Pleasurepays |
03-02-2009 07:33 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
(Post 15574400)
Sort of revisionist history there. The country supported Bush after the attacks. His approval rating was nearly 90% when the Afghanistan war started and over 60% when the Iraq war started. He was given the benefit of the doubt. The public turned on him when they realized that Iraq was never a threat and the was was completely pointless.
If in a couple years we look back and see that there was nothing to be worried about, people have every right to call Obama a fearmongerer and whatever else. But to act as though the public didn't give Bush the benefit of the doubt is revisionist history.
|
FACT... Bush used the rhetoric that if we don't do something right now, more attacks will come, we have no time, we need to make drastic changes etc etc etc - forget afghanistan then... think about The Patriot Act.
FACT... Obama used the same scare tactics and rhetoric saying we have no time to even so much as read or debate the planets largest spending bill ever because they economy is on the verge of going into an "irreversible" recession
simple point - two presidents using the same scare tactics to push through an agenda. thats all. you can argue the same points for either side. people refuse to admit or accept it because at the end of the day, politics is all about "us against them" and the "us" and "them" are just two sides of the same coin.
|