Originally Posted by fartfly (Post 16078260)

How about $500 for 0 uniques. :1orglaugh
Does that work for you?
i do not approve this message

Originally Posted by sortie (Post 16081788)

It helps if your nick is unique.

So google jmcb420 :

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...q=f&o q=&aqi=


For that reason making such titles are wrong without proof.

PS : So much for you "SEO Skills".

Originally Posted by jmcb420 (Post 16082862)

holy shitballs batman!!! My cats are on google.....


That was a scary click, i must say. But a well made point.

Originally Posted by SordidMedia (Post 16078923)

I was waiting for Killswitch`s next comment on how mmcfadden had lost $500 because that would have been the next thing that he had got wrong. For the umpteenth time, he was partially refunded. Do you want me to post the refund confirmation or is that another lie from me?

Funny how all his mates jump onto the bandwagon on what a great guy he is.

I have explained at length (in one of the three threads that the buyer took it upon himself to make) on how the original script works, I pasted in the original stat screenshot that showed the visitors sent, I posted in numbers for the 15th + 16th, I cannot get raw logs because to use the server techs comment -"There is no way to pull logs from 30 days ago if it is rotated or deleted." and I have been responsive at all time to the buyer through email/ICQ.

I 100% agree that we took too long setting-up the new script but that was the reason why I wanted to compensate the buyer which is why I offered 40 k of extra clicks.

We did send him traffic and the traffic sources were the exact same from when the campaign started on the 23rd June through to the 16th July (the difference was during the first 4.7 k, they were sent through the sordidstats script, the remaining 13 k was not).

Does all this sound like a person who is trying to rip off the buyer? Of course it doesn`t.

Did the buyer become abusive telling me to "fuck-off" etc. Yes he did.

And no I won`t be sending him some traffic URL`s of publishers who we work with because he will post them here and I certainly don`t want sites included in what has gone on here - that would be totally unfair to those individuals.

Originally Posted by PORNSTARGLOBAL™ (Post 16080315)

hookupthing.com <--- :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Killswitch (Post 16077861)

Suggestion, make an apology or try to come up with solid proof, because I sense a banning soon.

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 16085774)

Sordid... You have one hour to post a retraction/apology and we will change the thread title, or be banned.

Your choice!

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash (Post 16085878)

Go and copyright some "star"s :321GFY:321GFY:321GFY

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 16085774)

Sordid... You have one hour to post a retraction/apology and we will change the thread title, or be banned.

Your choice!

Originally Posted by kush (Post 16084610)

mmcfadden you have some balls posting your referring URLs like that. After this thread I wouldn't use SordidMedia for buying traffic.

However, I'm glad I never promoted your program because I would be fucking pissed to have my work show up in a public place like GFY for everyone to see.

Originally Posted by mmcfadden (Post 16087884)

I didn't want to post my stats but had numerous requests asking to do so to back my statement of no referring hits...

That being said... it's kinda alot of my work as well and i'm not really that pissed having to post it. I don't think most people would care that much... either way I pulled the link down

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 16086263)

Pampers party is basically a guys version of a baby shower. Everyone brings some Diapers. Then we played some poker and hit a strip club

Originally Posted by SordidMedia (Post 16080587)

This thread went way over your head. Simpleton.