GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Lindsey Lohan Suing eTrade for $100 Million (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=957505)

tiger 03-09-2010 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscortBiz (Post 16931923)
I think every woman named lindsay should sue her, as everytime I hear that name I think of a stinky junky fire crotch
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

seeandsee 03-09-2010 03:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toplessgoat (Post 16931910)
ouch :Oh crap

Jarmusch 03-09-2010 03:20 PM
Give the girl a break, she has to fund her drug habit somehow.

PornMD 03-09-2010 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 16931946)
I'll say this. I thought the FIRST talking baby commercial was cute. I have not liked a single one since then. But I have seen them all. And I have seen this one with the little, apparently cheating playa baby with the milkaholic line, and never, ever, not once, not at all have I ever thought of lindsay lohan during, or after the stupid ass commercial.

She's completely nuts.
Yea, those talking baby commercials are like the Aflac commercials with the duck...the first couple were actually funny in parts...everything since has been annoying as shit.

And I think the funny thing about this is that even IF they were parodying Lindsay:

1. It's a parody.
2. It's not untrue...she fucking drinks! If she wants $ for pain and suffering, she needs to sue herself.

Quagmire 03-09-2010 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 16932083)
I kind of tend to side with fire crotch, the commercial was obviously intended to poke fun at her, it's the first thing i thought when i watched it. Does she have a case is a whole nother story.
Wouldn't it have to be her talking on the phone to her girlfriend for it to be about Linday Lohan? I thought she was a donutbumper.

EdgeXXX 03-09-2010 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarmusch (Post 16933066)
Give the girl a break, she has to fund her drug habit somehow.
I would pay her to OD. Does that count?

mynameisjim 03-09-2010 05:07 PM
If you've ever worked in mainstream marketing, you know the amount of thought that goes into every line and every image is pretty intense, almost to the point of absurdity.

It's conceivable they chose the name for the reason Lohan claims, but you still can't sue over it. Maybe they did it as an inside joke or maybe they thought the name did have a subconscious connection to party girls but there is no way to prove it.

When shooting a commercial, the look of the people, the clothes they are wearing, the colors in the background, those are all chosen specifically, so a name of a character is probably not random.

Stupid lawsuit though.

kane 03-09-2010 05:12 PM
I remember seeing the commercial for the first time during the Super Bowl. I laughed and thought it was funny and then I turned to a friend of mine and said, "I wonder if that was Lindsay Lohan as a baby." We both laughed. I wouldn't be shocked to find out they named the baby Lindsay for just that reason.

Iron Fist 03-09-2010 10:26 PM
Can't sue parodies.... otherwise you might as well shut down late night television right now.

Monique Niccole 03-09-2010 10:57 PM
$100 million pays for a lot of cocaine and spray tan sessions.

PornMD 03-09-2010 11:27 PM
Fiddy x 2 mil for "pain and suffering" from a commercial...good fucking luck Lohan.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:35 PM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123