GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=904593)

Barefootsies 05-10-2009 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chodadog (Post 15840488)
Thread title was misleading 'cause you only quoted part of the sentence, and thus gave it a whole other meaning. Methinks thou doth protest too much.

Understood. They read the title, with was a part of the sentence (full sentence too long for title btw), assumed that was my position. Started attacking.

I am not protesting. Simply saying I have not stated my opinion. Which is obvious to anyone who can read.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blingbaby (Post 15840493)
He pretty much explained it to you, but obviously mathematics is not your strongest skill. Yes the planet is about to collapse, get in your jump pod and escape while you still can. Nuclear winter has already started in Australia.. :321GFY

I will pass it along to the original author of the article.

:thumbsup

Blingbaby 05-10-2009 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 15840453)
Oh right, now I follow you demented reasoning...

A direct sentence posted in the title of the thread, taken from an article, citing some guy, who is not me, is somehow me stating a position according to you?

Wow. Ignorance is bliss.

:2 cents:

Yes you copied/paste half the sentence out of context, not understanding the whole article and now you get flamed for it. Have a little dignity sir and admit you fucked up don't make yourself look like a bigger ass than you already are..

Barefootsies 05-10-2009 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blingbaby (Post 15840496)
Yo! Mr. Idiot. Someone has already pointed it out to you yet you are still trying to backtrack. The FUCKING THREAD TITLE that YOU typed says Unemployed will hit 30% by next year which is not what the article says at all. Get a clue dick..

Right. You ASSumed. Got it.

Next time you say anything remotely relevant to anything in this industry. I will copy it, quote it verbatim. I will then make a thread. Take a sentence out of it, use that as the thread title, and hit post.

Then I can claim it is my opinion, and I was the one who said it instead of you.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Barefootsies 05-10-2009 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blingbaby (Post 15840500)
Yes you copied/paste half the sentence out of context, not understanding the whole article

At no point have I remarked on my opinion, nor my understanding, of the article.

Fucking priceless.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Blingbaby 05-10-2009 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 15840478)
Really? Wow.

https://gfy.com/15840401-post23.html

I quoted the article in it's entirety, and underline the sentence for your ignorance. Guess that must have missed your hawk eye huh?

Let me repeat it for you toots, I'll even give you a countdown for your third grade reading level.

1. At no time in this thread have I stated my opinion, in my words.
2. Thread title is verbatim an underlined passage in #23.
3. You are ASSuming, based on thread title, that is my opinion.

You are like a dog with a bone. You have to get the last word in, and always be right. In this case, it is pretty obvious to anyone with a brain cell I have not stated my opinion on the original cited article in any way in this thread. Furthermore, the thread title is verbatim out of the original story. Also not written by me.

Guess that's too complicated for you eh?

:1orglaugh

Dude, YOU are the dog but you don't even have a bone. You're barking because you're scared at this point or just plain stupid like any other dog?

voa 05-11-2009 12:35 AM

Interesting news

GatorB 05-11-2009 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 15840499)
Understood. They read the title, with was a part of the sentence (full sentence too long for title btw), assumed that was my position. Started attacking.

I never said that was your position fucking retard. I'm "attacking" you because you're fucking retarded and can't read nor do math.

you posted a thread title "unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year ". It doesn't matter whether you agreed with it or not. You CLEARLY got the gist of the article wrong because the article never says that. You keep claiming it does, but it does not.

OG LennyT 05-11-2009 07:30 AM

As much as I want to disagree with that fucktard Gator, Barefootsy guy is the loser here. Just a very honest opinion from a neutral 3rd party

CarlosTheGaucho 05-11-2009 07:37 AM

Less credit to spend - less profit - less salaries paid - it's a logical and scary spiral.

There was too much virtual money in the economy, simple and scary.

Now you see far too many jobs being artificially kept - companies loosing net of 40 pct. of their yearly budget, such as General Motors.

It's a complete fail of the system built on cheap credit and reactive consumer behavior, banking cowboys - what is incredible is how could this last for so long?

You can only spend more than you earn until there are resources to grab, now the fridge is empty.

SteveHardeman 05-11-2009 07:38 AM

Ladies, ladies, ladies, go take a Midol come back. Geezus.

:-)

LiveDose 05-11-2009 07:54 AM

50% out of work!

Joshua G 05-11-2009 08:12 AM

there will never be 30% unemployed in a year. Even in the worst of the great depression, a much smaller economy with no safety nets, unemployment reached 25%.

Only nukes going off in our major cities can create 30% unemployment in a year.

NinjaSteve 05-11-2009 08:18 AM

This thread is f'n craziness!

Slappin Fish 05-11-2009 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 15840002)
You need to learn to read. It doesn't say unemployment wil be 30% moron.

"We're nearly at one out of four laid-off workers has already been out of work for six months.

That's Andrew Stettner at the National Employment Law Project. He and his research partners at UC-Berkeley predict the share of long-term unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year"

That means of those that have been laid off 30% will be laid off 6 months or more. So if umployment is at 10% then 30% of those or 3% overall, will have been out of work for 6 months or more.

:2 cents:

LeRoy 05-11-2009 08:46 AM

Hopefully our porn sales will go up.

People stay home people watch porn :thumbsup:thumbsup

iseeyou 05-11-2009 08:49 AM

Pure comedy.

Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.

you ASSumed.

(insert appropriate cliche here)

Priceless.

Fucking priceless.

Ignorance is bliss.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

markethustler 05-11-2009 10:12 AM

There will always be $ in online marketing, You just have to know what your doing. Times like this clears out the little guys and makes more money for the rest of us.

JP-pornshooter 05-11-2009 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoStar69 (Post 15840088)
Great Depression 2
(banks will crash,lose ALL your money) :)
World War 3

New World Order illuminati are behind current events they OWN Obamas ass.

i have heard this from other sources..
economy will crash, world order re-aligned with one global currency etc...
federal conspiracy to control the masses.
where do people come up with this stuff?

Barefootsies 05-11-2009 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iseeyou (Post 15841277)
Pure comedy.

Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.

you ASSumed.

(insert appropriate cliche here)

Priceless.

Fucking priceless.

Ignorance is bliss.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

:glugglug

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveHardeman (Post 15841099)
Ladies, ladies, ladies, go take a Midol come back. Geezus.

:-)

:1orglaugh:thumbsup

cykoe6 05-11-2009 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 15840002)
You need to learn to read. It doesn't say unemployment wil be 30% moron.

"We're nearly at one out of four laid-off workers has already been out of work for six months.

That's Andrew Stettner at the National Employment Law Project. He and his research partners at UC-Berkeley predict the share of long-term unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year"

That means of those that have been laid off 30% will be laid off 6 months or more. So if umployment is at 10% then 30% of those or 3% overall, will have been out of work for 6 months or more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 15840020)
The one that needs to learn to read is you bitch. Was it too complicated to follow the linked the article? I quoted it verbatim. Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.
:disgust

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 15840381)
No BITCH it's you that need to learn to read. Please read CORRECTLY. It does NOT say that unemployment will be 30%. I already explained what he meant. Now I would appreciate an apology.


While I consider you both to be idiots it is clear that GatorB is correct in this case. Why you would continue to argue the point after him having clearly pointed out your mistake is a mystery. :error

DWB 05-11-2009 12:39 PM

Here is the reality of the situation:

None of us nor does any of our governments know what the fuck is going on or what to really do about it. They all have "ideas" and "plans" but they don't know what is going to work and what is not. Neither do any of us.

30%? Fuck it, why not? Why would it be impossible for that to happen? What if all of the shit they are trying doesn't work and the nation continues to fall apart? We'll be hitting 10% without a doubt. Why does it have to stop there? It doesn't.

I'm not saying it will hit 30%, I'm just saying that NOBODY, including the super genius porno webmasters, know what the fuck is going to pull us out of this hole. Fact is, if any of you really know how to fix things or what was to come, you sure as fuck wouldn't be in this industry for a living.

xNetworx 05-11-2009 12:39 PM

Yo Barefoot, why don't you post one of those anti-Jewish sterotype pics you love so much since its now obvious why you dont like Jews... even the dumb ones are 10x smarter than you :1orglaugh

DWB 05-11-2009 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshgirls (Post 15841185)
there will never be 30% unemployed in a year. Even in the worst of the great depression, a much smaller economy with no safety nets, unemployment reached 25%.

Only nukes going off in our major cities can create 30% unemployment in a year.

If you are so sure, you are wasting your talent in the porn industry. Head to Washington! They could use the help right about know because NONE of them know what's going on.

Barefootsies 05-11-2009 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpporn (Post 15842123)
Yo Barefoot, why don't you post one of those anti-Jewish sterotype pics you love so much since its now obvious why you dont like Jews... even the dumb ones are 10x smarter than you :1orglaugh


:2 cents:

iseeyou 05-11-2009 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 15842132)
If you are so sure, you are wasting your talent in the porn industry. Head to Washington! They could use the help right about know because NONE of them know what's going on.

You are very naive. The people who have power and wealth in DC already know what is the solution. The solution involves them losing power and wealth. They politicans are part of the problem, not part of the solution. They will continue the current system until it breaks because they benefit from the current system.

Think about this. What would happen if Obama announced he would veto any military budget bills which did not reduce military spending by at least 75%?

The secret service failed to protect JFK, Reagan, RFK, etc. They can also fail to protect Obama.

Obama is a puppet and a hostage. You are foolish if you think you can simply walk into DC and start making major changes without resistance. Even the president can't do that without risking his life and he has hundreds of body guards.

pornguy 05-11-2009 01:56 PM

Allow me to fuel the fires of the Conspiracy people..

Notice how many new world order movies and end of the planet movies are coming out this year...

They are getting you ready.

Platinumpimp 05-12-2009 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blingbaby (Post 15840504)
Dude, YOU are the dog but you don't even have a bone. You're barking because you're scared at this point or just plain stupid like any other dog?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Wiredoctor 05-12-2009 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 15840020)
The one that needs to learn to read is you bitch. Was it too complicated to follow the linked the article? I quoted it verbatim. Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.
:disgust

You are sooooo wrong dude, as YOU said it must have been too complicated to follow. Stick to your board posting and post count..:1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123