How accurate NATS stats are? Payouts doesn't hit stats...

**Sly** · 04-26-2009, 12:59 PM

Payouts are not necessarily going to directly reflect stats. It depends on whether or not the sponsor charges you for the payout, what kind of delay they have on payments, etc.

**papill0n** · 04-26-2009, 12:59 PM

your payment is not the same as what is listed in your account, is that what you are saying ?

not heard of anything like this in our programs

**collegeboobies** · 04-26-2009, 01:04 PM

sucks i guess

**MrDeiz** · 04-26-2009, 01:08 PM

sure i know about processing fees and other stuff. i'm talking about amounts which should be paid according to stats for some pay period, but in fact other money was paid. and owners agreed that it was made due to mistake or mistakes in tracking...

**commonsense** · 04-26-2009, 01:13 PM

This entire thread is confusing

**Robbie** · 04-26-2009, 01:16 PM

Never heard of that. I haven't had any other site owner ever tell me that they had "due to mistake or mistakes in tracking" either.
Are you sure you aren't looking at the wrong numbers? Everyone holds back at least a month (some more than that). So maybe you are getting your check that reflects what you made a month or two ago. And in some cases if you don't hit the minimum payout you could be getting a check that is the combination of a few months.

**tabasco** · 04-26-2009, 01:24 PM

Occasionally sponsers make a mistake and get the payment wrong. I have been overpaid, underpaid and not paid at all. Most of the time I have got it sorted with their relative support people. Seems that companys using webmaster checks are more prone to getting it wrong.

**MrDeiz** · 04-26-2009, 01:26 PM

i repeat! owners confirmed that. that was the one reason

****
there was something wrong... you were getting 34 per sale instead of 60%...

****
from now on you will get the correct figures

****
already fixed it

me
just curious how did it happen?

****
dunno... i wish i knew, you can set payouts per webmaster

****
somehow yours was at 34

****
instead of 60%

****
will try to find out thou

****
so it doesnt happen again

****
because we lose money that way

****
for example your account shows a negative profit for us

i thought i was getting 3 months joins, which actually almost fit that commission.

**MrDeiz** · 04-26-2009, 01:33 PM

btw a payment i got from that program doesn't match none of the sums neither that one according to stats, neither that which actually should be paid after figuring out what the problem was.

**Robbie** · 04-26-2009, 01:37 PM

Ahhh, so the link codes were mixed up on PPS and Revshare? But wouldn't that have been clear in the stats ahead of time before you got a check? Doesn't make much sense. They must have customized their Nats setup and had a screw up somewhere.

**MrDeiz** · 04-26-2009, 01:44 PM

there's no such pps rate there

in other case i got payout which didn't exclude refunds...

How accurate NATS stats are? Payouts doesn't hit stats...

How accurate NATS stats are? Payouts doesn't hit stats...

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment