Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2008, 11:39 PM   #1
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Will this be the death of Tubes? Or at least give some a cold.

Will the World Economic Crisis Save the Web?

Read it and think about it before you post.

There will be an economic downturn in the West.
There will be less people able or willing to sign up to dating and cam sites.
There will be more people looking for free porn.

So will tubes that give it all away become too expensive to run?

The article points out the reality that people need paying for their labour. Investing in sites that bring in masses of people has to be paid for. In the next few years there might be less willing to pay for it. Because nothing is free.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2008, 11:52 PM   #2
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Will the economic crisis effect the porn industry and how we work?

As sites become less and less profitable many are cutting back on content production and buying. Not a good long term policy and can only go so far. How long before sponsors start to look at other costs?

We've had it very easy for the last 10 years and even without the recent economic crisis there was a downturn in the market. Are we fit for the hard slog in front of us?
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2008, 11:54 PM   #3
XPays
Team Player
 
XPays's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Inside the most accurately counting and reporting affiliate system in the world at XPays.com
Posts: 13,002
the answer is no
XPays is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2008, 11:57 PM   #4
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by XPays View Post
the answer is no
the answer is actually 27
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2008, 11:58 PM   #5
XPays
Team Player
 
XPays's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Inside the most accurately counting and reporting affiliate system in the world at XPays.com
Posts: 13,002
hahahahaha
XPays is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2008, 11:59 PM   #6
PersianKitty
Meow Media Inc.
 
PersianKitty's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: In the valley of the sun, cactus, tacos, tequila, and nod
Posts: 7,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear View Post
the answer is actually 27


Hmmm and here all this time I thought the answer was 42
PersianKitty is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:02 AM   #7
clickhappy
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
So will tubes that give it all away become too expensive to run?
I thought giving it all away for free was already the business model
clickhappy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:16 AM   #8
Dirty Dane
Sick Fuck
 
Dirty Dane's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
There are negative and positive effects for the industry.

- People will spend more time on home entertainment and less outdoor activities. After all, a pornsite subscription is (usually) cheaper than a date
- Unemployed people will have more time to jerk off to great paysites, than just a FHG-quickie
- Personal financial crisis will lead to more divorces. And more freedom

Oh, and as foreigner I do not complain about the 10% increase in dollar - compared to my currency past few months
Dirty Dane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:34 AM   #9
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane View Post
There are negative and positive effects for the industry.

- People will spend more time on home entertainment and less outdoor activities. After all, a pornsite subscription is (usually) cheaper than a date
- Unemployed people will have more time to jerk off to great paysites, than just a FHG-quickie
- Personal financial crisis will lead to more divorces. And more freedom

Oh, and as foreigner I do not complain about the 10% increase in dollar - compared to my currency past few months
Very true.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:38 AM   #10
mynameisjim
Confirmed User
 
mynameisjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,985
A good read.

I've had a similar thought about the effect on tube sites, although not in terms of labor as the author was talking.

I can see things going either way honestly at this point. But maybe that's what he meant when he said we are in the twilight between the old world and the new world.

Whatever happens, I think 2009 is going to be a very interesting year indeed. I think anyone that says tube sites are the future or tube sites will die is wrong. The future is going to be something that hasn't shown up yet on the radar.
__________________
jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert
mynameisjim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:42 AM   #11
aico
Moo Moo Cow
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 14,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by PersianKitty View Post
Hmmm and here all this time I thought the answer was 42
You didn't factor in the 15. (2+7)+(4+2) = 15. 42 - 15 = 27
Therefore Smokey is right, the answer is 27
aico is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 08:17 AM   #12
PowerCum
CjOverkill
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Woldwide
Posts: 1,328
If you run a hosting company the point of view is very different.

Tube sites search budget on bw burning. They CAN have budget bw because they burn several Gbit line (at least the mid sized and big ones). When a client comes and says "Hey, I will burn you 5 Gbit and will take 75 servers, so make a good price"... you usually tend to sell him the bw at very low cost. In most cases almost the same cost as your current carrier cost.

Why would someone sell 5 Gbit of bw at their current carrier cost? isn't it stupid at all?
It's because when you get more volume with your carriers the price also drops. So if you get 5 Gbit morewith your carriers the price per Gbit of line drops down. So you end making money with that.

Example (prices are not realistic, but I will not tell you how much does a gbit of line cost on carrier level because you will cancel all your servers after reading this):
Before tube site comes as client a gbit of line costs 10.000 at carriers and we have 10 bgit
We add 5 gbit of line with the carriers, so now we have 15 gbit
Tube site burns these 5 gbit and pays 10.000 x 5 = 50.000 monthly
Now our price per gbit with the carrier costs 9.000 because we have a volume discount on all thebw.
Profit = 5.000 per month only from the bw volume the tube site brought.

I know several tube sites that don't even pay the bw they burn. They get it for free and only pay for the servers as long as they guarantee a sustained bw burning volume and at least one year of permanency with the datacenter.

Paul, you as a serious businessman should already know that you don't give the same prices per set to someone that comes to buy 5 sets than to someone that comes to buy 1.000 sets.
Running a mid sized tube site (about 2 - 5 million uniques) at the moment is cheaper than running 5 thumb TGPs ranging 150k - 250k each one.
__________________
CjOverkill Traffic Trading Script
Free, secure and fast traffic trading script. Get your copy now
PowerCum is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 08:21 AM   #13
pr0
rockin tha trailerpark
 
pr0's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
short answer = no

bandwidth prices will continue to fall as use continues to climb
pr0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 09:59 AM   #14
germ
( o Y o )
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0 View Post
short answer = no

bandwidth prices will continue to fall as use continues to climb
agreed.

tubes arent going anywhere anytime soon.
germ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 10:03 AM   #15
Konda
...
 
Konda's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by mynameisjim View Post

Whatever happens, I think 2009 is going to be a very interesting year indeed. I think anyone that says tube sites are the future or tube sites will die is wrong. The future is going to be something that hasn't shown up yet on the radar.

I agree, probalby the (near) feature will bring us something that no one doesn't even think about now. But whatever it is, traffic = king, so all the big tube sites might be able to cash in bigtime anyway.
Konda is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 10:04 AM   #16
WarChild
Let slip the dogs of war.
 
WarChild's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 17,263
No, you're completely out of touch with the situation on the ground.
__________________
.
WarChild is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 10:44 AM   #17
brassmonkey
Pay It Forward
 
brassmonkey's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Yo Mama House
Posts: 77,228
theres no money in tube sites if u have any give them to me
__________________
TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com
brassmonkey is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:10 PM   #18
Rorschach
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerCum View Post
If you run a hosting company the point of view is very different.

Tube sites search budget on bw burning. They CAN have budget bw because they burn several Gbit line (at least the mid sized and big ones). When a client comes and says "Hey, I will burn you 5 Gbit and will take 75 servers, so make a good price"... you usually tend to sell him the bw at very low cost. In most cases almost the same cost as your current carrier cost.

Why would someone sell 5 Gbit of bw at their current carrier cost? isn't it stupid at all?
It's because when you get more volume with your carriers the price also drops. So if you get 5 Gbit morewith your carriers the price per Gbit of line drops down. So you end making money with that.

Example (prices are not realistic, but I will not tell you how much does a gbit of line cost on carrier level because you will cancel all your servers after reading this):
Before tube site comes as client a gbit of line costs 10.000 at carriers and we have 10 bgit
We add 5 gbit of line with the carriers, so now we have 15 gbit
Tube site burns these 5 gbit and pays 10.000 x 5 = 50.000 monthly
Now our price per gbit with the carrier costs 9.000 because we have a volume discount on all thebw.
Profit = 5.000 per month only from the bw volume the tube site brought.

I know several tube sites that don't even pay the bw they burn. They get it for free and only pay for the servers as long as they guarantee a sustained bw burning volume and at least one year of permanency with the datacenter.

Paul, you as a serious businessman should already know that you don't give the same prices per set to someone that comes to buy 5 sets than to someone that comes to buy 1.000 sets.
Running a mid sized tube site (about 2 - 5 million uniques) at the moment is cheaper than running 5 thumb TGPs ranging 150k - 250k each one.
great post... tube sites flourish because of the commoditization of bandwidth...
Rorschach is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:16 PM   #19
sortie
Confirmed User
 
sortie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerCum View Post
If you run a hosting company the point of view is very different.

Tube sites search budget on bw burning. They CAN have budget bw because they burn several Gbit line (at least the mid sized and big ones). When a client comes and says "Hey, I will burn you 5 Gbit and will take 75 servers, so make a good price"... you usually tend to sell him the bw at very low cost. In most cases almost the same cost as your current carrier cost.

Why would someone sell 5 Gbit of bw at their current carrier cost? isn't it stupid at all?
It's because when you get more volume with your carriers the price also drops. So if you get 5 Gbit morewith your carriers the price per Gbit of line drops down. So you end making money with that.

Example (prices are not realistic, but I will not tell you how much does a gbit of line cost on carrier level because you will cancel all your servers after reading this):
Before tube site comes as client a gbit of line costs 10.000 at carriers and we have 10 bgit
We add 5 gbit of line with the carriers, so now we have 15 gbit
Tube site burns these 5 gbit and pays 10.000 x 5 = 50.000 monthly
Now our price per gbit with the carrier costs 9.000 because we have a volume discount on all thebw.
Profit = 5.000 per month only from the bw volume the tube site brought.

I know several tube sites that don't even pay the bw they burn. They get it for free and only pay for the servers as long as they guarantee a sustained bw burning volume and at least one year of permanency with the datacenter.

Paul, you as a serious businessman should already know that you don't give the same prices per set to someone that comes to buy 5 sets than to someone that comes to buy 1.000 sets.
Running a mid sized tube site (about 2 - 5 million uniques) at the moment is cheaper than running 5 thumb TGPs ranging 150k - 250k each one.
I didn't know how that worked but my first thought when reading this thread is that the
hosting companies would do something to keep tubes alive because they can still
make money from the tube site.

Now I know how the host does it. Thanks
__________________
sortie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:20 PM   #20
TheSenator
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheSenator's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 13,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerCum View Post
If you run a hosting company the point of view is very different.

Tube sites search budget on bw burning. They CAN have budget bw because they burn several Gbit line (at least the mid sized and big ones). When a client comes and says "Hey, I will burn you 5 Gbit and will take 75 servers, so make a good price"... you usually tend to sell him the bw at very low cost. In most cases almost the same cost as your current carrier cost.

Why would someone sell 5 Gbit of bw at their current carrier cost? isn't it stupid at all?
It's because when you get more volume with your carriers the price also drops. So if you get 5 Gbit morewith your carriers the price per Gbit of line drops down. So you end making money with that.

Example (prices are not realistic, but I will not tell you how much does a gbit of line cost on carrier level because you will cancel all your servers after reading this):
Before tube site comes as client a gbit of line costs 10.000 at carriers and we have 10 bgit
We add 5 gbit of line with the carriers, so now we have 15 gbit
Tube site burns these 5 gbit and pays 10.000 x 5 = 50.000 monthly
Now our price per gbit with the carrier costs 9.000 because we have a volume discount on all thebw.
Profit = 5.000 per month only from the bw volume the tube site brought.

I know several tube sites that don't even pay the bw they burn. They get it for free and only pay for the servers as long as they guarantee a sustained bw burning volume and at least one year of permanency with the datacenter.

Paul, you as a serious businessman should already know that you don't give the same prices per set to someone that comes to buy 5 sets than to someone that comes to buy 1.000 sets.
Running a mid sized tube site (about 2 - 5 million uniques) at the moment is cheaper than running 5 thumb TGPs ranging 150k - 250k each one.

Great inside info... +1
__________________
ISeekGirls.com since 2005
TheSenator is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:26 PM   #21
polle54
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Beach
Posts: 4,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by PersianKitty View Post
Hmmm and here all this time I thought the answer was 42
me too...
__________________
ICQ# 143561781
polle54 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:34 PM   #22
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
:2cents

Quote:
Originally Posted by Konda View Post
traffic = king.
No offense toots, but that is the reason a lot of companies are in trouble. They have high traffic, and nothing to sell. Pushing the same old tired content, that surfers have seen.

Content is king.

The sooner you realize this, in adult and mainstream, the better off you'll be.
__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:48 PM   #23
Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE
MOBILE PORN: IMOBILEPORN
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tinseltown NL
Posts: 16,502
Quote:
Originally Posted by aico View Post
You didn't factor in the 15. (2+7)+(4+2) = 15. 42 - 15 = 27
Therefore Smokey is right, the answer is 27
Actually you all are wrong, you forgot to divide by 3.
(2 + 7) + (4 + 2) = (15. 42 - 15) / 3 = 9
Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:53 PM   #24
Yngwie
I am an Alien from space
 
Yngwie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by PersianKitty View Post
Hmmm and here all this time I thought the answer was 42

no. both 27 and 42 are wrong.. the real # is 35 divided by the amount of teeth you have times the amount of small hairs on your arm divided in 4.5 time 1009.

this will give you the answer.
__________________
ICQ: 16544251 - Skype: gator37 @ eastlink.ca - email: yngwie @ isys.ca
Yngwie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 12:59 PM   #25
notoldschool
Confirmed User
 
notoldschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild View Post
No, you're completely out of touch with the situation on the ground.
I have to say I agree with you on this point. BUT there are tube sites out there that really give away too much, but legit tubes are not so bad.
__________________
No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
-- Learned Hand

http://www.bjpenn.com
notoldschool is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 01:03 PM   #26
Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE
MOBILE PORN: IMOBILEPORN
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tinseltown NL
Posts: 16,502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane View Post
- Unemployed people will have more time to jerk off to great paysites, than just a FHG-quickie
Ok after actually reading the thread and shit, I just don't understand this logic...

How the hell is someone who just lost their job gonna think "Oh hey, now I have more time to spend $30/mo on a full porn site instead of jacking to FHG's!"

Nope, not gonna happen, if anything that person is gonna do all they can to save money, even if it includes SHUTTING OFF the stuff they don't really need, such as cell phones, television, and wait for it... INTERNET...
Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2008, 12:38 AM   #27
Dirty Dane
Sick Fuck
 
Dirty Dane's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retox Josh View Post
Ok after actually reading the thread and shit, I just don't understand this logic...

How the hell is someone who just lost their job gonna think "Oh hey, now I have more time to spend $30/mo on a full porn site instead of jacking to FHG's!"

Nope, not gonna happen, if anything that person is gonna do all they can to save money, even if it includes SHUTTING OFF the stuff they don't really need, such as cell phones, television, and wait for it... INTERNET...
I'm not saying everyone will... but consider; those jerking off to FHGs because of 'lack of time', are not paying anyway. So... its not a loss if they become unemployed, if they didn't signup in the first place.
Of course, the social/economic situation is individual and also depends on the local welfare system, but I think you underestimate the sexual needs. And why should they pay 30 bucks? There are also cheaper trials - which is better than nothing
Dirty Dane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2008, 12:53 AM   #28
mynameisjim
Confirmed User
 
mynameisjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,985
Just out of curiosity, will bandwidth prices every stop declining or even go up? Before you knee jerk and say no. Isn't most of the infrastructure we are using up until now stuff that was built during the internet boom of the 90's? I wish I could find the article but a bigwig from AT&T said at the current rate of growth they were going to max out their capacity in 2.5 years. With credit so tight, who is going to build new infrastructure if that is the case?

I'll be honest, I really don't know much about that side of the hosting world so this is an honest question. Just remember, when gasoline was chosen to fuel cars it was because gasoline was a waste product and it was thought there would always be a cheap abundance of it.
__________________
jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert
mynameisjim is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.