![]() |
Quote:
|
Congrats AlienQ, nice to see your back to your old ways again - always a good path to follow.
|
Quote:
Sorry ya folks don't like it. Once the industry as a whole learns to put stop gaps in the flow of content in the free circuit and being aggressive in copyright... This industry is going to keep going down the shitter. |
Quote:
I have a few I'm testing the scripts on to see how it all works Takes about $50 total cost for url/hosting/and script to setup and maybe 20 min of total time... Sure you're not going to have 250,000 videos on day one but 10,000 - 30,000 not that big of a deal.. More time and more cash into it and you could have that.. I'm not talking the same about of time it takes to rip and cut 20 scenes from 4 dvd encode and upload or more then $500 plus a nice design... you can buy a data dump of 200,000+ for $400 (it was already posted on GFY) |
Even the big guys they will buy themselves a new Lambo before even thinking about Copyrighting a single image or enforcing thier rights on the internet.
OH oh all of a sudden it's to expensive to enforce copyright especially after the purchase of a 5th fucking Mercedes to throw in the mansions garage with the other ones. The pocket book is suddenly tight when it comes to controling content they fucking own? Jeesus fucking christ! Worse yet these same fucking guys provide compelte downloads of the content and allow members to download the shit and then have the nerve to turn around and scream about thier shit being stolen! Its totally fucking stupid! |
Quote:
Of course not. Instead just bash, speak out of the hole in your head, and continue to show everyone that you have not changed at all. |
I agree 100% with Jay.....but there's a difference between what you know and what you can prove in a court of law.
|
They would be safe if the content was submitted. But we all know that the content on those sites is not all submitted.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am generalising the stupid mental cases in this fucking industry. You people call me fucking nuts? Jesus fucking christ I do not even open up photoshop unless I am paid for it. PERIOD! THats it why? Because its good business sense, yet I see very succesful guys screaming about Copyright infringement and for two years not a fuck shit thing has been done about it. They are not serious they just want you little players to scream about it and feel secure in some brotherly love bullshit lie. Oh so fucking hurt.... WHY???? Another simple fact to the matter is they can play the victim all they want! The truth is its more affordable to just keep shooting and let the shit spill out. Copyright does not even fucking matter! But to turn around and say oh god we are being stolen from is totally totally without question absurdly stupid! These so called Players do not give a shit. Do not believe it for a second and if you do just read the same shit for two years all over again regarding tube sites and content theft. |
Quote:
Throw in the fact that content sellers, DVD sellers are running around selling tube sites top notch DVD stuff just to throw into Tube sites where it is all viewed for free. Its gone beyond just theft to utter stupidity. And many of you wonder why you have hard time making a sale these days. Its a no brainer. You are all getting shafted in more ways than can be counted on a mutant with 20 arms with 10 fingers on each hand. |
fighting the war across the pond is the problem.
US or N. American webmasters who are taking part in or took part in piracy are getting the picture - it's just a matter of time before they're under fire. The European, Chinese, Russian, etc. webbies/companies, they think they're immune, because up until recently, none had really gotten any heat. |
Quote:
Quote:
"In a summary judgement issued today, Judge Howard Lloyd of the Northern California Federal District Court declared that online video site Veoh can not be held liable for copyright infringement in a case brought by the Io Group, an adult content producer better known as Titan Media." http://valleywag.gawker.com/5042796/...er-titan-media Court docs: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1081750/Veoh-v-IO-Group |
Quote:
I know of someone who ran a very high traffic blog (on Blogspot no less) as a hobby and got close to the traffic levels of the largest legit site in that niche. How can that be? He eventually got his own domain and started pushing paysites after an affiliate program told him that there was money in porn. |
Quote:
|
Matt, thats the one I was talking about
"In the end, it's a big win for Veoh and for other online video sites ? users can upload all the copyrighted ass-fucking they want, but as long as they follow standard DMCA procedure, they can rest assured that they won't be held liable." Quote:
|
Quote:
If it's a clueless surfer who wants to turn his empire into something legit after coming across new information about the industry, I'm ok with that. ..... but if we are talking about webmasters who think they can lurk in the shadows and build up traffic on a stolen content site and then go legit, that should follow those webmasters around forever. I had found this from the buy & sell forum to be interesting, but I don't think GFY made an issue about it: http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=836144 Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
One legal angle might be to attack the post roll ads that illegal tube sites run for dating sites.
Youtube will not run ads in any part of a video that it is not from a trusted source because even they know they will have no DMCA protection if they do that. Illegal tube sites run pre and post roll ads on copyrighted content. That appears to not be protected by DMCA no matter who uploaded it. |
Title II: Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act
DMCA Title II, the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act ("OCILLA"), creates a safe harbor for online service providers (OSPs, including ISPs) against copyright liability if they adhere to and qualify for certain prescribed safe harbor guidelines and promptly block access to allegedly infringing material (or remove such material from their systems) if they receive a notification claiming infringement from a copyright holder or the copyright holder's agent. OCILLA also includes a counternotification provision that offers OSPs a safe harbor from liability to their users, if the material upon notice from such users claiming that the material in question is not, in fact, infringing. OCILLA also provides for subpoenas to OSPs to provide their users' identity. |
Quote:
So they are out there trying to put a cap on copyright violations. |
i alwayswatch all the asian movies and japanese drama on youtube. so whats this, youtube is racist ?
|
Quote:
|
As always you are so dead on!!
We need to find them, hold them and punch them!! I am a firm believer that Violence solves %95 of the worlds problems.:2 cents: |
I also believe its the illegal site owners themselves in most cases whom are uploading the stolen/illegal content... but heres the ?... they get their content from Torrents/Forums which is user submitted stuff... thus wouldnt they still be protected under dcma if they are simply downloading/uploading this stuff to their tube/site?
Kinda like the example of leeching/spidering content from another site... Sure he is uploading the content himself but as far as he could know this stuff is ok to be shared thus making it ok to use or at least thus covering his ass with dcma. I mean if it was being shared elsewhere it must be ok to use/share. Like couldnt he pass the buck (problem) onto the original place/user that uploaded the content in the first place. Sorry if my post goes in circles, trying to word it right. |
Quote:
|
In my opinion the biggest porn tubes like redtube, pornhub, youporn etc. ARE NOT under the safe harbour of the user submitted content. When you upload movie to youtube.com it is listed instantly. When you upload movie to porn tubes it is listed after someone accepted it. I did simple tests
|
But do they have to screen every clip and decide for themselves if its legal or not or can they just figure it was uploaded so it must be ok to use... im sure in their terms it has something about the material being submitted must be legal thus if their members follow the rules why would they have to screen each/every clip?
|
Quote:
Just my opinion. :2 cents: |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123