Amanda Knox supporters!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sortie
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2007
    • 7771

    #1

    Amanda Knox supporters!

    I was with you at the start but after actually looking at the evidence I see guilt.

    The prosecution's theory of "sex game gone wrong" still sounds like a fantasy to
    me and the logical conclusion is that Rudy Guede did the crime alone.
    But Knox's actions when combined with other evidence makes her look very guilty.


    It's hard to believe, but those foot/shoe prints are convincing and people don't buy
    bleach at 7:45 AM from the corner store on the morning of the murder for nothing and
    then lie about ever buying it or even being awake at that time.

    Knox was outside the store waiting for the owner to open and she went straight to
    the cleaning section and bought bleach. The store owner identified her and the police
    found the receipt for the bleach in her boyfriend's apartment.

    Knox cleaned outside the murder room with bleach so well that even though she
    had lived there for more than a month the police could only find one
    of Knox's finger prints in the entire apartment.

    She's really good at cleaning yet she admits seeing shit in the other bathroom
    toilet and not even bothering to flush it. The shit is still in the toilet when the
    cops take over the crime scene. There was no need to flush the shit because it
    was not evidence. She was only cleaning up evidence and thus ignored stinky shit
    in a toilet. She was cleaning up in a hurry; no time to spare to even hit the flusher.


    Get over the cute face. It's the ugly brain inside that commits crime.


    Let the rock throwing begin.
  • sortie
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2007
    • 7771

    #2
    EDIT : "Rock throwing at me" not "at her".

    Thanks

    Comment

    • tehHinjew
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2006
      • 5755

      #3
      lol the dateline episode on her about a year ago had nothing about sex games, now I read about the sex games last month on cnn.com.. shes for sure guilty

      Hot Porn Wanna trade? email me at wanker (@) wanknation dot com

      Comment

      • candyflip
        Carpe Visio
        • Jul 2002
        • 43069

        #4
        Who? What? Huh?

        Spend you some brain.
        Email Me

        Comment

        • sortie
          Confirmed User
          • Mar 2007
          • 7771

          #5
          Originally posted by tehHinjew
          lol the dateline episode on her about a year ago had nothing about sex games, now I read about the sex games last month on cnn.com.. shes for sure guilty
          Yeah, these TV shows about the case got me to jump face first on the
          "innocent bandwagon". It only took 30 minutes of looking at real evidence to
          jump the fuck off the bandwagon though.

          We (USA folk) are suckers for a cute face and media hype; we'll believe anything fed to
          us this way and stick to it until we die no matter how wrong it is.
          Last edited by sortie; 12-19-2009, 08:25 AM.

          Comment

          • ShellyCrash
            Confirmed User
            • Jun 2004
            • 6708

            #6
            Originally posted by sortie
            The prosecution's theory of "sex game gone wrong" still sounds like a fantasy to
            me and the logical conclusion is that Rudy Guede did the crime alone.
            But Knox's actions when combined with other evidence makes her look very guilty.
            Honestly I do not know what to think, but I agree with that you started out with. The prosecution's "sex game" theory does not hold water, it's pretty ludicrous.

            Amanda Knox's behavior is odd, but it's odd either way you slice it. If she had comitted the crime her actions don't seem to make sense either. Additionally the same can be said of the other roommate. While the other roommate wasn't making out with her boyfriend they were both in the house when police first arrived and neither called them there themselves. The other roommate's window had been smashed in and they had both admitted to seeing blood in one of the bathrooms.

            The only person who can be tied to the crime is Guede, not only from his semen but moreso because of his fingerprints in the victim's blood. The victim didn't appear to be raped, and that's where the prosecution came up with the "sex game" theory.

            I wouldn't put money on this chic being innocent, but I also wouldn't be able to return a verdict of guilty either.

            Start making money with the hottest hookup site!
            up to $55 PPS or up to 75% Revshare
            ICQ 196766477

            Comment

            • starpimps
              Confirmed User
              • Sep 2006
              • 6954

              #7
              id fuck her
              Teen Porn Models / Solo Girls

              Comment

              • VikingMan
                Exploiting human weakness
                • Jan 2008
                • 6861

                #8
                Although I agree that the trial was a joke I also believe that she at least helped cover up the crime. She gets no sympathy from me.

                Comment

                • sortie
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 7771

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ShellyCrash
                  Honestly I do not know what to think, but I agree with that you started out with. The prosecution's "sex game" theory does not hold water, it's pretty ludicrous.

                  Amanda Knox's behavior is odd, but it's odd either way you slice it. If she had comitted the crime her actions don't seem to make sense either. Additionally the same can be said of the other roommate. While the other roommate wasn't making out with her boyfriend they were both in the house when police first arrived and neither called them there themselves. The other roommate's window had been smashed in and they had both admitted to seeing blood in one of the bathrooms.

                  The only person who can be tied to the crime is Guede, not only from his semen but moreso because of his fingerprints in the victim's blood. The victim didn't appear to be raped, and that's where the prosecution came up with the "sex game" theory.

                  I wouldn't put money on this chic being innocent, but I also wouldn't be able to return a verdict of guilty either.
                  You seem to be focusing on the "media presentation" of her actions.
                  The media had the "strange behavior" hype; where her facial expressions meant
                  something.

                  Get over that!

                  It's not the case against her.

                  The case is based on her actuall physical actions of cleaning up blood with
                  bleach at 8:AM when she claimed to be still at her boyfriends.


                  Understand this :

                  If Guede does it all by himself; then he walked out of the murder room and down the
                  hall to the bathroom where he leaves bloody foot prints on the bathroom rug.
                  So how does he leave prints on the rug but none in the hall?

                  Answer : He doesn't. The hall is cleaned with bleach purchased by Knox.
                  Luminol is then used by cops to highlight the prints in the hall that were cleaned
                  with bleach. Knox's foot print is there in the luminol.


                  Motive : Who the fuck really knows?

                  But here's one besides the "sex game" one.

                  Knox had been threaten to be fired several times by her boss. The boss has
                  also told her he wanted to hire the victim instead. The boss actually does
                  hire Knox's roomate to be a DJ on what will be called "Mez Night".
                  "Mez" is the nick name of the murder victim.
                  "Mez Night" never happens because the victim is murdered before that day.

                  It would not be hard of Knox to imagine that her job is over and the roommate
                  is going to be the hottest new thing in this bar.

                  Jealousy!!!

                  Anger!!!

                  Her fucking boss is going to dump her and make her fucking roomate a star and
                  everybody is going to know it.

                  That boss needs fixing, doesn't he?

                  So fix him by setting him up for murder and get rid of this bitch roomate once and
                  for all at the same time.

                  The boss is black so get a black guy to do the crime so the evidence left behind
                  points to a black that she can name as her boss.
                  Of course doing that is stupid because of DNA, but stupid is all in this one so I
                  don't count it out.

                  My confidence in the above motive is low ; but
                  it beats the sex game gone bad one I think.

                  Comment

                  • fatfoo
                    ICQ:649699063
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 27763

                    #10
                    That's a cute cat, ShellyCrash.

                    Send me an email: [email protected]

                    Comment

                    • Manowar
                      jellyfish  
                      • Dec 2003
                      • 71528

                      #11
                      its fucked up royally, who knows if we'll ever know what happens

                      Comment

                      • Dood
                        Confirmed User
                        • Dec 2003
                        • 353

                        #12
                        I think the prosecutors claims against her were weak. The local media did a good job of persecuting her before the trial. The evidence seems to be either all circumstantial or a fantastic story dreamed up by the prosecution. Like the killing based on a comic book or how it was a sex orgy gone wrong or strange behavior at the police station or buying underwear (after not being able to retrieve her own).

                        Buying bleach the morning after and the police finding bleach was used to remove blood in the house, yes ironic but there's no proof she was the one using it to clean up the blood. A kitchen knife with Knox's DNA on the handle found in her boyfriends home with trace amounts of unidentifiable DNA on it that didn't even match the murder wounds, shouldn't have been an issue in court.

                        The detectives were the ones who mentioned Lumumba after finding she texted him that night. They then asked her to "imagine" what could have happened if the evidence said she did it, and she gave them a story to get out of the interrogation which she said they hit her during it.

                        More importantly there has been absolutely no DNA ever found linking Knox to the room where Kercher was murdered.

                        Just like everyone else I don't know if she did it or not, but from looking at the evidence I wouldn't be able to convict her.
                        Traffic-Out
                        We sell quality text link clicked traffic

                        Comment

                        • sortie
                          Confirmed User
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 7771

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Dood
                          I think the prosecutors claims against her were weak. The local media did a good job of persecuting her before the trial. The evidence seems to be either all circumstantial or a fantastic story dreamed up by the prosecution. Like the killing based on a comic book or how it was a sex orgy gone wrong or strange behavior at the police station or buying underwear (after not being able to retrieve her own).

                          Buying bleach the morning after and the police finding bleach was used to remove blood in the house, yes ironic but there's no proof she was the one using it to clean up the blood. A kitchen knife with Knox's DNA on the handle found in her boyfriends home with trace amounts of unidentifiable DNA on it that didn't even match the murder wounds, shouldn't have been an issue in court.

                          The detectives were the ones who mentioned Lumumba after finding she texted him that night. They then asked her to "imagine" what could have happened if the evidence said she did it, and she gave them a story to get out of the interrogation which she said they hit her during it.

                          More importantly there has been absolutely no DNA ever found linking Knox to the room where Kercher was murdered.

                          Just like everyone else I don't know if she did it or not, but from looking at the evidence I wouldn't be able to convict her.
                          All true!

                          I see all that too.

                          But that foot print that they claim matches Sollecito's shoes just blows me away.



                          That's a match to me and with all the other circumstances it's hard to deny.

                          Every time I look at the people involved; I'm like "This trial is a scam!!"
                          But I've been looking up the evidence and it's all there!

                          I figure like this,

                          I can say each one of these :

                          - the shoe print is not exact
                          - buying bleach at 7:45AM is normal when you don't even flush your shit.
                          - the DNA on the knife is flawed
                          - the size 7 foot prints in luminol are not from blood
                          - the foot print directions don't make sense to me, as if any of it did.
                          - the sole killer tracked blood into the bathroom but floated in mid-air in the hall
                          - no cleaning happened, but 200 fingerprints were found but only one from Amanda
                          even though she lived there for a month
                          - Sollecito's DNA on the bra clasp was contamination by someone who had his
                          DNA on a glove and ignore that, even if true, the DNA would still only get on his glove
                          from something in the murder room anyway.
                          - etc....


                          I can say all of that one statement at at time but when I look at it all together
                          she is guilty.

                          Comment

                          • sortie
                            Confirmed User
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 7771

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Dood
                            More importantly there has been absolutely no DNA ever found linking Knox to the room where Kercher was murdered.
                            No DNA, but a fingerprint matching Knox was on the victims face!

                            The fingerprint was "embedded" IN THE VICTIMS FACE!!!!!!

                            In other words; Knox pressed her hand so hard into the victims face that Knox's
                            fingerprint molded into the victims skin and the skin did not reform to normal
                            smoothness even after hours of death.

                            Comment

                            • pocketkangaroo
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jan 2005
                              • 8452

                              #15
                              Not really sure. I'd be 50/50 on whether she did it but there is no way I'd convict her for life. There are just too many things that don't add up in the story for me.

                              There's also a lot of shady shit that went on with the prosecutor. He is up for ethics stuff for basically railroading other people in cases and fabricating evidence. I don't know if he is being real honest about this case and has seemed to turn it into a tabloid fest with anti-American sentiments.

                              I guess the thing I don't get is that the guy they convicted earlier seemed to have no connection to Knox. He seemed to be a druggie drifter. I guess I don't get how two people with no connection to one another can be convicted of the same crime.

                              Comment

                              • sortie
                                Confirmed User
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 7771

                                #16
                                Originally posted by pocketkangaroo
                                Not really sure. I'd be 50/50 on whether she did it but there is no way I'd convict her for life. There are just too many things that don't add up in the story for me.

                                There's also a lot of shady shit that went on with the prosecutor. He is up for ethics stuff for basically railroading other people in cases and fabricating evidence. I don't know if he is being real honest about this case and has seemed to turn it into a tabloid fest with anti-American sentiments.

                                I guess the thing I don't get is that the guy they convicted earlier seemed to have no connection to Knox. He seemed to be a druggie drifter. I guess I don't get how two people with no connection to one another can be convicted of the same crime.
                                They knew each other, he danced at the club she worked at and sold weed and Knox
                                smoked plenty.

                                He also hung out with the guys in the apartment below Knox's at times.
                                The guy was known in the area, he was a fixture of sort.
                                He hung out on the basketball court all the time and that's the last place
                                Knox and Sollecetio were seen before the murder.

                                Comment

                                • PurrrsianPussyKat
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jan 2004
                                  • 2088

                                  #17
                                  She's guilty as fuck. I hope they fry her.

                                  I haven't followed the case like you have.. but about a week or two back she was proclaiming, "I'm not an assassin". Well no duh sweetie. You're a murderer.
                                  Need a reliable, reasonably priced php programmer? Hit me up! 2934409

                                  Comment

                                  • pocketkangaroo
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jan 2005
                                    • 8452

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by sortie
                                    They knew each other, he danced at the club she worked at and sold weed and Knox
                                    smoked plenty.

                                    He also hung out with the guys in the apartment below Knox's at times.
                                    The guy was known in the area, he was a fixture of sort.
                                    He hung out on the basketball court all the time and that's the last place
                                    Knox and Sollecetio were seen before the murder.
                                    Ahhhhh, didn't know that. I still don't think she would have gotten convicted in the U.S.

                                    Comment

                                    • sortie
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Mar 2007
                                      • 7771

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by pocketkangaroo
                                      I still don't think she would have gotten convicted in the U.S.
                                      Well of course not; we would have just convicted Lumumba and let her go.

                                      Comment

                                      • GatorB
                                        The Demon & 12clicks
                                        • Oct 2001
                                        • 18208

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by sortie
                                        I was with you at the start but after actually looking at the evidence I see guilt.

                                        The prosecution's theory of "sex game gone wrong" still sounds like a fantasy to
                                        me and the logical conclusion is that Rudy Guede did the crime alone.
                                        But Knox's actions when combined with other evidence makes her look very guilty.


                                        It's hard to believe, but those foot/shoe prints are convincing and people don't buy
                                        bleach at 7:45 AM from the corner store on the morning of the murder for nothing and
                                        then lie about ever buying it or even being awake at that time.

                                        Knox was outside the store waiting for the owner to open and she went straight to
                                        the cleaning section and bought bleach. The store owner identified her and the police
                                        found the receipt for the bleach in her boyfriend's apartment.

                                        Knox cleaned outside the murder room with bleach so well that even though she
                                        had lived there for more than a month the police could only find one
                                        of Knox's finger prints in the entire apartment.

                                        She's really good at cleaning yet she admits seeing shit in the other bathroom
                                        toilet and not even bothering to flush it. The shit is still in the toilet when the
                                        cops take over the crime scene. There was no need to flush the shit because it
                                        was not evidence. She was only cleaning up evidence and thus ignored stinky shit
                                        in a toilet. She was cleaning up in a hurry; no time to spare to even hit the flusher.


                                        Get over the cute face. It's the ugly brain inside that commits crime.


                                        Let the rock throwing begin.
                                        All that means is she was trying to cover up a murder a friend of hers did. That's called obstruction of justice or destroying evidence. Show me where someone in the US gets 26 years for that. Hell the dude that actually did the murder got 25 years. Those wops just wanted to get back at America so this was their chance. Fucky Italy and their greasy deigos.

                                        Comment

                                        • DVTimes
                                          xxx
                                          • Jun 2003
                                          • 31650

                                          #21
                                          i think you forget this fact.

                                          she is a babe

                                          thus not guilty
                                          XXX

                                          Comment

                                          • GatorB
                                            The Demon & 12clicks
                                            • Oct 2001
                                            • 18208

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by PurrrsianPussyKat
                                            She's guilty as fuck. I hope they fry her.

                                            I haven't followed the case like you have.. but about a week or two back she was proclaiming, "I'm not an assassin". Well no duh sweetie. You're a murderer.
                                            Are you fucking retarded?

                                            A) You don't know she's guilty the only evidence you know of is the one the Italian government wants to to believe that's all. Funny how people here don't trust our own government but trust one run by guidos.

                                            B) they can't fry her because Italy doesn't have the death penalty.

                                            C) She's already been sentenced dumbass. She got 26 years. The actual murderer got 25. He's not American so that explains a lot.

                                            Comment

                                            • POed-poster
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Feb 2005
                                              • 1588

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by GatorB
                                              Are you fucking retarded?

                                              A) You don't know she's guilty the only evidence you know of is the one the Italian government wants to to believe that's all. Funny how people here don't trust our own government but trust one run by guidos.

                                              B) they can't fry her because Italy doesn't have the death penalty.

                                              C) She's already been sentenced dumbass. She got 26 years. The actual murderer got 25. He's not American so that explains a lot.
                                              You should really start being nicer to people. Maybe you will get a friend.
                                              If you have a music site that sells digital downloads, please contact me.

                                              Comment

                                              • ShellyCrash
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Jun 2004
                                                • 6708

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by sortie
                                                No DNA, but a fingerprint matching Knox was on the victims face!

                                                The fingerprint was "embedded" IN THE VICTIMS FACE!!!!!!

                                                In other words; Knox pressed her hand so hard into the victims face that Knox's
                                                fingerprint molded into the victims skin and the skin did not reform to normal
                                                smoothness even after hours of death.
                                                This is not possible.

                                                I'm not saying there isn't an article out there that might have claimed that, but the claim itself is physically impossible.

                                                Stuff like this is one of the biggest problems I have with the case. There's so much BS put out there it's impossible to determine what the real facts are.

                                                Start making money with the hottest hookup site!
                                                up to $55 PPS or up to 75% Revshare
                                                ICQ 196766477

                                                Comment

                                                • EscortBiz
                                                  Fuck Checks, CASH only!
                                                  • May 2002
                                                  • 19422

                                                  #25
                                                  last week a man was set free after 35 years in jail, stories like these happen all the time, granted everyone in prison claims they are innocent but many truly are

                                                  Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING

                                                  Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts

                                                  ICQ# 158802076

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Young
                                                    Bland for life
                                                    • Nov 2004
                                                    • 10468

                                                    #26
                                                    Nobody buys bleach at 7:30am. PERIOD. The bitch is guilty. If she wasn't a cute American white girl and was some black chic from the ghetto instead....everyone in here would be singing a different tune.
                                                    ★★★

                                                    Comment

                                                    • sortie
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Mar 2007
                                                      • 7771

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by ShellyCrash
                                                      This is not possible.

                                                      I'm not saying there isn't an article out there that might have claimed that, but the claim itself is physically impossible.

                                                      Stuff like this is one of the biggest problems I have with the case. There's so much BS put out there it's impossible to determine what the real facts are.
                                                      Sorry, but you're full of shit now.

                                                      Do the following :

                                                      - Sit down and lean over your right knee
                                                      - place you index finger just before the knee cap on that knee
                                                      - place you other index finger on top of the first index finger
                                                      - now press down hard and hold your finger their for 60 seconds.
                                                      - Now look at your knee under some decent light

                                                      If you don't see a molded finger print on your knee then you are truly one weak person.

                                                      Try it, don't just talk shit about what's possible.
                                                      That's what's wrong with the case, people aren't looking at facts but
                                                      just spouting off shit without checking any of it out.

                                                      I just put a finger print on my knee with no problem.

                                                      So, it's you that's actually putting out bullshit on the case by saying this is impossible.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • ShellyCrash
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Jun 2004
                                                        • 6708

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by sortie
                                                        Sorry, but you're full of shit now.

                                                        Do the following :

                                                        - Sit down and lean over your right knee
                                                        - place you index finger just before the knee cap on that knee
                                                        - place you other index finger on top of the first index finger
                                                        - now press down hard and hold your finger their for 60 seconds.
                                                        - Now look at your knee under some decent light

                                                        If you don't see a molded finger print on your knee then you are truly one weak person.

                                                        Try it, don't just talk shit about what's possible.
                                                        That's what's wrong with the case, people aren't looking at facts but
                                                        just spouting off shit without checking any of it out.

                                                        I just put a finger print on my knee with no problem.

                                                        So, it's you that's actually putting out bullshit on the case by saying this is impossible.
                                                        Can you see the ridges of your fingerprint or just the outline of your finger?

                                                        Fingerprints are usually created by the oil on your hands transfering to surfaces you touch. Human skin has oils on it, it is also a porous surface, some of the prinicpals behind why you can't get a fingerprint off a face is behind why you can't pull a fingerprint off some types of leather.

                                                        If her actual fingerprint had been found on the girl's body I think the news reports would read alot differently. All I can find about the fingerprint are articles dated in the week or two following the murder claiming that cops "allege" to have found that, but nothing in any of the articles I've read from after the trial started reviewing the evidence against her.

                                                        Start making money with the hottest hookup site!
                                                        up to $55 PPS or up to 75% Revshare
                                                        ICQ 196766477

                                                        Comment

                                                        • sortie
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Mar 2007
                                                          • 7771

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by ShellyCrash
                                                          Can you see the ridges of your fingerprint or just the outline of your finger?

                                                          Fingerprints are usually created by the oil on your hands transfering to surfaces you touch. Human skin has oils on it, it is also a porous surface, some of the prinicpals behind why you can't get a fingerprint off a face is behind why you can't pull a fingerprint off some types of leather.

                                                          If her actual fingerprint had been found on the girl's body I think the news reports would read alot differently. All I can find about the fingerprint are articles dated in the week or two following the murder claiming that cops "allege" to have found that, but nothing in any of the articles I've read from after the trial started reviewing the evidence against her.

                                                          You're just stuck and won't move, giving you any facts doesn't matter.
                                                          You're no longer interested in facts you just need to be right.

                                                          Thank you for you non-scientific theory on finger prints but you'd be smarter to
                                                          stop thinking and just press a finger print into your own skin and look at.

                                                          My entire finger print shows on my knee. If you're skin is pale them back off the
                                                          light a little.

                                                          Read this brief article : http://www.forensicmag.com/articles.asp?pid=98

                                                          Comment

                                                          • PurrrsianPussyKat
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Jan 2004
                                                            • 2088

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by GatorB
                                                            Are you fucking retarded?

                                                            A) You don't know she's guilty the only evidence you know of is the one the Italian government wants to to believe that's all. Funny how people here don't trust our own government but trust one run by guidos.

                                                            B) they can't fry her because Italy doesn't have the death penalty.

                                                            C) She's already been sentenced dumbass. She got 26 years. The actual murderer got 25. He's not American so that explains a lot.
                                                            Oh that's right, I forgot. It's all a conspiracy! Don't forget to add an extra layer to your tin foil hat!

                                                            Just because she is american doesn't make her innocent DUMBASS!
                                                            Need a reliable, reasonably priced php programmer? Hit me up! 2934409

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Vendot
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • May 2002
                                                              • 3376

                                                              #31
                                                              I dunno much about this, but heres a video that Rudy Guede himself (who was convicted) posted on Youtube before he was convicted & jailed:

                                                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9P6KishWBA

                                                              Interesting viewing although....... I dont understand his message.
                                                              "In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act." - George Orwell

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Dood
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Dec 2003
                                                                • 353

                                                                #32
                                                                I don't remember hearing anything about Knox's fingerprint on Kercher's face.

                                                                Like ShellyCrash said, it's just an early report from the media and apparently the cops never confirmed it because there's no mention of it that I can find. If the fingerprint had been found then that would have played a major role in the prosecutions case but I don't think it was ever brought up.

                                                                If it is true, post a link cause I can't find it.
                                                                Traffic-Out
                                                                We sell quality text link clicked traffic

                                                                Comment

                                                                • ShellyCrash
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Jun 2004
                                                                  • 6708

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by sortie
                                                                  You're just stuck and won't move, giving you any facts doesn't matter.
                                                                  You're no longer interested in facts you just need to be right.

                                                                  Thank you for you non-scientific theory on finger prints but you'd be smarter to
                                                                  stop thinking and just press a finger print into your own skin and look at.

                                                                  My entire finger print shows on my knee. If you're skin is pale them back off the
                                                                  light a little.

                                                                  Read this brief article : http://www.forensicmag.com/articles.asp?pid=98
                                                                  Show me the facts, don't point me to some study on how lifting fingerprints off skin *might* work, show me an article written after the trial started about this fingerprint on a face.

                                                                  Actually, if anyone can point me to an article that lists all the evidence that was presented to the jury I would appreciate it. I've read a ton of the articles on BBC and the reporters there seem to be ust as confused about whats going on as I am.

                                                                  Start making money with the hottest hookup site!
                                                                  up to $55 PPS or up to 75% Revshare
                                                                  ICQ 196766477

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  Working...