why so cheap $300 content ?

[neonlights]

is there a catch ? i see a few content sellers on here.

[Sands]

I can't remember which GFYer presented this thesis, but hopefully someone will chime in and credit him or her. Essentially they said that in order to remain profitable as a content (re)seller, it's now more a matter of how many times over you can sell the content rather than how much you can charge for the content per single license. I suppose that would explain the abundance of content deals that we're beginning to see.

[NaughtyRob]

Sounds like something that Paul Markham would say. Not sure if it was him that said it though.

[Shoplifter]

It's cheap because it comes pre-fapped.

[Iron Fist]

How much if I want you to punch some kittens?

[Sands]

How much if I want you to punch some kittens?

Are we talking about jabbing tabbies or uppercutting exotic breeds?

[amacontent]

if its cheap , there is a reason

[Lassitor]

A lot of wanta-be PornMasters are going to buy it. If the seller limits the content to 10 buyers it is a great way for him or her to make money and a good deal for the buyer.

[Jon Oso]

hell I would sell exclusive solo scenes for $300 with releases.

[MaDalton]

obviously buyers do not care how often content is sold as long as they get as much as possible for as little money as possible. so saturation does not seem to be a problem.

[The Duck]

More money = better content / little saturation. Less money = Worse / more saturated content.

[InternetIsForPorn]

The economy is a bitch.

I can get girls to work for $100, so your total cost for a set of pics and a video scene would be under $300.

Hit me up if interested.