GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Roman Polanski arrested. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=930270)

Cyber Fucker 09-28-2009 08:58 AM

Btw. there is one more interesting fact about this - what's going on in Switzerland. Switzerland used to be a neutral ground and it looks like it is not anymore. Now any government can fuck u there and your bank accounts too. The phrase "Swiss bank" means nothing more like just a bank from now. Swiss banks privacy is gone :glugglug

cykoe6 09-28-2009 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 16367024)
Just ask Plaxico Burress, sometimes being famous in this country can fuck you when someone sees an opportunity to make a stand.

People do two years on Rikers for illegal possession of a firearms all the time (NYC has very draconian gun laws with very harsh sentences). All that happened with Buresss is that he got the sentence anyone else would have gotten instead of the usual celebrity discount.

Sarah_Jayne 09-28-2009 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbwebmaster (Post 16367000)
He not quite raped her because she said she wanted him. Anyway, I agree that what he did was not right and he should get some punishment.


If, and I say if, the reports of booze and drugs being involved are true. Do you then take it that a 13 year old can consent?

JP513 09-28-2009 10:22 AM

He's slimeball. The girl was only 13 for pete's sake!

kane 09-28-2009 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16366532)
Ok get some facts straight

"The director pleaded guilty in 1977 to a single count of having unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, acknowledging he had sex with a 13-year-old girl."

That totally different that saying

"pleaded guilty to having unlawful sex with a minor when he gave booze and drugs to a 13 year old and then had sex with her"

The DA said he drugged and raped her. And if they had a case why give him a plea deal that had no jail time except for the 42 days he already served?

Why would he make a plea deal? Because the guy is/was a celebrity and had/has a lot of money plus it sounds like the girl in the case wasn't going to be very co-operative so getting a full on conviction might have been difficult.

After making my original post I then made a second post stating that there were questionable things going on in the case. Still, the guy had a sesx with a 13 year old, it isn't like he an innocent person who is getting railroaded.

He should be brought back here, they should look into the case and see what happened and then decide the best legal course of action from there. If that ends up being that he get let go, so be it. If that ends up meaning he goes back on trial so be it.

TheDoc 09-28-2009 12:25 PM

The guy 76 today, if he did this 30 years ago he would be 46.

At the age of 46 he had sex with a 13 year old.

The guy is pedophile and should be treated as such..

O MARINA 09-28-2009 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 16366268)
time to face the music.



YES why so long

jimmycastor 09-28-2009 02:37 PM

bs, this is nonsense, polanski is a brilliant artist, his pregnant wife was shoot and killed by charles manson and he had a very bad time afterwards (when the stuff with the girl happend..)

nowadays
he just makes genious movies (real movies, not the usual bingo bango ) and this is story is just old bs .god i hope he is free soon

TheDA 09-28-2009 02:38 PM

I wonder why they waited until Saturday to arrest him.

Was it really that the Swiss succumbed to the pressure from the US over the UBS bank stuff do you think?

GatorB 09-28-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 16366928)
To the people defending Polanski.......... would he have any supporters if he was just some local loser who had tricked a 13 year old into having sex with him? No one would dare defend him. He would do his 10 years and suffer the consequences and then come out and be a registered sex offender for life and everyone would scream in unison that he should have his balls cut off, be killed in some gruesome fashion, etc.

The double standards we have for celebrities in our culture makes me sick to my stomach. :disgust

Listen he didn't "trick" anyone. She was a whore. Now does that mean it's ok for him to fuck her? No he was nearly 40. But she was hardly a "innocent victim". Also she appeared to be older than 13. Angelica Houston was in the house the night in question and said the girl looked 25. Now did he know she was 13 or not? Also where was this girl parents letting her stay at a 39 year old man's house at night?

Fact is the DA made a deal and should abide by it. Like it or not. The deal was for no extra time. Want to give him some time for running off, fine. If he went to trial 30 years ago he'd gotten less time then he would today, if any. The fact is even the "victim" wants this to be dropped and in the end if the victim doesn't want it to go further it's none of the DAs fucking business. She already sued Polanski and she got a nice big check in an out of court settlement. So it's over.

Obviously you think he's a pedo and by your comments those that you think "support" him make you sick. So by inference you are saying we support pedophilia. Accusing someon of that is a BANNABLE offense on this board. So I'd fucking check your ass right fucking now.

O MARINA 09-28-2009 03:42 PM

----50----

Robbie 09-28-2009 03:44 PM

I hear that next they are going to go dig up Elvis and arrest him for fucking Lisa Marie when she was 15. Then they will be picking up Jerry Lee Lewis for marrying his teen cousin.

Then they will be digging up all the graves of our great-great grandfathers and arresting them for fucking our underage great-great grandmothers.

Ringo Starr is currently under investigation for the song: "Your 16, Your Beautiful, And Your Mine" from the 1970's as well.

About time we cleaned this shit up once and for all.

GatorB 09-28-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmycastor (Post 16368256)
bs, this is nonsense, polanski is a brilliant artist, his pregnant wife was shoot and killed by charles manson and he had a very bad time afterwards (when the stuff with the girl happend..)

Actually his wife was STABBED( 16 times ) to death and was 8 1/2 months pregnant. Manson actually never killed any of those people he just told people too. Susan Atkins actually killed Tate. She died of brian cancer just 2 days before Polanski was arrested. Like I said nice timming Swiss cops.

TheDoc 09-28-2009 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16368441)
I hear that next they are going to go dig up Elvis and arrest him for fucking Lisa Marie when she was 15. Then they will be picking up Jerry Lee Lewis for marrying his teen cousin.

Then they will be digging up all the graves of our great-great grandfathers and arresting them for fucking our underage great-great grandmothers.

Ringo Starr is currently under investigation for the song: "Your 16, Your Beautiful, And Your Mine" from the 1970's as well.

About time we cleaned this shit up once and for all.

Are any of these men 46 years old, sleeping with a 13 year old?

My grandmother was very young, but so was my grandfather. Same with my parents and even my great grand parents. All young, but the male damn sure wasn't 46.

xxxjay 09-28-2009 04:02 PM

It took long enough. Fate has been chasing that guy for a while.

TheDA 09-28-2009 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 16368480)
It took long enough. Fate has been chasing that guy for a while.

Exactly, I don't understand why they decided to go after him now.

kane 09-28-2009 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 16368486)
Exactly, I don't understand why they decided to go after him now.

I think they have wanted him for some time, just didn't want to spend a lot of time and money to get him. A few years ago when he won the Academy Award for The Pianist he had lawyers ask if he would be allowed to come into the US for 24 hours and not be arrested and he was told no. He knew if he came here he would be arrested. So I think they have wanted to get him for a while, but wanted to be a situation where they didn't put forth a lot of resources to do it.

GatorB 09-28-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16368469)
Are any of these men 46 years old, sleeping with a 13 year old?

No Elvis was 24 fucking 14 year old. Which today would get you several yeas in prison and put on a sex offendeers list.

Quote:

My grandmother was very young, but so was my grandfather. Same with my parents and even my great grand parents. All young, but the male damn sure wasn't 46.
Actually 100 years ago it wasn't uncommon for a Civil War vet in his 60s to marry a 15 or 16 year old.

heymatty 09-28-2009 04:33 PM

Her testimony is on smoking gun.

Agent 488 09-28-2009 04:36 PM

manson is laughing in his cell.

TheDoc 09-28-2009 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16368508)
No Elvis was 24 fucking 14 year old. Which today would get you several yeas in prison and put on a sex offendeers list.



Actually 100 years ago it wasn't uncommon for a Civil War vet in his 60s to marry a 15 or 16 year old.


While not as bad... Elvis was a Pedo either way.

Many of the people 100 years ago, were racist, sexist, assholes that forced anything they thought was morally correct onto others. Just because it happened in the past, doesn't make it correct.

Most men, would gladly take some young fresh pussy over old pussy that has spit out 10 kids out if they knew they could get away with it.

Robbie 09-28-2009 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16368606)
Most men, would gladly take some young fresh pussy over old pussy that has spit out 10 kids out if they knew they could get away with it.

I'd actually enjoy a bit of both. :1orglaugh

Getting some 16 and 17 year old pussy used to be a good thing. I'm 47 and if I met a 16 year old with the body of a pamela anderson and a fake id...I don't think I'd hesitate to drill it.

Hell, I probably fucked tons of them across the country. I was playing in my rock bands...and I'm pretty sure that a good number of the girls in the clubs in Daytona & Ft. Lauderdale during Spring Break in the 1980's were sporting fake ids.

Of course I didn't require ID when I banged those young whores in the band house at 4 a.m. drunk off my ass.

But the pussy sure was good!

sysk 09-28-2009 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piernik (Post 16366425)

I was about to make the same call :p

TheDoc 09-28-2009 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16368637)
I'd actually enjoy a bit of both. :1orglaugh

Getting some 16 and 17 year old pussy used to be a good thing. I'm 47 and if I met a 16 year old with the body of a pamela anderson and a fake id...I don't think I'd hesitate to drill it.

Hell, I probably fucked tons of them across the country. I was playing in my rock bands...and I'm pretty sure that a good number of the girls in the clubs in Daytona & Ft. Lauderdale during Spring Break in the 1980's were sporting fake ids.

Of course I didn't require ID when I banged those young whores in the band house at 4 a.m. drunk off my ass.

But the pussy sure was good!


Old man :) 16/17 is fresh..... 13, not so much.

Robbie 09-28-2009 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16368651)
Old man :) 16/17 is fresh..... 13, not so much.

Yeah, 13 is getting pretty creepy. :disgust

katharos 09-28-2009 05:10 PM

lol ... and eight dot .

cykoe6 09-28-2009 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16368427)
Listen he didn't "trick" anyone. She was a whore.

A young confused 13 year old girl is not a "whore" but a "victim". If her mother is pimpin her out then that makes it even more horrible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16368427)
Obviously you think he's a pedo and by your comments those that you think "support" him make you sick. So by inference you are saying we support pedophilia. Accusing someon of that is a BANNABLE offense on this board. So I'd fucking check your ass right fucking now.

You have officially established yourself as the biggest idiot on the board with these absolutely absurd comments. Go to the mods and plead your case. I accuse you of being the dumbest fuck on this board. I can prove it by quoting any one of your idiotic posts. :1orglaugh

Danny B 09-28-2009 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 16366965)
If it is okay to sleep with a 13 year old because she had already had sex then I suppose you can't rape a porn star either.

Nice one Sarah :1orglaugh

But seriously, imho if you do the crime you do the time.
Off to jail with him.

D Ghost 09-28-2009 08:09 PM

It's probably gonna be dropped

The Judge 09-28-2009 10:45 PM

If indeed this 13 year old had numerous affairs with older men (which I seriously doubt) why did he then need to give her drugs to fuck her? If she was such a slut she would have fucked without him drugging her wouldn't she? The reasons she had 'forgiven' him was the large settlement she got to drop the civil case. Who knows how many other children he did this to that did not come forward.

PS 1. he admitted to cheating on Sharon Tate with other women during her pregnancy.
PS 2. he is member of the dominating ethnic minority
PS 3. he is a midget and a control freak
PS 4. he is going to walk away from this, just wait and see


Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 16366708)
Sleeping with a 13 year old is WRONG, but the facts in this case are being completely twisted.



This is true. A plea agreement was reached between the defense and the DA, Polanski served time in prison, and then the day of his release the judge pulled out at the last minute and wanted to add more time to Polanski's sentence.

The reason the DA was so quick to come to a plea agreement with Polanski is because of the character issues with the victim. The 13 year old model Polanski took photos of and later had sex with was not a virigin, and in fact had slept with numerous other adult men, also photographers. Prior to the charges the girl's mother was aware her daughter drank, smoked pot and had affairs with adult men. Huge credibility issues there :2 cents:

I keep reading these stories that Polanski just skipped town when faced with the charges and it's complete bullshit. Polanski did everything the DA asked him to, he only skipped town when his plea bargain was renegged- after he had served the time requested.

Even the original prosecuter in the case has called for the charges to be dropped and has publically admitted that what happened to Polanski after he served his time was a criminal miscarrage of justice on the part of the presiding judge.


Sarah_Jayne 09-29-2009 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 16368790)
A young confused 13 year old girl is not a "whore" but a "victim". If her mother is pimpin her out then that makes it even more horrible.


Thank you!

Fletch XXX 09-29-2009 07:02 AM

fact: i am 33 and if i got any one of your 13 year old daughters drunk and fucked her, youd want to see me in jail way longer than some 40 day hotel stay. LOL

the double standard applied to these fucking celeb directors astounds me, let some creep off the street do this at 25 and most people would want him hung, but oh noes, its some fucking director, royalty my ass, let him swing.

V_RocKs 09-29-2009 07:23 AM

I think he is a dick...

Nature on the other hand supports him... Think about it... and why most non-civilized cultures consider 18 to be "old"...

ShellyCrash 09-29-2009 08:21 AM

If he raped this girl against her will, especially if he fucked her in the ass as she stated in one version of her story, then they would have charged him with raping a child. Why didn't they?

Why did the mother choose to pursue charges only against Polanski and not any of the other photographers her daughter had slept with? Or men who had given her daughter drugs?

And to my mind most importantly to the mother- if you know your underage daughter does drugs and has sex with adult male photographers why keep sending her out ALONE with adult men?

The story kept changing, the girl admitted she consented to having sex with him, other people had said she lied about her age (said she was 15 which is an average age of consent in many european countries), and evidence came out that she had been having sex and doing drugs with other adult men and that the mother had full knowledge of this and had done nothing about it or to prevent it from recurring (as long as the money's right). All this shit together made it a sticky case for the DA, so they lowered the charges and pled him out.

Polanski likes to fuck young girls, he makes no bones about it and tries to spear as many 15 year olds as he can, but that's legal in France. Do I think that's sick, Yes- yes I do. I wouldn't let him around my family.

Everyone keeps saying "If this had been your daughter...", but it wouldn't be my daughter because I wouldn't let this shit happen. Her mother, knowing the daughter'sd pattern of behavior, sent her daughter out yet again with another adult man unsupervised, not just once but twice. God forbid I wind up with a little lolita, but if I do, I damn sure won't be sending her out unsupervised to go get fucked and get fucked up with adult men.

Fletch XXX 09-29-2009 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 16370321)
If he raped this girl against her will, especially if he fucked her in the ass as she stated in one version of her story, then they would have charged him with raping a child. Why didn't they?

Why did the mother choose to pursue charges only against Polanski and not any of the other photographers her daughter had slept with? Or men who had given her daughter drugs?

And to my mind most importantly to the mother- if you know your underage daughter does drugs and has sex with adult male photographers why keep sending her out ALONE with adult men?

The story kept changing, the girl admitted she consented to having sex with him, other people had said she lied about her age (said she was 15 which is an average age of consent in many european countries), and evidence came out that she had been having sex and doing drugs with other adult men and that the mother had full knowledge of this and had done nothing about it or to prevent it from recurring (as long as the money's right). All this shit together made it a sticky case for the DA, so they lowered the charges and pled him out.

Polanski likes to fuck young girls, he makes no bones about it and tries to spear as many 15 year olds as he can, but that's legal in France. Do I think that's sick, Yes- yes I do. I wouldn't let him around my family.

Everyone keeps saying "If this had been your daughter...", but it wouldn't be my daughter because I wouldn't let this shit happen. Her mother, knowing the daughter'sd pattern of behavior, sent her daughter out yet again with another adult man unsupervised, not just once but twice. God forbid I wind up with a little lolita, but if I do, I damn sure won't be sending her out unsupervised to go get fucked and get fucked up with adult men.

thats all good, but can we at least admit that if it was any joe off the street, hed be getting fucked in the ass in prison while we type this? :1orglaugh

Sarah_Jayne 09-29-2009 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 16370321)
If he raped this girl against her will, especially if he fucked her in the ass as she stated in one version of her story, then they would have charged him with raping a child. Why didn't they?

Why did the mother choose to pursue charges only against Polanski and not any of the other photographers her daughter had slept with? Or men who had given her daughter drugs?

And to my mind most importantly to the mother- if you know your underage daughter does drugs and has sex with adult male photographers why keep sending her out ALONE with adult men?

The story kept changing, the girl admitted she consented to having sex with him, other people had said she lied about her age (said she was 15 which is an average age of consent in many european countries), and evidence came out that she had been having sex and doing drugs with other adult men and that the mother had full knowledge of this and had done nothing about it or to prevent it from recurring (as long as the money's right). All this shit together made it a sticky case for the DA, so they lowered the charges and pled him out.

Polanski likes to fuck young girls, he makes no bones about it and tries to spear as many 15 year olds as he can, but that's legal in France. Do I think that's sick, Yes- yes I do. I wouldn't let him around my family.

Everyone keeps saying "If this had been your daughter...", but it wouldn't be my daughter because I wouldn't let this shit happen. Her mother, knowing the daughter'sd pattern of behavior, sent her daughter out yet again with another adult man unsupervised, not just once but twice. God forbid I wind up with a little lolita, but if I do, I damn sure won't be sending her out unsupervised to go get fucked and get fucked up with adult men.

Oh, I have no problem with the mother doing jail time too if she allowed it to happen. It doesn't make him any less guilty and the girl any less a victim of at least one person, if not two.

dirkpeddler 09-29-2009 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmycastor (Post 16368256)
bs, this is nonsense, polanski is a brilliant artist, his pregnant wife was shoot and killed by charles manson and he had a very bad time afterwards (when the stuff with the girl happend..)

nowadays
he just makes genious movies (real movies, not the usual bingo bango ) and this is story is just old bs .god i hope he is free soon

And I guess that makes what he did, right? I didn't realize this 13 year old could be held accountable for what happened to Polanski before he raped a 13 year old, made a plea bargain, confessing to it. If he's so innocnet, with the kind of money he has, he could have easily afford a lawyer clearing his name, long before he finally got arrested.

sperbonzo 09-29-2009 10:17 AM

It's somewhat ironic that last week Poland voted in some of the harshest anti-pedo laws in the EU and yet they are all yelling "He is an artist, let him go!"


I guess that if you are a popular artist of some type, then you are above the law in Poland....


.

cwd 09-29-2009 10:38 AM

I still don't understand why now? This is a guy who has traveled to England, Denmark, Sweeden, Canada, Israel, Brazil, Germany...its not like he was hiding out somewhere. I wonder too, if this was not a well known celebrity, would the US authorities still be invovled in the case? I mean, if this was a regular guy, in the same senario, and the victim no longer wants anything to do with the case would all this legal manuevering be going on? This has got to cost quite a lot and if it was not a celebrity,would it be happening?

TheDA 09-29-2009 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwd (Post 16370737)
I still don't understand why now? This is a guy who has traveled to England, Denmark, Sweeden, Canada, Israel, Brazil, Germany...its not like he was hiding out somewhere. I wonder too, if this was not a well known celebrity, would the US authorities still be invovled in the case? I mean, if this was a regular guy, in the same senario, and the victim no longer wants anything to do with the case would all this legal manuevering be going on? This has got to cost quite a lot and if it was not a celebrity,would it be happening?

He's travelled to Switzerland before this as well - he owns a home their :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123