GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Well, iBill fucked my ass good this week. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=94067)

FreeOnes 12-16-2002 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi


you have no idea... :1orglaugh

yes I do and just wrote it down

DarkJedi 12-16-2002 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeones


yes I do and just wrote it down

heh whatever

andi_germany 12-16-2002 05:41 AM

People here are so fucking hypocatic. Any of you who are bashing celeb sites please publish the URL of your 'leagal' website and I will name at least 10 laws that you are breaking. Free Porn is illegal, porn previews are illegal and so on. I won't even start with a list of countries you shouldn't travel to or you might be executed for what we all are doing.

Ok no to the ibill issue. I gotten the same from ibill and I have reacted. I send them emails of movie companies sending me content, I send them a lot of legal stuff but they still banned any site that has celeb in the domain. I kicked them from all my sites as soon as the notice came in and they are still processing my rebills. If they don't send out my payments for the rebills they will get sued due to fraud.

The problem I have that those people at ibill are totally unprofessional. I cannot talk to anyone in the legal departement by phone and those fucks don't answer emails. I have emails dating back as far as 1997 stateing that ibill has no problem with celebrity content. They better pay up or I will bring them more legal trouble than Norman Zadeh can.

IBill will be finished in the adult business because they suck ass when it comes to customer service. CCBill seems so much more sophisticated when it comes to that.

I will be using dutchbilling.com for now. I emailed them and they stated that they are ok with celebrity content. They are based in Holland and therefore US laws seem not to important to them.

Interlude 12-16-2002 12:32 PM

Let's see now... GloBill doesn't want my business apparently, and I fear the same for CCBill. Any suggestions, peeps? Looking into that 200charge.com place, any experiences with that?

FreeOnes 12-16-2002 12:44 PM

try to find a honest dialer company :Graucho to charge your visitors

SpeakEasy 12-16-2002 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Interlude
Let's see now... GloBill doesn't want my business apparently, and I fear the same for CCBill. Any suggestions, peeps? Looking into that 200charge.com place, any experiences with that?
May I suggest starting to practice these words,
"Welcome to McDonalds, may I take your order please?":1orglaugh

jimmyf 12-16-2002 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by prostock
i am wondering why no one would reply to me asking of them if they ever downloaed a mp3 or better yet MADE A CODY OF A VIDEO TAPE from the rental store

WHAT that is all ok ,, HUMM u think not if you can trash him for that then we all need to get al over your asss for that , i do not know one person that never done one of the two down load a mp3 or copy a video ,,


some people just need to learn to shut the fuck up and learn to help out some and not be such a DICK :( :BangBang:

you won't see them post shit prostock, because if they do it, it's ok. I've seen'em many time on this board asking what's the best to down load music with. And then turn around and jump on someone else for having some Non Lic. content or the Lic. is screwed up. This world is full of fucking bigots or maybe I should say fucking ass holes. And then you've got the 1's that really enjoy it when someone is down or needs some help, they love it.

p1mpdogg 12-16-2002 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimmyf
you won't see them post shit prostock, because if they do it, it's ok. I've seen'em many time on this board asking what's the best to down load music with. And then turn around and jump on someone else for having some Non Lic. content or the Lic. is screwed up. This world is full of fucking bigots or maybe I should say fucking ass holes. And then you've got the 1's that really enjoy it when someone is down or needs some help, they love it.
:)

jimmyf 12-16-2002 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by p1mpdogg


lol

I guess 85-90% of the ppl on this board are too huh?

This is correct... At least until they want something and use Kazaa to download it... then it's ok.

BVF 12-16-2002 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by andi_germany
I will be using dutchbilling.com for now. I emailed them and they stated that they are ok with celebrity content. They are based in Holland and therefore US laws seem not to important to them.
from their website:

To protect itself from unforeseen circumstances, DutchBilling will hold 10% of all transactions as a reseve for 6-months. This reserve covers DutchBilling in the event your site becomes unreachable, or there are other circumstances which will dramatically increase the potential for customer charge-backs or the need for customer refunds.
DutchBilling will charge USD 15.00 plus the value of the transaction per chargeback. A charge-back is an automatic debit of charges incurred plus an administrative fee by the merchant bank to compensate the issuing bank - which on behalf of a customer reversed a charge on that customer's credit card. There are a number of reasons a charge-back can occur. Most often it happens due to fraud.


that reserve is kinda high (10%..ccbill 5%) and they pass on the chargeback fees (ccbill doesn't)

However the fact that your money is being processed somewhere besides America is worth the extra cost.....

heqdvd 12-16-2002 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by [The Leader]



Mr. Skin is legally allowed to post the content he does. There are ways to get around celeb laws.

I think flashcash is ok,

but how is it legal to take screen shots of monster's ball?

I don't understand that... and about 10 other movies as well.


Surely the distributor doesn't allow screen shots to be sold to subscribers?

Paul Markham 12-16-2002 02:00 PM

The problem is that Ibill are worried, they are worried some celeb includes them in a legal suit. They have money and are worth linking to you in a case.

Plus they are worried that if this gets back to Visa and blows up it makes them look bad.

Let's face it the Internet is changing and this is part of it. It will not happen over night but it's on the way.

evildick 12-16-2002 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by heqdvd


I think flashcash is ok,

but how is it legal to take screen shots of monster's ball?

I don't understand that... and about 10 other movies as well.


Surely the distributor doesn't allow screen shots to be sold to subscribers?

What I have heard is that it has to do with laws regarding using the content for the purpose of review. For another example, think of video game sites taking screenshots of video games to review them.

I don't know if that is actually true, but I have seen a lot of people argue that point as being true.

tony286 12-16-2002 02:31 PM

Saying the people downloading mp3's for their own use is the same as selling content not licensed to you is insane. Now if I downloaded mp3's and burned them on cd and sold them then it would be the same thing. There is no comparing, its people that sell memberships to content they dont have a license give us all a bad name. I am not judging but some of us must be right when no third party processor wants to touch him, must say something.

<IMX> 12-16-2002 02:33 PM

andi_germany --

Every countries laws are different regarding porn.
Canada dif from US dif from Ger dif from Rus.

Interlude 12-16-2002 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
The problem is that Ibill are worried, they are worried some celeb includes them in a legal suit. They have money and are worth linking to you in a case.

Plus they are worried that if this gets back to Visa and blows up it makes them look bad.

Let's face it the Internet is changing and this is part of it. It will not happen over night but it's on the way.

You're probably right about that. What pisses me off is that the copyright holders themselves, the only ones with real legal recourse, are not going after celebrity sites. It's the celebrities themselves, who have no legal right to the pictures, who are doing the harassing. Because it's cheaper to shut down the celebrity sites than it is to hire lawyers to fight the cases, the processors just bend over and fuck us.

Those of you who produce content, think of it like this - you have your models sign releases so that YOU own the pictures. There's nothing wrong with YOU going after infringers, but think how pissed you'd be if the models starting making bogus claims to owning YOUR content. That's what's happening here.

Even if you wouldn't think of dealing with celebrity content, realize this - it's just a matter of time before some group or governmental agency starts threatening lawsuits over what they deem "obscene" content, and a lot of you will be up shit's creek even though they don't have a valid legal claim. You think iBill is going to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars defending people that sell S&M content? Young teen content? Bullshit. VISA is already sticking their nose in our business these days - don't think for a second that when the shit hits the fan they'll just pull the plug on what is really a very minor portion of their business.

So, back on topic, what processor should I go with? :)

Interlude 12-16-2002 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
Saying the people downloading mp3's for their own use is the same as selling content not licensed to you is insane. Now if I downloaded mp3's and burned them on cd and sold them then it would be the same thing. There is no comparing, its people that sell memberships to content they dont have a license give us all a bad name. I am not judging but some of us must be right when no third party processor wants to touch him, must say something.
I suppose the RIAA shutting down free file sharing networks, free CD cover archives and threatening Universities and the US military academies with lawsuits isn't the same thing then? Bullshit. They don't care, it's still a violation of copyright law.

Again though, I'm not arguing that the movie studios and magazines don't have the right to enforce their copyrights - legally, they do. Problem is, they're not doing this, the celebrities themselves are using intimidation techniques to scare processors into shutting down the sites when they have NO LEGAL RIGHT to do so. It's a nasty trend, and people should be fucking outraged over it, because one of these days the same technique is going to be used against everyone.

I don't know why I bother to keep saying this shit.

antigravityboy 12-17-2002 08:08 PM

I can tell you who is behing the whole thing. I have been dealing with the celeb issue behing the scenes for some time now. Perfect 10 is the one sending out all of the lawsuits.
They are the ones that caused adultcheck.com to pull all the celeb sites and are the ones suing Ibill and CCbill both.
So if you want somebody to rant and rave at turn your frustration to http://www.perfect10.com

SpeakEasy 12-17-2002 08:11 PM

You know an easy solution is to stop stealing other peoples Copyrighted work and using it illegally for your own profit??

sehns 12-17-2002 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gutterboy
Since I am in a generous mood tonight, and you didn't grasp the subtle hint that was dropped already, allow me to spell the solution out for you in 5 easy steps..

#1: Open Notepad

#2: Find typical licensing agreement legalese on Google

#3: Cut & paste legalese into notepad

#4: Insert relevant domain name + celeb name(s)

#5: Send to IBill

Very likely they are just looking for something to cover their own asses with, otherwise known as plausible deniability. If it doesn't work, you're in no worse shape than you were before.

:thumbsup

:GFYBand

Kimmykim 12-17-2002 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by antigravityboy
I can tell you who is behing the whole thing. I have been dealing with the celeb issue behing the scenes for some time now. Perfect 10 is the one sending out all of the lawsuits.
They are the ones that caused adultcheck.com to pull all the celeb sites and are the ones suing Ibill and CCbill both.
So if you want somebody to rant and rave at turn your frustration to http://www.perfect10.com


So I've heard as well. I wonder if Zadeh will actually produce a list of images that are in violation or if he's just hoping that his deep pockets will wear down the defendants.

You cannot cry copyright infringement on things you do not own the copyright to.

If I see pimpdogg breaking the fuck in your house and stealing shit, I can call the cops -- it is a criminal matter --

If I see pimpdogg using someones content and I know he didn't pay, I can't call the internet police or even fill out a DMCA on the owners behalf. All I can do is tell the owner and if he's not interested in pursuing it, that's all there is to it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123