Did all Smart Thumbs TGPs just get dropped from Google?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • master_design
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2006
    • 772

    #136
    wow that sucks

    Comment

    • Si
      Such Fun!
      • Feb 2008
      • 13900

      #137
      Originally posted by hribar81
      I do. This sucks big time...
      seems a lot do aswell

      Comment

      • dready
        Confirmed User
        • Oct 2002
        • 5247

        #138
        Originally posted by Pleasurepays
        and if i recall.. he shot an alien, in their under ground civilization with a Walther PPK - or the same pistol that James Bond used.

        amazing stuff!!
        I've met that guy before. He's quite the storyteller.
        ICQ: 91139591

        Comment

        • Pleasurepays
          BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
          • Aug 2002
          • 11913

          #139
          Originally posted by dready
          I've met that guy before. He's quite the storyteller.
          really? that's kind of fascinating to me. i mean i think he was a lunatic and full of shit.. but at the same time, i think it would be sort of interesting and sobering to sit in a room full of people and listen to all that... looking around seeing everyone stare in total amazement.

          how did you meet him? at a speaking engagement?

          Comment

          • dready
            Confirmed User
            • Oct 2002
            • 5247

            #140
            Originally posted by Pleasurepays
            really? that's kind of fascinating to me. i mean i think he was a lunatic and full of shit.. but at the same time, i think it would be sort of interesting and sobering to sit in a room full of people and listen to all that... looking around seeing everyone stare in total amazement.

            how did you meet him? at a speaking engagement?
            Yeah, about 10 years ago at a convention. I chatted with him briefly after. He makes it sound pretty believable, but I agree, he's a nutbar.
            ICQ: 91139591

            Comment

            • TheSenator
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Feb 2003
              • 13340

              #141
              This is fucked up!

              This is my analysis....

              I think a few bad apples using Smart Thumb used exploits. I remember cruising Google for key phrases and would come across TGPs that would lock you in until you clicked or download something. The site would eventually die a quick death but another would pop right back up with these exploits.

              Google's algorithm couldn't keep up because Google bot would be re-directed to a clean version of the site. My theory is that Google did a manual manipulation of its search algorithm to throw back sites using Smart Thumbs. The bad apples using Smart Thumbs cause this Google backlash.

              or I could be completely wrong....
              ISeekGirls.com since 2005

              Comment

              • Pleasurepays
                BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                • Aug 2002
                • 11913

                #142
                Originally posted by TheSenator
                This is fucked up!

                This is my analysis....

                I think a few bad apples using Smart Thumb used exploits. I remember cruising Google for key phrases and would come across TGPs that would lock you in until you clicked or download something. The site would eventually die a quick death but another would pop right back up with these exploits.

                Google's algorithm couldn't keep up because Google bot would be re-directed to a clean version of the site. My theory is that Google did a manual manipulation of its search algorithm to throw back sites using Smart Thumbs. The bad apples using Smart Thumbs cause this Google backlash.

                or I could be completely wrong....
                yes! google is super concerned with relevant porn results. nothing they hate more than having a surfer typein "asian ladyboys sucking assholes" and getting mixed results back.

                they don't manually manipulate results. they just don't. they don't look at 1.5 trillion stored pages and try to figure out how to improve the results for "donkey fucked teens"

                that's not how search engines work... and its self defeating if you have to manually create good results vs find a tweak to algorithmically produce the best results. further, looking in that direction doesn't give you a solution (although it would be quite expected for everyone to jump on the "there's nothing i can do and its not my fault" bandwagon which is popular in porn)

                since i have free ST sites with ZERO outbound links and NOTHING going on that also ended up getting penalized, i would suggest again that it has to with the smart thumbs link and how those links link to other sites. its not about whether a site has it or not (paid or free version).. its about those sites, and who's linking to who and the general link matrix itself.

                there is ZERO contextual relevance between "smart thumbs" and "naked midgets" and the these sites are typically shitty, low quality sites that look EXACTLY like an auto generated link farm from a search engines eyes without a decent number of quality back links. Just pages with zero info with 100's of outbound links per page. linking to what can be considered a spam site can hurt you just as much as having your own network of spam sites interlinked can hurt you. having a "clean site" that gets penalized tells you that you should also be looking at your link trades and who you are trading hard links with. you'll find that your "clean site" suddenly just got a little dirtier.

                why is this happening for sure? who knows. i personally dont care enough to figure it out because the TGP model in its traditional form is 100% doomed to fail no matter what. we used ST to put domains live that we might develop in 3-4 months.

                all people have to do is start posting domains, start making lists of the commonalities and start trouble shooting... or do that with your own networks. but of course, this biz is too backwards for that to happen it could be that there are some common hardlink trades that are causing this... could be a lot of things. it simply requires a methodical approach to building a list of common factors and then determining which can/cannot be ruled out... and then looking at the remaining factors and testing.

                you already have a strong lead... it seems to be affecting ST sites. so you've already narrowed it down from around 1.5 million domains to 1000's.
                Last edited by Pleasurepays; 06-20-2009, 09:33 AM.

                Comment

                • 1200mics
                  Confirmed User
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 5131

                  #143
                  Wow looks like i lost more then 50% of my traffic
                  I guess the only thing we could do is ask Google in webmasters central and try to make ST script more seo friendly ?

                  We will need much luck and health to overcome this .. so good luck all Smart thumbers :thumbs up:

                  Comment

                  • sortie
                    Confirmed User
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 7771

                    #144
                    Originally posted by TheSenator
                    This is fucked up!

                    This is my analysis....

                    I think a few bad apples using Smart Thumb used exploits. I remember cruising Google for key phrases and would come across TGPs that would lock you in until you clicked or download something. The site would eventually die a quick death but another would pop right back up with these exploits.

                    Google's algorithm couldn't keep up because Google bot would be re-directed to a clean version of the site. My theory is that Google did a manual manipulation of its search algorithm to throw back sites using Smart Thumbs. The bad apples using Smart Thumbs cause this Google backlash.

                    or I could be completely wrong....
                    You could be but you ain't!

                    This non-sense about the back link to smart thumbs causing a problem is bullshit,
                    especially considering that smart thumbs still comes up #1 on the first page.

                    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=smart...fp=leBsIIJAIN0

                    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=smart...fp=leBsIIJAIN0

                    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=tgp+s...fp=leBsIIJAIN0

                    Holy shit! Smart thumbs is way down to 4th on the 1st page for "tgp script"

                    So if google thinks the back link is spam then why penalize the site/message board
                    that got spammed and not the domain being spammed?

                    The other option would be that smart thumbs is using an SEO method that google
                    has decided to penalize. Add in some spammy sites and that's enough.
                    Last edited by sortie; 06-20-2009, 10:04 AM.

                    Comment

                    • HorseShit
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Dec 2004
                      • 17513

                      #145
                      Originally posted by 1200mics
                      Wow looks like i lost more then 50% of my traffic
                      I guess the only thing we could do is ask Google in webmasters central and try to make ST script more seo friendly ?

                      We will need much luck and health to overcome this .. so good luck all Smart thumbers :thumbs up:

                      Comment

                      • Pleasurepays
                        BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                        • Aug 2002
                        • 11913

                        #146
                        Originally posted by sortie
                        You could be but you ain't!

                        This non-sense about the back link to smart thumbs causing a problem is bullshit,
                        especially considering that smart thumbs still comes up #1 on the first page.

                        http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=smart...fp=leBsIIJAIN0

                        http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=smart...fp=leBsIIJAIN0

                        http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=tgp+s...fp=leBsIIJAIN0

                        Holy shit! Smart thumbs is way down to 4th on the 1st page for "tgp script"

                        So if google thinks the back link is spam then why penalize the site/message board
                        that got spammed and not the domain being spammed?

                        The other option would be that smart thumbs is using an SEO method that google
                        has decided to penalize. Add in some spammy sites and that's enough.
                        a site doesn't get penalized because of links pointing to it.

                        Comment

                        • Ecchi22
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Nov 2005
                          • 10012

                          #147
                          Seems that http://petitenympha.com got penalty too..

                          Comment

                          • cykoe6
                            Confirmed User
                            • Apr 2005
                            • 4499

                            #148
                            Originally posted by Godsmack
                            I lost over 70k google! we have no clue why this happens like everyone else...if we know why this happens we may find some fix for it. Also i wanna say that it's a bit too easy putting the blame on ST unless we know exactly whats happening.
                            I agree. I have ST sites that were not penalized.
                            бабки, шлюхи, сила

                            Comment

                            • sortie
                              Confirmed User
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 7771

                              #149
                              Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                              a site doesn't get penalized because of links pointing to it.
                              Exactly, so why punish the site pointing to it?

                              By your scenario we should all be penalized for pointing to the same sponsors.

                              Comment

                              • Slick
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2001
                                • 7338

                                #150
                                Thank God I don't use Smart Thumbs ;)

                                I do feel sorry for the rest of you though because I do trade with a lot of you guys. Hopefully shit can get straightened out with it.

                                Comment

                                Working...