GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   "The death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child" (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=837197)

Tom_PM 06-25-2008 11:58 AM

I dunno man, I've met some of the 15-18 year old kids in my neighborhood, and I think I could have outwitted them when I was 11 very easily..

GatorB 06-25-2008 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14374814)
Thank your liberal court.

7 of the 9 justices were nominated by REPUBLICANS.

Serious dipshit like sticking a needle in their arm is going to do anything. Most will die of old age before getting put to death and at 4X the cost. Let the general popualtion beat the fuck out of them rape them and kill them. And then we can execute those guys for murder. 2 birds one stone. Think outside the box dude.

TheSenator 06-25-2008 12:01 PM

Death is the easy way out.

Life in jail, beatings, stabbings...mental break downs....for the rest of his life.

GatorB 06-25-2008 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiger (Post 14374870)
Death is too easy.

Life in prison is a much worse fate for a child molester. Maybe a better idea would be that everyone in prison has to wear a sign saying what they were convicted of.

Yeah I don't get all these pro-death people that think life is easier than death. Personally If I had to choose I choose death. Either way I'm not getting out unless I'm in a box so why live another 40-50 years without freedom? Why live 50 years in a cell the size of walk-in closet if that. Why live for 50 year always in fear of rape, beatings or getting stabbed. If I'm going to die in prison I'd rather have a needle in my arm than to get shanked.

Ayla_SquareTurtle 06-25-2008 12:04 PM

I would be for the death penalty for all actual rapists (not the 18 year old who had sex with his 15 year old girlfriend) if I trusted the US court system to accurately determine who is and isn't a rapist. Overall they tend to not do a very good job with that, though.

stev0 06-25-2008 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 14374600)
Define "rape of a child" please.

Under what age do they consider the victim a child?

I find "children" and "minors" to be two different groups. A minor can be considered all people under the age of 18, but I consider them more 14, 15, 16 and 17 years old. A child to be is 13 and under. Pre-teen age.

I would be in favor of killing anyone who rapes someone under the age of 12 or 13, still a pre-teen.

What does age really matter? Rape is rape... I don't think anyone should be showing mercy to any rapists regardless of the victims age.

Jenny S. 06-25-2008 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday (Post 14375131)
These hot air faggots wont do anything.. most can only spew stupid bullshit
from their computer chair .

There is a huge support for Maxhardcore on this site if that says where some of these dicksucks stand.

I am amazed. Yea, let's hang all child rapists, as long as we can still do biz with those who clearly promote child rape on the internet.

Fuck it! Talk smack and bag the cash.

Disgusting.

DWB 06-25-2008 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 14375230)
What does age really matter? Rape is rape... I don't think anyone should be showing mercy to any rapists regardless of the victims age.

Again, you can't just kill rapists. If that were the case, there would be a LOT of dead 18 year old guys who got caught banging their 17 year old girlfriends.

borked 06-25-2008 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 14375101)
The difference is a child, we will say 11 years old, is still developing mentally and physically while a 17-year-old is more mentally developed. A 17-year-old can defend themselves, somewhat, and is more likely to mentally recover than an 11-year-old.

exactly my point - the proposed law would have covered the 4, 11 and 17 year old equally. :warning

/edit, unless the law for consenting sex in the US is 16 - no idea

Deej 06-25-2008 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C_U_Next_Tuesday (Post 14374992)
I believe the reason for this not becoming the law if the fine line that this area can cross over into.

For example.. an 18 year old boy who has sex with a willing 14 year old girl...and the parents call rape. Technical terms, since he is so many years older than the "victim" , it would be considered "child rape"..should we put that boy to death?...NO.

A young 14 year old in my town was left babysitting his neighbors 9 months old baby.. and 3 year old. The 14 year old anally raped the baby to the point he had to have alot of surgery and barely lived through it. They are trying to figure out if to try this boy as an adult or not. ...Ask yourself.. does this 14 year old deserve to die?... Consider the abuse the 14 year old had to go through to make him even think of doing such a thing to another... still think the 14 year old should die?

There are so many gray areas , its sad but true.

Any rape resulting in a death should have the death penalty...children especially.

so what, the kid is bad goods, kill him...

in that case, yes, shoot the little fucker in the head. quick, easy, 50cents for a shell.

its too late for him.

I love the fact that i was born into the time and country that i was. for most parts of it i am thankful, BUT, i do feel we as a country are far too easy on some convicts.

THeres a reason why some dictatorships have their people in order. They are afriad to commit such offenses.

That kid there, yes he has issues that are most likely brought on by his parents or uncle or whoever raping him... they should ALSO be shot.

the only flaw with my thinking is how would we go through and make sure all the proper penalties were inflicted according to the offense at hand.

50% of the people that are guilty in prison deserve to die. period...

the country and world as a whole would be a lot better off...

this WOULD deter quite a bit of crime

it WOULD deter feeding criminals better food than what others that deservedly need, for life!!

it would deter perpetuating these behaviors

sure, my outlook has a couple flaws... but they only need refined...

im against dictatorship... BUT, when it comes to max criminals... i think its time for their rights to be abolished...

perhaps an island :winkwink:

_Richard_ 06-25-2008 12:38 PM

this is what judges are for..

HAPPYPEEKERS 06-25-2008 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jenny S. (Post 14374937)
I have. You think people who are against the nazification of the USA and only partially support the death penalty shouldn't have kids? If someone is against the death penalty for a certain offense it doesn't necessarily mean the person supports the offense, you know that, or are you just "smartassing".

Ok Ms. Jenny,


Lets say you have a very young boy or girl and they are violently raped up the ass by a grown man

A child rapist is not into just raping / molesting 1 child .. they do it through out their lives, as much as they can get away with it.

They are attracted to fucking little kids

what do you personally think the punishment should be ???

:helpme

ps.. and yes you are right.. i am a smartass when it comes to raping children:Oh crap

HAPPYPEEKERS 06-25-2008 12:44 PM

double post :-)

BradM 06-25-2008 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD (Post 14374499)
Death is too good for them. They make it so sanitary and painless. Therefore, it's not proportionate.

To be proportionate, they should be made to suffer for a very long time.

An eye for an eye. But not much can compare to destroying the life of a child. This kid will in no way ever be able to recover in any capacity.

Jenny S. 06-25-2008 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Happypeekers (Post 14375348)
Ok Ms. Jenny,


Lets say you have a very young boy or girl and they are violently raped up the ass by a grown man

A child rapist is not into just raping / molesting 1 child .. they do it through out their lives, as much as they can get away with it.

They are attracted to fucking little kids

what do you personally think the punishment should be ???

:helpme

ps.. and yes you are right.. i am a smartass when it comes to raping children:Oh crap


I did have boys and girls, which are now grown, and I probably would have shot anybody who would have attempted to rape them. That would have been and understandable reaction of a mother, but it shouldn't be basis for creating laws. The death penalty is not the solution for solving the child molestation problem in this country.

Fact is, only 25% of child molestation and rape is committed by outsiders. So who are the other 75%? Family, neighbors, friends, etc. right? Only a small percentage of these cases ever end up in court, so it's a primarily hypothetical question if we'd kill child molesters.

Tough laws haven't solved the problem so far, and the death penalty won't either. Also, too many have gotten life in this country, and had to be released after 20 years in prison, because they were found innocent. Can't do that with the death penalty.


What about my suggestion?

Let's start in here, right now and oust and ostracize those who support child molestation on the Internet. This is where it starts. People who run rape blogs, even if it's only fictional, should be ostracized, and those who sponsor them through their programs should be too. May be it helps if we educate about it, and show everybody that we will not accept it?


Anybody with me?

Tom_PM 06-25-2008 01:27 PM

I know nobody needs a pact or agreement to report any criminal images or content they find online. I've done it before and I'll certainly do it again if I happen to come across anything.

There is no business in the world with a more compelling reason to get all sick fucks out of here. With media lumping ALL "porn" together whether it's legal or not (pisses me right the fuck off), it's doubly important to be vigilant and proactive in getting the sicko's put in prison.

It's just a given. So really when you ask is anybody with me, I think thats a given too. If some banner is on some site that clearly violates TOS or law, just report it to the program (and legal if it's seriously sick).

payd2purv 06-25-2008 01:33 PM

With how fucked up the legal system is the death penalty should not exist.

We end up murdering innocent people.

If the person has been convicted of the crime more than once than it's a given you got the right person so I think than you could give them the death penalty..

I say if you kill a convicted pedophile you should be given a pardon for it tho :P

Sly 06-25-2008 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jenny S. (Post 14375412)
I did have boys and girls, which are now grown, and I probably would have shot anybody who would have attempted to rape them. That would have been and understandable reaction of a mother, but it shouldn't be basis for creating laws. The death penalty is not the solution for solving the child molestation problem in this country.

Fact is, only 25% of child molestation and rape is committed by outsiders. So who are the other 75%? Family, neighbors, friends, etc. right? Only a small percentage of these cases ever end up in court, so it's a primarily hypothetical question if we'd kill child molesters.

Tough laws haven't solved the problem so far, and the death penalty won't either. Also, too many have gotten life in this country, and had to be released after 20 years in prison, because they were found innocent. Can't do that with the death penalty.


What about my suggestion?

Let's start in here, right now and oust and ostracize those who support child molestation on the Internet. This is where it starts. People who run rape blogs, even if it's only fictional, should be ostracized, and those who sponsor them through their programs should be too. May be it helps if we educate about it, and show everybody that we will not accept it?


Anybody with me?

Your request to go after the Internet community still does not address what should be done with these people.

Jenny S. 06-25-2008 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 14375545)
I know nobody needs a pact or agreement to report any criminal images or content they find online. I've done it before and I'll certainly do it again if I happen to come across anything.

There is no business in the world with a more compelling reason to get all sick fucks out of here. With media lumping ALL "porn" together whether it's legal or not (pisses me right the fuck off), it's doubly important to be vigilant and proactive in getting the sicko's put in prison.

It's just a given. So really when you ask is anybody with me, I think thats a given too. If some banner is on some site that clearly violates TOS or law, just report it to the program (and legal if it's seriously sick).

I think we do need an agreement. Badly. Not just to get rid of this shit on the Internet, also to make a point and let everybody know that thee is a conscience, even in the porn industry. Reporting? Where? These sites are often run from abroad.


Fact is, in the past 12 months a shitload of tube and share site promoting rape, KP, torture and other sick stuff have popped up. These sites can only survive because major sponsors have their banners on there. No billing company in the world would ever directly accept such scum bags as customers.

This means: Have programs remove their banners from those sites and the sites will go away.

It's in our hands. We can do something RIGHT NOW. If we don't have an agreement there will always be fly-y-nighters- who'll profit. Only if the asswipes know that they'll be shunned they'll drop it.

So don't leave it up to the feds, do something now.

Jenny S. 06-25-2008 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 14375586)
Your request to go after the Internet community still does not address what should be done with these people.


I don't want to go after the internet community, I just with there was a consensus about where to draw the line.

What should be done with criminal rapists is to sentence them and lock them away.

Capital punishment is not the right way, because the borderline between rape and consensual sex is often not clearly defined. There were cases where 14 year old girls accused their stepfather of rape, and the guy went in, only to find out later that he was innocent. You can only support the death penalty for child rape if you believe in the 100% correctness of our legal system.

Death penalty for serial killers (like Dahmer, Gien, Bundy, etc.): yes. But that's about how far I'd go with it.

madfuck 06-25-2008 01:49 PM

bump this shit!!!!!

Beaver Bob 06-25-2008 01:50 PM

if you rape a child, you should die. no questions asked.

Tom_PM 06-25-2008 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jenny S. (Post 14375600)
I think we do need an agreement. Badly. Not just to get rid of this shit on the Internet, also to make a point and let everybody know that thee is a conscience, even in the porn industry. Reporting? Where? These sites are often run from abroad.


Fact is, in the past 12 months a shitload of tube and share site promoting rape, KP, torture and other sick stuff have popped up. These sites can only survive because major sponsors have their banners on there. No billing company in the world would ever directly accept such scum bags as customers.

This means: Have programs remove their banners from those sites and the sites will go away.

It's in our hands. We can do something RIGHT NOW. If we don't have an agreement there will always be fly-y-nighters- who'll profit. Only if the asswipes know that they'll be shunned they'll drop it.

So don't leave it up to the feds, do something now.

Report it to the sponsor program. Check out the terms of service on a program who's banner you see on such a site, email them and send the link and how it violates their terms. People report things every day. And programs dont automagically know that an affiliate is sending traffic from a horrible website unless it comes to their attention. One email is all it's going to take to review the site and take appropriate action.

FelixFlow 06-25-2008 01:55 PM

if they knew they could get the death penalty if the child were to tell on them, it would encourage child-rapists to murder their victims


THAT is why it didn't pass

Rochard 06-25-2008 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14374466)
dude is in prison, he isn't getting out and will most likely to be killed in prison by another inmate than die of old age. You want him put to sleep like you would do to a beloved pet that has cancer. I think getting shanked in the throat is more appropriate but we'll agree to disagree.

I agree. Killing him is an easy way out. Put him in prison for the rest of his life, let him get gang raped every day - they love his kind is prison! - and then let him get killed without warning with a shank in a nice violent way.

CyberHustler 06-25-2008 02:19 PM

"Thou shall not kill" - your God said it, not me...

Jenny S. 06-25-2008 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 14375651)
Report it to the sponsor program. Check out the terms of service on a program who's banner you see on such a site, email them and send the link and how it violates their terms. People report things every day. And programs dont automagically know that an affiliate is sending traffic from a horrible website unless it comes to their attention. One email is all it's going to take to review the site and take appropriate action.


You gotta believe in Santa if you think that the big sponsors with emplyoees and staff don't know where their banners are.

Anyway, I give you the benefit of the doubt. Tonight I will email a sponsor whose banner appears on a board whith topics like:

"War Rape"
"Cunts to rape and abuse. Be as brutal as you want"
"Mother and daughter rape"

I will take screenshots and notify him. I am not going to say which one right now, just in case they read this. In a couple of days I'll get back and report how it worked.

If it doesn't work, would that convince you to do something?

I'm Looking For A... 06-25-2008 03:28 PM

first off, i agree... death penalty is not proportional, these assholes need to be skinned alive and pissed on BEFORE they are fried on the chair.

Second...

in prison for life = my tax money feeding and housing a child rapist = Fuck you, no good

in electric chair = death and thats that. i dont wanna pay to keep your rotten child raping ass alive. Die die die

That concludes my feelings.

After Shock Media 06-25-2008 03:32 PM

Death penalty and the court system as a whole is still very flawed and like it or not to damn many innocent people get sentenced still. Until that is fixed and justice becomes not only equal for all and not just those with good attorneys, but one that can guarantee with 100% accuracy that no innocent person could be put to death for something that they did not do.

GatorB 06-25-2008 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I'm Looking For A... (Post 14376132)
first off, i agree... death penalty is not proportional, these assholes need to be skinned alive and pissed on BEFORE they are fried on the chair.

Second...

in prison for life = my tax money feeding and housing a child rapist = Fuck you, no good

in electric chair = death and thats that. i dont wanna pay to keep your rotten child raping ass alive. Die die die

That concludes my feelings.

Listen tard let me explain what's wrong with your post.

A) they don't use the chair anymroe anywhere dipshit. It's all lethal injection now.

B) it take 4 times the more per year to keep someone on death row that it does to put them in genral popualtion. In other words a guy on death row for 15 years uses up as much money as guy spending 60 years in regular prison. And no one lives for 60 years in prison.

GatorB 06-25-2008 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0 (Post 14375230)
What does age really matter? Rape is rape... I don't think anyone should be showing mercy to any rapists regardless of the victims age.

Are you fucking stupid? Guys get thrown in jail for "rape" for having consensual sex with their girlfriends because they are underage.

That one kid on Georgia spent 2 years in prison because he was 17 and he let a 15 year old suck his dick. She WILLINGLY did it. This kid should have been executed? Hell he only got out because of all the public outrage and involvement by major polticians getting involved.

After Shock Media 06-25-2008 04:20 PM

I am pretty certain the McMartins back in the 80's would of ended well with such penalties.

ronaldo 06-25-2008 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradM (Post 14375367)
This kid will in no way ever be able to recover in any capacity.

I don't know about that. Elizabeth Smart seems to be doing incredibly well. I can't imagine what a rape victim goes through, but I'm sure how well they recover has a great deal to do with the support they receive afterwards. Not that they'll ever forget, but that doesn't mean they can't go on and lead a normal life.

Spunky 06-25-2008 04:30 PM

Being ripped in half by two horses is more appropriate..scum of the earth

I'm Looking For A... 06-25-2008 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14376299)
Listen tard let me explain what's wrong with your post.

A) they don't use the chair anymroe anywhere dipshit. It's all lethal injection now.

B) it take 4 times the more per year to keep someone on death row that it does to put them in genral popualtion. In other words a guy on death row for 15 years uses up as much money as guy spending 60 years in regular prison. And no one lives for 60 years in prison.


im sorry... i dont follow execution procedures, but death is death... you wanna get technical, fuck you. you think child rapists should not be executed? Fuck you.

I piss more dignity then you'll ever have, tard.

Beaver Bob 06-25-2008 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14376299)
B) it take 4 times the more per year to keep someone on death row that it does to put them in genral popualtion. In other words a guy on death row for 15 years uses up as much money as guy spending 60 years in regular prison. And no one lives for 60 years in prison.

then don't keep them alive in death row for 15 years. :2 cents:

once the sentence has handed down, execute within 30 days. problem solved.

After Shock Media 06-25-2008 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beaver Bob (Post 14376463)
then don't keep them alive in death row for 15 years. :2 cents:

once the sentence has handed down, execute within 30 days. problem solved.

30 days eh?

http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/arti...scid=6&did=110

After Shock Media 06-25-2008 05:04 PM

Frank Lee Smith Florida Conviction: 1985, Charges Dismissed: 2000
Frank Lee Smith, who had been convicted of a 1985 rape and murder of an 8-year-old girl, and who died of cancer in January 2000 while still on death row, was cleared of these charges by DNA testing, according to an aide to Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. After the trial, the chief eyewitness recanted her testimony. Nevertheless, Smith was scheduled for execution in 1990, but received a stay. Prosecutor Carolyn McCann was told by the FBI lab which conducted the DNA tests that: "He has been excluded. He didn't do it." Another man, who is currently in a psychiatric facility, is now the main suspect. (Washington Post, 12/15/00 (AP) and St. Petersburg Times (Florida) 12/15/00).

On another note, wouldn't more real child rapists (pedophiles) just end up killing all of their victims anyways if there already is a death penalty on the line?

I'm Looking For A... 06-25-2008 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 14376510)
On another note, wouldn't more real child rapists (pedophiles) just end up killing all of their victims anyways if there already is a death penalty on the line?

or maybe death would make them reconsider doing it in the first place.

After Shock Media 06-25-2008 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I'm Looking For A... (Post 14376520)
or maybe death would make them reconsider doing it in the first place.

Um my guess would be no. They are sick, most can not controll their actions at all. If they had such will power odds are they would not be fucking children to begin with.

I'm Looking For A... 06-25-2008 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 14376530)
Um my guess would be no. They are sick, most can not controll their actions at all. If they had such will power odds are they would not be fucking children to begin with.

o okay, in that case, fuck it. lets just give em a fine.

GatorB 06-25-2008 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beaver Bob (Post 14376463)
then don't keep them alive in death row for 15 years. :2 cents:

once the sentence has handed down, execute within 30 days. problem solved.

it doesn't work that way in REAL life you fucking retard. That what we are talking about REAL life not PRENTEND life. Hell in my state we just had a guy of natural causes at the age of 68 that had been on death row for 30 years. Not only did that equate to a 120 year sentence for a regular prisoner as far as cost it must of been nice him knowing he had a cell to himself, no wories about geting raped or shanked or even beat up. Must have been sweet.

I swear some of you here are ignorant. Yeah execute in 30 days. Real fucking smart. you know how many HUNDREDS of people are being released after spending YEARS or DECADES in prison for crimes, INCLUDING rape, that they did NOT commit.

grow up kid

After Shock Media 06-25-2008 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I'm Looking For A... (Post 14376535)
o okay, in that case, fuck it. lets just give em a fine.

Is your world really that black and white? Where in the hell do you even get the idea of just giving them a fine.

Lock them up, do not release with some very damn valid sex offender exceptions built in to protect some really stupid shit from going down as not all sex offenders are pedophiles.

GatorB 06-25-2008 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I'm Looking For A... (Post 14376520)
or maybe death would make them reconsider doing it in the first place.

If the death penalty was deterant there would not be any crime. Texas executes all the time. Still has more murders than most states. When someone is so fucked in the head they commit rape and/or murder they aren't even using logic so why would the death penalty be a thought in thier mind?

Like I said anyone who think life in prison is better than death is fucking retard of preposterous dimensions

I'm Looking For A... 06-25-2008 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14376544)
it doesn't work that way in REAL life you fucking retard. That what we are talking about REAL life not PRENTEND life. Hell in my state we just had a guy of natural causes at the age of 68 that had been on death row for 30 years. Not only did that equate to a 120 year sentence for a regular prisoner as far as cost it must of been nice him knowing he had a cell to himself, no wories about geting raped or shanked or even beat up. Must have been sweet.

I swear some of you here are ignorant. Yeah execute in 30 days. Real fucking smart. you know how many HUNDREDS of people are being released after spending YEARS or DECADES in prison for crimes, INCLUDING rape, that they did NOT commit.

grow up kid


you're a quick one to call names arnt you? your posts sound like a 15 year olds. I dont think you are very young tho. Could be wrong. Either way, nothing coming out of you in that manner will be remotely entertained.

GatorB 06-25-2008 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 14376496)


hey that's how China, Iran and N Korea do it. We should emulate these countries.:thumbsup

GatorB 06-25-2008 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I'm Looking For A... (Post 14376569)
you're a quick one to call names arnt you? your posts sound like a 15 year olds. I dont think you are very young tho. Could be wrong. Either way, nothing coming out of you in that manner will be remotely entertained.

listen guy we are talking baout a serious topic and this turd comes up with insults and "once the sentence has handed down, execute within 30 days. problem solved.". Now unless he is actually retarded he should know it doesn't work that way nor should it.

Robbie 06-25-2008 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy (Post 14374600)
Define "rape of a child" please.

Under what age do they consider the victim a child?

I find "children" and "minors" to be two different groups. A minor can be considered all people under the age of 18, but I consider them more 14, 15, 16 and 17 years old. A child to be is 13 and under. Pre-teen age.

I would be in favor of killing anyone who rapes someone under the age of 12 or 13, still a pre-teen.

You just hit on the reason that I am so glad they didn't pass that. Seems the government keeps changing the defintions of words. Remember when nuclear weapons became "weapons of mass destruction" and then they changed that defintion to mean chemical weapons too?
Or how about this: Pedo's used to mean someone who liked sex with small children. Now they apply it to guys who fuck a 16 year old! And they brand them for life as sex offenders!
Hell, I was watching the news during the Girls Gone Wild shit, and the "reporters" on Fox News were wondering out loud where the parents of the 18 year old "children" were and why they didn't control these 18 year old women better so they wouldn't be filmed like that.
Or how about Britney Spears? She's in her 20's. And if you put all the "crazy" shit she's ever done in her whole life together it probably wouldn't equal ONE night for Steven Tyler of Aerosmith in the mid-1970's. Yet the government gave her father complete control of all of her money and property and her very life!
It's all bullshit power grabs.
And if that had passed they would have just used whatever definition of "child" suited their purposes at any given time.
Did I mention I hate the fucking government?
I also watched that story today.
The guy that did it is a big 6'4", 250 pound black guy. He raped a little 8 year old black girl.
But that was then and this is now.
She is now in college. He's still in prison.
Sounds about right.
What he did is unfathomable to me. But the govt. proves over and over that they will rape every goddamn one of us if given the chance. So I'm glad they didn't let the death penalty be applicable for rape.

I'm Looking For A... 06-25-2008 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 14376551)
Is your world really that black and white? Where in the hell do you even get the idea of just giving them a fine.

Lock them up, do not release with some very damn valid sex offender exceptions built in to protect some really stupid shit from going down as not all sex offenders are pedophiles.

hey, at least you're not calling names when someone disagrees with you. thanks for that.

Examples. I believe people need to be made examples of.

Hope. Every criminal hopes not to get caught. I have to believe that hope grows greater with greater suggested punishment. Even in the minds of sick, sick people... theres something there, its not all empty. Make the sickos afraid. If you say they are so sick there is no fear... how do you discourage future incidents? Just give up? Say to ourselves "they are sick, fear or not, they will do it."?

I cant agree with that.

I'm Looking For A... 06-25-2008 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14376614)
listen guy we are talking baout a serious topic and this turd comes up with insults and "once the sentence has handed down, execute within 30 days. problem solved.". Now unless he is actually retarded he should know it doesn't work that way nor should it.

I dont recall insulting you whatsoever. As a matter of fact, i hadnt even quoted you in my first post in this thread when you posted this as a response...

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 14376299)
Listen tard let me explain what's wrong with your post.


you seem pretty opinionated about the topic. thats cool, i like people with passion for something. But people that are not in favor of your opinion are not necessarily retarded.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123