanted, nobody would buy them and there would be no reason to produce them in the first place. So just because you work hard doesn't mean you have to be rewarded. However you will be rewarded (paid) if you produce (and sell) something that benefits society (something other people need or want). (If you get up in the morning and start digging a hole in your backyard and at the end of the day you end up with a giant hole in the ground, that means you worked really hard that day. But should you get paid for that? Of course not. Now if you worked hard producing something people wanted to buy, then you'd get rewarded).

    So if people have a right to their own body and a right to their own property, then there can't be a thing like "free health care" or "health care as a basic right" because pills and bandages and syringes and hospital beds etc don't magically appear when we wish for them. Some one has to make/build/produce those items and why would somebody do that for free, if he can use his time to do something else? How is the government supposed to pay for those items? The government doesn't have any money... unless they take it from people (and commit an act of aggression by doing so).


    I think you are confusing 2 things here. Labour has always been considered a factor of production so the law of supply and demand applies here.
    If you refer to the fact that a lot of companies treat their employees without respect, then yes, I agree, that's repugnant and in a free market system, you have the possibility to boycott those companies and you have the right to quit your job if boss treats you like sh*t. Those are you options, anything that goes beyond that would be unethical.
    Ok well it's safe to say you have the best grasp of economics on this forum.
    Last edited by The Demon; 03-18-2010, 03:35 PM.
    Greed is Good

    Comment

    • The Demon
      Confirmed User
      • Apr 2003
      • 7336

      #242
      Originally posted by TheDoc
      So now you steal my line? You have been spewing shit on this forum from day one... at least cum up with your own spew.

      It really shows you have nothing when you point out peoples typo's as your attack... so please, proceed on shit stain.
      I was mimicking you. My god it's so easy to insult someone so incredible stupid. How does it feel talking to your superior?
      Greed is Good

      Comment

      • kane
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Aug 2001
        • 20684

        #243
        Originally posted by Vendzilla
        It's funny how we all argue about this
        But at least we have the choice of doing so
        If the president can get something this big thru without a vote, or by going around the rules, then we have as a nation already lost because with all the people that have spoken out among it, all the polls showing that they don't want this, then our freedom has just been take away from us.
        Actually, it will most likely pass on a vote. The bill that they are voting on is the senate bill. It passed the senate and now Pelosi and company are trying to get it through the house. So it will get a vote and pass on a vote. But it will be done with a lot of backroom deals and there will be a lot of amendments to the bill brought forth to help make good on the promises that were made to these people in order to get them to vote for it. What is already a mess, will only become a bigger mess.


        We're going to get a repeat of history, the last time this happened it was to Clinton, but I don't think the voters are going to be as nice this time. Too bad, as a nation under Clinton and a GOP house and senate, our economy did pretty damn good, people had jobs, Business was going pretty good, the everything went in the deep hole, first Bush, then a Democratic congress and House that ran on the promise of change, well we got the change. The country ain't doing well and after over a year we have a president that has not addressed our concerns over health-care, even in an interview, he just stuck to sales mode, not answering the questions. At Least the new version we can all read, 2700 pages worth, good luck with that, anyone that says they understand it or think it's going to do good is full of shit, you have NO idea what it's going to do, you're just trusting the government, not just the liberal side, both sides, because do you think the democrats will always be in charge?
        I think the republicans will win more seats back, but I'm not too sure that they will take both the house and senate back over. They might get one or the other, but right now there is still a reasonably strong anti-republican sentiment out there. According to Rasmussen right now about about 34% of the people see democrats in a favorable light while only 27% see republicans favorably. The tea party gets a 21% favorably rating. I have said before and still believe that the tea party is just another wing of he republicans, but it is yet unproven that the republicans can wrangle them into voting for them at the moment. I won't be shocked to see some independent candidates win this November and I won't be shocked to see the democrats hold onto both the house and senate but by much smaller margins.

        I do agree with you though that having one party hold the house and senate and the other the white house is probably the best way to go because it forces them to work together and find common ground.

        Comment

        • The Demon
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2003
          • 7336

          #244
          Kane, there isn't strong anti republican sentiment out there anymore. It's strong liberal/Obama Administration sentiment. Strong anti republican sentiment didn't win Scott Brown Massachusetts. While I'm not saying Republicans are back in the good graces with the people, there's a VERY good chance that they'll win back both the house and the senate. Maybe then shit will get done.
          Greed is Good

          Comment

          • TheDoc
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jul 2001
            • 13827

            #245
            Originally posted by The Demon
            I was mimicking you. My god it's so easy to insult someone so incredible stupid. How does it feel talking to your superior?
            Right, right.. listen shit stain, you're a nobody, with nothing, that dreams you had a life like mine and others on here...

            I can't imagine how much it must suck to be you.. come on, you're not even in our industry and you come here to post in political threads? Hahahaha... pathetic simply gives you too much credit.
            ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
            It's all disambiguation

            Comment

            • slavdogg
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2001
              • 3570

              #246
              Originally posted by The Demon
              Lol@health care being a human right. I guess so is welfare.
              Soviet Union had healthcare, a job, a house as a human right
              UN charter has those 3 as a human right as well, mind you US is not a signatory to that UN human rights charter.
              Adult Traffic for Sale

              Comment

              • The Demon
                Confirmed User
                • Apr 2003
                • 7336

                #247
                Originally posted by TheDoc
                Right, right.. listen shit stain, you're a nobody, with nothing, that dreams you had a life like mine and others on here...

                I can't imagine how much it must suck to be you.. come on, you're not even in our industry and you come here to post in political threads? Hahahaha... pathetic simply gives you too much credit.
                Yea, you're my little bitch now, it's cute. I really don't like having an ego but when the people that argue with you have your IQ and disability, it's hard to be humble. But I guess that's what I get for being better than you in life
                Greed is Good

                Comment

                • kane
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Aug 2001
                  • 20684

                  #248
                  Originally posted by The Demon
                  Kane, they've already lost the midterm elections. It's a matter of by how much. And I completely disagree with your 85-15% discrepancy, I don't know where you got those numbers. I'd say we all agree we need some kind of health care reform, but the majority do NOT want Obamacare.
                  I got those numbers right from the mouth of Republican leader John Boehner. He didn't give that exact number but said that republicans and democrats agree on about 80-85% of what is going into the bill. These are the common sense things like forming pools to allow individuals to by insurance on the open market as part of a group and changing the rules on pre-existing conditions. Here is the bill his party has suggested. http://gopleader.gov/UploadedFiles/S...d_11-04-09.pdf . Much of what is in there is in the Obama plan.

                  Where the big difference come is on abortion and whether is should be covered in the bill, the republicans want tort reform and it isn't in the bill and how to help those without insurance get that insurance. They also differ on how to pay for these things once they are done and the big on is how to cover those who are uninsured. Basically, the republicans feel if you lower costs, encourage small businesses to give their employees health insurance and make it readily available at good prices to anyone who wants it, then the problem will take care of itself. The democrats feel you need to help provide health insurnace for those that don't have it and that the government should pay for it if need be.

                  Many a republican has said that they could easily pass a bill that did most of the small, fast changes right now so some good things could start right away.

                  As for them already losing the election. . .I'm not so sure about that. I think the republicans have won a couple of elections recently and are suddenly feeling cocky. But they have lost some recently too and there is still a lot of anti-republican feelings in the country. I think it will be a lot closer than the republicans might think. I could be wrong, but I think the democrats will hold on to at least one house, if not both, but their majorities will shrink. I personally am so fed up that my voting strategy is going to be simple. If you are the incumbent, I am voting for your opponent no matter what party you are from.

                  Comment

                  • The Demon
                    Confirmed User
                    • Apr 2003
                    • 7336

                    #249
                    Originally posted by slavdogg
                    Soviet Union had healthcare, a job, a house as a human right
                    UN charter has those 3 as a human right as well, mind you US is not a signatory to that UN human rights charter.
                    I lived in the Soviet Union, please don't act like you know what you're talking about when trying to define those terms, lol.
                    Greed is Good

                    Comment

                    • The Demon
                      Confirmed User
                      • Apr 2003
                      • 7336

                      #250
                      Originally posted by kane
                      I got those numbers right from the mouth of Republican leader John Boehner. He didn't give that exact number but said that republicans and democrats agree on about 80-85% of what is going into the bill. These are the common sense things like forming pools to allow individuals to by insurance on the open market as part of a group and changing the rules on pre-existing conditions. Here is the bill his party has suggested. http://gopleader.gov/UploadedFiles/S...d_11-04-09.pdf . Much of what is in there is in the Obama plan.
                      If that's the case, then it's one hell of a hefty 15%.

                      Where the big difference come is on abortion and whether is should be covered in the bill, the republicans want tort reform and it isn't in the bill and how to help those without insurance get that insurance. They also differ on how to pay for these things once they are done and the big on is how to cover those who are uninsured. Basically, the republicans feel if you lower costs, encourage small businesses to give their employees health insurance and make it readily available at good prices to anyone who wants it, then the problem will take care of itself. The democrats feel you need to help provide health insurnace for those that don't have it and that the government should pay for it if need be.
                      Yes, that much I understand.

                      Many a republican has said that they could easily pass a bill that did most of the small, fast changes right now so some good things could start right away.
                      I think the Dems blew their chance at "some good things", with their ego and unwillingless to be realistic.

                      As for them already losing the election. . .I'm not so sure about that. I think the republicans have won a couple of elections recently and are suddenly feeling cocky. But they have lost some recently too and there is still a lot of anti-republican feelings in the country. I think it will be a lot closer than the republicans might think. I could be wrong, but I think the democrats will hold on to at least one house, if not both, but their majorities will shrink. I personally am so fed up that my voting strategy is going to be simple. If you are the incumbent, I am voting for your opponent no matter what party you are from.
                      Can you blame the Republicans? The Democrats have achieved what amounts to political suicide. I actually don't see the Republicans being cocky though. They're doing the smart thing right now and playing "representatives for the people". Being cocky would be a terrible political maneuver at this point, when they have everything in the bag.
                      Greed is Good

                      Comment

                      • TheDoc
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Jul 2001
                        • 13827

                        #251
                        Originally posted by The Demon
                        Yea, you're my little bitch now, it's cute. I really don't like having an ego but when the people that argue with you have your IQ and disability, it's hard to be humble. But I guess that's what I get for being better than you in life
                        Hahaha, man you come up with some weak shit....but hey, you got your spewage in like always. Let's bump this to the top... let the world know you're dumb ass is on the prowl.
                        ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                        It's all disambiguation

                        Comment

                        • slavdogg
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2001
                          • 3570

                          #252
                          Originally posted by The Demon
                          I lived in the Soviet Union, please don't act like you know what you're talking about when trying to define those terms, lol.
                          I've lived in Soviet Union as well and I have a poli sci degree and yes i know what i'mj talking about
                          Adult Traffic for Sale

                          Comment

                          • The Demon
                            Confirmed User
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 7336

                            #253
                            Originally posted by TheDoc
                            Hahaha, man you come up with some weak shit....but hey, you got your spewage in like always. Let's bump this to the top... let the world know you're dumb ass is on the prowl.
                            I can't let the world know that, I'm too busy letting the world know that you're the dumbest person on gfy.

                            *Spew spew spew spew*
                            ROFL way too easy.
                            Greed is Good

                            Comment

                            • TheDoc
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Jul 2001
                              • 13827

                              #254
                              Originally posted by The Demon
                              I lived in the Soviet Union, please don't act like you know what you're talking about when trying to define those terms, lol.
                              HAHAHAHAHA.... shut the hell up, you never lived in the Soviet Union. So you're a doctor, a a lawyer, going to school to be a lawyer, have a degree in some crap economics, and now you lived in the Soviet Union as well?

                              And yet post on GFY political threads? Dude, please keep your pile of lies in check.
                              ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
                              It's all disambiguation

                              Comment

                              • kane
                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                • Aug 2001
                                • 20684

                                #255
                                Originally posted by The Demon
                                Such as what exactly? Care to show me a poll? And then care to explain to me how polls are a representative of Americans? Notice everytime I use polls, I also say "if we are to take polls seriously."
                                Here is some info from Newsweek.
                                http://www.newsweek.com/id/233890

                                In the article it says, " a new NEWSWEEK Poll shows that while a majority of Americans say they oppose Obama's plan, a majority actually support the key features of the legislation."

                                Further down it says: " The NEWSWEEK Poll asked respondents about eight health-care-reform provisions that Obama and many Democrats in Congress have generally supported. It found that the majority of Americans supported five of those provisions, three by particularly large margins. Eighty-one percent agreed with the creation of a new insurance marketplace, the exchange, for individual subscribers to compare plans and buy insurance at a competitive rate. Seventy-six percent thought health insurers should be required to cover anyone who applies, including those with preexisting conditions; and 75 percent agreed with requiring most businesses to offer health insurance to their employees, with incentives for small-business owners to do so."

                                People don't like the overall bill, but there is stuff in there that people do lie. I think this also shows two things that I find interesting. 1. It really shows that nobody really knows what is in the bill and what isn't and 2. the republicans have done a masterful job of demonizing it. People hear about it and instantly think there is nothing of value in it when that is just not the case. I don't support it as a whole, but there are some good things in it.

                                Comment

                                Working...