I am curious, I have a bachelors degree in Interactive Multimedia and I think my SEO is pretty up to par, for Digitaldivasonline.com, I am page one google for foot fetish links, foot fetish reviews, pantyhose links, busty links, yada yada.
I am curious as to the Bing algorithm, I spent a week changing my html and directory pages from
http://www.digitaldivasonline.com/world < which did not really make any sense as far as url tags to
http://www.digitaldivasonline.com/co...directory.html < which makes much more sense as far as the url keyword relevancy that is one of the main stays in Bing's spider popularity algorithms.
...In fact I spent a fucking week doing it to my 200 plus html pages and although I may need more time to have the new url structure propagate correctly, am I missing something? I deleted some of my older meta's and replaced with new, messed around with some of the wording, etc. I have run through my optimizers and my index scores almost perfect, my subdirectories, on the other hand...
One more question, as far as proper backlinks, I have been using java for this on some of my other sites, an example is
<SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript">
<!--
var bl = new backlink();
bl.write();
//-->
</SCRIPT>
Line 1 opens the script element and line 2 sets the obligatory comment for older browsers. Line 3 creates a backlink object, storing it in the bl variable. Line 4 then calls the backlink object’s write() method which writes out the HTML code for the link. 5 closes the comment and 6 closes the script element.
The backlink object uses object detection to test if the history.back() method works. If the browser does not support history.back(), or if the browser is in the first page it has loaded since the browser opened (i.e. there is no page to go "back" to), then the back link is not written out. This is why it is better to use a scripting object to write out the link instead of hardcoding the link into the page.
...or is my reasoning totally off in your opinon?
...feedback? advice?
and what do you all think of bing so far.
thanks
~Christiaan
I am curious as to the Bing algorithm, I spent a week changing my html and directory pages from
http://www.digitaldivasonline.com/world < which did not really make any sense as far as url tags to
http://www.digitaldivasonline.com/co...directory.html < which makes much more sense as far as the url keyword relevancy that is one of the main stays in Bing's spider popularity algorithms.
...In fact I spent a fucking week doing it to my 200 plus html pages and although I may need more time to have the new url structure propagate correctly, am I missing something? I deleted some of my older meta's and replaced with new, messed around with some of the wording, etc. I have run through my optimizers and my index scores almost perfect, my subdirectories, on the other hand...
One more question, as far as proper backlinks, I have been using java for this on some of my other sites, an example is
<SCRIPT TYPE="text/javascript">
<!--
var bl = new backlink();
bl.write();
//-->
</SCRIPT>
Line 1 opens the script element and line 2 sets the obligatory comment for older browsers. Line 3 creates a backlink object, storing it in the bl variable. Line 4 then calls the backlink object’s write() method which writes out the HTML code for the link. 5 closes the comment and 6 closes the script element.
The backlink object uses object detection to test if the history.back() method works. If the browser does not support history.back(), or if the browser is in the first page it has loaded since the browser opened (i.e. there is no page to go "back" to), then the back link is not written out. This is why it is better to use a scripting object to write out the link instead of hardcoding the link into the page.
...or is my reasoning totally off in your opinon?
...feedback? advice?
and what do you all think of bing so far.
thanks
~Christiaan
Comment