XBIZ NEWS: Larry Flynt Victorious in Infringement Case

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • xbizdon
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2004
    • 221
    #1

    XBIZ NEWS: Larry Flynt Victorious in Infringement Case

    XBIZ NEWS: Larry Flynt Victorious in Infringement Case

    LOS ANGELES ? A federal jury sided with Hustler publisher Larry Flynt in a trademark infringement case against his nephews who sought to launch a competing adult entertainment company using the name Flynt.

    http://www.xbiz.com/news/115600
    Don Parret
    Editor/Publications Director
    XBIZ™ | The Industry Source
    Adnet Media

    [email protected]
    Tel: 310.820.0228 x 701

    Tags: None
    • ArsewithClass
      So Fucking Banned
      • Mar 2007
      • 7957
      #2
      Larry Flynt = money = winning power


      Nightmare!


      To be honest, who would want to know anyone that wants to fight against any family especially nephews in court.

      Money makes the world crazy!

        Comment

        • tiger
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2002
          • 6986
          #3
          Kinda sad that his family isn't trying to continue what he started instead of fighting him.

            Comment

            • fatfoo
              ICQ:649699063
              • Mar 2003
              • 27763
              #4
              Yes, can't use the name Flynt. That's his name. The federal jury maybe likes to jerk off on Hustler magazine as well.
              Send me an email: [email protected]

                Comment

                • DaddyHalbucks
                  A freakin' legend!
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 18975
                  #5
                  Larry was right. His nephews had no right to compete in the same business using the same name.

                  Sure, trademarks are not "en masse" rights. They usually pertain to the field of use. So, the nephews can use their name to sell hotdogs or manufacture furniture. But, that tradename is already taken in the entertainment arena.
                  Boner Money

                    Comment

                    • SleazyDream
                      I'm here for SPORT
                      • Jul 2001
                      • 41470
                      #6
                      Originally posted by DaddyHalbucks
                      Larry was right. His nephews had no right to compete in the same business using the same name.

                      Sure, trademarks are not "en masse" rights. They usually pertain to the field of use. So, the nephews can use their name to sell hotdogs or manufacture furniture. But, that tradename is already taken in the entertainment arena.
                      agreed.

                      they WERE trading on Larry's name.
                      This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

                      Now read without the word dog.

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next
                        Working...