GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The Bailout Bill Just Failed - Not Passed (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=858235)

nosey 09-29-2008 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 14824023)

:1orglaugh

qxm 09-29-2008 11:26 AM

fuck... I better stop watching fucked up news and go and make myself a freaking Omelet du Formage..... at this point that seems like a better investment of my time.... c u all in 30 mins....

Antonio 09-29-2008 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buzzy (Post 14824364)
dow is down around 1000 now i heard.

-470 right now, watch CNN

Agent 488 09-29-2008 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM (Post 14824356)

Oddly... the republicans just saved this country from a major ass raping.... for now.

most republican strategists advised a no vote as a way to separate themselves from the toxic bush admin.

foghead 09-29-2008 11:29 AM

aint that armerica... foreclosures to see...

aint that armerica... jobs sold oversease...

aint that armerica... home of the greed

little pink houses for the banks to seize

gornyhuy 09-29-2008 11:30 AM

http://dunamai.com/Humor/BagdadBob/i..._bob_large.gif

GetSCORECash 09-29-2008 11:31 AM

Stock market crash... Tommorrow, or possibly by end of day.

pood 09-29-2008 11:31 AM

This Is The Dream Contrarian Market.omg.

uno 09-29-2008 11:39 AM

Repubs are blaming the bill failing on a speech by Pelosi. What tards.

pocketkangaroo 09-29-2008 11:39 AM

Pelosi's speech was retarded. So was voting down a bill because of a speech. Everyone in Congress is an idiot.

BradM 09-29-2008 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budsbabes (Post 14824479)
most republican strategists advised a no vote as a way to separate themselves from the toxic bush admin.

Great move, good timing on this vote.

bronco67 09-29-2008 11:40 AM

So these "nay" fuckers in the house would rather watch the US economy collapse than lose their jobs?

pocketkangaroo 09-29-2008 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 14824614)
Repubs are blaming the bill failing on a speech by Pelosi. What tards.

The Republicans in Congress are scumbags, but the speech was ridiculous. Trying to pass a major bill and she gets up and just thrashes them. Save that for afterwards.

shermo 09-29-2008 11:40 AM

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/financial_meltdown

We needed this... Stimulation is what we needed, and even economists like Buffet said we need it. Down goes the market, and we're heading towards depression. We were already, but still...The poor get poorer.

pocketkangaroo 09-29-2008 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 14824633)
So these "nay" fuckers in the house would rather watch the US economy collapse than lose their jobs?

They will lose their jobs when we hit 10% unemployment and everyone's 401K drops 20%.

uno 09-29-2008 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 14824621)
Pelosi's speech was retarded. So was voting down a bill because of a speech. Everyone in Congress is an idiot.

I sincerely doubt her speech made a lick of difference and only provided some disingenuous cover for voting against the bill they wanted to vote against anyway.

selena 09-29-2008 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sherm (Post 14824645)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/financial_meltdown

We needed this... Stimulation is what we needed, and even economists like Buffet said we need it. Down goes the market, and we're heading towards depression. We were already, but still...The poor get poorer.


Sherm, I'm a financial dumbass, but if we need stimulation, wouldn't dividing that $700 million up between Americans do a much better job of it?

Peaches 09-29-2008 11:45 AM

I suspect a new bill with a few minor rewritings will be presented and passes within the next week. :2 cents:

notoldschool 09-29-2008 11:45 AM

"Ample no votes came from both the Democratic and Republican sides of the aisle. More than two-thirds of Republicans and 40 percent of Democrats opposed the bill."

Dollarmansteve 09-29-2008 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pood (Post 14824537)
This Is The Dream Contrarian Market.omg.

Anyone who missed 4Q 01 as a buying opp, 4Q 08 might be just as good!

ADL Colin 09-29-2008 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 14824654)
They will lose their jobs when we hit 10% unemployment and everyone's 401K drops 20%.

The average person's 401k is already down 28% from the peak.

ADL Colin 09-29-2008 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve (Post 14824859)
Anyone who missed 4Q 01 as a buying opp, 4Q 08 might be just as good!

I'm planning on buying a lot in October.

October *shudder*

ADL Colin 09-29-2008 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 14824785)
I suspect a new bill with a few minor rewritings will be presented and passes within the next week. :2 cents:

Seems likely.

JP-pornshooter 09-29-2008 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 14824654)
They will lose their jobs when we hit 10% unemployment and everyone's 401K drops 20%.

i think your predicament would be a soft landing, i think the carnage will go much worse, possible with many people taking up to 50% "adjustments" on their 401k retirement savings.

Peaches 09-29-2008 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 14824778)
Sherm, I'm a financial dumbass, but if we need stimulation, wouldn't dividing that $700 million up between Americans do a much better job of it?

Giving the money to the people doesn't help the banks afford more loans and very few people have the ability to purchase houses and cars and pay tuition with cash, even if they were given their "portion" of the bailout.

seeric 09-29-2008 12:00 PM

there will absolutely be another bill.

Snake Doctor 09-29-2008 12:00 PM

This whole thing sucks.

There are no good choices, only bad choices and worse choices.

226 members of the House made the worse choice today.

If this weren't an election year the bill would have passed 430 to 5 in the house and 97 to 3 in the Senate......but, as usual, they're only worried about saving their own necks and not ours.

Brujah 09-29-2008 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 14824116)
My count is 94 nay for dems and 66 yea from repubs. That means that the dems are the ones that made the bill fail to me. Why couldn't the dems get on board with each other over it? They only needed a handful of votes.

You wanted this bailout bill to pass?

Splum 09-29-2008 12:02 PM

Let the banks fail, all them motherfuckers should have paid their mortgages on time. They deserve to be homeless.

-----------------------------------
http://www.survivalblog.com

mikeyddddd 09-29-2008 12:03 PM

Minority Leader John Boehner calls the financial rescue deal a ?crap sandwich?
http://www.mikeyddddd.com/gfy/images...bj-sammich.gif


selena 09-29-2008 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 14825020)
Giving the money to the people doesn't help the banks afford more loans and very few people have the ability to purchase houses and cars and pay tuition with cash, even if they were given their "portion" of the bailout.

Well, and I'm just playing around in my mind, obviously, but I'd think that would be a pretty good sized chunk of change if they did that. They could tax it as well, and make me give some back to the feds. First thing I'd do was pay off my house, which gives money back to my bank.

Not going to happen, I know, but I just cannot stomach the idea of them doing this bailout. And it's not a popular opinion, I'm pretty sure, but I don't have much sympathy for people who bought houses that they had to *know* that they could not afford, and are facing foreclosure.

I bought in 2005. When I went through the loan process, they told me I was eligible for a loan far, far greater than I expected. For a day or so, I dreamed of the house that I could buy with that kind of money. But then even dumbass me knew that the amount was a stupid ass amount for me to even begin to consider, so I shopped for and bought something pretty modest.

If I hadn't, no one would be talking about bailing me out today.

andrej_NDC 09-29-2008 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 14824351)
i have no idea if it is true i am no economist.

but wouldnt the less printed money ie $700billion make it better for the dollar?

can anyone explain this.

In long term it is better, as the economy will have a chance to heal on its own. Short term, not so good, people will buy different currencies or commodities which are safer for now. And that will make the dollar weaker.

uno 09-29-2008 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 14825210)
Well, and I'm just playing around in my mind, obviously, but I'd think that would be a pretty good sized chunk of change if they did that. They could tax it as well, and make me give some back to the feds. First thing I'd do was pay off my house, which gives money back to my bank.

Not going to happen, I know, but I just cannot stomach the idea of them doing this bailout. And it's not a popular opinion, I'm pretty sure, but I don't have much sympathy for people who bought houses that they had to *know* that they could not afford, and are facing foreclosure.

I bought in 2005. When I went through the loan process, they told me I was eligible for a loan far, far greater than I expected. For a day or so, I dreamed of the house that I could buy with that kind of money. But then even dumbass me knew that the amount was a stupid ass amount for me to even begin to consider, so I shopped for and bought something pretty modest.

If I hadn't, no one would be talking about bailing me out today.

If the bailout was split amongst the population we'd only get a few hundred bucks each.

selena 09-29-2008 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 14825285)
If the bailout was split amongst the population we'd only get a few hundred bucks each.

Obviously my dumbass-edness applies to math as well then. :winkwink:

I just don't see how this goes hand in hand with a free market economy, but maybe we aren't that anymore.

andrej_NDC 09-29-2008 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 14825147)
Let the banks fail, all them motherfuckers should have paid their mortgages on time. They deserve to be homeless.

Those people are too stupid, banks which gave them the money are the responsible ones. Give a monkey a gun...

mynameisjim 09-29-2008 12:12 PM

The economy won't collapse if this bill isn't passed. If business really wanted to fix the credit market they would, just pumping in money won't fix anything. I applaud congress for standing up finally and looking out for average Americans. There needs to be provisions for struggling home owners in this bill or it simply won't pass.

Honestly though, if you want to restart the economy, this 700 billion along with this summer's stimulus package should of been spent on public works construction projects like building roads, bridges, etc. When you do that you put people to work and that's what fuels a healthy economy.

Bailing out banks who knew this day would come for several years will not save our economy from a deep recession.

Juicy D. Links 09-29-2008 12:13 PM

the cost of Cologne is gonna skyrocket

mynameisjim 09-29-2008 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 14825285)
If the bailout was split amongst the population we'd only get a few hundred bucks each.

I read $2500 each.

andrej_NDC 09-29-2008 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 14825285)
If the bailout was split amongst the population we'd only get a few hundred bucks each.

Few k each, but it wouldn't make a difference anyway. Maybe even a worse solution. People are dumb, they would think everything is ok now and spend it on some stupid shit.

Rochard 09-29-2008 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 14825020)
Giving the money to the people doesn't help the banks afford more loans and very few people have the ability to purchase houses and cars and pay tuition with cash, even if they were given their "portion" of the bailout.

That's the problem though. You can give all of the money in the world to the banks, but that won't help anyone get loans. Everyone is upside down on their mortgages and owes more money on their houses than it's worth by hundreds of thousands of dollars. No bank in their right fucking mind is going to give them a loan!

All this is gonna do is bail out the banks. It's not going to fix the problem for someone who owes $600k on a house now worth $200k.

shermo 09-29-2008 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 14825210)
Well, and I'm just playing around in my mind, obviously, but I'd think that would be a pretty good sized chunk of change if they did that. They could tax it as well, and make me give some back to the feds. First thing I'd do was pay off my house, which gives money back to my bank.

Not going to happen, I know, but I just cannot stomach the idea of them doing this bailout. And it's not a popular opinion, I'm pretty sure, but I don't have much sympathy for people who bought houses that they had to *know* that they could not afford, and are facing foreclosure.

I bought in 2005. When I went through the loan process, they told me I was eligible for a loan far, far greater than I expected. For a day or so, I dreamed of the house that I could buy with that kind of money. But then even dumbass me knew that the amount was a stupid ass amount for me to even begin to consider, so I shopped for and bought something pretty modest.

If I hadn't, no one would be talking about bailing me out today.

If you break up 700,000,000,000 evenly into the 305,291,233 people that live in the US according to http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html, that would be $2292 give or take per person. As you can see with the first stimulus checks, this did next to nil.

Now, if we can save banks, this will allow people to still borrow money for homes, cars, etc. This commerce would keep the economy moving. With the fat cats having no money, falling salaries, etc...This takes jobs away from Americans as the fat cats can no longer employ, etc.

The general person thinks that it's best for the country to save the common person, and it's just as selfish as the CEO's who think they deserve the world. If everybody would stop to thinking about me, me, me, we could all pull together and figure this out.

I know I'm in the minority and I know that this bill had a lot of BS attached...but overall, I think we needed this, and I hope they can counteract this with a new version shortly. let's split the difference between WS and the American people by a SMALL tax increase...This will strengthen the dollar once again, get the economy moving and possibly pull us out of a potential depression.

Agent 488 09-29-2008 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno (Post 14825285)
If the bailout was split amongst the population we'd only get a few hundred bucks each.

$2333.33 per person.

Serge Litehead 09-29-2008 12:20 PM

Does anyone know projected amount of foreclosures happening doe to this mess? How many people may end up on the streets?

uno 09-29-2008 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 14825396)
Obviously my dumbass-edness applies to math as well then. :winkwink:

I just don't see how this goes hand in hand with a free market economy, but maybe we aren't that anymore.

Karl Marx said, and I'm paraphrasing, "Give free markets enough rope and they'll hang themselves."

Quagmire 09-29-2008 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 14825147)
Let the banks fail, all them motherfuckers should have paid their mortgages on time. They deserve to be homeless.

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC (Post 14825415)
Those people are too stupid, banks which gave them the money are the responsible ones. Give a monkey a gun...

What, you mean giving a $300,000 mortgage to a person making $35,000 a year was a bad idea?? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Not teaching the population about credit and how it works and then handing them money is totally the fault of the system. In general (and I don't mean Americans, I mean globally in general) people are stupid. Take all the wealth of the world and divide it equally and in a few years the money ends up right back where it was to start with, with a few minor changes.

BlackCrayon 09-29-2008 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holograph (Post 14825605)
Does anyone know projected amount of foreclosures happening doe to this mess? How many people may end up on the streets?

Gonna be a helluva lot more if this bailout doesn't happen. Hope you guys like soup kitchens.

FlexxAeon 09-29-2008 12:25 PM

sooooo.... as much as these politicians say that this was a non-partisan bill, it fell victim to the same partisan crap as all other bills?

stickyfingerz 09-29-2008 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 14825127)
You wanted this bailout bill to pass?

Not saying I did. But the majority of the dems did, but were not able to come together enough to pass it.

qxm 09-29-2008 12:26 PM

- 700!!!!!! fuck

uno 09-29-2008 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC (Post 14825466)
Few k each, but it wouldn't make a difference anyway. Maybe even a worse solution. People are dumb, they would think everything is ok now and spend it on some stupid shit.

Oh, I thought someone broke it down the other day when someone posted a chain letter with incorrect math and it came out to 400 bucks.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123