Nina Fox going to sue affiliates?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IllTestYourGirls
    Ah My Balls
    • Feb 2007
    • 14311

    #1

    Nina Fox going to sue affiliates?

    Just got an email from medium pimpin, whats the deal here?


    Dear affiliate,

    It recently came to our attention that a certain lawyer representing Nina Fox has been making legal threats towards our affiliates for using Nina Fox content provided by us in our affiliate section.

    The content in question was exclusively shot by us and we do have the proper license for it.

    However, Nina and her lawyer has still decided to sue us for the use of said content and we simply do not care to fight a legal battle because of two photo shoots.

    That being said we will have to ask you to remove any Nina Fox content you have used from our affiliate section.

    If you are linking to our FHG's don't worry, they have already been removed but, there was also a free content zip available so if you have used that please pull it.

    We're truly sorry for the inconvenience, should you have any question whatsoever please direct them to [email protected] and you shall get a prompt reply.

    Best regards,
    Medium Pimpin
  • MediumPimpin
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2003
    • 1488

    #2
    No she is suing us, we have a three page contract, signed and initialed and her I.D., but with only two sets of content on our site is it worth it to risk it?

    It's better to play on the safe side when we are talking one hosted gallery.
    nats.mediumpimpin.com

    Comment

    • Rangermoore
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2009
      • 1541

      #3
      Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls
      Just got an email from medium pimpin, whats the deal here?
      Already posted...

      Comment

      • Rangermoore
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2009
        • 1541

        #4
        Originally posted by MediumPimpin
        No she is suing us, we have a three page contract, signed and initialed and her I.D., but with only two sets of content on our site is it worth it to risk it?

        It's better to play on the safe side when we are talking one hosted gallery.
        To me it's about standing up for yourself..If we let every cum dumpster that decides they don't like the content that they signed away their rights to, scare people into backing down.. What does that say...

        Comment

        • Fletch XXX
          GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
          • Jan 2002
          • 60840

          #5
          they shouldnt buckle imo

          Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

          Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

          Comment

          • MediumPimpin
            Confirmed User
            • Apr 2003
            • 1488

            #6
            Originally posted by Fletch XXX
            they shouldnt buckle imo
            We are fighting it, it's two sets of picture content about seven years old, just playing it safe, if you don't want to remove it don't it should be fine.
            nats.mediumpimpin.com

            Comment

            • Fletch XXX
              GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
              • Jan 2002
              • 60840

              #7
              Originally posted by MediumPimpin
              We are fighting it, it's two sets of picture content about seven years old, just playing it safe, if you don't want to remove it don't it should be fine.
              I agree its not worth it, but I also hate seeing people strong armed by lawyers when they ar doing nothing wrong.

              Good luck man

              Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

              Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

              Comment

              • Rangermoore
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2009
                • 1541

                #8
                Originally posted by MediumPimpin
                We are fighting it, it's two sets of picture content about seven years old, just playing it safe, if you don't want to remove it don't it should be fine.
                Cool, Good luck as well

                Comment

                • Machete_
                  WINNING!
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 14579

                  #9
                  is she returning the money she recived from the content ? I would guess "no"

                  I hope you win.

                  It's one thing to regret getting content shot, and negotiating a deal to get it offline. But its another to try and stongarm people like this. Don't bite the hand that feeds you
                  Last edited by Machete_; 07-24-2009, 05:12 PM.

                  Comment

                  • DonovanTrent
                    Confirmed User
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 968

                    #10
                    I had a model I shot one time, three sets. She contacted me 2 years later, told me that she was getting out of the business and asked me to stop using her shoots.

                    I advised her that I would be happy to stop using her sets, provided she purchase the exclusive rights to them. She would get the full copyright to the sets that I had paid her to pose for, and would include the model release that she signed and initialed which gave me unlimited rights to the content, for $1000 per set. (bold type is exactly as I bolded it in the response to her)

                    Strange, I never heard back from her.
                    Donovan Trent

                    Comment

                    • qxm
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jul 2006
                      • 5970

                      #11
                      Originally posted by DonovanTrent
                      I had a model I shot one time, three sets. She contacted me 2 years later, told me that she was getting out of the business and asked me to stop using her shoots.

                      I advised her that I would be happy to stop using her sets, provided she purchase the exclusive rights to them. She would get the full copyright to the sets that I had paid her to pose for, and would include the model release that she signed and initialed which gave me unlimited rights to the content, for $1000 per set. (bold type is exactly as I bolded it in the response to her)

                      Strange, I never heard back from her.
                      and THAT is how u close the deal in style!

                      ICQ: 266990876

                      Comment

                      • Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life
                        (felis madjewicus)
                        • Jul 2006
                        • 20368

                        #12
                        funny, over two sets it probably would be cheaper to just buy the rights then pay a lawyer...

                        Comment

                        • JFK
                          FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
                          • Jan 2002
                          • 67369

                          #13
                          Originally posted by MediumPimpin
                          No she is suing us, we have a three page contract, signed and initialed and her I.D., but with only two sets of content on our site is it worth it to risk it?

                          It's better to play on the safe side when we are talking one hosted gallery.
                          That SUCKS

                          FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
                          For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

                          Comment

                          • Rangermoore
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 1541

                            #14
                            Originally posted by DonovanTrent
                            I had a model I shot one time, three sets. She contacted me 2 years later, told me that she was getting out of the business and asked me to stop using her shoots.

                            I advised her that I would be happy to stop using her sets, provided she purchase the exclusive rights to them. She would get the full copyright to the sets that I had paid her to pose for, and would include the model release that she signed and initialed which gave me unlimited rights to the content, for $1000 per set. (bold type is exactly as I bolded it in the response to her)

                            Strange, I never heard back from her.
                            Medium Pimpin should take note

                            Comment

                            • DonovanTrent
                              Confirmed User
                              • Dec 2006
                              • 968

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Rangermoore
                              Medium Pimpin should take note
                              I wasn't saying that as a suggestion to Medium Pimpin, I was just relating an experience. They've got to decide whether it's worth the time and expense to go into a court battle they could easily win, but could result in a tough time recouping legal expenses from the plaintiff. And you can't recoup the time involved.

                              I was prepared to take that risk and maybe they will, too. But if I were running an affiliate prog of the magnitude they are, I'd be advising affiliates to pull the sets, too. That's just common sense.
                              Donovan Trent

                              Comment

                              Working...