Don Cheadle in Iron Man 2

**tony286** · 10-21-2008, 08:05 PM

i always like don

**The Duck** · 10-21-2008, 08:07 PM

what why would the do that

**Deej** · 10-21-2008, 08:10 PM

Why in the fuck?

Did he fuck up?

I dont see any other reason to replace him. Cheadle is good but that will only turn negative feelings up

**uno** · 10-21-2008, 08:12 PM

agreed sly.

**Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE** · 10-21-2008, 08:33 PM

Wtf.... SMFB.

**starpimps** · 10-21-2008, 08:36 PM

thats odd

**After Shock Media** · 10-21-2008, 08:42 PM

Willing to bet if people dig deep you will find a very greedy agent who fucked it all up for him. That and since Marvel is new to the movie studio business, one would imagine they would use some of the very same lame ass penny pinching they did in the comics world that caused so many to jump shit - pre comic meltdown of late 90's.

**Malicious Biz** · 10-21-2008, 09:47 PM

gggaaaayyyyyyyy

**tiger** · 10-21-2008, 09:52 PM

WTF did they do that for?

**Corleone** · 10-21-2008, 09:54 PM

hmm hate it when they change actors.. wonder what happened

**pigman** · 10-21-2008, 10:42 PM

Will they integrate the hulk and Iron man in the next movie?

**TidalWave** · 10-21-2008, 11:12 PM

wtf Don Cheadle sucks. pretty ridiculous doing an actor swap.

**Marcus Aurelius** · 10-21-2008, 11:24 PM

That sucks. When you have an ensemble cast and you swap players in a sequel its usually a surefire way to lose a part of your audience.

**GatorB** · 10-22-2008, 12:12 AM

Originally posted by MDCQ

That sucks. When you have an ensemble cast and you swap players in a sequel its usually a surefire way to lose a part of your audience.

Yeah. I mean look at the Dark Knight. Batman Begins made $205 million US and then they replace Kate Holmes and the Dark Knight only made $527 million US.

**aico** · 10-22-2008, 12:15 AM

Originally posted by GatorB

Yeah. I mean look at the Dark Knight. Batman Begins made $205 million US and then they replace Kate Holmes and the Dark Knight only made $527 million US.

Kate Holmes passed on Dark Knight, big difference.

**Marcus Aurelius** · 10-22-2008, 12:15 AM

Originally posted by GatorB

Yeah. I mean look at the Dark Knight. Batman Begins made $205 million US and then they replace Kate Holmes and the Dark Knight only made $527 million US.

This is true. But Katie Holmes was forgettable in that role also and with all the bullshit hype surrounding her and Cruise it probably only helped the franchise by not having her.

**Horny Alf** · 10-22-2008, 12:38 AM

Hopefully Don buffs up for this role

**qxm** · 10-22-2008, 12:55 AM

wha? they keep replacing actors? WTF?

**NinjaSteve** · 10-22-2008, 01:01 AM

Originally posted by aico

Kate Holmes passed on Dark Knight, big difference.

I doubt most of the movie audience cares about an actor passing on a job or the studio changing their mind.

**GatorB** · 10-22-2008, 01:30 AM

Originally posted by MDCQ

This is true. But Katie Holmes was forgettable in that role also and with all the bullshit hype surrounding her and Cruise it probably only helped the franchise by not having her.

I haven't seen the movie but from the reviews I read this guy was pretty forgettable too. In fact he was the wost part of the movie according to most reviewers. Most said he could have not been in the movie and it'd still be the same movie. In other words he added nothing to it. So sounds the same to me.

**aico** · 10-22-2008, 01:35 AM

Originally posted by NinjaSteve

I doubt most of the movie audience cares about an actor passing on a job or the studio changing their mind.

Movies that deal with Comic Books require more of a consistency, the die hards don't like changes in characters.

**jimbona** · 10-22-2008, 04:12 AM

They dumped Terrence Howard as he apparently asked for to much for the next film.
Then Howard did a press release stating he was in talks about getting a contract agreed and he found out in the mean time he had been replaced by cheadle.

So he was pissed. His part wasnt major in IronMan, but alot wont like the change.
But it wont harm the film that much.

**Martin** · 10-22-2008, 04:43 AM

I don't think IM was that strong for a part 2. It's gonna suck for sure.

**bloggingseo** · 10-22-2008, 04:49 AM

I really like Don Cheadle, and I wish him the best, but that role belonged to Howard. I actually liked him in the Iron Man movie and I just like Terrence Howard period. He's talented. Well I don't think this would stop me from seeing the sequel and probably still liking it since I loved Robert Downey Jr. and Gwyneth Paltrow in Ironman! So I don't think they will lose out on much business by not having Terrence, but I don't personally like it since I thought he deserved the role after doing pretty well in the original. However, Don Cheadle is one of my favorites so I don't think I'll feel that guilty for enjoying the movie but probably a little bit

Oh well, Terrence will find something else. He's talented and he'll be all right. I'm sure this is only an ego bruise, it's not like he's a broke actor. He will find other roles and do just fine.

**StuartD** · 10-22-2008, 04:53 AM

Originally posted by Martin

I don't think IM was that strong for a part 2. It's gonna suck for sure.

Apparently you didn't watch the same movie that everyone else watched.

Don Cheadle in Iron Man 2

Don Cheadle in Iron Man 2

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment