hmm think there is dirt on the censor, notice the black dot over her lip..

She's cute but her tits are weird

doesn't look any different than $500 camera... :2 cents:

Well, maybe it's just me, but I see a pretty huge difference.

can you post one full res, unedited pic straight from the camera?

im looking at getting that glass and the 70-200 f2.8 :thumbsup

:2 cents::2 cents::thumbsup

it's the photographer and his subject who make the magic - there are guys i see who are fantastic photographers using the Canon Rebel still.

for those that have not seen this video made with that camera.. granted done by a professional

http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/control...articleID=2326

Show that pussy-hole

It is the photographer not the camera but the better the camera the more flexible of a tool it is. I was reading in american photog this big fashion guy and he shot a bunch of people for fashion week with a consumer level olympus dslr. He said the quality of flashes was more important than the camera.

that's awesome

Poor quality photographs...sorry but I am not going to lie to you.

Lighting, focus and correct exposure and a reasonable camera will give excellent results. Camera manufactures want to sell cameras but other factors just as important.

The promo which shows what you can do with professional film crew shows the point, the camera could have been any professional camera and the result would be the same.

You want to be a good photographer? Spend half as much on the camera, read a $20 book on photography "Manual of Photography" and be creative....