Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 16904025)

you are proof enough of his theory for me.

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16903928)

Calling names people because of something they liked to be freed, Very nice of You :2 cents:

Originally Posted by dig420 (Post 16901176)

It's a pretty well known fact that angers stupid fucking conservatives to no end. Higher education is also strongly inversely related to conservatism as well.

Originally Posted by dig420 (Post 16903634)

ummm... no. The more intelligent you are, the more capable of learning you are. The more education you have, the more likely it is that you are going to be a liberal. The reason for this is very simple: Conservative ideas are stupid, and they don't work. History has shown this repeatedly. Almost everything you believe is stupid to the point of being retarded. YOU are retarded. The reason you think of us as 'elite' and you're so concerned about us being 'better than you' is because for the most part, we ARE better than you. More intelligent, more compassionate, less violent, better neighbors, we raise our children better and in general we are just more complete and more valuable human beings than you and the people who think like you.

You're also correct in thinking that liberals think you're stupid, and that we don't like you. Your demographic in general is both ill-informed AND absolutely sure you have all the answers. You have a negative impact on this country and it's laws, and the American way of life in general. You are anti-intellectual. You think stupidity in general and your thuggish brand of religion and patriotism in particular is something to be proud of. We wish you would leave, or perform some kind of manual labor and shut the fuck up about things you don't and can't understand. In my opinion, if you don't have at least a bachelor's degree, or can't pass a moderately difficult civics test, you shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Originally Posted by Bill8 (Post 16903824)

So, to conclude, rightwingers dismiss studies unless the studies support their point of view.

And make nonsensical jokes about studies in general.

What a shock.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16904917)

And the left wingers do the exact thing. Hooray for double standards :)

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat (Post 16904108)

Get somebody who speaks English as their first language to explain what I wrote back to you.

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16903923)

Man, You got a great respect from me with this post, it couldn't have said better.

Originally Posted by wig (Post 16906036)

Back to back that was damn funny.

Originally Posted by Slappin Fish (Post 16905424)

The Demon, how about you stop repeating what pops use to say around the kitchen table and get a few thoughts of your own?

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16906106)

So have fun...

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16906257)

Haha this makes it way too easy. After verbally raping BFT3K in almost every thread, his only response is to make an avatar dedicated to me. Why can't liberals be more objective and..Intelligent? But this disproves any of those retarded study, thanks guys :)

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 16906426)

As a sidenote, I would argue that libertarians also "care about others" - we just have a fundamentally different approach to obtaining that.

However, I'm mostly socially liberal - fiscally, I don't mind a whole lot either way, as long as it's in the interest of the people. For example, I'd be okay with UHC if it was done properly. The current bill(s) are completely in favor of corporations and only seek to fuck over the people.

And I disagree with any "liberal" laws which seek to restrict social freedoms. Banning video games, etc. Same as I disagree with any "conservative" laws to restrict freedoms.

I'd argue that most Dems in the US are only fiscally liberal, yet still socially conservative on a lot of issues(gun control, video games, etc etc).

Originally Posted by dig420 (Post 16906451)

You have a point, thanks to Obama's propensity for outreach and being 'bipartisan'. I think he's starting to realize that you just have to treat conservatives as stubborn children and do the responsible thing whether they like it or not. If there's a public option in the bill that finally gets passed thru reconciliation I'll be much happier about this administration.

Originally Posted by dig420 (Post 16906449)

Answer Matt's post. Tell me why I have to support you inbred conservatives with my tax dollars.

Originally Posted by wig (Post 16906381)

Not sure what this means, but surely you can see the hypocrisy of praising a post full of name calling and then following that up with the chiding of another for the same offense.

Carry on....

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 16901832)

What a shock that some coffee house Marxist designs a study that proves that coffee house Marxists are superior to everyone else in every possible way. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 16905819)

There is one way to somewhat validate this theory.

Historically speaking, it is the liberal states that support the conservative states.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2165/...ca5b05d221.jpg

The fact is, the most successful states are either liberal or owe their success to a liberal big city. All of those liberal areas that conservatives dislike are actually the ones that make this country go 'round.

If it were not for this tax welfare system, most conservatives would have a much lower standard of living.

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 16906426)

As a sidenote, I would argue that libertarians also "care about others" - we just have a fundamentally different approach to obtaining that.

However, I'm mostly socially liberal - fiscally, I don't mind a whole lot either way, as long as it's in the interest of the people. For example, I'd be okay with UHC if it was done properly. The current bill(s) are completely in favor of corporations and only seek to fuck over the people.

And I disagree with any "liberal" laws which seek to restrict social freedoms. Banning video games, etc. Same as I disagree with any "conservative" laws to restrict freedoms.

I'd argue that most Dems in the US are only fiscally liberal, yet still socially conservative on a lot of issues(gun control, video games, etc etc).

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16906659)

Wait what? ROFL!!!!!

I can't tell what the Dems really believe because they're too stupid to know themselves. They have no real identity, nor do they have any clue what the American public wants. They're definitely out of touch with reality. With the Republican party, I wish they would offer some logical solutions, rather than play the anti government, anti Obama card. I mean it works from a political standpoint, but it doesn't do shit for us.

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16907249)

You don't see the difference, i don't care how one calls the other, it's how You express Yourself.

my problem is a person calls others with names due to they asked something to be freed.

AJC calls a group as pothead due to they ask ganja to be legalized, so what should pornographers be called?

Most of us bitching here how some conservative mofos have a beef with us, so what's the difference?

how it's any different then asking porn must be an untouchable right to ask wead being legalized?

if You think deeper, You will see the real hypocrisy.

Freedom is freedom and we should all stand beside it :2 cents:

Originally Posted by xmas13 (Post 16907910)

Get off your high horse.

Originally Posted by dig420 (Post 16908137)

No. Conservatives are dangerous, anti-american hystericals and the teabaggers are verging on cultists. You people need to be addressed and marginalized, the way we USED to marginalize neo-nazis, racists, luddites and xenophobic extremists before the Republicans decided to consolidate them into a voting bloc and exploit them. Turns out you idiots aren't as controllable as they thought, and now you're running this country straight into the shithole.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 16908206)

check the score card, Liberals are running the show now, right down the crapper

Originally Posted by dig420 (Post 16908421)

Not exactly, since Repubs filibuster every single piece of legislation. Because governing the country responsibly always takes a back seat to 'winning' for these creeps.

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16904969)

Considering these studies as 100% valid is like saying "most polls show Obama with a 25% approval rating, therefore everybody hates Obama!" Gotta love the liberals and the atheists. They discard everything until a study comes out in their favor :)

Originally Posted by dig420 (Post 16908137)

No. Conservatives are dangerous, anti-american hystericals and the teabaggers are verging on cultists. You people need to be addressed and marginalized, the way we USED to marginalize neo-nazis, racists, luddites and xenophobic extremists before the Republicans decided to consolidate them into a voting bloc and exploit them. Turns out you idiots aren't as controllable as they thought, and now you're running this country straight into the shithole.

Originally Posted by wig (Post 16908736)

I don't want to get in the middle of your political squabble with the liberals, but I'm curious what the atheists are discarding?

Are these serious studies? Peer reviewed? Have any links?

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 16908792)

Can you say that in english?

Originally Posted by wig (Post 16908981)

You can read, right?



Have a link?