GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   for the people making 250k who are worrying about being taxed to death. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=863954)

baddog 10-23-2008 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 14941432)
Seriously, do you really believe that?

You know he does.

uno 10-23-2008 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 14941452)
If it had said "howz bout you" I might have just shit myself right here and now. :1orglaugh

:helpme

eh, "how about yall" would have been better, imo.

Stephen 10-23-2008 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiger (Post 14942634)
How is he going to pay 50k in takes when the guy only makes 40k.

If you read the page that Tony posted (what this thread is about), it assumes an income of 300+k, not 40k

Stephen 10-23-2008 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14942653)
You know he does.

Sigh. I shall now excuse myself from the Obama rally :(

Ya know, L, it might be time to move into the clubhouse and fly under the radar :winkwink:

baddog 10-23-2008 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 14942808)
Sigh. I shall now excuse myself from the Obama rally :(

Ya know, L, it might be time to move into the clubhouse and fly under the radar :winkwink:

I am almost hoping he wins just so I can say, "I told you so."

yys 10-23-2008 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14942894)
I am almost hoping he wins just so I can say, "I told you so."

I'm hoping he wins now. It will be 4 years of pure comedy to hear the left wing and peace activists in Canada claim that our P.M. is the lapdog of fascist Obama and his illegal war in Afghanistan, etc. It's going to be pure gold. :1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 10-23-2008 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14942408)
How is that ? Under Bush wages have dropped and employment has dropped and that was even before the blow up of the economy.

How many years was unemployment lower than it was after Clinton? Don't mention that though. :winkwink:

tony286 10-23-2008 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 14942808)
Sigh. I shall now excuse myself from the Obama rally :(

Ya know, L, it might be time to move into the clubhouse and fly under the radar :winkwink:

I show you true numbers and that's all you have? Some me numbers not what the pundits said.

tony286 10-23-2008 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14942894)
I am almost hoping he wins just so I can say, "I told you so."

Or if its great will you be man enough to say I was wrong?

After Shock Media 10-23-2008 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 14943091)
How many years was unemployment lower than it was after Clinton? Don't mention that though. :winkwink:

Show me how that the rules regarding what an unemployed person even was had not been changed during such periods. Oh wait huge numbers of people do not count as unemployed since they were not full time, or benefits ran out, or a whole fucking list of ways to fuck with the numbers.
I know damn well both sides have adjusted such over their terms. Does not make it right for either party. It has recently just been adjusted to the point that it is now a useless number all together, from a partially useless number.

baddog 10-23-2008 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14943155)
Or if its great will you be man enough to say I was wrong?

Of course, just like if he wins I will take back my assertion that he was unelectable.

Of course, if he loses you will accuse the Republicans of stealing the election. You can't deny that.

tony286 10-23-2008 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14943307)
Of course, just like if he wins I will take back my assertion that he was unelectable.

Of course, if he loses you will accuse the Republicans of stealing the election. You can't deny that.

No I cant lol

baddog 10-23-2008 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14943718)
No I cant lol

At least you are honest about how blind you are. I will give you credit for that.

tony286 10-23-2008 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14943844)
At least you are honest about how blind you are. I will give you credit for that.

Blind thats funny. Things are so great now, you guys are a trip.Im always honest, its fucking politics at the end of the day.

Snake Doctor 10-23-2008 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xmas13 (Post 14940819)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_of_wealth

The top 1% in this country own 38% of our nation's wealth.

The top 10% own 71%.

The bottom 40% own less than 1% of our country's wealth.

These figures were from 2001, and are undoubtedly more skewed now toward the top 1% and 10%, respectively.

The top 10% own over 71% of the nation's wealth and paid 65% of the taxes. That's hardly a case of "making the rich pay more"
Even though marginal rates are higher at the top, the wealthy in this country don't pay a disproportionate amount in taxes. The percentage of taxes they pay is in direct proportion (or less than direct proportion) to the percentage of wealth they hold.

Even though the marginal rate on the top tax bracket is 3.5 times higher than the marginal rate on the bottom bracket, when you look at what is actually paid (after deductions, loopholes, shelters, etc etc) the wealthy, by and large, pay a smaller percentage of their overall income in taxes than do the middle and lower classes, who don't have the resources to hire attorneys and accountants to get them out of their tax obligations.

Even if that weren't the case, I think it's laughable that people clearing over 250K per year are boo-hooing about paying another 4 cents on the dollar so that we can fix the health care system and pay down our $10 trillion debt, among other things.

DatingGold 10-23-2008 11:21 PM

yeah right

Snake Doctor 10-23-2008 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14943307)
Of course, just like if he wins I will take back my assertion that he was unelectable.

Well it would be kind of weird for you to still be saying he's unelectable after he got elected.

Stephen 10-24-2008 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14943307)
if he loses you will accuse the Republicans of stealing the election.

You can expect riots in the streets.

The deal with the Obama core is that they'll tell pollsters "YES! I'm gonna vote for Obama!!!" when they get called on these phone surveys, but being a bunch of slackers, they won't actually bother to go out and vote.

They WILL however bother to burn down the Wal-Mart and grab a new TV on the way out "as a protest against the Republicans stealing the election."

We have an old expression in motorsports: "you don't race a dyno"

This won't be over on election day :2 cents:

Kudles 10-24-2008 12:24 PM

I'm so tired of hearing about all this

Snake Doctor 10-25-2008 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor (Post 14944261)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_of_wealth

The top 1% in this country own 38% of our nation's wealth.

The top 10% own 71%.

The bottom 40% own less than 1% of our country's wealth.

These figures were from 2001, and are undoubtedly more skewed now toward the top 1% and 10%, respectively.

The top 10% own over 71% of the nation's wealth and paid 65% of the taxes. That's hardly a case of "making the rich pay more"
Even though marginal rates are higher at the top, the wealthy in this country don't pay a disproportionate amount in taxes. The percentage of taxes they pay is in direct proportion (or less than direct proportion) to the percentage of wealth they hold.

Even though the marginal rate on the top tax bracket is 3.5 times higher than the marginal rate on the bottom bracket, when you look at what is actually paid (after deductions, loopholes, shelters, etc etc) the wealthy, by and large, pay a smaller percentage of their overall income in taxes than do the middle and lower classes, who don't have the resources to hire attorneys and accountants to get them out of their tax obligations.

Even if that weren't the case, I think it's laughable that people clearing over 250K per year are boo-hooing about paying another 4 cents on the dollar so that we can fix the health care system and pay down our $10 trillion debt, among other things.

Funny how when you bring facts into the conversation instead of rhetoric all of the supply side tax cut worshippers STFU.

tony286 10-25-2008 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor (Post 14952436)
Funny how when you bring facts into the conversation instead of rhetoric all of the supply side tax cut worshippers STFU.

you bring in facts the righties lose this time lol

Paul Markham 10-26-2008 12:09 AM

This end of the porn industry lives off people earning low wages. The vast majority of the people who sign up are on less than $50,000 a year. So putting more money in their pockets brings more money to your pockets.

This was told to me by a porn multi millionaire, in British pounds not US dollars.

A man like me takes a girl to the Bahamas for a week to fuck her.
A multi millionaire takes her to Paris.
A millionaire takes her to the Savoy.
A person on half that takes her to his flat.
A guy on $25,000 buys my mags with your porn pictures in.

Think about that. The more the low paid have the more they have to spend on porn. The more the high paid have to spend the more they can spend on expensive hookers.

It's the trickle up effect working well.

GatorB 10-26-2008 12:16 AM

If the election were like this

Candidates for Prez and VP

A) Republican: President Adolph Hilter VP Joseph Stalin

B) Democrat: President God VP Jesus Christ

Sticky and his ilk would choose A no doubt just beause of the R next to their names. And that's just sad.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123