Hacked emails show global warming fraud

Really? The biggest fraud in history? Ok.

Dude they are/were getting ready to tax pretty much everything under the sun with this scam. Change and manipulate our entire society with it.

I presume you are referring to Saddam Hussein who convinced the *world* he had WMD to intimidate Iran, a country he feared and had fought in a bloody 8 year war.

sad thing is people are going to fall for this spin.... out of context, cherry picking, no proof global warming is hoax, no big deal...


As this guy summerized, it's a big deal..
“Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more” was revealed in the 61 megabites of confidential files released on the Internet for anyone to read
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/a...hadley_hacked/

So you're saying that the actual experts saying the stolen stuff is out of context, is actually spin?

So the tail IS wagging the dog, lol.

If you stole 61 megs of my emails, you could "prove" I was the devil himself I'm sure.

Time will tell wont it?

50 bullshit global conspiracies....

There's plenty of proof. It was all being denied and controlled by these people. The scientists disproving it all were losing their jobs getting their lives ruined for going against what these people were saying. These emails prove that they were doing all of this. They admit that they are real emails and documents showing their manipulation, lies, fraud, conspiracy, treason, scams, etc. But because the majority trusted in and believed that these people were actually doing things to "save them" from this BS rather than creating a entirely new system of tax and government where one of the very founding elements of all life on earth would be taxed. Literally the air you breathe would be taxed. They could use this to control anyone and anything they wanted.

Lol yep, time will tell. I'm ok with that. I dont care if someone drives an SUV over a spotted owl or snail darter, I'll just choose not to do it myself. No biggy.

Here ... fixed !

Top experts at NASA arent different from experts at the Climate Research Unit.... It's agenda driven, it's corrupt, if you don't want to play ball you don't get in... So those guys are defending themselves..

I read the treaty that is going to be debated in Copenhagen. It provides a governing body (those are the words used) to which all countries are bound regarding environmental policy. Furthermore, it provides for a system of redistributing wealth by way of a "climate debt" so that developed nations will pay undeveloped nations for past, present and future energy consumption.

When you combine that with this new information that looks like the mainstream opinion on global warming has been carefully crafted and dissenting opinions have been suppressed and the catalyst for this movement is a former VP of the US who stands to gain BILLIONS from the green movement you have to admit that while you may not be able to see the fire just yet there is some smoke.

So you know the FACT that CO2 levels affects the earth's temperature as determined by scientists computing data taken from ice samples tracing back 70,000 years. I believe that as well.

Doesn't their data show a dramatic rise in CO2 levels in the past 100 years compared to the 70,000 years before that. Can you see all the things man has introduced in the last 100 years that emit CO2 into the atmosphere like cars and factories and cow farts and furthering the balance by things like deforestation. None of which existed the 70,000 years before that.

Simply put, the earth progressed for millions of years and went through it's cycle of changes. In the last 100 years mankind became industrialized and in doing so introduced things to the environment that has a very good chance of destroying it.

If we built enough buildings that did nothing but pump CO2 into the atmosphere I'm sure that ALL scientists would agree that would soon make the planet uninhabitable. There are things all around us now that emit CO2. The question is just how much can we get away with. Hopefully credible science will find the answer in time.

My gripe is some people just pass this off as being cyclical.

well said justinsain , good to see a little intelligence in this thread

Thanks, I was beginning to feel like the guy in your avatar

All bullshit. CO2 makes for warmer temperatures and said warmer temperatures will create more abundant life! They don't want more abundant life they want less life that's why they have been spraying chemicals out of airplanes for years blocking the sun and changing the weather! They want you dead so they can inhabit the Earth and not you!