Thanks for everyone's patience in my response. I tuned out over the weekend for some sorely needed family time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscortBiz
(Post 16186736)
its kill or be killed, paysites doing 50% less joins = less movies being downloaded, less people doing hosted galleries or getting traffic to them = death for old fashioned hosts.
So as transparent as you are I doubt you'll just come out and admit that if you didn't make this move you'd slowly continue seeing less and less revenue monthly just like the rest of the hosting world.
|
Like many others, you're making assumptions which are inaccurate. We don't seek this business, we never have. While many hosts are struggling, we are still experiencing exponential growth every year since inception and this year is no exception. It's a fight, but any worthwhile endeavor always is and all of us hosts are having to work smarter and harder than ever.
MojoHost has accomplished it's growth with tremendous integrity and client service. I've already said it before but it's gone unnoticed. As a percentage of revenue and "growth" this stuff is insignificant. In terms of future growth, this type of traffic isn't even in the business plan. Why do it, then? Well, again, we're not seeking clients and perhaps I should have been clearer about this.
We simply host too many tens of thousands of sites for me to not make a public statement leveling the playing field with other host competitors and setting expectations properly. It's impossible to know everything about all clients anymore. The fact that we have ended up hosting a few such sites out of many hundreds of tubes run to a high standard was enough for me to make mention of all this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
(Post 16188387)
you just realize that you have killed revenue stream you are counting on saving you with this statement.
The fact is big tube sites are pushing the limits of fair use, they are the ones that are extending those rights. They are counting on your to respect the process so that those rights can be properly established.
Claiming that "All of the decisions I made were with our content producing customers in mind." put you into the catagory of host that will usurp that process.
Why would any "fair use" tube site risk their entire business opperation to host with a company who declares he is against them from the very begining.
|
We don't need saving - comments to that effect are baseless, total nonsense. The process and laws already exist. MojoHost is a hosting company, we will always do what is prudent to the letter of the law. It is my hope that the laws mature and also that those who push their limits grow their business model to favor copyright holders and smart promotion of relevant web sites. I hold myself to a higher standard and as much as we can without creating liability, the corporate entity will continue to do the same. If we are to do business outside of the law in either direction we may then be subject to losing
the protections afforded to ISPs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
(Post 16191834)
cliffnotes ?
you now allow customers using unlicensed content ?
|
I am not seeking any different clientele than we ever have. If you have unlicensed content on any free, pay, tube, blog, forum or other site you will be subject to the DMCA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrozenJag
(Post 16191902)
Im super bummed to hear about this. I do appreciate you posting, and I knew that one day the pressure would surpass your stance but doesnt make it any easier to hear.
I just hope that you pass on the lower bandwith costs down to the non full length tube customers.
If these full length tube guys are gonna hurt our bottom dollar, then if you support it the decent thing to do is at least make it cheaper to run OUR businesses.
|
What we're doing here isn't a response to "pressure" and I am sorry that you are disappointed. As I stated several times over, we have hardly any such business of this type. The idea that I have any such site on our network is what prompted my post. I've long since been giving every available tool to our clients to fight back with - that was the goal the whole time. Your account is already a perfect example with W servers, X bandwidth, full management, full backups, Y overage and Z total cost.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanCapture
(Post 16192088)
Yes....he does. He does this because his competition does it. And he's afraid that if he doesn't do it, they'll get all the tube money and their businesses will grow and his won't. I guess he's finding it difficult to compete in the marketplace if he runs an honest operation over there. Sad :(
As far as I know...there are only two kinds of tube sites. Legal ones and illegal ones. And Brad says that he's happy to do business with "all kinds". Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out now does it?
Brad, it's always nice to see someone's business grow & expand beyond their wildest dreams. But it's sad to see them stooping to the level of doing business with content thieves just to get the overhead paid. It would be nice if you could make money the old fashioned "honest" 'way and stay away from sites that steal from producers like myself. But if you need the money that bad to keep your business afloat, well...good luck.
Of course you're not the only company out there who sleeps with illegal tube sites. There are other hosting companies as well as billing companies who are happy to take money from illegal tube sites. The difference is that none of them are on GFY bragging that they'll be happy to do business with this kind of scum. You apparently are happy to do it and think that we should commend you for your honesty. All I can say is *wow* : (
|
Dean, you're taking this so far that I'm quite surprised. I'm not on here bragging about anything or even soliciting for this business. You've typed thousands of words after my initial post and really everything is in your own head, you've made a ton of assumptions on all levels. As a point of fact, I have stated that a few such sites do exist on our network. Everything else is you going to the Nth degree. Do my posts sound happy and gleeful, did I ask you for a commendation? Dude, check yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanCapture
(Post 16192522)
Here is what Brad said..."To this date, we host very few sites which receive DMCAs and I can count the clients on one hand who receive more than one per month."
This is in reference to tube sites ok? Why would a tube site be getting a DMCA notice if they were dealing in legal content? Why would Brad have clients that are getting "more than one (DMCA) notice per month".... if they didn't have stolen content on their tube site. Brad came here to GFY "bragging" that he's now working with "all kinds" of tube sites. He didn't come right out and say that he has clients who have stolen content but that wasn't necessary since he admitted that he has tube clients that are receiving DMCA notices. Would a perfectly "legal" tube site receive monthly DMCA notices? I think not....
Let's not forget that Brad started his post off by saying that at first he was NOT going to do business with tube sites like these. Then when he couldn't get his competitors to take the high ground like he was going to take, he decided that in order to stay competitive, he'd have to do business with tube sites. His argument was that as long as the DMCA's get taken care of promptly, everything is legal and he's fine with it.
Here's the bottom line Choker. Even if Brad takes care of the DMCA notices in a timely and professional manner, it's still immoral and unethical that stolen content was put up on a site to begin with. And just as unethical to do business with companies like these who steal content. It's just like the guy said earlier....
That about sums up my interpretation of what Brad said in his post!
That's about all I'm going to say on this matter. My whole argument was from a producers standpoint. A guy who spends him money & time producing content so that tube sites can steal it and hosting companies can host it. Brad claims to have had our best interest at heart with his decision but I don't see how that could be.
Brad my friend - good luck on this new adventure to work with tubes. I saw the pictures of your new place - very nice job. People seem to think that you are about as honest and transparent as they come. I would only hope that some day we would have an opportunity to do business together in some capacity but to be honest with you, I can't ethically do business with a guy who thinks it's ok to host tube sites that get DMCA notices on a regular basis....and then brag about it. Which reminds me - I need to talk to my boys at Phatservers. I love those guys but if they are hosting a bunch of illegal tubes, I'll be looking for another host.
|
You're naive about DMCAs and with the tube stuff still taking it out of context. All hosts get DMCAs and they're not always correct, either. Blogs, tubes, forums, free hosted galleries - I've seen them for every type of site and many times over for people who were using them as per affiliate marketing agreements... or from user submitted stuff on forums... for domainers with their page text or domain names... from companies that have decided they want to get nasty and really end a relationship sour.
The data center isn't new at all but thank you for the congratulations, sort of. We moved here over three years ago with 200 servers and it just happens that we now have 1200. This was simply the first photo opportunity that we had within the site which was exciting for us.
Any continuation of censoring business coming in the door to the extent that I have done in the past could create added liability for MojoHost. To have the protections of an ISP, we must function like one - even if it means in some instances taking positions that are less adamant than I would like them to be.
Brad