Sweet Entertainment Group Busted

KB, why on earth do you refer to Lightspeed in pretty much every post you've made on the subject?

I don't see the relevance of what Steve does compared to what the Sweets do -- Lightspeed isn't in Canada, they don't have fetish sites, they most likely have cleared what they do shoot with their attorney, so your parallel is more like a perpendicular line...

And as for some people comments on the Sweets situation, there's a saying my granny has, it goes like this -- 'there but for the grace of God go I'...

Other companies in this industry have come under fire for various reasons, big US government bodies have come after them, the cc companies are cracking down on everyone due to some people's actions, shit happens. There is a reason this business is called high risk, and if you can't stomach it then get out.

The hypocrisy is just too fucking funny.

Pipe-Squeek you're working hard at being a smart ass again.

I don't plan on retiring anytime soon! And that has nothing to do with Sweet.

Dood I could beat you down in 5 mins! haha

I for once agree with KB. He is actually making alot of sense today!

People who stick their necks out too far, eventually get it chopped off. I am sure Sweets are just the first to run into some legal problems. Lightspeed does what they do with the pigtails, and such.

I am not passing judgment, but I would imagine it could cause them some problems in the future. I know our lawyer says no pig tails, no portraying models to look under 18, even if they are 80.

If they've seized all their computers, I wonder what else will be found on those machines....

hopefully all the SWEET computers have licensed software....

Exactly - its really funny to see all the shit coming out of peoples mouths now.

Exactly.....

Paul,

You should probably talk to your lawyer before continuing to use this forum as a platform to voice your opinions about this matter.

If the police are smart, they'll be searching forums like this, and you'll be accountable for everything that is said...

What the Sweet Entertainment Group produces and what is allowed by the CRTC (our FTC) are not in anywhere near the same ballpark.

Interesting how different US states define obscenity. Some are strictly Miller test, like Arizona. Some are not, like Kentucky, Texas and Mississippi are quite concerned with distribution of obscene materials. Some, like Montana and New Mexico don't have any obscenity laws.

http://www.moralityinmedia.org/nolc/...tutesIndex.htm

Everyone please read this again. There are NO....let me repeat that N O rape charges.

Also there are No....N O charges for
- fisting
-pissing
- degradation


There are 2 charges on 3 scenes in our BDSM feed SadoSlaves. Each of those scenes involves Needles/piercings on the girls.

None of our content features Rape or girls being held against their will - besides the fact that they are tied up. Lets go over that again. No Rape. No rape is depicted.

There is no dialogue of a girl begging to be let go, they never say "NO" - in all our footage this is true. In the BDSM footage they cry and scream. Thats in the script. Most of the "torture" devices are fake - just like Bangbus...its a script. The electric cattle prod is a toy, the wax candles are made of the same wax ladies use to wax their legs, etc.....the fact that people are shocked by it is the point. Its just like when you go to a movie and you believe that someone is bruised or injured. THey aren't really.

You don't have to like BDSM. But BDSM has existed for a very, very long time, well before people used a term like "porn" and respresents a lifestyle between two CONSENTING adults. There are safe words involved so people no when the line is being crossed. Do some research on BDSM if you know nothing on it but feel the need to babble on unfettered.

Thats our stance and we believe in it. And we're going to fight for that right in court if need be.

If what you say above is true, then you are 100% correct.

Fantasy is legal.

Fight it.

I can't believe the amount of bullshit posts on this thread. Ya the Sweets pushed the envelope, but hey we all take risks in this biz every day. It's the people who take the risks in the first place to pave the way. No doubt the Sweets will prevail and have probably already been well prepared for this day.

Paul tell Steve and Jamie I wish them the best of luck.

And you're going to lose.

Arguing that community standards need to be changed won't get you anywhere except into the poor house. Enjoy the 5 year supreme court battle.

Sweet's defense is that community standards have changed. He's all over the map on what his defense actually is....and the fact that he is claiming to continue to produce work in Amsterdam will win him no support - isnt the same place that allows kiddie porn?

Sweet produces content that is illegal in British Columbia. This is the jurisdiction in which they operate a business. The police have the SWEET computers. They have all the evidence they need.