Exactly, fighting fraud by delaying payouts for new affiliates makes sense, but raising minimum payouts for all affiliates serves only one goal: earning interest.

provide some examples, otherwise you're talking out of your ass.

Hi if you have any questions regarding the min payout change feel free to icq me. My number is 175789972.

ok, I'm dumb? I'm not the one calling out programs that actually did pay me.

And since this does not effect you, as you stated, and now with the information you have.... what do you care? Why keep posting about it?

I have "NEVER" noticed a major program that has set off red flags like you stated. I may have forgotten about one but nothing ever the size of TB that I know of has ever done something like you might have thought was going on.

from here: https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/848807-companies-raising-payouts.html

You have my ICQ... do you need help with something? Send me a message and I can go over whatever your issue is, no problem. At times somebody may slip past me, but I do my absolute best not to ignore anyone... big or small.

All companies with reps have a bad ones, that doesn't mean everyone on the team is.

I haven't ever seen Sly or Kristin not help the little or big guy, equally. They have had some other great, experienced reps in the past too. Both know exactly how to sling traffic, and Kristin can run programs on her own, I don't know of all of Sly's skills.

I don't think you can get much more skilled and professional reps than those two. Actually, I would challenge you to find one other program with two higher skilled reps than those two.

You are foolish and arrogant to assume people around you are slow.
Your reply has no basis in logic or in reality.

To think that major credit card processors need 7 or more days to catch fraudulent transactions is complete ridiculous.
If it took them seven days to catch up with the fraud they would all be broke and shut down exactly one week ago.

You obviously have no idea how vast, intricate and efficient the global credit card system is.

Once again, quadrupling the minimum payout is not a fraud reduction measure.

Ok, I'm done arguing. It's clear that some people care about this, while others don't care at all.

Personally, I haven't been affected yet. But I do think that such changes may have been done because of financial problems, otherwise they could implement this to new webmasters only. And that scares me, since I like TopBucks.

Doc: I'm not calling out Topbucks, I clearly stated that I was concerned and asked what people thought about it.

Beemk: recently a HUGE AVS program did this, and a lot of webmasters lost a lot of money. You can search GFY if you want, this thread is not about them.

I'm sure they deal with more fraud that most here can imagine. If the payout is too high just find one of thousands of other sponsors. I'd imagine 90% of the time scammers LOVE getting paid by Epass.

true, thinking about it they also could be using this as a method to discourage the use of epassporte compared to other payment types, that could be a strategy as well to encourage the other stuff

Huh? They don't need seven days, they need more sales, that's is why they are doing this.

I have owned/ran affiliate programs for 10 years. I know what fraud is.

The global cc system catches stolen cards, not generated cc fraud. That's the processor and programs job.

think this kind of fraud happened to naughty america and they also raised their payout recently

http://www.businessvoyeur.com/2008-0...ops-epassporte

probs the same people affecting them

To clarify, the reason we did not only apply this to new webmasters is due to the fact that Topbucks has over 50,000 open webmaster accounts and webmaster fraud is ocurring from both new and old accounts. If there is any specific webmaster we have had established relationships with getting paid by epassporte who does not hit the minimum, we are happy to work with those situations on a case by case basis.

~Alli

is changing the wire minimum from $2k to $1k possible?
just curious...

This is not correct.

I think it's hilarious that the people who don't make $200 every two weeks consider themselves experts on the credit card fraud big programs have to deal with.

I started reading this thread and my eyes started bleeding from the stupidity.

You are correct, I have never owned an affiliate program, they don't need to track sales for fraud, and visa/mc control all fraud for everyone.

Wow - you nailed it all on the head in one shot!

More assumptions.

Topbucks or any other program can raise their payouts to whatever they choose.
The argument is not about the change in minimum payout.
The argument is about saying it will reduce fraud.
There is enough bullshit in this industry without adding another myth to the pile.

Let's clarify the statements:
The epassporte minimum was moved to $200 in order to discourage the use of epassporte which is the preferred payment method of fraudulent webmasters.
It will also allow more data to catch fraud from webmasters using epassporte as payment in a more timely fashion.


We operate multiple programs and there has been a tremendous increase in fraud attempts going on over the past 6 to 9 months and more methods to cover up the fraud. This is not unique to TopBucks and the fraudulent webmasters ultimately cost the legitimate webmasters as well as the programs. Many programs do not offer epassporte, delay payments by 30 days or more, or have much higher default minimums. The choice at TopBucks to raise the minimums puts us in line with most programs and is within reason.

Again, as mentioned before, we are and have always been willing to work with reputable webmasters on their specific needs and can be contacted to discuss.

~Alli

Yes it does reduce fraud. I do a lot of fraud checking for our programs and I have to say I have seen a huge increase in fraud. All want to be paid via ePassporte and live in the United States.

It's easier to spot as some are getting dumb, but there are still some good frauders out there. When we are running five programs and have ten of thousands of webmasters it takes a little bit more time to comb through all the data and pick out the bad ones.

Unfortunately, many of the scammers and frauders are hurting the good webmasters. If we pulled together as a community more, we may be able to crack down on fraud all around.

With that, TopBucks has been around 8+ years, we work and have worked with our webmasters to get them what they need. If a webmaster with a reputable history hits us up and asks for their account to be put back down to a lower minimum, we wouldn't deny it.

The programs are always the first to get bitched at when we try and implement things that cover our asses because we still have to make the webmasters happy. So work with us people, we aren't asking for the moon, we are just trying to reduce our fraud while still keeping our GOOD webmasters happy.

Hit up anyone from the team if you have questions or want further clarification. We want to work with the good webmasters and always have. We won't bite, promise. : )

fraudulent webmasters can make a ton of money by doing one join a month from 50 different programs.
200 minimum gives you more join data to discover them. anyone saying otherwise should not speak in this thread. period.

I think you should allow 50$ minimum payout for webmasters who send sales for a while a leave that 200$ minimum to new webmasters only.

That's a great suggestion. Unfortunately, our payout infrastructure doesn't support changing minimums automatically based on how long someone sends and doesn't take into account webmasters who use multiple accounts so this is why we offer dealing with each webmaster on an individual and case by case basis. For many webmasters this has no impact or no significant impact, and it's easier to deal with those who are impacted on a case by case basis.

~Alli

I hate it when sponsors raise payout minimums to over $50-100

In fantasy world maybe, the real one is more complex.

Not worried at all... looks to be trying to prevent fraud

say what?? all the other programs?? I have heard nothing of this...?

A lot of the people who respond that it is no big deal have their own affiliate programs and are likely considering the same thing.

Of course these things are cause for concern to an affiliate. All i can say is that I have really been pushing ccbill lately. 50 sponsors with $200 minimums just will not work for me. But by all means, do run your business as you see fit. But do nto expect me to drink the kool-aid!

This might be so.....but those of us with accounts since 2000 shouldn't be much of a concern. They could have easily just applied this to new affiliates.

I don't believe by any means that this sort of thing is all about stopping fraud one bit. :) Funny how so many are trying it at once....

read above..

You could read what the president of TB wrote above, and other reps. They said "contact them if you need it lowered"... And that the fact they use truestats, it's now understandable why they couldn't make it so some accounts could and couldn't do it.



Any more non program owners wish to tell us program owners that fraud isn't an issue?

Affiliates should be greatfull that they have great programs to promote. If you don't like it bugger off and promote another program. :)

-N

drop them like a hot potato

70% of webmasters will never reach that minimum. I have some money with Vivid from my Kardashian sites that never worked for me. I don’t think I’ll ever see that money.

Have you emailed them, said it just is not working out and you would like to get paid out and have your account closed?
Ussually that always works.

With most programs, of course I can't speak for Vivid, but really most and I would assume all. If you are done and can't push anymore sales, you can ask for your payout. It's your money, I can't see why a program would have a problem with such a request.

There you have said it yourself. "it takes a little bit more time"
Increasing the delay to payout might help reduce fraud.
Increasing the minimum payout does nothing to reduce fraud.

You may have legitimately chosen the increased payout method as a way of increasing the delay. Perhaps this will reduce fraud, yes, but it is certain to hurt a lot of small affiliates.

The biggest flaw in your technique is that a big time fraudster makes the minimums no problem and this cocksucker gets his payment pronto.

So in fact when you come right down to it, your technique only achieves more stress for the small affiliate and really does nothing to eliminate fraud on the worst scale.

Right, no matter what they do make the minimum. Do you know how much easier it is to spot a fraudulent person making over $200 each time in comparison to $50? A lot.
Thus saving time ...

And again, if you are an affiliate (big or small) that would like their minimum put back down, hit us up and we'll get ya hooked up.