GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   GFY Believe it or Not... Your call! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=930266)

CDSmith 09-28-2009 10:20 PM

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...1&postcount=20

I've said my piece on this topic, nothing more to add to it.

stickyfingerz 09-28-2009 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 16369297)
its hardly about the alexa ranking but more about the paying sponsors who decided to stop advertising here. Just 1 sponsor pulls his ad dollars from this site, they lose more that over the next year and half (just from 1 person) than they made from the skin. If they lost, 2,3,4,5 advertisers... do the math.

Do you think GFY really cares that much about a few posters leaving? 20 people leaving isn't going to move alexa which is probably mostly surfer traffic anyways.


To all the people saying " good move with the unbanning" are you really serious? The people who got banned decided they didn't want to post on this site anymore. To prove to everyone they felt this way they got banned, on purpose. They wanted to be banned. How is the "unbanning" such a good move when those people don't want to come back anyway. It just makes GFY try to look better when it is really irrelevant.

think people, and if you can't think ask someone who can.

Where there are views there will be people in line to get those eyes on their products. And of course I know you are one of the ones that have been fighting content theft so we are on the same team on this, I just see it differently on the side of gfy accepting the skin. And letting the skin cloud the real problem and divert focus on the real issue is the REAL problem. Im glad they did it, but also its laughable that some of these gfy "protestors" are suddenly the biggest haters of content theft suddenly. Smacks of hypocrisy, and especially when many of them push traffic ALREADY to the owners of pornhub and tube8 and don't have a problem lining their pockets that way, yet gfy takes some money by selling their ad services here and OMG!! Bloody fuckin murder.

Its pathetic and its a thinly veiled bandwagon leap. Many of the people are just jumping on the side they think will garner their own business the most new customers. LAME! Unless they can show me at some point in the last 2 years where they have taken a stand and stood up to do something to stop content theft they are just frankly full of shit.

So many ulterior motives around here its laughable. :1orglaugh

BV 09-28-2009 10:25 PM

http://coinchronicles.com/wp-content...ys20080503.gif

brassmonkey 09-28-2009 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BV (Post 16369361)

:1orglaugh

PAR 09-28-2009 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quagmire (Post 16367113)
Sneaky Dees has muffins?

and beer...
Lazzlo you moved to far away ...

SleazyDream 09-28-2009 11:23 PM

I'm disappointed in Eric.

in the old days he'd have his boxing gloves on and participate in this shit slinging thread.

When did Eric decide he wanted to be clean and not smelly like the rest of us?

AtlantisCash 09-29-2009 12:22 AM

i wouldn't want to be involved in any sides here, but what's funny is, almost everyone here was trying to prove us How much those peeps can suck Ice's balls (which You call it ass licking), but now he becomes Joe Dalton for the so called "Lucky Luke"s, Thats so pathetic and lame :2cents

SleazyDream 09-29-2009 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16369492)
i wouldn't want to be involved in any sides here, but what's funny is, almost everyone here was trying to prove us How much those peeps can suck Ice's balls (which You call it ass licking), but now he becomes Joe Dalton for the so called "Lucky Luke"s, Thats so pathetic and lame :2cents

i have no idea what the fuck you are trying to say there :2 cents:

AtlantisCash 09-29-2009 12:26 AM

i wouldn't want to be involved in any sides here, but what's funny is, almost everyone was trying to prove us How much those peeps can suck Ice's balls (which You call it ass licking), but now he becomes Joe Dalton for the so called "Lucky Luke"s, Thats so pathetic and lame :2 cents:

SmokeyTheBear 09-29-2009 12:28 AM

i'm curious as to how plastering the name of tubesites that directly steal product from your parent company playboy's stockholders profits helps the industry or playboy stockholders in any way ? Whats next ? Will you put up ads for drug dealers so we can stop drug dealing ?

SleazyDream 09-29-2009 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16369499)
i wouldn't want to be involved in any sides here, but what's funny is, almost everyone was trying to prove us How much those peeps can suck Ice's balls (which You call it ass licking), but now he becomes Joe Dalton for the so called "Lucky Luke"s, Thats so pathetic and lame :2cents:

I still have no idea what the fuck you are trying to say here.

and repeating the same thing kinda just makes you an idiot.....

AtlantisCash 09-29-2009 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream (Post 16369504)
I still have no idea what the fuck you are trying to say here.

and repeating the same thing kinda just makes you an idiot.....


it was just a copy/paste error done by the mistake, i don't repeat anything.

what i m trying to say is so much hypocrisy around, No need to show Your arrogance, Mate :error

SleazyDream 09-29-2009 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16369524)
it was just a copy/paste error done by the mistake, i don't repeat anything.

what i m trying to say is so much hypocrisy around, No need to show Your arrogance, Mate :error

umm , a copy paste error IS repeating yourself - error or no error - it's still repeating yourself.

arrogant, asshole, fat bastard -call me what you want...

I'm sensing you're not capable of admitting things to yourself and look for excuses.....

and that's laughable :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

AtlantisCash 09-29-2009 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream (Post 16369532)
umm , a copy paste error IS repeating yourself - error or no error - it's still repeating yourself.

arrogant, asshole, fat bastard -call me what you want...

I'm sensing you're not capable of admitting things to yourself and look for excuses.....

and that's laughable :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


i accidentally copied the previous message and re posted it again thats all, i don't know what You talking about mate, don't mind me, just enjoy Your Day and Got a Nice Work :2 cents:

SleazyDream 09-29-2009 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16369537)
i accidentally copied the previous message and re posted it again thats all, i don't know what You talking about mate, don't mind me, just enjoy Your Day and Got a Nice Work :2 cents:

still can't admit it... dude you got a serious problem...

rowan 09-29-2009 01:57 AM

If the skin was pulled prematurely then surely trafficjunky would have received a pro rated refund?

Or maybe the buzz it generated was still worth it...

Dirty Dane 09-29-2009 02:28 AM

Awareness? "Healthy" debate? 100% greater good? Sponsored by Brazzers??? Yeah right...
People left this board, not because they couldn't behave and got banned, but voluntary in protest. They had enough of the obvious.

If your intention is to fight content theft, why not create a sub-forum where the webmasters can report infringements? Make stickies "how to" fight and deal with it? Organize and focus? Why not? That would be awareness and for the greater good!

signbucks 09-29-2009 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XXXMovie4M (Post 16368290)
are you fucking kidding me? you guys fucked up and that should be your appology, not some bullshit excuse playing it off as some kind of noble and worthy cause.

would it be ok if i sold drugs as long as i donate part of the money to drug rehab programs?

or how about if i use hidden pre-checked cross sales as long as i donate a portion of the proceeds toward credit card fraud!

this is almost as bad as the board skin! this just shows us how stupid you think we are.

oh and by the way, this is not how you have a "healthy" debate over a topic. pick a topic like religion, politics, health care, ect....not fucking around with someone's hard work and income.

double that

peedy 09-29-2009 04:48 AM

http://www.peedymedia.com/crap/nospi...929-072003.png

MrMaxwell 09-29-2009 05:32 AM

Since when is it a crime for some wealthy white people to experiment and or even play with something they own... LoL over here.. I still say it's a Howard Stern effect.. :2 cents:

nico-t 09-29-2009 07:57 AM

this thread is one big LOL

CaptainHowdy 09-29-2009 08:06 AM

I love you, Eric...

MaDalton 09-29-2009 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16369499)
i wouldn't want to be involved in any sides here, but what's funny is, almost everyone was trying to prove us How much those peeps can suck Ice's balls (which You call it ass licking), but now he becomes Joe Dalton for the so called "Lucky Luke"s, Thats so pathetic and lame :2 cents:

please leave my boys out of this, thanks...

TheLegacy 09-29-2009 08:33 AM

It's safe to say that Eric and Ice along with the team at GFY were caught in a situation and did the right thing. As Ice was on the front lines Eric I am sure was working behind the scene's to look and correct the situation unaware of how the webmaster community would feel so strongly about it. The team I am sure knew of tubes and the overall feeling from webmasters but that GFY's rule book had nothing written down regarding doing business with them. Now a prescience has been set with consequences that will be remembered and copied by other boards in how they deal with tubes and future problem companies - that webmasters ARE the one's who guide decision making.

Thanks GFY for making a landmark decision instead of letting it run it's course and waiting a few weeks until it blows over as we all know it would eventually. I know it wasn't an easy one, but it was the right one. Bringing back those that were banned was also a wise move.

DamageX 09-29-2009 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLegacy (Post 16370334)
It's safe to say that Eric and Ice along with the team at GFY were caught in a situation and did the right thing. As Ice was on the front lines Eric I am sure was working behind the scene's to look and correct the situation unaware of how the webmaster community would feel so strongly about it. The team I am sure knew of tubes and the overall feeling from webmasters but that GFY's rule book had nothing written down regarding doing business with them. Now a prescience has been set with consequences that will be remembered and copied by other boards in how they deal with tubes and future problem companies - that webmasters ARE the one's who guide decision making.

Thanks GFY for making a landmark decision instead of letting it run it's course and waiting a few weeks until it blows over as we all know it would eventually. I know it wasn't an easy one, but it was the right one. Bringing back those that were banned was also a wise move.

Kindly remove your lips from Eric's ass. Thank you.

stickyfingerz 09-29-2009 08:54 AM

Still waiting for all the "protesters" to show where they have in the recent past made some or of an effort to stop theft, and show they weren't really just bandwagon jumping with their indignation... :uhoh

SmokeyTheBear 09-29-2009 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16370384)
Still waiting for all the "protesters" to show where they have in the recent past made some or of an effort to stop theft, and show they weren't really just bandwagon jumping with their indignation... :uhoh

i totally agree. You cant disagree with murder unless you have actually helped catch a murderer. Same with bank robbers, nobody should say anything bad about bank robbers unless they personally have made an effort to stop them. Infact you should praise bank robbers and support them unless you have personally done something to stop it. You shouldnt even be allowed to have an opinion unless you have punched a bank robber in the face.

stickyfingerz 09-29-2009 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 16370465)
i totally agree. You cant disagree with murder unless you have actually helped catch a murderer. Same with bank robbers, nobody should say anything bad about bank robbers unless they personally have made an effort to stop them. Infact you should praise bank robbers and support them unless you have personally done something to stop it. You shouldnt even be allowed to have an opinion unless you have punched a bank robber in the face.

Ya that makes a perfect parallel to this. That is if fighting murder suddenly became the cool thing and people that have murdered in the past, or sent money to murders in the past and even currently were suddenly "murder protestors".

http://images.travelpod.com/users/wo...eep-herder.jpg

Come on sheep "I show you other magical posting land where no content theft occur.. you will have much business from impressing other sheep with your tales of protest of evil gfy.. no it does not matter if you didn't lift a finger in the past. All sheep may get free ride on bandwagon of self indignation and will much impress other fellow shee.. err protestors.."

CYF 09-29-2009 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane (Post 16369649)
Awareness? "Healthy" debate? 100% greater good? Sponsored by Brazzers??? Yeah right...
People left this board, not because they couldn't behave and got banned, but voluntary in protest. They had enough of the obvious.

If your intention is to fight content theft, why not create a sub-forum where the webmasters can report infringements? Make stickies "how to" fight and deal with it? Organize and focus? Why not? That would be awareness and for the greater good!

Looks like they took your advice and made a forum for content theft.

HomeFry 09-29-2009 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CYF (Post 16370589)
Looks like they took your advice and made a forum for content theft.

That is an expensive forum.

TheStout 09-29-2009 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 16370465)
i totally agree. You cant disagree with murder unless you have actually helped catch a murderer. Same with bank robbers, nobody should say anything bad about bank robbers unless they personally have made an effort to stop them. Infact you should praise bank robbers and support them unless you have personally done something to stop it. You shouldnt even be allowed to have an opinion unless you have punched a bank robber in the face.

Im assuming you are being sarcastic here

The Duck 09-30-2009 02:18 AM

Wait, what?

WWC 09-30-2009 02:31 AM

Still going and going and going..... small violin in between my index finger and thumb ;-)

" play that funky music white boy " lol

DamageX 10-02-2009 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheStout (Post 16370960)
Im assuming you are being sarcastic here

Gee, what gave it away? :)

JFK 10-02-2009 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 16370248)
this thread is one big LOL

YES and I almost missed it :helpme

will76 10-02-2009 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLegacy (Post 16370334)
It's safe to say that Eric and Ice along with the team at GFY were caught in a situation and did the right thing. As Ice was on the front lines Eric I am sure was working behind the scene's to look and correct the situation unaware of how the webmaster community would feel so strongly about it. The team I am sure knew of tubes and the overall feeling from webmasters but that GFY's rule book had nothing written down regarding doing business with them. Now a prescience has been set with consequences that will be remembered and copied by other boards in how they deal with tubes and future problem companies - that webmasters ARE the one's who guide decision making.

Thanks GFY for making a landmark decision instead of letting it run it's course and waiting a few weeks until it blows over as we all know it would eventually. I know it wasn't an easy one, but it was the right one. Bringing back those that were banned was also a wise move.

http://fc07.deviantart.com/fs45/f/20...by_RIOTmon.jpg

Profits of Doom 10-02-2009 01:41 PM

I heard The Great Pumpkin is also really coming this Halloween...

http://a.abc.com/media/specials/movi...eatpumpkin.jpg

Dennis69 10-02-2009 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLegacy (Post 16370334)
It's safe to say that Eric and Ice along with the team at GFY were caught in a situation and did the right thing. As Ice was on the front lines Eric I am sure was working behind the scene's to look and correct the situation unaware of how the webmaster community would feel so strongly about it. The team I am sure knew of tubes and the overall feeling from webmasters but that GFY's rule book had nothing written down regarding doing business with them. Now a prescience has been set with consequences that will be remembered and copied by other boards in how they deal with tubes and future problem companies - that webmasters ARE the one's who guide decision making.

Thanks GFY for making a landmark decision instead of letting it run it's course and waiting a few weeks until it blows over as we all know it would eventually. I know it wasn't an easy one, but it was the right one. Bringing back those that were banned was also a wise move.


You have got to be fucking kidding me!

mineistaken 10-02-2009 04:53 PM

what a pile of.........

nation-x 10-02-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 16366053)
On the flip side, why would anybody bitch about a for-profit business going after profits? This tends to be an industry where people only take a moral stance when they're not the one making the money.

I'd be curious how many of the people that bitched would turn down a premium pre-paid ad spot from Tube 8. I bet they wouldn't and would justify it to themselves by saying "eh, the surfers already know about this site, I'm not pointing them to anything they don't already know about, so I'll take the money."

Bye!

You really think you know what the fuck you are talking about don't you? :321GFY

Iron Fist 10-02-2009 08:01 PM

I'm loving this thread.... down with da pirates ARRRRRRR!!!!

stickyfingerz 10-02-2009 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nation-x (Post 16384510)
You really think you know what the fuck you are talking about don't you? :321GFY

sounds pretty dead on to me there. :2 cents:

will76 10-02-2009 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16384770)
sounds pretty dead on to me there. :2 cents:

His comparison is off.

If Tube8 offered anyone here a nice big paid advertising deal, would they turn it down? Considering most people here make next to nothing what do you think the answer to that question would be (99% would take it).

Most people here don't like Tube8 because what they are doing " is wrong". They disagree with it. But most of them aren't the ones being ripped off by Tube8 as most of the people here don't produce content or own membership sites and it isn't THEIR content that is being blasted all over Tube 8 for free.

Most of the people here also don't several clients that they make millions off of, and these same clients are also being ripped off by Tube8.

Still sound dead on ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome
On the flip side, why would anybody bitch about a for-profit business going after profits? This tends to be an industry where people only take a moral stance when they're not the one making the money.

I'd be curious how many of the people that bitched would turn down a premium pre-paid ad spot from Tube 8. I bet they wouldn't and would justify it to themselves by saying "eh, the surfers already know about this site, I'm not pointing them to anything they don't already know about, so I'll take the money."

Bye!

Playboy Inc accepted money to skin GFY from a company that profits off of playboy's own content. Playboy Inc accepted money to promote a company that steals from several of Playboy Inc's own customers. Customers who have spent millions of dollars with them over the years. The payment accepted from Traffic Junky is likely about 2% of what GFY makes a year.

Would any Joe Blow here who thinks content theft is bad accept the payment, hell yeah they would. They don't make much money if any and that payment might be more than they make in a year. The tube site is not stealing from them, and they wouldn't be pissing on their other customers who the tube site is stealing from. Are these people hypocritical, sure, but that doesn't make what Playboy Inc did ok.

Playboy Inc can not be compared to Joe Blow poster here.

Should a business be faulted for wanting to make money? hell no. But that business should think their actions through from a financial standpoint if nothing else. If the business has no business ethics and doesn't practice good business then that is their choice but they should think their actions though a little better. It's one thing to promote and do business with a company that is stealing from you, but when you promote the company that is also stealing from your customers then that is just bad business. All of that just for about 2% of your anual income. It only takes losing 1 or 2 of your LOYAL customers, who get pissed by your greedy actions to COST your more than you made off of the skin.

So does it make sense to me that they did, hell no, but I am not greedy and try to look at the big picture and I practice good business. I wouldn't piss on my LOYAL customers who represent 98% of my income.

Does it make a little better sense now ?

stickyfingerz 10-02-2009 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 16384807)
His comparison is off.

If Tube8 offered anyone here a nice big paid advertising deal, would they turn it down? Considering most people here make next to nothing what do you think the answer to that question would be (99% would take it).

Most people here don't like Tube8 because what they are doing " is wrong". They disagree with it. But most of them aren't the ones being ripped off by Tube8 as most of the people here don't produce content or own membership sites and it isn't THEIR content that is being blasted all over Tube 8 for free.

Most of the people here also don't make millions off of their clients who are also being ripped off by Tube8.

Still sound dead on ?



Playboy Inc accepted money to skin GFY from a company that profits off of playboy's own content. Playboy Inc accepted money to promote a company that steals from several of Playboy Inc's own customers. Customers who have spent millions of dollars with them over the years. The payment accepted is likely about 2% of what GFY makes a year.

Would any joe blow here who thinks content theft is bad accept the payment, hell yeah they would. They don't make much money if any and that payment might be more than they make in a year. The tube site is not stealing from them, and they wouldn't be pissing on their other customers who the tube site is stealing from. Are these people hypocritical, sure, but that doesn't make what Playboy Inc did ok.

Playboy Inc can not be compared to Joe Blow poster here.

Should another business be faulted for wanting to make money? hell no. But that business should think their actions through from a financial standpoint of nothing else. If the business has no business ethics and doesn't practice good business then that is their choice but they should think their actions though a little better. It's one thing to promote and do business with a company that is stealing from you, but when you promote the company that is also stealing from your customers then that is just bad business. All of that just for about 2% of your anual income. It only takes losing 1 or 2 of your LOYAL customers, who get pissed by your greedy actions to COST your more than you made off of the skin.

So does it make sense to me that they did, hell no, but I am not greedy and try to look at the big picture and I practice good business. I wouldn't piss on my LOYAL customers who represent 98% of my income.

Does it make a little better sense now ?


You should continue to focus on the actual problem rather than gfy putting a skin up. That COST the tube sites and traffic junky money to do. More money out of their pocket good. Too many people getting sidetracked and pointing the focus at "hurting gfy" which is just logically retarded. Focus on the ACTUAL problem which is content theft, and the saturation done by programs as well with giving out 40% of their members areas for affiliates to use to "promote" them. Thats what started all this shit. People trying to give away more and more free of ... the product we sell (brilliant).. hoping to get more sales... :uhoh its one of the most retarded business models in history imo. Then on top of it. Lets host all the content for the affiliate too that gets 50% or a huge pps... :uhoh ok Im done back to work...

will76 10-02-2009 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 16384813)
You should continue to focus on the actual problem rather than gfy putting a skin up. That COST the tube sites and traffic junky money to do. More money out of their pocket good. Too many people getting sidetracked and pointing the focus at "hurting gfy" which is just logically retarded. Focus on the ACTUAL problem which is content theft, and the saturation done by programs as well with giving out 40% of their members areas for affiliates to use to "promote" them. Thats what started all this shit. People trying to give away more and more free of ... the product we sell (brilliant).. hoping to get more sales... :uhoh its one of the most retarded business models in history imo. Then on top of it. Lets host all the content for the affiliate too that gets 50% or a huge pps... :uhoh ok Im done back to work...

Sure... but I was just replying to a post about " a company shouldn't be faulted for trying to make money and everyone here would take the money if they had the opportunity to". If people have that attitude, which is wrong, good luck on getting them to understand and agree with any of what you said above.

also good luck with the core problem and trying to fix it, pointing out if people are bandwagon jumpers or not, or getting off track and worrying about gfy, whoever was fighting this a couple years ago, protecting you own content, etc etc etc.... No one here is going to fix tube sites, this isn't 2257 where it is the gov vs all of porn or acacia vs all of porn, this is porn vs porn. Too many people are already on the side with tube sites, big porn companies own tube sites, or people are doing business with tube sites. There will be no resolution, no amount of posts is going to change anything.

People like Steve Lightspeed or 3x tom can't fix tube sites, but what they can do is choose to stop doing business with other companies who are working with tube sites that is stealing their content. Does that fix their problem, hell no, but every now and then it makes helpless people feel a little better to take a stand even if it is a small one or a moral victory. It's one thing to lose money to tube sites when there is really nothing you can do about it but its another thing, actually a spit in the face when you spend 15 - 20K a year with a company who decides to do business with the company fucking you.

EthnicLover 10-02-2009 10:33 PM

Can't wait to see where that money was spent fighting theft.

Aussie Rebel 10-02-2009 10:49 PM

Interesting thread indeed, Not what I expected that's for sure. Be interesting to see where this goes from here.

Tjeezers 10-03-2009 12:47 AM

GFY is not a neutral playground anymore, and a bad place for a discussion about tube sites. GFY is now an extension tool for those tubes, and supports fully the theft by accepting their money.

I will drop no valuable information AT GFY anymore. Cause this is a troll board not a discussion board. Oohh Eric, please take a shovel and stick that in your ass, you might get the same feeling we small webmasters have when we see and read your transparent comment. You only reacted here cause you thought you we`re obligated to tell something. But the message was already made, its all for the money, dom ta domperdiedom

okny 10-03-2009 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epitome (Post 16366016)
My theory is that the "good guys" got some of the "bad guys" money, even if indirectly.

What's so wrong with that?

Better that it go here than somewhere else, right?

Besides, I haven't seen anyone step to the plate with donations to GFY so that such an ad sale never takes place again.

Now, inquiring minds REALLY want to know what the hell happened with that data center snafu and why did it take almost 24 hours to get back to normal speed? Even a move gone bad shouldn't take that long to recover, me thinks.

What kind of theory is that so tomorrow you put up a company that supports kiddy porn so you would say the same thing? I think not, regardless of the money it's the support that you lose.

Btw the posters are who make this board and no donation is needed we donate our time in her and that's worth more then money.

okny 10-03-2009 12:58 AM

Nothing against Eric or Ice which is understandable it's not their choice who goes up as an advertiser they are just doing their job. But it wasn't the greatest move by the company just my :2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123