Los Angeles commuter train crash: Driver 'distracted by text message'
A train driver blamed for missing a red signal shortly before two trains collided in Los Angeles last week killing 25 people may have been distracted by text messages right before the crash, officials have said.
Man i was kinda pissed off while watching the news on this whole deal. I mean like 20 hours after it happened they were already blaming the driver to cover thier asses. I smell cover up but thats me.
Man i was kinda pissed off while watching the news on this whole deal. I mean like 20 hours after it happened they were already blaming the driver to cover thier asses. I smell cover up but thats me.
i like how its easier to blame text messages and human error were the reason, when sooo many other railroads have technology that stops this type of accident.
C O V E R U P for lack of technology and railroads that have methods of shutting down trAINS ON THE SAME TRACK.
"The NTSB for decades has recommended collision-avoidance devices for corridors where passenger and freight trains use the same track. Railroads say the technology costs too much and isn't reliable."
The people at fault here are the same ones placing the blame on some dead guy. Very convenient, but this problem has been around for decades.
Its no different than underfunded levees in Louisiana.
i like how its easier to blame text messages and human error were the reason, when sooo many other railroads have technology that stops this type of accident.
Wouldn't that be a good reason to put the phone down?
Wouldn't that be a good reason to put the phone down?
"A train driver blamed for missing a red signal shortly before two trains collided in Los Angeles last week killing 25 people may have been distracted by text messages right before the crash, officials have said."
The sentence says "may have been" - nowhere does it state anything other than a POSSIBILITY. You claim he was actually using his phone, I have YET to read that from anyone but you.
I am not here to debate possibilities, but the fact is, people have already begun placing the blame on a dead guy instead of focusing on how to make sure this doesnt happen again.
The blame game always tops the ones who know what really caused this. Lack of technology due to the most common phrase used before devastation occurs, "costs too much."
"A train driver blamed for missing a red signal shortly before two trains collided in Los Angeles last week killing 25 people may have been distracted by text messages right before the crash, officials have said."
The sentence says "may have been" - nowhere does it state anything other than a POSSIBILITY. You claim he was actually using his phone, I have YET to read that from anyone but you.
I am not here to debate possibilities, but the fact is, people have already begun placing the blame on a dead guy instead of focusing on how to make sure this doesnt happen again.
The blame game always tops the ones who know what really caused this. Lack of technology due to the most common phrase used before devastation occurs, "costs too much."
The National Transportation Safety Board rightly says it is continuing to investigate, before it confirms or denies whether the engineer who failed to see one or more warning lights to stop the commuter train in his charge was exchanging text messages at the time he blew through.
But a 15-year-old has claimed to be conducting a series of exchanges with the engineer, up until a minute before the wreck.
I think its fucked up how fast metrolink jumped to blame the dead guy. The NTSB has jumped all over them and shot down every news piece they can find saying that at this time there is no way to know. It appears that metrolink is attempting to shift the blame to the outside contractor that supplies the train operators. The NTSB says that it can still be any number of things. Just blaming a dead guy without knowing or having the phone records is way wrong. I will wait for the NTSB's report of the investigation.
Comment