Even if it happened exactly like all the Jew haters say it did... it was 41 years ago. Geo political realities have shifted a number of times since then. In 1941 Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. I guess those evil Japs cant be trusted either.

sounds like common sense to me. :2 cents:

when someone invades your home, what do you do?

Its so easy to label anyone who questions anything regarding Israel a "jew hater" - that does not change the fact, innocent people lost their life because of an UNPROVOKED DEADLY ASSAULT on a US ship by an ALLY.

This is all that matters:

"The facts are simple and straightforward. Israeli forces reconnoitered the ship for hours in daylight with unlimited visibility, correctly reported the ship’s identity to their headquarters, then attacked the clearly marked and defenseless American ship by air and sea for more than 75 minutes, killing 34 men and wounding more than two-thirds of the 297-man crew."

not a damn thing to do with hating jews, this is about being attacked by an ally.

16 dead in car bomb, ambush at US Embassy in Yemen
By AHMED AL-HAJ, Associated Press Writer 1 minute ago
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080917/...men_us_embassy

This is not good:Oh crap

You and I both know that this incident is the rallying cry for Stormfront types worldwide. It is a disputed set of facts which happened 41 years ago during a totally different set of geopolitical realities. It is safe to say that anyone who obsesses over this incident is a Jew hater. That is why someone would mention it in a totally unrelated thread about Pakistan border disputes. But then you already know that. :disgust

Imagine the reaction here if you replaced Israel by Iran in that text ....

For a moment I though this is the worst moment for a war for US, considering the economical crisis, but then I reminded that wars have always been a engine to recover the economical power...

It's easier to just label any intelligent discussion racist and not deal with facts I suppose.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hinman_Moorer

I believe him over any anti-american like cycoe6

I guess because I disagree with you I must be an anti-American. I am continually amazed how poorly the left understands the concept of free exchange of ideas. The totalitarian urge to make everyone submit to the "group-think" or be ostracized is one of the least attractive aspects of the modern lunatic left. :upsidedow

I wouldn't exactly call Pakistan a politically stable entity. Let's not for get that Musharaff came to power via a military coup, so there's a history here of military leaders giving themselves a long leash.

In addition, Musharaff was kicked out of power and the masses are grumbling, don't be surprised if there's alot of tough talk from goverment and military officials about "protecting their territorial integrity" while the US does as it pleases.

You called me a jew hater, simply because I disagreed with you. You actually use the term free expression of ideas? LOLOLOL - You condemned mine, when I am backed by naval officers and investigations, you just wanted to call another White American Male an anti-semite, you succeedded but that did not make you correct.

Just because I hold a different opinion, and agree with those who were on board the vessel and not you, I am called a jew hater.

You should choose your own words more wisely.

You are anti-american, thats a fact. But nowhere did I say anything negative about the jewish people, you used the tired old race card because you had no facts to rely on.

What evidence do you have to support this assertion?

What evidence do you have to support this?

"It is safe to say that anyone who obsesses over this incident is a Jew hater. "

I am done with you.

You pulled the race card and now want to back out with another tired argument, you called me a jew hater based on my difference of opinion, then comdemn those who express other ideas as anti-emetic.

Childish and very uneducated

Damn, I should spice this up even more and call someone an "unpatriotic nazi who supports Scientology and Al-Qaeda, has a small penis, steals toys from children and eats dogs alive...and doesn't greet...and smokes" but I don't know who to pick...HELP!

Anti-human worst of them all :/

I get the feeling that Musharaff was actually kicked out by the US.

It was with US backing that Benazir Bhutto foolishly went back to Pakistan to be
killed. Why the fuck would Musharaff want her back in the country?

The US wanted Bhutto in because the US thought Musharaff wasn't doing enough.

So the US got what it wanted and now Pakistan is ready to fire on US troops at sight.

(Please substitue "Bush INC." for US above, for more accuracy)

In fact you are right. When I refer to neo-con I refer to Zionists, but usually the tools come out and call me an anti-semite when I say that. But yes, Obama is operating to a Zionist/AIPAC defined ME plan.

Glad to see Fletch back and speaking the truth in such threads :thumbsup :thumbsup

Oh , Well , that's always nice to know...

Goes to show again a bunch of old fucks who cant fight pick a war and send kids to do the fighting, pathetic

I hate to remind everyone Pakistan is an unstable country and they have nuclear power!!

I wouldn't want to go to war against a country that has nothing to lose! They are probably as dangerously minded as Iran.

But I'm Canadian, so why would I worry?

that is exactly what they're doing.. the raids were uncalled for, considering the amount of missiles that fall in their country

Yeah, everyone's dangerous except the one dropping the most bombs and killing
the most people and engaged in the most wars.

:thumbsup

Yeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!