Of course I understand "truthers" But the truthers label should be changed to "Honesty".
It's more testimonial as to why the constitution should be FOLLOWED and not TRASHED.

Our forefathers would roll over in their graves today.

We need back to the constitution. To the LETTER.

Sticky I hate to tell ya man. The courts nor are our supposed leaders doing much of anything within the boundaries of the Constitution if you can tell. It's mostly all "statutes" in admiralty/maritime under the War Powers Act of 1933. Which they claim to be in line with the constitution. They just create the illusion they are staying within it in reality.

Someone needs to mark this thread with a TROLL ALERT.

No such thing as real men anymore. We're witnessing the downfall of American society.

Why? because some don't have spam or AFF referral code in their sig?

I know you're the King of c/p, but perhaps you should take some of your own advice rather than your rampant spreading of misinformation. I should not have to do your research for you.

Well I guess the feeling is mutual :) I've spent loads of time doing my own research. Once again you can't just pick out one thing and claim it's all not true. The whole point is to get others to realize that there's been years of deception and everyone needs to start figuring that out and doing their own research..

For what it's worth the are many countries with more 'LIBERTY', free speech and freedom that don't use a very old piece of paper to justify it. The US sadly just has the illusion of freedom in many areas these days. Whilst undoubtably there are countries less liberated, the US is far from the top of the pile when it comes to freedom of anything.

I never said all of it was untrue, but adding something into a post claiming you've researched it when clearly you haven't takes away from the validity and credibility of the rest of the post(s). I'm sure if I took a few minutes I could easily find evidence of other invalid claims, but again, I'm not going to do your research for you.

If the point is to get people to realize there's deception afoot, providing deceptive/untrue/false information is a pretty poor way to prove your point.

What I said was

"I would be willing to bet that most (including you) are more clueless than you could ever imagine.

An example"

Not, "hey I've verified everything here and it's all facts" In fact I cut out a lot of shit from the original myself which went astray.. That's the problem these days. A lot of the truth is being distorted by non-truths so exactly what happened there could happen and it all be dismissed. Which is why I did "some editing before posting it. :thumbsup

BTW it's all a good read

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22790849/T...S-Constitution