GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Obama forces GM CEO resignation (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=896642)

Drake 03-29-2009 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686231)
And when they come for Wildcash whose head should we cut off?

WildCash isn't begging for your tax dollars. They're running a tighter ship than GM.

Splum 03-29-2009 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeSmoke (Post 15686238)
Try reading up on "jawboning" before you spew.

Fuck you socialist pig and your "jawboning" just another word for what you believe in isnt it? Hey bitch try reading up on "The United States Constitution" before you spew.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitut....overview.html

Splum 03-29-2009 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33 (Post 15686242)
If that's what it would have taken to make GM profitable, he should have done it. That's his job. ?

Ask the unions and liberal groups that question.

Splum 03-29-2009 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker (Post 15686244)
I guess thats what can happen when you ask for money and get it. You are essentialy taking on a not so silent partner. Duke

WE ARE THE PARTNER DUKE, not Obama. Firing Wagoner will do NOTHING it simply is a scape goat and will drive the stock price up for a day or two. Are you people all so blindly in Obama's pocket you can't see that this is wrong? This company shouldnt get ANOTHER PENNY of our money.

Splum 03-29-2009 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33 (Post 15686252)
WildCash isn't begging for your tax dollars. They're running a tighter ship than GM.

You are a bit scruffy perhaps this will help.

MikeSmoke 03-29-2009 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686259)
Fuck you socialist pig and your "jawboning" just another word for what you believe in isnt it? Hey bitch try reading up on "The United States Constitution" before you spew.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitut....overview.html

Right...because I point out what has been a historical power of a strong President during a crisis, I'm a socialist pig. :321GFY

Sly 03-29-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686214)
You really think this one man is responsible for this?
http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=G...urce=undefined

You cant be that ignorant.

If you are willing to concede that one man (the CEO of GM) is not responsible for all of its institutions failures, would you also be willing to state that one man (President Obama) is not solely in charge or responsible for any of this countries successes or failures?

It's never "one man". But "one man" is essentially responsible and also held accountable for anything that happens. That's how it works.

Splum 03-29-2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeSmoke (Post 15686277)
Right...because I point out what has been a historical power of a strong President during a crisis, I'm a socialist pig. :321GFY

What crisis? Oh the crisis that you cant pay your mortgage or credit card bills so you vote for a socialist president because you know he will take care of all that debt for you? Yes you are a socialist pig feeding off the money of others. :321GFY

Splum 03-29-2009 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 15686283)
If you are willing to concede that one man (the CEO of GM) is not responsible for all of its institutions failures, would you also be willing to state that one man (President Obama) is not solely in charge or responsible for any of this countries successes or failures? It's never "one man". But "one man" is essentially responsible and also held accountable for anything that happens. That's how it works.

Sure if the BOARD OF DIRECTORS wants him fired I would support that, thats what happens in companies. The problem here is that THE GOVERNMENT IS DECIDING WHO IS BEST TO RUN THIS FAILED COMPANY. This is nationalization pure and simple and you obviously support it.

dyna mo 03-29-2009 06:53 PM

it's clear the OP didn't read the article and also is not educated about the history of such actions of u.s. presidents


from the article:
Quote:

As a condition for additional government aid to GM, the Obama administration asked Wagoner to step aside, which Wagoner agreed to do today, people familiar with the plan said. Wagoner’s move, effective immediately, ends a 31-year career with GM.

Not since President Franklin Roosevelt considered taking control of Ford Motor Co. in 1943 from a failing Henry Ford has the federal government pushed for such sway in the management of Detroit’s automakers.

tony286 03-29-2009 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686202)
You have got it all wrong, these companies didnt fail because of the leadership of a few people they failed because of their social policies towards workers and unions. You cannot be competitive when you are paying your workers 4 times as much as foreign car companies. This guy would have been burned at the stake had he suggest a 75% pay cut for GM workers. One man leaving GM is not going to save it, public money will not save it either, only shedding of jobs will save it. Why arent you mad at Obama for giving YOUR money to failed businesses?

That's not true they didn't get paid 4 x as much as foreign workers. If you want to argue please do it with facts. The big problem they couldnt compete with the socialized medicine those other countries have. The right scream at the idea of government healthcare but paying everyone 10 bucks an hour is cool. Also why are you alright with fucking the guy busting his ass on the line but the ceo running the company in to the ground. Thats fine and his big fucking golden parachute.

directfiesta 03-29-2009 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686155)
It isnt Obama's money.

Are you just plain dumb .... or playing dumb ?

Sly 03-29-2009 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686297)
Sure if the BOARD OF DIRECTORS wants him fired I would support that, thats what happens in companies. The problem here is that THE GOVERNMENT IS DECIDING WHO IS BEST TO RUN THIS FAILED COMPANY. This is nationalization pure and simple and you obviously support it.

Apparently you have reading issues. I've already stated I did not support any bailout from the beginning. His company failed and he ultimately failed. The executives at any of the big three could burn alive tomorrow and I would not care one bit. They have burned their employees, they have burned the common taxpayer, and they have not kept up with market demands due to their own stupidity and lack of foresight. Each and everyone of them requesting money should be ousted. They have failed. Period.

Splum 03-29-2009 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 15686314)
it's clear the OP didn't read the article and also is not educated about the history of such actions of u.s. presidents from the article:

Dont you mean socialist presidents? Look you are missing the point, the government should not be allowed to take control of businesses unless the business is illegal plain and simple. You have no idea what dangerous waters you are treading if you agree with this administration. What this administration is doing is NO DIFFERENT than what Chavez is doing in Venezuela.

Splum 03-29-2009 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 15686329)
Apparently you have reading issues. I've already stated I did not support any bailout from the beginning. His company failed and he ultimately failed. The executives at any of the big three could burn alive tomorrow and I would not care one bit. They have burned their employees, they have burned the common taxpayer, and they have not kept up with market demands due to their own stupidity and lack of foresight. Each and everyone of them requesting money should be ousted. They have failed. Period.

Apparently you have comprehension issues, I agree wholeheartedly but your logic defies me. If you believe the company is failed why give it OUR money?

Splum 03-29-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 15686327)
Are you just plain dumb .... or playing dumb ?

Shut the fuck up you stupid Canuck. Go suck your Queens dick you know NOTHING of freedom.
Quote:

Canadian Monarch HM Queen Elizabeth II

tony286 03-29-2009 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686332)
Dont you mean socialist presidents? Look you are missing the point, the government should not be allowed to take control of businesses unless the business is illegal plain and simple. You have no idea what dangerous waters you are treading if you agree with this administration. What this administration is doing is NO DIFFERENT than what Chavez is doing in Venezuela.

if the companies take government money and want more.They are answerable.

Splum 03-29-2009 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15686346)
if the companies take government money and want more.They are answerable.

Dude with that argument anytime you make a tax deduction you are accountable as well.

tony286 03-29-2009 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686348)
Dude with that argument anytime you make a tax deduction you are accountable as well.

That makes no sense. Its my money not the government and Im asking them for nothing.

Sly 03-29-2009 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686335)
Apparently you have comprehension issues, I agree wholeheartedly but your logic defies me. If you believe the company is failed why give it OUR money?

I already said we shouldn't have given them any money!

Splum 03-29-2009 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 15686357)
That makes no sense. Its my money not the government and Im asking them for nothing.

Actually you do owe that money initially to the government, it is not yours. The government allows you to deduct it from what you owe. Of course that is up to the government to decide which when and how many deductions you can claim. By taking their deduction you are legally agreeing to the terms and compliance of that deduction. Rest assured you do owe that money initially. :1orglaugh

GAMEFINEST 03-29-2009 07:17 PM

dayam, ceo got bitch slapped..

Pleasurepays 03-29-2009 07:21 PM

yeah.. .Obama clearly the bad guy here. It's not like people have been getting pissed off about this very thing.

the appropriate thing to do would have been for him to ask for the money... then resign and stand aside like a rational human being with the health/future of the company in mind. instead.. they all fly to DC on private jets and basically say "yeah... just go ahead and load the plane with cash while we go get a good meal and crack open a few 1000.00 bottles of wine.

Splum 03-29-2009 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays (Post 15686392)
they all fly to DC on private jets and basically say "yeah... just go ahead and load the plane with cash while we go get a good meal and crack open a few 1000.00 bottles of wine.

Yeah its not like Obama doesnt have a private jet or is taking trillions of tax payer money while partying it up. :1orglaugh

http://i40.tinypic.com/4l0lm8.jpg

Serge Litehead 03-29-2009 07:49 PM

this is pointless

JJ Gold 03-29-2009 07:55 PM

Some of you all just don't get the big picture.

The government is going to dictate to you what type of vehicle you are allowed to drive.

This is just the latest salvo in the mission to ban fun in the name of the "environment".

Splum 03-29-2009 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Gold (Post 15686469)
Some of you all just don't get the big picture. The government is going to dictate to you what type of vehicle you are allowed to drive. This is just the latest salvo in the mission to ban fun in the name of the "environment".

That certainly is a high possibility. I think they will meet with some resistance but then again most of the fucking idiots on this board think humans are causing global warming. :1orglaugh

cykoe6 03-29-2009 09:04 PM

While there is no doubt that Obama has a radical socialist agenda and is marching the US down the road to ruin, it seems reasonable that if GM is demanding to be bailed out by the government that the government will have some say in how it is run.

It s the bailout itself that is outrageous.... not the resignation of the CEO. Now if we could just get Obama to resign. :(

BlackCrayon 03-29-2009 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sausage (Post 15686188)
Socialism isn't all that bad, and you are already half way down the path anyway. Nothing any of you can do about it either, you are losing your rights at an alarming pace.

Says the guy from the country that is forcing isp's to block any kind of sexual material...

grumpy 03-29-2009 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686122)
You dont get it do you, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEMANDED A PRIVATE CITIZEN LEAVE A PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY. Are you willing to die for this President? Better ask yourself that seriously because its a real possibility.

you dont get it. They want billions, the rotten tomatoes have to go. He is taking care of your tax money, you should thank him.

kane 03-30-2009 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686117)
What are you talking about, GM is a publicly traded company. The government LOANED GM money they didnt BUY stock. You want to know the real reason? Because STOCKS normally go UP when a CEO resigns which gives the company more money AND Im sure some of Obamas friends will make a nice nickel when they sell their shares tomorrow.

It is pretty simple. If your company is about to go bankrupt and you come to me asking for billions in loans to help dig you out of your hole, I can set some conditions of the loan. If I say that I want the CEO that lead you into the downward spiral gone or no loan the company, and that CEO, have a choice. If they want him to stay, then they can get the money elsewhere. Nobody is forcing them to take the money.

He was in trouble before this stipulation ever came into place. There was talk of ousting him after their first appearance before congress a few months ago.

kane 03-30-2009 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686231)
And when they come for Wildcash whose head should we cut off?

Wildcash isn't asking for a huge loan from the government (or anyone for that matter) so it isn't the same thing.

roly 03-30-2009 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686181)
Why would you give this company a loan anyways? They dont hold mortgages to homes. Allow the car companies to fail and let the free market correct itself. This is stupid no one can give me a good reason why the government is giving GM money anyways. Michigan unemployment is already in double digits, Detroit is a fucking bombed out shell of a city already, why is it going to make any difference?

Ill tell you why its going to make a difference, Obama doesnt want his unemployment numbers to truly reflect what is going on in this country. He wants to slow the bleeding so he can get re-elected.

So let me get this straight its ok that Obama is fucking your kids as long as he takes down a couple of rich people to satisfy your class warfare wishes? Sick, just sick.

14 million jobs rely on the auto industry in the US (1 in 10 jobs), that's a lot of lost income tax. I'm not sure if you pay social security to unemployed people in the US as well? Then you have 14 million people who haven't got money to spend on other stuff which has a big impact on other industries. That's why they are bailing them out.

pocketkangaroo 03-30-2009 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686122)
You dont get it do you, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEMANDED A PRIVATE CITIZEN LEAVE A PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY. Are you willing to die for this President? Better ask yourself that seriously because its a real possibility.

It was a stipulation for getting money from the government. When you deal with investors and banks, they often require you to do certain things to get your money. I worked at a VC funded internet company years ago and the guys with the capital would come in and demand certain things be changed or they wouldn't loan the money.

If GM doesn't like it, they certainly have the right to not borrow money from the government and find a private loan elsewhere. Otherwise, if you want our money, you play by our rules. Welcome to the real world.

nation-x 03-30-2009 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 15687066)
It was a stipulation for getting money from the government. When you deal with investors and banks, they often require you to do certain things to get your money. I worked at a VC funded internet company years ago and the guys with the capital would come in and demand certain things be changed or they wouldn't loan the money.

If GM doesn't like it, they certainly have the right to not borrow money from the government and find a private loan elsewhere. Otherwise, if you want our money, you play by our rules. Welcome to the real world.

:2 cents:

Splum - Barack Hussein Obama is the President... he isn't a "socialist president". You say your a libertarian but post links from ridiculous right wing sites and constantly spew right wing talking points and racist comments on this board. I don't know anything about you other than the personality you portray on this board... do you live in Ohio or Missouri?

kmanrox 03-30-2009 05:30 AM

alot of the things obama is doing is pretty dictator-ish.. getting thing passed and laws created, things stopped, retributions imposed with a swift hand... while that sounds a bit un-american to me, it may just be what the country needs.. a little tough love... within reason.

pornguy 03-30-2009 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeCreep (Post 15686115)
Rick Wagoner had his chance. Under his leadership, GM lost billions of dollars in market cap. GM needs someone who can successfully downsize the company to a level that is realistic with US demand for automobiles.



GM needs to just shut down with no bail out money.

Davy 03-30-2009 05:45 AM

Obama basically blackmailed GM.

nation-x 03-30-2009 05:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox (Post 15687316)
alot of the things obama is doing is pretty dictator-ish.. getting thing passed and laws created, things stopped, retributions imposed with a swift hand... while that sounds a bit un-american to me, it may.

I don't agree with this sentiment... I don't think he has been dictatorial at all. If he was he would be signing a mad amount of Executive Orders like Bushy did. I find it refreshing that he is actually working to accomplish goals... I just think you aren't used to that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kmanrox (Post 15687316)
just be what the country needs.. a little tough love... within reason

I totally agree with this.

Just for the record... I don't like the way they are handling the automakers. They are bailing out huge banking/insurance institutions with almost no stipulations to date... but are making the automakers toe the line and the amount of money the automakers are asking for is far smaller than what the banks want... it's ridiculous and hypocrisy. Millions of people are employed by the automakers... and in addition they are treating them each differently... one get's 60 days to provide a restructuring plan and the other gets 30 days or nothing... it's bullshit in my book.

GatorB 03-30-2009 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 15686106)
What the fuck is going on in this country when the President of the United States can FORCE a CEO of a company to resign? I mean the guy did nothing illegal, he may have been a poor CEO or mad bad decisions but last time I checked this wasnt a communist nation. :mad:

http://www.freep.com/article/2009032...31-year+career

Ok idiot let me explain. Say you own a company and your CEO sucks so much you have to come to ME for a loan. Now if I say "get rid if the idiot or you don't get any money" you have 2 choices A) get rid of the idiot. B) keep him and go belly up. Now it's MY money why can't I ditate the rules under which it's loaned? Don't come begging me for money then bitch about the terms.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123