Tube site owners, STEP INSIDE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

»Rob Content« · 08-23-2008, 05:06 PM

Get who organized?

No one wants to put up the money it's going to take to get into court.. It's just not viable.

Who are your lawyers ready to step up and take on this fight? Because I already have questions for them...

Pleasurepays · 08-23-2008, 05:07 PM

(edit) 51 jackasses providing awesome entertainment!

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-23-2008, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick Decker

Anybody else smell smegma?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smegma

How do you even know what that smells like....?

Hit me up.. We need to catch up soon and get ready for the season..

DatingGameExpert · 08-23-2008, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

What I am trying to do is get people motivated and orginized... Fired up!

I am the first person to put a video on watermarked video on youtube that I know of..

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-23-2008, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VG.Content

Get who organized?

No one wants to put up the money it's going to take to get into court.. It's just not viable.

Who are your lawyers ready to step up and take on this fight? Because I already have questions for them...

We have to find the lawyers after we build the team..

»Rob Content« · 08-23-2008, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

We have to find the lawyers after we build the team..

The team of who though?

Most people are not interested.

Remember Airek formed an actual non profit anti piracy group which included a lot of top people over a year ago, and none of them wanted to divvy up the cash.

Who so far of any significance has joined the team?

mrkris · 08-23-2008, 05:26 PM

Although I'm sure you have the best intentions, why would people, who know they are running illegal sites, cut off the people that bring them sales?

I don't see it happening.

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-23-2008, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrkris

Although I'm sure you have the best intentions, why would people, who know they are running illegal sites, cut off the people that bring them sales?

I don't see it happening.

Because if they are not working with us, then we are working against them..

mrkris · 08-23-2008, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

Because if they are not working with us, then we are working against them..

You're asking lazy webmasters to do work. Funny.

Iron Fist · 08-23-2008, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrkris

You're asking lazy webmasters to do work. Funny.

I hope postcount isn't used as an indication of quality of work or sales potential

aico · 08-23-2008, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

Nope, because then you must have 2257 docs on all the content.... Pay attention to the laws!

Maybe you should learn a little more about tube sites...

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-24-2008, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Maybe you should learn a little more about tube sites...

Really, what should I learn...?

That if the allow unrestricted uploading they are not responsable for anything uploaded untill they get a dmca..? And the moment they start to police there sites themselves and removing content with out a dmca being recieved they are then responsable for 2257...

Also, if they do not take user uploads, they are responsable...

There is alot of loopholes here...

Maybe you should learn about about tubes alittle more..

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-24-2008, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico

Maybe you should learn a little more about tube sites...

Here... read about dmca, the tube site safe harbor law...
http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf

And a simple read... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMCA

»Rob Content« · 08-24-2008, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

Here... read about dmca, the tube site safe harbor law...
http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf

And a simple read... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMCA

Yes, and no significant tube site is hosted in or does it maintain a business in the US market, which makes DMCA pointless. Unless you have a "secret" way to get people who have a business in Hong Kong, hosting in China, Russia, and South America and live in sweden.

What's the plan to get them?

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-24-2008, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VG.Content

Yes, and no significant tube site is hosted in or does it maintain a business in the US market, which makes DMCA pointless. Unless you have a "secret" way to get people who have a business in Hong Kong, hosting in China, Russia, and South America and live in sweden.

What's the plan to get them?

Most of the big ones like pornhub.com are touchable..

As for the untouchable ones... We can hire legal mercenaries to take care of them? Like AirScan, Blackwater Worldwide, Erinys International, ect.

»Rob Content« · 08-24-2008, 12:32 PM

Jon you are missing the big point, no one is going to divvy up the millions of millions of dollars it would take to even start a court case.

It's just not going to happen, we tried to do this 2 years ago when it was not that bad and all we got were crickets, and now most of the main content buyers seed the main tube sites with their content.

They've moved on.

No one wants to put up that kind of cash, it's not worth it. The money lost in trying to fight it would far surpass the money they are losing off the content.

And hire a legal mercenary, to do what exactly? They live in an area where US law does not apply. So they are not breaking any laws.

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-24-2008, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VG.Content

Jon you are missing the big point, no one is going to divvy up the millions of millions of dollars it would take to even start a court case.

It's just not going to happen, we tried to do this 2 years ago when it was not that bad and all we got were crickets, and now most of the main content buyers seed the main tube sites with their content.

They've moved on.

No one wants to put up that kind of cash, it's not worth it. The money lost in trying to fight it would far surpass the money they are losing off the content.

And hire a legal mercenary, to do what exactly? They live in an area where US law does not apply. So they are not breaking any laws.

Ok.... https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/850114-fuck-am-post14656227.html

08-23-2008, 05:06 PM	#51
»Rob Content« Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 4,348	Get who organized? No one wants to put up the money it's going to take to get into court.. It's just not viable. Who are your lawyers ready to step up and take on this fight? Because I already have questions for them... __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557 ICQ - 436 795 438 E-mail rob /@/ cool-content dotcom

08-23-2008, 05:26 PM	#57
mrkris Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,737	Although I'm sure you have the best intentions, why would people, who know they are running illegal sites, cut off the people that bring them sales? I don't see it happening. __________________ PHP-MySQL-Rails \| ICQ: 342500546

08-24-2008, 12:32 PM	#66
»Rob Content« Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 4,348	Jon you are missing the big point, no one is going to divvy up the millions of millions of dollars it would take to even start a court case. It's just not going to happen, we tried to do this 2 years ago when it was not that bad and all we got were crickets, and now most of the main content buyers seed the main tube sites with their content. They've moved on. No one wants to put up that kind of cash, it's not worth it. The money lost in trying to fight it would far surpass the money they are losing off the content. And hire a legal mercenary, to do what exactly? They live in an area where US law does not apply. So they are not breaking any laws. __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557 ICQ - 436 795 438 E-mail rob /@/ cool-content dotcom

08-23-2008, 05:07 PM	#52
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	(edit) 51 jackasses providing awesome entertainment!