If Iran is indeed building nukes, then pray Bush/Israel take them out before November - GoFuckYourself.com

spacedog · 09-03-2008, 02:06 AM

Seems the US could be sitting defenseless ducks and powerless if Obama is pres.
How do you feel about a US without nukes?

Do you think Israel and Bush will act before election day?

fuzzylogic · 09-03-2008, 02:06 AM

nukes aren't needed anymore.

moreover, the contamination leftover is a huge international liability.

cardinalvices · 09-03-2008, 02:17 AM

If local economy sucks and is going down the drain then best thing you can do is to think out a foreign treat. That way people will point their attention to the Enemy and forget to blame the politicians. I say "nukes" story in Iran is about as truthful as "WMD in Iraq".
https://youtube.com/watch?v=v4epat3c23k

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 09-03-2008, 02:19 AM

What makes you think that Obama would allow Iran to have nukes?
Please stop.

As a politician he has to to aim for the reduction of nuclear weapons. So in that one sentence there is no way that Iran would be permitted to have nukes under his presidency.

Nothing wrong with a leader that wants to shore up alliances and make friends while reducing the potential of nuclear conflict.

DO you speak english spacedog?

spacedog · 09-03-2008, 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzzylogic

nukes aren't needed anymore.

moreover, the contamination leftover is a huge international liability.

Sure, I'd agree if all countries didn't have them.
Here's who has them
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...uclear_weapons

spacedog · 09-03-2008, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ

What makes you think that Obama would allow Iran to have nukes?
Please stop.

I don't think that.. the question was in regards to Obama's policy on disarming America's nukes and at the same time there exists a very remote and tiny chance Iran MAY be making nukes just because W & Israel say so...

So, my question was, do you think Obama's policy in regards to US nukes would prompt Israel or US to act before November?

You know.. like nuke em now while we have the chance, lol

babymaker · 09-03-2008, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ

What makes you think that Obama would allow Iran to have nukes?
Please stop.

As a politician he has to to aim for the reduction of nuclear weapons. So in that one sentence there is no way that Iran would be permitted to have nukes under his presidency.

Nothing wrong with a leader that wants to shore up alliances and make friends while reducing the potential of nuclear conflict.

DO you speak english spacedog?

You Spelled Obama right lol how the fuck did you do that lol :D

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 09-03-2008, 02:30 AM

One thing Obama did say that in that video contrasts what he was saying in the DNC.

In the DNC he assured Americans that we would maintain a strong and technologically equiped military, while creating an end to Iraqi war and expanding America's Diplomacy.

I for one can appreciate a strong and ready military and I can definatly get behind a guy that wants to reduce our military actions while maintaining a sharp and strong military.

Just because America has an awesome military does not mean it has to be used and it is that fact that separates the Democrats from the Warmonger Repugnicans.
Just because one carries a big stick does not mean it has to be used.

Its as simple as that.

kane · 09-03-2008, 02:35 AM

I highly doubt we would ever nuke Iran unless they nuked Israel first. Even then it would probably Israel that nuked them. We don't need to nuke them. We can use missiles to destroy their nuclear facilities and if they strike back by invading Iraq or attacking our military in the Persian Gulf we have enough Air and Naval power to bomb them back into the stone age. We could rain fire on them for three month non-stop and turn that country into rubble. No need to nuke.

kane · 09-03-2008, 02:37 AM

As to the question will we act before election day? I really doubt it. Bush is already one of the most hated presidents in history. If he attacks before election day it could cause such a backlash that McCain could get stomped. Maybe it would rally the country around McCain, but right now people feel like they were lied to about Iraq so Bush would have to have rock solid, world class proof that Iran had a nuke or he would doom McCain.

spacedog · 09-03-2008, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ

.... separates the Democrats from the Warmonger Repugnicans.
Just because one carries a big stick does not mean it has to be used.

Are you fucking shitting me? Warmonger Republicans..

WWI -> Wilson (Democrat)
WWII -> FDR (Democrat)
Korea -> Truman (Democrat)
Vietnam -> JFK (Democrat) LBJ (Democrat) ended by: Nixon(Republican)
Kosovo -> Clinton(Democrat)

spacedog · 09-03-2008, 02:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

As to the question will we act before election day? I really doubt it. Bush is already one of the most hated presidents in history. If he attacks before election day it could cause such a backlash that McCain could get stomped. Maybe it would rally the country around McCain, but right now people feel like they were lied to about Iraq so Bush would have to have rock solid, world class proof that Iran had a nuke or he would doom McCain.

What you say is true, it's unlikely the US would make the first strike. It would be Israel starting it so of course that could be the excuse to get involved without as much backlash, to help their ally, perhaps.

spacedog · 09-03-2008, 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ

...while creating an end to Iraqi war ....

You mean that Iraqi war that's already been ending that has a scheduled withdrawal.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 09-03-2008, 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog

You mean that Iraqi war that's already been ending that has a scheduled withdrawal.

Well now it does or is close.

Humm wonder why...

kane · 09-03-2008, 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog

What you say is true, it's unlikely the US would make the first strike. It would be Israel starting it so of course that could be the excuse to get involved without as much backlash, to help their ally, perhaps.

The only way Iran can hurt anyone but Israel is if they can smuggle a bomb into the country and detonate it. More likely they would fire a missile or sneak a bomb into Israel. If that happened we could (and probably would) jump in to defend out ally, but if we just attack them because we think they might be dangerous we would stir up a real hornets nest.

bbm · 09-03-2008, 03:34 AM

Israil and Bush will fail

09-03-2008, 02:06 AM	#1
spacedog Yes that IS me. Bitch. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 14,149	If Iran is indeed building nukes, then pray Bush/Israel take them out before November Seems the US could be sitting defenseless ducks and powerless if Obama is pres. How do you feel about a US without nukes? Do you think Israel and Bush will act before election day?

09-03-2008, 02:06 AM	#2
fuzzylogic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: buffalo, las vegas. icq: 285808879 Posts: 4,796	nukes aren't needed anymore. moreover, the contamination leftover is a huge international liability. Last edited by fuzzylogic; 09-03-2008 at 02:08 AM..

09-03-2008, 02:17 AM	#3
cardinalvices Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 2,084	If local economy sucks and is going down the drain then best thing you can do is to think out a foreign treat. That way people will point their attention to the Enemy and forget to blame the politicians. I say "nukes" story in Iran is about as truthful as "WMD in Iraq". https://youtube.com/watch?v=v4epat3c23k __________________ Cardinal Vices Studio - your one stop shop for webdesign! Paysites \| Consulting \| Tube sites \| TGPs \| Galleries/Banner ads \| Flash peel ads Start your own cam site - Get Live Cam Site Solution

09-03-2008, 02:19 AM	#4
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	What makes you think that Obama would allow Iran to have nukes? Please stop. As a politician he has to to aim for the reduction of nuclear weapons. So in that one sentence there is no way that Iran would be permitted to have nukes under his presidency. Nothing wrong with a leader that wants to shore up alliances and make friends while reducing the potential of nuclear conflict. DO you speak english spacedog? __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \| Last edited by AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE; 09-03-2008 at 02:22 AM..

09-03-2008, 02:30 AM	#8
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	One thing Obama did say that in that video contrasts what he was saying in the DNC. In the DNC he assured Americans that we would maintain a strong and technologically equiped military, while creating an end to Iraqi war and expanding America's Diplomacy. I for one can appreciate a strong and ready military and I can definatly get behind a guy that wants to reduce our military actions while maintaining a sharp and strong military. Just because America has an awesome military does not mean it has to be used and it is that fact that separates the Democrats from the Warmonger Repugnicans. Just because one carries a big stick does not mean it has to be used. Its as simple as that. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

09-03-2008, 02:35 AM	#9
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	I highly doubt we would ever nuke Iran unless they nuked Israel first. Even then it would probably Israel that nuked them. We don't need to nuke them. We can use missiles to destroy their nuclear facilities and if they strike back by invading Iraq or attacking our military in the Persian Gulf we have enough Air and Naval power to bomb them back into the stone age. We could rain fire on them for three month non-stop and turn that country into rubble. No need to nuke.

09-03-2008, 02:37 AM	#10
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	As to the question will we act before election day? I really doubt it. Bush is already one of the most hated presidents in history. If he attacks before election day it could cause such a backlash that McCain could get stomped. Maybe it would rally the country around McCain, but right now people feel like they were lied to about Iraq so Bush would have to have rock solid, world class proof that Iran had a nuke or he would doom McCain.

09-03-2008, 03:34 AM	#16
bbm So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 3,710	Israil and Bush will fail