yeap...all true,
my kind of a hero
;-)))

check your FACTS, son, you are wrong...

Dunno about that - I guess a lawsuit is probably - the problem is not similar to caching a page but manipulating it (URLs editing etc).
But think about how much bw they will have :(

LOL :1orglaugh
You dont realize that yet - do you?

Most TGPs today rely on HTTP_REFERER - because they use CJ scripts based on that..
But not all the referrers will be fucked cause it will all be referred through xcite. All TGPs (based on CJ scripts) will stop working..
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh
(It may be a nice try - but sure not appropriate for TGPs - or any site trading for that matter)

url editing???wow, that is a huge crime...
do you know that Yahoo LOST the court case to sex.com who uses:
http://yahoo.sex.com
and
http://gofuckyourself.sex.com
and even...here this:
http://xxxmanager.sex.com

wow!!!!!

Serge,

Good job keeping your own thread alive :thumbsup

:1orglaugh

Like i've always said, Serge plays chatboards like Perlman fiddles a Stradivarius.

:1orglaugh
Well... the "Dunno" was for the legitimacy of a lawsuit.
A lawsuit is filed regardless of legitimacy :winkwink:
As you yourself self-confessed sex.com was sued by yahoo.com
the fact that Yahoo lost prooves nothing but the fact that they actually got to court. I agree there is not always legitimate to sue someone but that is a hell of a hassle and money consuming process to protect yourself regardless if you are right or wrong.
I dont think xites is doing anything so bad - in fact the only thing I know for sure is that their site design is cool :) looks a little like BigPlayers - is there any connection?
Serge - is xites yours? are you part of it?
Anyway - its cool to see people try to innovate - time will tell if its actually a good idea. But I say - no winning without trying.

What I dont figure is who is going to use it and for what purposes (in adult industry I mean)?
As I pointed before - its not going to work for TGPs so who would use it? why send to someone elses site in the first place anyway? Why should I send people to CNN.com?

First of all,
Sex.Com sued Yahoo! not the other way around
;-))

Secondary,
this si NOT mine,
but I made a bet with it's owner that I'll have more posts in
Xite thread on GFY than he would on Oprano...
I am losing so far
;-(

http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index...f=1&t=101&st=0

c'mon, GFYers, help me out, show the world that GFYers can carry BUSINESS related tune and not just
whom would one fuck if he had dick!

Don't make me lose the bet!

Yassi,
I made a bet and so far I am losing...
;-((
there are more posts on the subject on Oprano than on GFY
;-((((
http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index...f=1&t=101&st=0

I can't beleive GFYers let me down and can't carry BUSINESS related discussion
;-(((

<img src=http://69khz.com/images/happyface.jpg>

Xerox = mouse technology

Actually the larger bumblers were not mentioned in your post--the developers of Unix..... Bell Labs! [AT & T] Unix = Internet [give or take the crappy NT/ASP Microcrap crap]

Serge is right. Yahoo sent a letter to Sex.com for trademark violation, and Sex.com turned around and sued them. Yahoo execs had no idea what a wildcard dns was which is what sex.com uses. Yahoo apologized publically and retracted their stance.

From last year:

http://www.infosatellite.com/news/20...oo_sexcom.html

gi-gi,
was I ever wrong when it comes to FACTS?
;-)))

see you at PHB2, girl!

You bet Serge! Last year at Liberace's mansion rocked! I can't wait to see what you guys have in store for this year...hehehe.

:glugglug

BTW, nice butt Serge....but where's the goat? :Graucho

Have you guys SEEN what this program does?

1. It steals your top banner spot
2. It redirects your traffic back to the referring site.
3. It kills consoles beyond the referring site

I'm surprised I didn't see more discussion about this program here. *shrugs*

How do our affiliates feel about it? Any concerns?

Comments?

You can use Xites or you can use frames. They both do the same thing. Only with frames it's much faster and you have everything under your control.

Good point Petr,

Except you can't stop consoles with frames, and you can't redirect a surfer back to your site after a certain amount of sites they view...unless you had a 'home' link or something in your frame and they would have to click it to go there....

[add]
I guess you could put a timed redirect in the frame....that might work.
[/add]

It's just a matter of time before this site steals all of YOUR traffic while you're trying to steal someone elses, or at least shaves a pretty good piece of it.

What comes around goes around.



RD

I get a Javascript error for every page that I load with that thing, can you install this program on your own server or do you have to use their third party server.