Originally Posted by fmltube (Post 16681468)

The issue is it is against the law to produce with a minor under any circumstance just like it is against the law to serve any minor alcohol. Instead of acting like a man and owning up to the situation in response to her allegations, he placed all the blame on her and painted himself as a victim and that someone was trying to harm his business. The fact that the content remained on his site for an entire year and members downloaded the videos and affiliates marketed the video exposes all of them to distribution/possession/promotion of a sexual performance by a minor. And if Kelsie's accusation is to be believed, then Dirty D would have known she was underage by telling her to write down exactly what is on the ID she was told to bring with her. It was poor judgment on his part in any sense that could have taken down a lot of innocent people in the process.

Just remember, ignorance of age is not an acceptable defense in a court of law. Just the same, if a 17 year old has a fake ID and goes to a bar and gets picked up and fucked sideways til Sunday in a state that's age of consent is 18, saying her ID stated she was 18 is no defense. In adult, you take even bigger risks because you have demonstrate that you in good faith did all you can to verify the model's identity and verified the information provided. If he was diligent, he would have seen the picture of Kelsie's friend on the ID looks nothing like Kelsie to begin with which should have raised flags. But we can't have little issues like that occur when we need to get our content shot now can we?

Originally Posted by nation-x (Post 16681871)

post proof... if he really did what you say he did he would be in alot of trouble... since he isn't, I say it didn't happen.

Originally Posted by fmltube (Post 16681885)

Just watch. Its coming sooner than you know. Why do you think the douche pulled her content down after it sat on his server for the entire year being downloaded?

Originally Posted by fmltube (Post 16681468)

The issue is it is against the law to produce with a minor under any circumstance just like it is against the law to serve any minor alcohol. Instead of acting like a man and owning up to the situation in response to her allegations, he placed all the blame on her and painted himself as a victim and that someone was trying to harm his business. The fact that the content remained on his site for an entire year and members downloaded the videos and affiliates marketed the video exposes all of them to distribution/possession/promotion of a sexual performance by a minor. And if Kelsie's accusation is to be believed, then Dirty D would have known she was underage by telling her to write down exactly what is on the ID she was told to bring with her. It was poor judgment on his part in any sense that could have taken down a lot of innocent people in the process.

Just remember, ignorance of age is not an acceptable defense in a court of law. Just the same, if a 17 year old has a fake ID and goes to a bar and gets picked up and fucked sideways til Sunday in a state that's age of consent is 18, saying her ID stated she was 18 is no defense. In adult, you take even bigger risks because you have demonstrate that you in good faith did all you can to verify the model's identity and verified the information provided. If he was diligent, he would have seen the picture of Kelsie's friend on the ID looks nothing like Kelsie to begin with which should have raised flags. But we can't have little issues like that occur when we need to get our content shot now can we?

Originally Posted by BillyHoe (Post 16682363)

Good thing we have you around to give us all legal advice. I don't know what we would have done without you thanks for your insight :)
Since you like to share your legal expertise, what's your take on someone who doesn't pay their hosting billing, and continues to link to their deliquent account?

Originally Posted by BillyHoe (Post 16682363)

Good thing we have you around to give us all legal advice. I don't know what we would have done without you thanks for your insight :)
Since you like to share your legal expertise, what's your take on someone who doesn't pay their hosting billing, and continues to link to their deliquent account?

Originally Posted by fmltube (Post 16682391)

Did you ever consider where the legal advice came from dumb shit? Maybe I know more about the situation than you are aware of. Just watch, all win be vindicated VERY soon and I am glad to say I had a part in making that happen.

Originally Posted by weekly (Post 16682394)

So, what's gonna happen?

Originally Posted by fmltube (Post 16682391)

Did you ever consider where the legal advice came from dumb shit? Maybe I know more about the situation than you are aware of. Just watch, all win be vindicated VERY soon and I am glad to say I had a part in making that happen.

Originally Posted by BillyHoe (Post 16682873)

Touchie aren't we. All I asked was a simple question. But if you seriously think anyone believes you're more then a keyboard warrior you're sadly mistaken.
BTW do you own the rights to the image on your profile? Copyright infringement is a crime, but I'm sure someone with your resources and intelligence is aware of that


PS
You never answered my question ;)

Originally Posted by BillyHoe (Post 16682902)

Here's fity cents towards your hosting.

PS you STILL haven't answered the question.
But here's another one. Can you prove it's you please.

Originally Posted by fmltube (Post 16682907)

Here I will make it really easy for you and Ill redirect it. What do you want me to do, a webcam session? :upsidedow

Originally Posted by Les Grossman (Post 16679611)

Sounds good. When you have time, also try to get to the bottom of him shooting a minor. If you're lucky, you can promote that very scene!