For all those that don't know SWASTIKA is simbol of the first christianity and its old simbol . Swastika is not invented by Adolf Hitler or nazis it just existed and it means loyalty & christianity .

SO nothing bad i see as a tatoo of some guy that doesnt make crimes.

The same for me. My family has suffered from Nazis (those who had swastika) but not from crusaders, christian inquisition, black panthers or kkk.

SmokeyTheBear, I hope you got my answer right.

Not Christian but Buddhist symbol. But actually it doesn't matter.

Ah yeah probably you are right .

I just saw by myself a swastika symbol in old christian monastery from from XII century in Ohrid,Macedonia.

So i thought it is old christian symbol only :

The swastika shape was also present in pre-Christian Slavic mythology. It was dedicated to the sun god Svarog .

I guess swastika is old spiritual symbol which is present in many religions .

The guy has a swastika and white power tattoos, and you think he has been given an unfair label? You honestly think we should ask him what his views are? Unbelievable...

Me either. It's femdom, I've seen worse in this niche than a swastika tat.

In regular old vanilla porn I'd see people having a problem with it though. But femdom? I think not.

The black panthers didn't execute 6 million people dude. Nazi symbolism isn't just about white power, as fucked up as that is. It promotes genocide and fascism.

I would never do business with any company who had anything to do with this.

he wouldnt work for me

for good reason. i couldn't name you one symbol that is more controversial than the swastika.

:1orglaugh at the people trying to marginalize the significance of the fucking swastika of all things. unfucking real.

the black panthers??? really?? that's the best you got? :1orglaugh

You've got to be one of the most annoying twits to ever come down the highway.

But, I'm rather surprised that even you would show yourself to be this stupid.

the nazis got that symbol from tibet i believe.

unfair label ? no , like i said in your quote, he is probably a scumbag, thats kinda the point of the content isn't it ? i think it would be silly to "label" him based on 2 pics, maybe they ar removeable and he is jewish and having a great laugh at the controversy, who knows, the question was should we censor it i think .. my vote would be no, if the content was somehow glorifying what hitler did then perhaps yes , but it seems quite the opposite. Humiliating what appears to be a scumbag..

You should move away from the highway, i hear the fumes are dangerous.:thumbsup

I find a little humor in the fact that it is, after all, humiliation porn and the chick in control is obvioulsy not of aryan decent. Maybe she steps on his balls in another set with those heels? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh