Maybe scientist read GFY. This is some wild shit. Maybe the world will never end!

[sortie]

I just read something on yahoo about science and it reminded me of a previous thread
on gfy. I dug up the thread and thought hmmmmmmm?

The part that made me go hmmmmmm, was the theory of a void in space.
The GFY post was made in 2002; six years ago!!

Here are the links and quotes :


http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/200809...ntcosmicbubble

Originally Posted by yahoo news

Earth may be trapped in an abnormal bubble of space-time that is particularly void of matter. Scientists say

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=454185

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

As I said there can be void in space like an air bubble in the sea that can't find the surface(notice I said air and not void!).
The sea has no void because there is air in the bubble so the sea does not force an object into the bubble.
But space does force objects into it's "bubble" because it's "bubble" is a true void of space.

[pr0]

says 2005 here buddy.....

[pornjudge]

Yeah even George Bush reads GFY, thats why the economy is fucked today

[sortie]

Originally Posted by pr0

says 2005 here buddy.....

You're right...was looking at the wrong date.

[F-U-Jimmy]

I was postulating that theory in 1999

[dozey]

That thread is pretty "out there," what you're talking about does sound a bit like a false vacuum though.

Originally Posted by Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum

The possibility that we are living in a false vacuum has never been a cheering one to contemplate. Vacuum decay is the ultimate ecological catastrophe; in the new vacuum there are new constants of nature; after vacuum decay, not only is life as we know it impossible, so is chemistry as we know it. However, one could always draw stoic comfort from the possibility that perhaps in the course of time the new vacuum would sustain, if not life as we know it, at least some structures capable of knowing joy. This possibility has now been eliminated.

[SlowDash]

george bush declared that he will fuck up everything, and he did so nothing is new

[JamesK]

Originally Posted by dozey

That thread is pretty "out there," what you're talking about does sound a bit like a false vacuum though.

There's one nipple missing

[sortie]

Originally Posted by F-U-Jimmy

I was postulating that theory in 1999

Bullshit.

[Libertine]

You do realize that although they both use the word "void", they are saying something entirely different, right?

[AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE]

Ever hear of Atomic wobble?

One of my theories... Seriously one of my theories and it makes perfect sense.

Now in Einsteins theory he says the faster you move the slower time goes and my theory holds to to this principal how ever it may have to do more with atomic wobble.

Basically atoms vibrate and within our locality the atoms have a vibration to them, however in a completely different part of the universe the atoms in that space may have a different vibration. So if we were to for example just zap a human being accross the universe to another human that resides in that distant part of universe. The Human that exhists in the distant universe may not be able to see the human from our part of the universe.

SO neither hyuman would see each other till the vibrations of both of them were within the same tune or wobble.

I invented this theory I have explained this theory many times in letters to a professor at Stanford and it lines up with the current theories of quantum mechanics. The concept is being looked at. True story.

THis theory also explaines the concept of multiple time lines and potentially even infinate time lines that run along side our very own and are less than milliseconds ahead of us and behind us. TO change the wobble of atoms is to travel the time lines itself.

[AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE]

Also... my theory holds true to what scientists have observed in Partical accelerators. The atoms may not be destroyed at all but merely changing wobble, which explains why some atoms in these partical accelerators simply "Vanish". Rather they do not "Vanish" at all they simple fall into a different wobble and thus move to another time line during the re-orientation of the atoms vibration.

[sortie]

Originally Posted by Libertine

You do realize that although they both use the word "void", they are saying something entirely different, right?

I realize that both use a concept of a void of space to argue different theories of space.

My point is they both talk about something called a void that no one has really ever talked about much before to my knowledge.

This goes against old theories of space, that space is filled with dark matter, a void would
have no dark matter. I think.