GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Roman Polanski arrested. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=930270)

O MARINA 09-28-2009 03:42 PM

----50----

Robbie 09-28-2009 03:44 PM

I hear that next they are going to go dig up Elvis and arrest him for fucking Lisa Marie when she was 15. Then they will be picking up Jerry Lee Lewis for marrying his teen cousin.

Then they will be digging up all the graves of our great-great grandfathers and arresting them for fucking our underage great-great grandmothers.

Ringo Starr is currently under investigation for the song: "Your 16, Your Beautiful, And Your Mine" from the 1970's as well.

About time we cleaned this shit up once and for all.

GatorB 09-28-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmycastor (Post 16368256)
bs, this is nonsense, polanski is a brilliant artist, his pregnant wife was shoot and killed by charles manson and he had a very bad time afterwards (when the stuff with the girl happend..)

Actually his wife was STABBED( 16 times ) to death and was 8 1/2 months pregnant. Manson actually never killed any of those people he just told people too. Susan Atkins actually killed Tate. She died of brian cancer just 2 days before Polanski was arrested. Like I said nice timming Swiss cops.

TheDoc 09-28-2009 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16368441)
I hear that next they are going to go dig up Elvis and arrest him for fucking Lisa Marie when she was 15. Then they will be picking up Jerry Lee Lewis for marrying his teen cousin.

Then they will be digging up all the graves of our great-great grandfathers and arresting them for fucking our underage great-great grandmothers.

Ringo Starr is currently under investigation for the song: "Your 16, Your Beautiful, And Your Mine" from the 1970's as well.

About time we cleaned this shit up once and for all.

Are any of these men 46 years old, sleeping with a 13 year old?

My grandmother was very young, but so was my grandfather. Same with my parents and even my great grand parents. All young, but the male damn sure wasn't 46.

xxxjay 09-28-2009 04:02 PM

It took long enough. Fate has been chasing that guy for a while.

TheDA 09-28-2009 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 16368480)
It took long enough. Fate has been chasing that guy for a while.

Exactly, I don't understand why they decided to go after him now.

kane 09-28-2009 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 16368486)
Exactly, I don't understand why they decided to go after him now.

I think they have wanted him for some time, just didn't want to spend a lot of time and money to get him. A few years ago when he won the Academy Award for The Pianist he had lawyers ask if he would be allowed to come into the US for 24 hours and not be arrested and he was told no. He knew if he came here he would be arrested. So I think they have wanted to get him for a while, but wanted to be a situation where they didn't put forth a lot of resources to do it.

GatorB 09-28-2009 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16368469)
Are any of these men 46 years old, sleeping with a 13 year old?

No Elvis was 24 fucking 14 year old. Which today would get you several yeas in prison and put on a sex offendeers list.

Quote:

My grandmother was very young, but so was my grandfather. Same with my parents and even my great grand parents. All young, but the male damn sure wasn't 46.
Actually 100 years ago it wasn't uncommon for a Civil War vet in his 60s to marry a 15 or 16 year old.

heymatty 09-28-2009 04:33 PM

Her testimony is on smoking gun.

Agent 488 09-28-2009 04:36 PM

manson is laughing in his cell.

TheDoc 09-28-2009 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16368508)
No Elvis was 24 fucking 14 year old. Which today would get you several yeas in prison and put on a sex offendeers list.



Actually 100 years ago it wasn't uncommon for a Civil War vet in his 60s to marry a 15 or 16 year old.


While not as bad... Elvis was a Pedo either way.

Many of the people 100 years ago, were racist, sexist, assholes that forced anything they thought was morally correct onto others. Just because it happened in the past, doesn't make it correct.

Most men, would gladly take some young fresh pussy over old pussy that has spit out 10 kids out if they knew they could get away with it.

Robbie 09-28-2009 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16368606)
Most men, would gladly take some young fresh pussy over old pussy that has spit out 10 kids out if they knew they could get away with it.

I'd actually enjoy a bit of both. :1orglaugh

Getting some 16 and 17 year old pussy used to be a good thing. I'm 47 and if I met a 16 year old with the body of a pamela anderson and a fake id...I don't think I'd hesitate to drill it.

Hell, I probably fucked tons of them across the country. I was playing in my rock bands...and I'm pretty sure that a good number of the girls in the clubs in Daytona & Ft. Lauderdale during Spring Break in the 1980's were sporting fake ids.

Of course I didn't require ID when I banged those young whores in the band house at 4 a.m. drunk off my ass.

But the pussy sure was good!

sysk 09-28-2009 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by piernik (Post 16366425)

I was about to make the same call :p

TheDoc 09-28-2009 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16368637)
I'd actually enjoy a bit of both. :1orglaugh

Getting some 16 and 17 year old pussy used to be a good thing. I'm 47 and if I met a 16 year old with the body of a pamela anderson and a fake id...I don't think I'd hesitate to drill it.

Hell, I probably fucked tons of them across the country. I was playing in my rock bands...and I'm pretty sure that a good number of the girls in the clubs in Daytona & Ft. Lauderdale during Spring Break in the 1980's were sporting fake ids.

Of course I didn't require ID when I banged those young whores in the band house at 4 a.m. drunk off my ass.

But the pussy sure was good!


Old man :) 16/17 is fresh..... 13, not so much.

Robbie 09-28-2009 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 16368651)
Old man :) 16/17 is fresh..... 13, not so much.

Yeah, 13 is getting pretty creepy. :disgust

katharos 09-28-2009 05:10 PM

lol ... and eight dot .

cykoe6 09-28-2009 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16368427)
Listen he didn't "trick" anyone. She was a whore.

A young confused 13 year old girl is not a "whore" but a "victim". If her mother is pimpin her out then that makes it even more horrible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16368427)
Obviously you think he's a pedo and by your comments those that you think "support" him make you sick. So by inference you are saying we support pedophilia. Accusing someon of that is a BANNABLE offense on this board. So I'd fucking check your ass right fucking now.

You have officially established yourself as the biggest idiot on the board with these absolutely absurd comments. Go to the mods and plead your case. I accuse you of being the dumbest fuck on this board. I can prove it by quoting any one of your idiotic posts. :1orglaugh

Danny B 09-28-2009 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 16366965)
If it is okay to sleep with a 13 year old because she had already had sex then I suppose you can't rape a porn star either.

Nice one Sarah :1orglaugh

But seriously, imho if you do the crime you do the time.
Off to jail with him.

D Ghost 09-28-2009 08:09 PM

It's probably gonna be dropped

The Judge 09-28-2009 10:45 PM

If indeed this 13 year old had numerous affairs with older men (which I seriously doubt) why did he then need to give her drugs to fuck her? If she was such a slut she would have fucked without him drugging her wouldn't she? The reasons she had 'forgiven' him was the large settlement she got to drop the civil case. Who knows how many other children he did this to that did not come forward.

PS 1. he admitted to cheating on Sharon Tate with other women during her pregnancy.
PS 2. he is member of the dominating ethnic minority
PS 3. he is a midget and a control freak
PS 4. he is going to walk away from this, just wait and see


Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 16366708)
Sleeping with a 13 year old is WRONG, but the facts in this case are being completely twisted.



This is true. A plea agreement was reached between the defense and the DA, Polanski served time in prison, and then the day of his release the judge pulled out at the last minute and wanted to add more time to Polanski's sentence.

The reason the DA was so quick to come to a plea agreement with Polanski is because of the character issues with the victim. The 13 year old model Polanski took photos of and later had sex with was not a virigin, and in fact had slept with numerous other adult men, also photographers. Prior to the charges the girl's mother was aware her daughter drank, smoked pot and had affairs with adult men. Huge credibility issues there :2 cents:

I keep reading these stories that Polanski just skipped town when faced with the charges and it's complete bullshit. Polanski did everything the DA asked him to, he only skipped town when his plea bargain was renegged- after he had served the time requested.

Even the original prosecuter in the case has called for the charges to be dropped and has publically admitted that what happened to Polanski after he served his time was a criminal miscarrage of justice on the part of the presiding judge.


Sarah_Jayne 09-29-2009 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 16368790)
A young confused 13 year old girl is not a "whore" but a "victim". If her mother is pimpin her out then that makes it even more horrible.


Thank you!

Fletch XXX 09-29-2009 07:02 AM

fact: i am 33 and if i got any one of your 13 year old daughters drunk and fucked her, youd want to see me in jail way longer than some 40 day hotel stay. LOL

the double standard applied to these fucking celeb directors astounds me, let some creep off the street do this at 25 and most people would want him hung, but oh noes, its some fucking director, royalty my ass, let him swing.

V_RocKs 09-29-2009 07:23 AM

I think he is a dick...

Nature on the other hand supports him... Think about it... and why most non-civilized cultures consider 18 to be "old"...

ShellyCrash 09-29-2009 08:21 AM

If he raped this girl against her will, especially if he fucked her in the ass as she stated in one version of her story, then they would have charged him with raping a child. Why didn't they?

Why did the mother choose to pursue charges only against Polanski and not any of the other photographers her daughter had slept with? Or men who had given her daughter drugs?

And to my mind most importantly to the mother- if you know your underage daughter does drugs and has sex with adult male photographers why keep sending her out ALONE with adult men?

The story kept changing, the girl admitted she consented to having sex with him, other people had said she lied about her age (said she was 15 which is an average age of consent in many european countries), and evidence came out that she had been having sex and doing drugs with other adult men and that the mother had full knowledge of this and had done nothing about it or to prevent it from recurring (as long as the money's right). All this shit together made it a sticky case for the DA, so they lowered the charges and pled him out.

Polanski likes to fuck young girls, he makes no bones about it and tries to spear as many 15 year olds as he can, but that's legal in France. Do I think that's sick, Yes- yes I do. I wouldn't let him around my family.

Everyone keeps saying "If this had been your daughter...", but it wouldn't be my daughter because I wouldn't let this shit happen. Her mother, knowing the daughter'sd pattern of behavior, sent her daughter out yet again with another adult man unsupervised, not just once but twice. God forbid I wind up with a little lolita, but if I do, I damn sure won't be sending her out unsupervised to go get fucked and get fucked up with adult men.

Fletch XXX 09-29-2009 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 16370321)
If he raped this girl against her will, especially if he fucked her in the ass as she stated in one version of her story, then they would have charged him with raping a child. Why didn't they?

Why did the mother choose to pursue charges only against Polanski and not any of the other photographers her daughter had slept with? Or men who had given her daughter drugs?

And to my mind most importantly to the mother- if you know your underage daughter does drugs and has sex with adult male photographers why keep sending her out ALONE with adult men?

The story kept changing, the girl admitted she consented to having sex with him, other people had said she lied about her age (said she was 15 which is an average age of consent in many european countries), and evidence came out that she had been having sex and doing drugs with other adult men and that the mother had full knowledge of this and had done nothing about it or to prevent it from recurring (as long as the money's right). All this shit together made it a sticky case for the DA, so they lowered the charges and pled him out.

Polanski likes to fuck young girls, he makes no bones about it and tries to spear as many 15 year olds as he can, but that's legal in France. Do I think that's sick, Yes- yes I do. I wouldn't let him around my family.

Everyone keeps saying "If this had been your daughter...", but it wouldn't be my daughter because I wouldn't let this shit happen. Her mother, knowing the daughter'sd pattern of behavior, sent her daughter out yet again with another adult man unsupervised, not just once but twice. God forbid I wind up with a little lolita, but if I do, I damn sure won't be sending her out unsupervised to go get fucked and get fucked up with adult men.

thats all good, but can we at least admit that if it was any joe off the street, hed be getting fucked in the ass in prison while we type this? :1orglaugh

Sarah_Jayne 09-29-2009 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash (Post 16370321)
If he raped this girl against her will, especially if he fucked her in the ass as she stated in one version of her story, then they would have charged him with raping a child. Why didn't they?

Why did the mother choose to pursue charges only against Polanski and not any of the other photographers her daughter had slept with? Or men who had given her daughter drugs?

And to my mind most importantly to the mother- if you know your underage daughter does drugs and has sex with adult male photographers why keep sending her out ALONE with adult men?

The story kept changing, the girl admitted she consented to having sex with him, other people had said she lied about her age (said she was 15 which is an average age of consent in many european countries), and evidence came out that she had been having sex and doing drugs with other adult men and that the mother had full knowledge of this and had done nothing about it or to prevent it from recurring (as long as the money's right). All this shit together made it a sticky case for the DA, so they lowered the charges and pled him out.

Polanski likes to fuck young girls, he makes no bones about it and tries to spear as many 15 year olds as he can, but that's legal in France. Do I think that's sick, Yes- yes I do. I wouldn't let him around my family.

Everyone keeps saying "If this had been your daughter...", but it wouldn't be my daughter because I wouldn't let this shit happen. Her mother, knowing the daughter'sd pattern of behavior, sent her daughter out yet again with another adult man unsupervised, not just once but twice. God forbid I wind up with a little lolita, but if I do, I damn sure won't be sending her out unsupervised to go get fucked and get fucked up with adult men.

Oh, I have no problem with the mother doing jail time too if she allowed it to happen. It doesn't make him any less guilty and the girl any less a victim of at least one person, if not two.

dirkpeddler 09-29-2009 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmycastor (Post 16368256)
bs, this is nonsense, polanski is a brilliant artist, his pregnant wife was shoot and killed by charles manson and he had a very bad time afterwards (when the stuff with the girl happend..)

nowadays
he just makes genious movies (real movies, not the usual bingo bango ) and this is story is just old bs .god i hope he is free soon

And I guess that makes what he did, right? I didn't realize this 13 year old could be held accountable for what happened to Polanski before he raped a 13 year old, made a plea bargain, confessing to it. If he's so innocnet, with the kind of money he has, he could have easily afford a lawyer clearing his name, long before he finally got arrested.

sperbonzo 09-29-2009 10:17 AM

It's somewhat ironic that last week Poland voted in some of the harshest anti-pedo laws in the EU and yet they are all yelling "He is an artist, let him go!"


I guess that if you are a popular artist of some type, then you are above the law in Poland....


.

cwd 09-29-2009 10:38 AM

I still don't understand why now? This is a guy who has traveled to England, Denmark, Sweeden, Canada, Israel, Brazil, Germany...its not like he was hiding out somewhere. I wonder too, if this was not a well known celebrity, would the US authorities still be invovled in the case? I mean, if this was a regular guy, in the same senario, and the victim no longer wants anything to do with the case would all this legal manuevering be going on? This has got to cost quite a lot and if it was not a celebrity,would it be happening?

TheDA 09-29-2009 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwd (Post 16370737)
I still don't understand why now? This is a guy who has traveled to England, Denmark, Sweeden, Canada, Israel, Brazil, Germany...its not like he was hiding out somewhere. I wonder too, if this was not a well known celebrity, would the US authorities still be invovled in the case? I mean, if this was a regular guy, in the same senario, and the victim no longer wants anything to do with the case would all this legal manuevering be going on? This has got to cost quite a lot and if it was not a celebrity,would it be happening?

He's travelled to Switzerland before this as well - he owns a home their :)

DaddyHalbucks 09-29-2009 11:09 AM

He has one person to blame and that's himself. It is a simple bail jumping case. The guy fled. End of story.

beerptrol 09-29-2009 11:15 AM

an adult shouldn't be sleeping with a 13 year old period. doesn't matter if she was a whore or not. an adult shouldn't be sleeping with a 13 year old period He pled guilty and then ran, doesn't matter if she forgives him and says move on....He pled guilty

Robbie 09-29-2009 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 16370079)
fact: i am 33 and if i got any one of your 13 year old daughters drunk and fucked her, youd want to see me in jail way longer than some 40 day hotel stay. LOL

the double standard applied to these fucking celeb directors astounds me, let some creep off the street do this at 25 and most people would want him hung, but oh noes, its some fucking director, royalty my ass, let him swing.

Nope, I'd have to go old school on you.
A shotgun, a preacher and then: "Welcome to the family Fletch! You can call me Dad" :1orglaugh

idiftl 09-29-2009 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 16368427)
Listen he didn't "trick" anyone. She was a whore. Now does that mean it's ok for him to fuck her? No he was nearly 40. But she was hardly a "innocent victim". Also she appeared to be older than 13. Angelica Houston was in the house the night in question and said the girl looked 25. Now did he know she was 13 or not? Also where was this girl parents letting her stay at a 39 year old man's house at night?

Fact is the DA made a deal and should abide by it. Like it or not. The deal was for no extra time. Want to give him some time for running off, fine. If he went to trial 30 years ago he'd gotten less time then he would today, if any. The fact is even the "victim" wants this to be dropped and in the end if the victim doesn't want it to go further it's none of the DAs fucking business. She already sued Polanski and she got a nice big check in an out of court settlement. So it's over.

Obviously you think he's a pedo and by your comments those that you think "support" him make you sick. So by inference you are saying we support pedophilia. Accusing someon of that is a BANNABLE offense on this board. So I'd fucking check your ass right fucking now.

Welcome to america. this stupid americans dont know there laws are still backwards from the view of gay protestant christians. Same reason legal drinking age is at 21, but you let mentally unstable ppl own fire arms. Same reason marijuana is illegal because the bible say drugs are bad.

People have misconception that the what the law says is morally just and ethical. Little do stupid americans know that these laws were constructed by very intelligent people who knows their dumb american population will get out of control, so instead of saying "hey know your limit", they just make it into a law, and forbid you to do it. This is the same for religion. Why do muslims cannot eat pork? Well its cuz historically porks can't graze so its not really useful. Why muslims allow polygamy? Well cuz their men go to war, and women can't take care of themselves, so they need to remarry and bla blah

on and fucking on.

There is no right or wrong. Except shooting up school or killing ppl without reason, i still think thats fucked up.

And for the rest of you fucking retarded adult webmasters, Do you actually think adult industry is dying because of tubre sites? its because of you retards shooting the same boring shit nobody wants to buy


fuck you all. fuck you all.

cykoe6 09-29-2009 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 16370079)
the double standard applied to these fucking celeb directors astounds me, let some creep off the street do this at 25 and most people would want him hung, but oh noes, its some fucking director, royalty my ass, let him swing.

That is my point entirely. The same standard should apply to everyone. If some fat local loser had slept with that girl under similar circumstances he would have done 10 years in the DOC (likely being subjected to violence and possible sexual assault the whole time).

I am not condemning Polsanski per se but rather a system where one class of defendant is treated differently than another. That is what makes me sick. :mad:

DaddyHalbucks 09-29-2009 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 16371044)
That is my point entirely. The same standard should apply to everyone. If some fat local loser had slept with that girl under similar circumstances he would have done 10 years in the DOC (likely being subjected to violence and possible sexual assault the whole time).

I am not condemning Polsanski per se but rather a system where one class of defendant is treated differently than another. That is what makes me sick. :mad:

I agree 100%.

beerptrol 09-29-2009 12:18 PM

set up a half way house, Or housing for pedos in the neighbor hoods of those stars/directors who support him.

bbobby86 09-29-2009 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O MARINA (Post 16368435)
----50----

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

smutnut 09-29-2009 04:34 PM

He's a great filmmaker but he's a scum bag.

It's funny how Andrew Diceclay can make a few misogynistic comments and the feminazis want to cut off his pecker, but Polanski and Woody Allen pretty much crossed the line and you have bitches coming out of the woodwork to support these guys.

Goes to show you, it's not who you blow, it's you you fuck up the ass! :1orglaugh

Robbie 09-29-2009 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 16371044)
That is my point entirely. The same standard should apply to everyone. If some fat local loser had slept with that girl under similar circumstances he would have done 10 years in the DOC (likely being subjected to violence and possible sexual assault the whole time).

I am not condemning Polsanski per se but rather a system where one class of defendant is treated differently than another. That is what makes me sick. :mad:

Not in the 1970's he wouldn't have. Back then there were sane laws for how crimes were judged. A judge could take things on a case by case basis and make a decision. 9 times out of 10 the guy and the girl would have probably gotten married if it were some fat local loser in West Virginia or Alabama. lol

Now in 2009? It would have been prison instantly. The judge wouldn't even need to show up as he wouldn't have much to do except give a sentence out. And then Polanski would be a registered sex offender.

Kind of like a lot of all or our relatives a hundred years ago would now be called "pedos" and "sex offenders"

Different time, different culture.

If this were during the Roman Empire days, Polanski would have been given grief for fucking someone too OLD. lol And probably given double grief because it wasn't a boy.

BlackCrayon 09-29-2009 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16368441)
I hear that next they are going to go dig up Elvis and arrest him for fucking Lisa Marie when she was 15. Then they will be picking up Jerry Lee Lewis for marrying his teen cousin.

Then they will be digging up all the graves of our great-great grandfathers and arresting them for fucking our underage great-great grandmothers.

Ringo Starr is currently under investigation for the song: "Your 16, Your Beautiful, And Your Mine" from the 1970's as well.

About time we cleaned this shit up once and for all.

The girl was drugged and raped. Its very different. Though I still don't agree with still developing young girls with 40 year old guys. Its just wrong. 99% of the time there is some taking advantage there.

Robbie 09-29-2009 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 16372112)
The girl was drugged and raped. Its very different. Though I still don't agree with still developing young girls with 40 year old guys. Its just wrong. 99% of the time there is some taking advantage there.

Here is an article from Jan. of 2008 that talks a little more about it:
http://www.time.com/time/arts/articl...706557,00.html

And I keep thinking about the "drugged and raped" part.

Using a little common sense tells me that he was probably partying with her. In other words, instead of being completely sober and using his evil intentions to fuck her up...isn't it more probable that he was drinking the champagne and popped a qualude right along with her?

And as a former 13 year old myself in the 1970's...me and my friends did qualudes all the time. They were the BEST! You felt no pain at all on those babies. And you did get real horny and you felt great and then you passed out.

So I'm just gonna guess that they took a qualude, washed it down with champagne, fucked, and passed out. Then the girls family decided to cash in since he was famous.

Matter of fact I saw her on Larry King last night and she said she didn't want to see him go to jail and she acknowledged a large "undisclosed" amount of money that he gave her.

Stupid shit on his part all the way around. He's never done anything like it again and now he's an old man in his 70's getting thrown in prison for one night of partying like a fool over 30 years ago.

I know there's a lot of indignation...from people who have no part of what happened (the girl doesn't want any of this going on in her life, she's a well adjusted and wealthy woman in her 40's now)...but it kinda sucks that once again the U.S. looks like a goon squad to the rest of the world.

If we are going to take this view as a society about under-age sex...then we should just make it the death penalty and be done with it. At least it wouldn't look as dumb as the laws now where a 25 year old guy in college could be fucking his 16 year old girlfriend and end up as a "sexual predator" and have his entire life ruined.

Let's just kill 'em all. Lump the guys that like to fuck hot teen pussy right along with the sick fucks who rape babies. That's what we do now anyway. So let's just give 'em all the death penalty and quit fucking around.

smutnut 09-29-2009 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16372143)
Here is an article from Jan. of 2008 that talks a little more about it:
http://www.time.com/time/arts/articl...706557,00.html

And I keep thinking about the "drugged and raped" part.

Using a little common sense tells me that he was probably partying with her. In other words, instead of being completely sober and using his evil intentions to fuck her up...isn't it more probable that he was drinking the champagne and popped a qualude right along with her?

And as a former 13 year old myself in the 1970's...me and my friends did qualudes all the time. They were the BEST! You felt no pain at all on those babies. And you did get real horny and you felt great and then you passed out.

So I'm just gonna guess that they took a qualude, washed it down with champagne, fucked, and passed out. Then the girls family decided to cash in since he was famous.

Matter of fact I saw her on Larry King last night and she said she didn't want to see him go to jail and she acknowledged a large "undisclosed" amount of money that he gave her.

Stupid shit on his part all the way around. He's never done anything like it again and now he's an old man in his 70's getting thrown in prison for one night of partying like a fool over 30 years ago.

I know there's a lot of indignation...from people who have no part of what happened (the girl doesn't want any of this going on in her life, she's a well adjusted and wealthy woman in her 40's now)...but it kinda sucks that once again the U.S. looks like a goon squad to the rest of the world.

If we are going to take this view as a society about under-age sex...then we should just make it the death penalty and be done with it. At least it wouldn't look as dumb as the laws now where a 25 year old guy in college could be fucking his 16 year old girlfriend and end up as a "sexual predator" and have his entire life ruined.

Let's just kill 'em all. Lump the guys that like to fuck hot teen pussy right along with the sick fucks who rape babies. That's what we do now anyway. So let's just give 'em all the death penalty and quit fucking around.

He was taking photographs of her and he dropped something in her drink. Her mother should be arrested to for letting her go with him, but still. The girl doesn't want to pursue this but it's not really her choice. I know he had a rough time there cause of Charlie Manson and even some Poland issues before that, but come on.

She was thirteen and he stuck his dick up her ass. That should pretty much rap up everything this side of the mississippi and north of the mason/dixon even back in the 70's.

Add in the fact that he ran because the judge was pressured into reneging on the original deal and well...

Different punishments for different tax brackets I guess.

BlackCrayon 09-29-2009 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16372143)
Here is an article from Jan. of 2008 that talks a little more about it:
http://www.time.com/time/arts/articl...706557,00.html

And I keep thinking about the "drugged and raped" part.

Using a little common sense tells me that he was probably partying with her. In other words, instead of being completely sober and using his evil intentions to fuck her up...isn't it more probable that he was drinking the champagne and popped a qualude right along with her?

And as a former 13 year old myself in the 1970's...me and my friends did qualudes all the time. They were the BEST! You felt no pain at all on those babies. And you did get real horny and you felt great and then you passed out.

So I'm just gonna guess that they took a qualude, washed it down with champagne, fucked, and passed out. Then the girls family decided to cash in since he was famous.

Matter of fact I saw her on Larry King last night and she said she didn't want to see him go to jail and she acknowledged a large "undisclosed" amount of money that he gave her.

Stupid shit on his part all the way around. He's never done anything like it again and now he's an old man in his 70's getting thrown in prison for one night of partying like a fool over 30 years ago.

I know there's a lot of indignation...from people who have no part of what happened (the girl doesn't want any of this going on in her life, she's a well adjusted and wealthy woman in her 40's now)...but it kinda sucks that once again the U.S. looks like a goon squad to the rest of the world.

If we are going to take this view as a society about under-age sex...then we should just make it the death penalty and be done with it. At least it wouldn't look as dumb as the laws now where a 25 year old guy in college could be fucking his 16 year old girlfriend and end up as a "sexual predator" and have his entire life ruined.

Let's just kill 'em all. Lump the guys that like to fuck hot teen pussy right along with the sick fucks who rape babies. That's what we do now anyway. So let's just give 'em all the death penalty and quit fucking around.

So fucking impressionable 13 year old girls is ok in your books? Even forgetting about the drug and rape thing, he should have been an adult and realize its not her or his best interest to fuck her.

Robbie 09-29-2009 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 16372176)
So fucking impressionable 13 year old girls is ok in your books? Even forgetting about the drug and rape thing, he should have been an adult and realize its not her or his best interest to fuck her.

No. You overlooked my statement that he made a stupid mistake. And you are theorizing that she is "impressionable" There are 60 year old women who are "impressionable" and at the same time there are 10 year olds that will pickpocket you and cut your throat.

You're generalizing all people together. Everyone doesn't grow or mature at the same rate. I had a buddy in school who at 12 years old had a full beard, sideburns, a hairy chest, pubic hair, and an 8 inch cock. When he walked through the locker room in gym class we were all scared to death! lol

And by the time he was 25 he was bald and fat. Now he looks like he could be my grandfather.

Just sayin...

But no, I wouldn't personally ever fuck a 13 year old girl. I think it was dumb on his part. But I don't think he lured her to his house with candy and ice cream either. He was a big celebrity and a well known figure. And teen girls are...well, teen girls. You have to watch them every second or they WILL go out and fuck somebody. I have 2 of them right here at home. And it's a nightmare. :1orglaugh

BlackCrayon 09-29-2009 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 16372184)
No. You overlooked my statement that he made a stupid mistake. And you are theorizing that she is "impressionable" There are 60 year old women who are "impressionable" and at the same time there are 10 year olds that will pickpocket you and cut your throat.

You're generalizing all people together. Everyone doesn't grow or mature at the same rate. I had a buddy in school who at 12 years old had a full beard, sideburns, a hairy chest, pubic hair, and an 8 inch cock. When he walked through the locker room in gym class we were all scared to death! lol

And by the time he was 25 he was bald and fat. Now he looks like he could be my grandfather.

Just sayin...

But no, I wouldn't personally ever fuck a 13 year old girl. I think it was dumb on his part. But I don't think he lured her to his house with candy and ice cream either. He was a big celebrity and a well known figure. And teen girls are...well, teen girls. You have to watch them every second or they WILL go out and fuck somebody. I have 2 of them right here at home. And it's a nightmare. :1orglaugh

13 just seems so damn young to me. Even 25 and 16. I remember going to parties at 25 and there being a bunch of highschool girls there. They just seemed so young and immature.

Part of the problem with the case is despite all the alligations, he was in a position of authority. She wanted to be in movies and perhaps felt if she didn't do what he wanted then no stardom for her. Hell maybe she wanted to fuck him because she thought it would advance her career. There is just so much room for manipulation in these cases. You can't just say, oh you banged a 13 year old. Here is a slap on the wrist and a juice box just because the girl "may" be mature or a slut or whatever. I don't agree with throwing people in jail for life either but the message has to be sent that its wrong in some way.

Robbie 09-29-2009 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 16372201)
13 just seems so damn young to me. Even 25 and 16. I remember going to parties at 25 and there being a bunch of highschool girls there. They just seemed so young and immature.

Part of the problem with the case is despite all the alligations, he was in a position of authority. She wanted to be in movies and perhaps felt if she didn't do what he wanted then no stardom for her. Hell maybe she wanted to fuck him because she thought it would advance her career. There is just so much room for manipulation in these cases. You can't just say, oh you banged a 13 year old. Here is a slap on the wrist and a juice box just because the girl "may" be mature or a slut or whatever. I don't agree with throwing people in jail for life either but the message has to be sent that its wrong in some way.

I agree with what you're saying. Fact is he got scared and jumped bail. So now he finds himself looking at doing real jail time instead of the little bit that he got back then. Obviously anybody with any common sense knows better than to do what he did. But throw a qualude and some good pot and coke on top of it...and you're brain tends to take a few hours off. His sure did.

I guess the bottom line is...he's fucked, she gets to be on Larry King, the U.S. looks like a police state to the Europeans and I don't even know how the media in third world, middle eastern, and Asian countries are spinning it.

This just kinda seems like one of those things that the U.S. govt. should have just left alone.

I know that might sound crazy...but as intelligent people we need to be able to take things on a case by case basis. And sending the goon squad to "capture" an internationally acclaimed director while Bin Laden still runs around free just seems kinda dumb to me. But that's just my opinion.

One thing for sure...it was a nice job of directing the countries attention away from all the deals they are cutting with the pharmaceutical companies on "health care reform" and also getting the media to cover something other than the fact that so many people are unemployed...or that we are sending more troops to Afghanistan.

They had the Colosseum for the Roman populace to keep them entertained. We get stuff like this to keep our minds off of really important stuff I guess.

TDF 09-29-2009 06:33 PM

I wonder why porners are so passionate about this issue...

Robbie 09-29-2009 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TDF (Post 16372302)
I wonder why porners are so passionate about this issue...

I'm not a "porner" and I'm not passionate about it. Just saw it on the news, saw this thread and found the conversation interesting.

What is a "porner" anyway? :1orglaugh

Oh...you mean people who produce porn? Or people that sell it? Or people that use it?

I'm as confused as a 13 year old on qualudes...

directfiesta 09-29-2009 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 16370874)
He has one person to blame and that's himself. It is a simple bail jumping case. The guy fled. End of story.

not exactly...
Judge was not to respect the sentenced agreed in the plea bargain ... and made it knowned...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123