RabbitsReviews Top Ten Sites for March

[Doug of Montreal]

RabbitsReviews top ten new reviews for March are ready to check out, although a little late. What can I say... Phoenix got the better of me!

Site / Program / Score
1. Teen GFS, Pretty In Cash, 85
2. FM Teens, New Nude Cash, 81
3. Humiliation POV, Midnight Carnival, 80
3. Jizz Mouth Wash, Brain Cash, 80
4. Best DVDz, Cabellero Cash, 79
4. Cum Stained Casting Couch, Red Light Revenue, 79
5. Erotica HD, Erotica HD, 78
5. Argen Teens, New Nude Cash, 78
5. Anonymous Masked Men, Anonymous Masked Men, 78
6. Throat Gaggers, Red Light Revenue, 77
6. Daddy Action, Daddy Kink, 77
6. Natural Simone, Natural Simone, 77
6. Jiu Jitsu Girls, Jiu Jitsu Girls, 77

If we're not sending traffic your way, you can always submit here.

*Sites may not be new themselves, but new to RabbitsReviews.
*Sites are rated based on our criteria.

[JimmiDean]

Bump, and a big thank you for getting our reviews done Doug.

[Doug of Montreal]

Cheers Mista Dean! Thanks for helping make them happen!

[Veevee]

nice!!!

bump for the rabbits!!

[Meeper]

Doug is the man!

[TeenCat]

oh ... not sure if those sites are the best ... argen teens is old as hell and fm teens are not updated for months ... but maybe something changed havent checked them for some time ... anyway looks like you preffer more sites that needs to be pushed than quality ones ... for example, where do you have x-art? thats the top nude art site, not fm or argen ... just my two cents, wish you luck with your service!

[kowalsky]

Great list as usual!

[Doug of Montreal]

Meeper! Good seeing you this past weekend. Hopefully the recovery is going well!

TeenCat: I can't recall the last month we had sites in our top 10 that scored in the 70's. It was a weird one. But as for the scoring and making our top 10, these are the top NEW sites to RabbitsReviews--sites we reviewed over the course of the month--not the top sites in our categories.

[Cherry7]

This is what 10/10 quality looks like! You really should learn a bit about photography and video if you are going to be taken seriously. And quality is only 10% of the score which is surreal.



Here is a good quality picture posted in another thread for reference

[Doug of Montreal]

Still sore about the scoring, eh Cherry? One of these days you'll get it. I have faith.

Originally Posted by Cherry7

This is what 10/10 quality looks like! You really should learn a bit about photography and video if you are going to be taken seriously. And quality is only 10% of the score which is surreal.



Here is a good quality picture posted in another thread for reference

Please tell me you are kidding. That first picture is blurry and has horrible lighting. You need to learn about photography. That is not a 10 picture. If you want a 10 picture look up Dean Capture's work.

[Doug of Montreal]

We don't rate FHG pictures--which is what that blurry pic is from. We rate what we find in the members' area. Cherry just has a hard time understanding how the scoring works. Try to take everything he says with a shot of tequila. It helps kill the pain.

[Meeper]

Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal

Meeper! Good seeing you this past weekend. Hopefully the recovery is going well!

Likewise dude! Always good hangin out with ya. The drive was rough but almost recovered!

[Kenny B!]

DOUG!!! I don't have much to add to this thread other then, when will i see you next?

[D-Money]

RabbitsReviews is one of the best sites out there.

Can't knock it.

[HorseShit]

TeenCat: You are so retarded, why do you even bother typing out what your retarded brain came up with?

JaneB: Same goes for you, TeenCat + JaneB = WTF

[pussyluver]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

[IMG]


This is what 10/10 quality looks like! You really should learn a bit about photography and video if you are going to be taken seriously. And quality is only 10% of the score which is surreal.



Here is a good quality picture posted in another thread for reference

Don't know much about the scoring, but this is excellent photo work IMHO! Would only be fair to credit the photographer on the post. That sets aside the possible copyright infractions.. Think we got fair use here??

For those that have tried, these just don't pop up easily all the time. For me it is more luck than anything I'm sure.


Gee, could you define camera, settings, lights used and position......

[Doug of Montreal]

Kenny! Missed you in Phoenix! Maybe we'll do a wing night downtown? The weather is getting better!

Mista D-Money - cheers for that! We do try!

[Cherry7]

Jane B said...
"Please tell me you are kidding. That first picture is blurry and has horrible lighting. You need to learn about photography. That is not a 10 picture. If you want a 10 picture look up Dean Capture's work. "

Exactly this is 10/10 according to Rabbit Reviews...

"RabbitsReviews is one of the best sites out there"

Porn review sites are all pretty terrible so not great competition.

Rabbit says...

We don't rate FHG pictures--which is what that blurry pic is from. We rate what we find in the members' area. Cherry just has a hard time understanding how the scoring works. Try to take everything he says with a shot of tequila. It helps kill the pain.


The picture was taken from your review, so it is part of the review.

I think it is easy to see how your scoring works e.g

Content Quality 10/10
Site Design 8/10
Navigation 8/10
Updates Score 4/10
Content Amount 7/10
Price vs Content 9/10
Unique Content 15/15
Video Downloads 5/5
Other Score 14/20

It must have been thought up after drinking a lot of tequila. To the sober it is nonsense.

For example if you made a site that had 10 out of 10 for quality, 15 out of 15 for unique content and 10 out of 10 for Price V Content. you would only have 35 points.

The scoring system is so wacky as to be without meaning. After all if someone said a site is 10 for price / content -That is the result . That would be worth buying.

Websites are ways of delivering Pictures and Videos, it is a shame there is not anyone reviewing the few interesting sites out there.

Originally Posted by Justin

TeenCat: You are so retarded, why do you even bother typing out what your retarded brain came up with?

JaneB: Same goes for you, TeenCat + JaneB = WTF

Like anyone cares what you think bot boy. You are the biggest retard known to GFY for being so deperate to get a higher post count. Only a retard loser with no life would do that. jdavis = loser.

[The Ghost]

Bump for Rabbits! Always appreciate making the list

[TeenCat]

Originally Posted by Justin

TeenCat: You are so retarded, why do you even bother typing out what your retarded brain came up with?

JaneB: Same goes for you, TeenCat + JaneB = WTF

lol at you boy

[quantum-x]

Nice to be on top of that list - very honored to be reviewed by you guys!

[Big Red Machine]

Bump for Rabbits

[hypedough]

Congrats to the Top 10 sites, RabbitsReviews rocks

[Doug of Montreal]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

The scoring system is so wacky as to be without meaning. After all if someone said a site is 10 for price / content -That is the result . That would be worth buying.

I can't spend more time going over everything with you that you keep bringing up. You point at the best sites on the Net and say they've all got it wrong. What can I say to that? I mean, we've only reviewed close to 6,000 sites. What do we know?

Tell you what, put your money where your mouth is. Start a review site and give it a whirl. If the rest of us have it wrong, you should be making millions by Christmas. Go gettem, tiger!

[Honez]

Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal

We don't rate FHG pictures--which is what that blurry pic is from. We rate what we find in the members' area. Cherry just has a hard time understanding how the scoring works. Try to take everything he says with a shot of tequila. It helps kill the pain.

Mmmmm tequila

[lulu36]

rar go doug. bump for the rabbit crew

[Doug of Montreal]

Honez - THATS what we should have done in Phoenix! I bet if we had done a few shots, you wouldn't have been able to feel your foot! Ah well, next time!

Lulu! Thanks for the bump! When are you sending Max back... ? He's missed!

Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal

I can't spend more time going over everything with you that you keep bringing up. You point at the best sites on the Net and say they've all got it wrong. What can I say to that? I mean, we've only reviewed close to 6,000 sites. What do we know?

Tell you what, put your money where your mouth is. Start a review site and give it a whirl. If the rest of us have it wrong, you should be making millions by Christmas. Go gettem, tiger!

[wargames]

Sweeet Teen GFS #1

[Niktamer]

your inspiration and motivation for us !

[PPjohn]

rabbit is the best

[Cherry7]

Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal

I can't spend more time going over everything with you that you keep bringing up. You point at the best sites on the Net and say they've all got it wrong. What can I say to that? I mean, we've only reviewed close to 6,000 sites. What do we know?

Tell you what, put your money where your mouth is. Start a review site and give it a whirl. If the rest of us have it wrong, you should be making millions by Christmas. Go gettem, tiger!

For a site that critacises for a living you don't seem to be able to take what you give out.

You ask what you know. Well you don't seem to know about what is good photography or video production. Or have a scoring system designed to give the sites that make you the most money the most traffic.

This is a shame as in all creative activity, reviewers can play an important part in advancing the industry. In main stream film making a good review of an independent film can help that film win profits from the poorly made Hollywood blockbuster. This help the industry as Hollywood then sees that quality pays, the independent gets funds, and the audience have new experiences.

Sadfly, your promotion of the mundane does nothing to help win new audiences to adult material.

If you took an interest in the creative possiblities of erotic photography and video you could play an exciting role in changing the future the industry.

No need to be a tiger, an inteligent rabbit should be able to cope.

[Joe BrainCash]

Hi Doug.

BTW, great #4 we have there.

[Doug of Montreal]

Nik: Whassup brudda! Hopefully we'll see you here again in Montreal sometime soon... or I should get out to QC!

PPjohn: Cheers for that!

Cherry: We LOVE critiques on our work! You've just never given us anything decent to work with... largely because you don't seem to understand the business you find yourself in and refuse to accept that. Sorry! (you know we think you do good work... it's just funny that you continue to go on and on and on about how badly you're treated, despite the solid review)

And Pat! Cheers bud! You guys know how to get it done!

[Ozarkz]

Cherry7 is obviously smoking something.

Hey Doug I haven't checked because i'm lazy but do you offer User/Surfer reviews?

[Doug of Montreal]

Originally Posted by Ozarkz

Hey Doug I haven't checked because i'm lazy but do you offer User/Surfer reviews?

Yep, we absolutely do... on the bottom of every review we have a place for it. It's an essential part of what we do.

[Cherry7]

[QUOTE=

Cherry: We LOVE critiques on our work! You've just never given us anything decent to work with... largely because you don't seem to understand the business you find yourself in and refuse to accept that. Sorry! (you know we think you do good work... it's just funny that you continue to go on and on and on about how badly you're treated, despite the solid review)

QUOTE]

In fact our complaint is not as simple as "you badly treat us". You give us 10/10 for content quality. This is just silly I think we are about say 4 out of 10. It is true we do plan our films and try and select only the most beautiful models, we use semi professional HD cameras, professional sound and lights, etc but we are under budgeted and shoot too much without getting good perfomances. Adult models arn't always the best actors.
We feel we are making better and better films but of course this will not be reflected in any improvement in your scoring as we already have 10/10.

Other scores are a bit of a puzzle, content amount, navigation , Site design, Other Score,


but the thing the gets us is updates, as we charge a flat fee or VERY LOW recurring fee of $10 for 3 months, why do you lower our score by another 5 points ?

We have to have another busines model if we spend 10 times as much on making a film as sites who just shoot a girl on a sittee, or rip their DVD catalogue.

If we go for unique exclusive quality content the updates are bound to be less. But as we don't charge for them, why do you penalise us for that?


So in the end you give us a score of 83. This means that our site is not featured in any of your main pages and the traffic we get is minimal.

3 months 519 clicks 3 sales.... Thats the busines bit.


Now back to the smoking...

[Kevin Cunningham]

Bump for RabbitsReviews. Good seeing you in Phx Doug.

[Jon B]

Doug thanks for the review. Very pleased to be in the top Ten!! Melissa was a huge help and the sign ups will just keep coming in!! So thanks again! Now all you webmasters get your links up or get signed up fast!!

[Elixir]

Veri useful !

[Kiwigirl]

Interesting read LOL
Btw - good to see u in Phx Doug and hope to do it again real soon my friend!

[Doug of Montreal]

Originally Posted by Cherry7

...but the thing the gets us is updates, as we charge a flat fee or VERY LOW recurring fee of $10 for 3 months, why do you lower our score by another 5 points ...

Your score is lower because just about everyone else delivers more porn to their users more frequently. More porn equals more value. Users can blow through a hundred scenes a month easy if it's available for them. You don't give your users the choice. How do you not see the importance of that in the world we operate in today? The 70's are long gone. The masses want and expect different standards. That's who we serve.

[Doug of Montreal]

It was a pleasure chilling with you, Kevin! Next time we should try it seated with a cold one in hand. ;)

I'm glad things are working out for you Jon. Nice work!

And Jo... where did you get off to Saturday night?! I figured you'd come back... But it was chatting with you and we'll have to do it up next time! Hopefully that's sooner rather than later!

[QUOTE=Cherry7;15722266]

Originally Posted by

Cherry: We LOVE critiques on our work! You've just never given us anything decent to work with... largely because you don't seem to understand the business you find yourself in and refuse to accept that. Sorry! (you know we think you do good work... it's just funny that you continue to go on and on and on about how badly you're treated, despite the solid review)

QUOTE

In fact our complaint is not as simple as "you badly treat us". You give us 10/10 for content quality. This is just silly I think we are about say 4 out of 10. It is true we do plan our films and try and select only the most beautiful models, we use semi professional HD cameras, professional sound and lights, etc but we are under budgeted and shoot too much without getting good perfomances. Adult models arn't always the best actors.
We feel we are making better and better films but of course this will not be reflected in any improvement in your scoring as we already have 10/10.

Other scores are a bit of a puzzle, content amount, navigation , Site design, Other Score,


but the thing the gets us is updates, as we charge a flat fee or VERY LOW recurring fee of $10 for 3 months, why do you lower our score by another 5 points ?

We have to have another busines model if we spend 10 times as much on making a film as sites who just shoot a girl on a sittee, or rip their DVD catalogue.

If we go for unique exclusive quality content the updates are bound to be less. But as we don't charge for them, why do you penalise us for that?


So in the end you give us a score of 83. This means that our site is not featured in any of your main pages and the traffic we get is minimal.

3 months 519 clicks 3 sales.... Thats the busines bit.


Now back to the smoking...

There is nothing wrong with an 83. When your review is first done you are featured on the first page for a few days. They also send out an e-mail of the top 10 sites for that month. AVN also has a place in it's magazine for 4 of the review sites including RabbitsReview. They list the 10 top sites on that as well. If you are only getting 519 clicks and 3 sales from your review, then clearly there is an issue. The customers are the ones that pick the site to join. If they are not joining, then the website is not offering what they want. You can be unique and still give quality stuff.

[Denny]

cool, thanks for the list

[Cherry7]

Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal

Your score is lower because just about everyone else delivers more porn to their users more frequently. More porn equals more value. Users can blow through a hundred scenes a month easy if it's available for them. You don't give your users the choice. How do you not see the importance of that in the world we operate in today? The 70's are long gone. The masses want and expect different standards. That's who we serve.

The masses want lots of different things, some want the shopping channel, some want HBO. You just cater for one sort of audience - The classic porn client - if he exists (and it would be a him ).

If we have a different busines model, which is we either charge a one off fee for our films or a very low rate for continued membership, why is that unfair on the client? A fair price for the product. As you yourselves say in your review of our site.

So your crazy system of scoring knocks off 5 points -equal to half of what you give for content quality.

More porn is not more value. Better less but better. Especially now the the mundane routine porn can be found for free.

Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal

Your score is lower because just about everyone else delivers more porn to their users more frequently. More porn equals more value. Users can blow through a hundred scenes a month easy if it's available for them. You don't give your users the choice. How do you not see the importance of that in the world we operate in today? The 70's are long gone. The masses want and expect different standards. That's who we serve.

He is never going to get it. All he can do is say every site but his is lame and boring. If he was smart he would read all the reviews and learn from them. That is what most people do. I know that I did. You are very nice to keep answering a person that always thinks they are right.

[Biggy]

[QUOTE=Cherry7;15722266]

Originally Posted by

Cherry: We LOVE critiques on our work! You've just never given us anything decent to work with... largely because you don't seem to understand the business you find yourself in and refuse to accept that. Sorry! (you know we think you do good work... it's just funny that you continue to go on and on and on about how badly you're treated, despite the solid review)

QUOTE

In fact our complaint is not as simple as "you badly treat us". You give us 10/10 for content quality. This is just silly I think we are about say 4 out of 10. It is true we do plan our films and try and select only the most beautiful models, we use semi professional HD cameras, professional sound and lights, etc but we are under budgeted and shoot too much without getting good perfomances. Adult models arn't always the best actors.
We feel we are making better and better films but of course this will not be reflected in any improvement in your scoring as we already have 10/10.

Other scores are a bit of a puzzle, content amount, navigation , Site design, Other Score,


but the thing the gets us is updates, as we charge a flat fee or VERY LOW recurring fee of $10 for 3 months, why do you lower our score by another 5 points ?

We have to have another busines model if we spend 10 times as much on making a film as sites who just shoot a girl on a sittee, or rip their DVD catalogue.

If we go for unique exclusive quality content the updates are bound to be less. But as we don't charge for them, why do you penalise us for that?


So in the end you give us a score of 83. This means that our site is not featured in any of your main pages and the traffic we get is minimal.

3 months 519 clicks 3 sales.... Thats the busines bit.


Now back to the smoking...

your site blows, it sucks. youre too wrapped up with what your photos look like and how hi res they are, not everyone is into it - plus theres shitloads of sites already like there, i bet theres is easier to navigate and has a lot more content than yours - the adult internet isnt played out 1 picture at a time, and you barely/never update, thats nice.. on the other hand, teengfs is my favorite site - its awesome. i masturbate to it weekly, its hard for me to jerk off to the water drops on that girls pussy, water drops dont get me off, sorry - now kindly go fuck yourself...

doug - you also suck - you shouldve given teengfs a score of 110 - are you blind and do you not recognize greatness?