Hacked emails show global warming fraud

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • onwebcam
    Fake Nick 1.0
    • Oct 2005
    • 27689

    #61
    Inhofe to call for hearing into CRU, U.N. climate change research

    http://www.infowars.com/inhofe-to-ca...ange-research/
    PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
    ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

    Comment

    • Dirty Dane
      Sick Fuck
      • Feb 2004
      • 9491

      #62
      I think some rich russian oil men got tired of the bullshit and hired some agents to do the dirty work. Hacking is not ok, but at least they found what they were looking for.

      Comment

      • papill0n
        Unregistered Abuser
        • Oct 2007
        • 15547

        #63
        Originally posted by onwebcam
        All bullshit. CO2 makes for warmer temperatures and said warmer temperatures will create more abundant life! They don't want more abundant life they want less life that's why they have been spraying chemicals out of airplanes for years blocking the sun and changing the weather! They want you dead so they can inhabit the Earth and not you!


        oh fuck this place is awesome

        Comment

        • onwebcam
          Fake Nick 1.0
          • Oct 2005
          • 27689

          #64
          Originally posted by papill0n
          oh fuck this place is awesome
          Let me guess. You don't want to believe in the spraying of chemicals over your head and that by doing so they are causing death and destruction?

          BEIJING -- Heavy snowfall in northern China is testing the country's disaster preparedness and prompting fresh questions about Beijing's efforts to alter its weather.

          A massive blizzard over the past week has dumped some of the heaviest snow in five decades on China's usually arid north, clogging highways and collapsing buildings in seven provinces. The storm, which began Monday, had caused at least $650 million in damage as of Friday afternoon and killed more than 40 people in traffic accidents or building collapses triggered by the snow and ice, the government said.

          http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125814710015847539.html

          BEIJING ? Unusually early snow storms in northern China have claimed 38 lives in weather-related incidents and caused more than half a billion dollars in damage, the Civil Affairs Ministry said Friday.

          Nineteen of the deaths resulted from traffic accidents related to the storms that began on Nov. 9, the ministry said in a news release posted on its Web site.

          The snowfall is the heaviest in the area since records began being taken following the establishment of the communist state in 1949, the ministry said. It estimated economic losses from the storm at 3.5 billion yuan (US$513 million).

          More than 4.7 million people have been affected by the storms, which have caused the collapse of more than 7,000 buildings, damaged 297,000 acres (120,000 hectares) of crops, and forced the evacuation of 158,000 people, the ministry said.

          http://www.google.com/hostednews/can...SdvlY2vWJ-s63g

          All a part of the fraud. The have been manipulating weather in the US, Canada, Australia and many other places for years.
          Last edited by onwebcam; 11-23-2009, 12:30 PM.
          PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
          ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

          Comment

          • CosmicTang
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2007
            • 1478

            #65
            Originally posted by onwebcam

            All a part of the fraud. The have been manipulating weather in the US, Canada, Australia and many other places for years.
            This is what I was wondering.
            ICQ: 456.689.835
            julian (at) orgasm (dot) com

            Comment

            • u-Bob
              there's no $$$ in porn
              • Jul 2005
              • 33063

              #66
              url to the zip?

              Comment

              • onwebcam
                Fake Nick 1.0
                • Oct 2005
                • 27689

                #67
                Originally posted by u-Bob
                url to the zip?
                http://www.megaupload.com/?d=U44FST89

                http://www.megaupload.com/?d=XD050VKY

                http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5171...s_(FOI2009.zip)
                PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                Comment

                • onwebcam
                  Fake Nick 1.0
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 27689

                  #68
                  Even the coder was in on the scam

                  Code:
                  function mkp2correlation,indts,depts,remts,t,filter=filter,refperiod=refperiod,$
                  datathresh=datathresh
                  ;
                  ; THIS WORKS WITH REMTS BEING A 2D ARRAY (nseries,ntime) OF MULTIPLE TIMESERIES
                  ; WHOSE INFLUENCE IS TO BE REMOVED. UNFORTUNATELY THE IDL5.4 p_correlate
                  ; FAILS WITH >1 SERIES TO HOLD CONSTANT, SO I HAVE TO REMOVE THEIR INFLUENCE
                  ; FROM BOTH INDTS AND DEPTS USING MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION AND THEN USE THE
                  ; USUAL correlate FUNCTION ON THE RESIDUALS.
                  ;
                  pro maps12,yrstart,doinfill=doinfill
                  ;
                  ; Plots 24 yearly maps of calibrated (PCR-infilled or not) MXD reconstructions
                  ; of growing season temperatures. Uses ?corrected? MXD ? but shouldn?t usually
                  ; plot past 1960 because these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to
                  ; the real temperatures.
                  ;

                  Code:
                  ;
                  ; Plots (1 at a time) yearly maps of calibrated (PCR-infilled or not) MXD
                  ; reconstructions
                  ; of growing season temperatures. Uses ?corrected? MXD ? but shouldn?t usually
                  ; plot past 1960 because these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to
                  ; the real temperatures.
                  http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/2...he-real-story/
                  PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                  ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                  Comment

                  • onwebcam
                    Fake Nick 1.0
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 27689

                    #69
                    Climate Change scam talking points leaked





                    Last edited by onwebcam; 11-23-2009, 06:08 PM.
                    PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                    ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                    Comment

                    • gleem
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2001
                      • 5593

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Darkland

                      I was merely stating that it is PROVEN FACT accepted by ALL scientists that the earth goes through climate cycles in connection with CO2 levels. They have traced back over 70,000 years, computing data taken from ice cores. It clearly shows cycles of warming and cooling trends each preceding higher or lower levels of CO2.
                      wrong, the only fact is they trend together, there isn't a scientist on earth that can prove that rising c02 causes temperatures to rise or the rising temperature causes the rise in c02.

                      Calling something a fact when it's not is the biggest reason why I believe and many others believe this is all hyped up to make money off cap and trade. Saying something is "undebatable" before a debate is complete even while people are debating the very issue INCLUDING scientist from around the word at the risk of being black balled from the rest of the community and the media is backwards.




                      Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

                      Comment

                      • Darkland
                        Confirmed User
                        • May 2002
                        • 1488

                        #71
                        Originally posted by gleem
                        wrong, the only fact is they trend together, there isn't a scientist on earth that can prove that rising c02 causes temperatures to rise or the rising temperature causes the rise in c02.

                        Calling something a fact when it's not is the biggest reason why I believe and many others believe this is all hyped up to make money off cap and trade. Saying something is "undebatable" before a debate is complete even while people are debating the very issue INCLUDING scientist from around the word at the risk of being black balled from the rest of the community and the media is backwards.
                        Well then you are clearly an idiot because what I said IS IN FACT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. I said the 2 were fucking connected and they are. When warming occurs the CO2 levels are always higher. Which came first the chicken or the egg? But even THAT is besides the point I WAS MAKING that over 70,000 years these "TRENDS" have proven cyclical.

                        Saying "in connection with" does not mean CAUSED BY or the RESULT OF. And look at that nifty word I used at the end of my post that you quoted. Holy shit... there it is "TRENDS".

                        I tell myself every time these debates come up to save it for my science and physics boards where intelligent debate can be had.

                        Read my other posts in this thread or any other from the past and you will ALSO SEE that I think this Man Made Global Warming is a crock of shit.


                        "The towers are gone now, reduced to bloody rubble, along with all hopes for Peace in Our Time, in the United States or any other country. Make no mistake about it: We are At War now -- with somebody -- and we will stay At War with that mysterious Enemy for the rest of our lives." H.S.T. 09/12/01

                        Comment

                        • Darkland
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2002
                          • 1488

                          #72
                          Originally posted by gleem
                          wrong, the only fact is they trend together, there isn't a scientist on earth that can prove that rising c02 causes temperatures to rise or the rising temperature causes the rise in c02.

                          Calling something a fact when it's not is the biggest reason why I believe and many others believe this is all hyped up to make money off cap and trade. Saying something is "undebatable" before a debate is complete even while people are debating the very issue INCLUDING scientist from around the word at the risk of being black balled from the rest of the community and the media is backwards.
                          I will also add that, aside from your inability to understand what I was saying, the post that you are quoting was not particularly ABOUT the correlation of climate warming or cooling in association with CO2 levels. It was about the cyclical climate change of Earth, whether it is cooling or warming, and that the only thing up for debate is if it is caused by man made CO2 versus a naturally occurring climate change in a natural cycle.

                          The remarks in that post were spawned by someone saying they were tired of hearing about the "cyclical nature" of climate change. And yes it is a proven fact that warming and cooling trends are repeating cycles on planet Earth.
                          Last edited by Darkland; 11-23-2009, 09:19 PM.


                          "The towers are gone now, reduced to bloody rubble, along with all hopes for Peace in Our Time, in the United States or any other country. Make no mistake about it: We are At War now -- with somebody -- and we will stay At War with that mysterious Enemy for the rest of our lives." H.S.T. 09/12/01

                          Comment

                          • katharos
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Nov 2005
                            • 1515

                            #73
                            its just a marketing hoax

                            Comment

                            • Darrah
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jun 2009
                              • 577

                              #74
                              Fraud? Hundreds of icebergs just broke from Antarctic and are now heading to New Zealand!!


                              http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091123...climateiceberg


                              Over 100 icebergs drifting to N.Zealand: official

                              Mon Nov 23

                              SYDNEY (AFP) ? More than 100, and possibly hundreds, of Antarctic icebergs are floating towards New Zealand in a rare event which has prompted a shipping warning, officials said on Monday.

                              An Australian Antarctic Division glaciologist said the ice chunks, spotted by satellite photography, had passed the Auckland Islands and were heading towards the main South Island, about 450 kilometres (280 miles) northeast.

                              Scientist Neal Young said more than 100 icebergs -- some measuring more than 200 metres (650 feet) across -- were seen in just one cluster, indicating there could be hundreds more.

                              He said they were the remains of a massive ice floe which split from the Antarctic as sea and air temperatures rise due to global warming.

                              "All of these have come from a larger one that was probably 30 square kilometres (11.6 square miles) in size when it left Antarctica," Young told AFP.

                              "It's done a long circuit around Antarctica and now the bigger parts of it are breaking up and producing smaller ones."

                              He said large numbers of icebergs had not floated this close to New Zealand since 2006, when a number came within 25 kilometres of the coastline -- the first such sighting since 1931.

                              "They're following the same tracks now up towards New Zealand. Whether they make it up to the South Island or not is difficult to tell," Young said.

                              New Zealand has already issued coastal navigation warnings for the area in the Southern Ocean where the icebergs have been seen.

                              "It's really just a general warning for shipping in that area to be on the alert for icebergs," said Maritime New Zealand spokesman Ross Henderson.

                              The icebergs are smaller remnants of the giant chunks seen off Australia's Macquarie Island this month, including one estimated at two kilometres (1.2 miles) and another twice the size of Beijing's "Bird's Nest" Olympic Stadium.

                              Young earlier told AFP he expected to see more icebergs in the area if the Earth's temperature continues to increase.

                              "If the current trends in global warming were to continue I would anticipate seeing more icebergs and the large ice shelves breaking up," he said.

                              When icebergs last neared New Zealand in 2006, a sheep was helicoptered out to be shorn on one of the floes in a publicity stunt by the country's wool industry.

                              Comment

                              • maxjohan
                                Confirmed User
                                • Dec 2002
                                • 7219

                                #75
                                The Real Deal.



                                1979-2009

                                BINGO
                                I went from 100 to 313,000 satoshis in 2 days! Lots of daily freerolls...

                                Comment

                                Working...