Woman Finds Kid Porn, Has Son Arrested

[fsck]

Allegheny County police on Friday arrested a Swissvale man who allegedly possessed child pornography, WTAE´s Sheldon Ingram reported. Brian Michael Dominy, 21, is charged with sexual abuse of children. Police said he had computer images of at least 20 children, ages 4 to 14, having sex with with other children and adults. Dominy´s mother found the pictures in her son´s room and reported them, police said


full story

[mastamindz]

Good mom.

[Exxxotica]

Son, I found little boys and girls on your computer while checking my email. The police are coming.

No Mom....it's "art"!

[pr0]

Fry his ass, no lethal injection...electricute the fuck

[Firehorse]

Make the punishment fit the crime!

[Exxxotica]

Originally posted by Firehorse
Make the punishment fit the crime!

Which would be?

[Rochard]

When I was living in Pleasanton California one guy brought his computer in to a local repair shop to be fixed. The tech working on his computer found tons of child porn and called the police. I hope he's still in jail.

[Sambuka]

All I can say is I am glad I don't have a bitch of mom like that. NO good mother would ever do something like that to her own son.
She must hate him and want him out of her house.

[Sly_RJ]

Shit, I don't think my mom could do that.

[421Fill]

Originally posted by Sambuka
All I can say is I am glad I don't have a bitch of mom like that. NO good mother would ever do something like that to her own son.
She must hate him and want him out of her house.

then she would have been enabling him. Tough love may seem harsh but it is the only logical way to go about anything like this...

[Sly_RJ]

Originally posted by turbo


then she would have been enabling him. Tough love may seem harsh but it is the only logical way to go about anything like this...

Maybe after multiple attempts of her trying to remedy the situation. But I agree with Sambuka, this mom had something up with her. I don't know many moms that could/would do that on a first "offence".

Could you? Don't say "of course, it's CP!", think about it.

[421Fill]

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Maybe after multiple attempts of her trying to remedy the situation. But I agree with Sambuka, this mom had something up with her. I don't know many moms that could/would do that on a first "offence".

Could you? Don't say "of course, it's CP!", think about it.

think about it? ok, but think about the mindset of someone who goes though the effort of downloading that shit... it isn't accidental, and do you really believe that this was the only method he chose to manifest his sickness? I doubt it. Granted I will agree with you that there is certainly a 'possibility' that this was the 'first offense' and you're right many Mom's wouldn't go so far in that case, but I just highly doubt it is the case here.

like it or not enabling someone to do stuff that is so wrong is just as wrong in my book.

I don't always think about what I say on this board, but I assure that I was not just spouting out of my ass this time.

[Aussie Rebel]

Originally posted by Sambuka
All I can say is I am glad I don't have a bitch of mom like that. NO good mother would ever do something like that to her own son.
She must hate him and want him out of her house.

You fuckin piece of shit you deserve to die just for making that statement!!! I hope you walk outside and get hit by a truck.
Was it one of your friends that got caught? or you?
Good on ya MUM
I hope your son FRYS

[steffie]

This is a tough one.

What would I do if I would find that shit on my son's pc. Probably try to kill him myself. Make him destroy it. Have him put into a phycho ward, shrink, made sure he is never around kids.. Watch him like a hawk.


I don't know if I would turn him in. I really don't know, this is tough. However I probably would have not turned him in instead I would probably try helping him with the above means.

Jail is not going to help this guy. He is probably not going to make it longer than 1 hour in jail before he will be dead. ( I heard what they do to guys like that, I watch TV)

Yeah, that's probably the route I would have went. Now, if after doing all this for him I would still found pictures like that on him, yeah, than I probably would have turned him in.

There is probably a lot more to the story we will probably never know.

Go ahead flame away, but unless you have children yourself (and I have a boatload over here) don't talk!

[Sambuka]

You fuckin piece of shit you deserve to die just for making that statement!!! I hope you walk outside and get hit by a truck.
Was it one of your friends that got caught? or you?
Good on ya MUM
I hope your son FRYS

=========================

Ohh honey your a charmmer, thank you for the kind words, But alas no trucks anywhere to be seen.

Firstly, you make out that he killed someone and deserves to die.
I bet he is some lonely computer geek with no life/girlfriend/friends/job living at home with his mom, overweight and has seen everything on the internet & his only pleasure in his shit life is masurbating & Food.

It does not make him a child molestor for looking at some pictures and wanking off, yes it is terrible stuff and can lead (sometimes) to people going out and doing bad stuff and I hate it just as much as you all do. But he did not hurt anybody he is most probably in a very sad depressed state and doesn't give a shit about his life.

I feel sorry for the guy cause he probably had a crap life before, now he has been kicked out of home and might do some jailtime.

Don't get me wrong I don't condone Child porn in any way but I believe the punishment should fit the crime. You kill someone here in Aussie you get about 8-10 years and then your free, you download some child porn and (hurt nobody else) and people think you should be shot dead! or at least goto jail for 5 years.

there ya go, I know I'm going to get flamed like shit for this statement but I say what I want. Once again I DO NOT condone child porn or think that he shouldn't be punished for what he did, I just think the laws should reflect the damage he did to society.

Flame away

Sammy

[Kanoealoha]

Originally posted by Sambuka


It does not make him a child molestor for looking at some pictures and wanking off, yes it is terrible stuff and can lead (sometimes) to people going out and doing bad stuff and I hate it just as much as you all do.

Don't get me wrong I don't condone Child porn in any way but I believe the punishment should fit the crime. You kill someone here in Aussie you get about 8-10 years and then your free, you download some child porn and (hurt nobody else) and people think you should be shot dead! or at least goto jail for 5 years.

How do you figure that no one got hurt? It said kids having sex with other kids and kids having sex with adults...oh wait, why would the children come out scarred after this?

(Do you hear the sarcasm???)

[Sambuka]

hrmm oops I just reread that first orginal where it says
"he is being charged with sexual abuse of children"

So maybe he was out there doing this to children after all, so if he was doing these acts himself then by all means cut his balls off and feed them too him. (Prefurablly over several days)

If on the other hand it was images he got off the internet then my previous message stands.

In my first message I thought he just got them off the net and therefore didn't HURT anyone mentally or physically himself, others did the terrible deeds but I might of misread the orginal message.

[Libertine]

I think child porn should lead to very severe penalties, however, I also think no mother who turns her own son in deserves to be called a mother. Blood goes before anything.

[Tipsy]

Originally posted by Sambuka

In my first message I thought he just got them off the net and therefore didn't HURT anyone mentally or physically himself, others did the terrible deeds but I might of misread the orginal message.

None too bright are you? Of course he's hurting children even if only indirectly. If he's out there grabbing this shit off the net he's creating demand. If you create demand then people go out and supply that demand by performing sick shit on children. Most of the crap out there is commercial and is made simply for these people who 'hurt nobody mentally or physically'. Wake up and see the big picture. Good grief.

[.:Frog:.]

Originally posted by Kanoealoha

How do you figure that no one got hurt? It said kids having sex with other kids and kids having sex with adults...oh wait, why would the children come out scarred after this?

(Do you hear the sarcasm???)

I think Sambuka is saying the guy downloading the CP didn't hurt the children, someone else did.

[Tipsy]

Originally posted by .:Frog:.

I think Sambuka is saying the guy downloading the CP didn't hurt the children, someone else did.

..and he would be 100% wrong. It's like saying the guy who paid someone to shoot his ex-wife didn't hurt anyone. Of course he did - he just didn't pull the trigger himself.

[richard123]

Originally posted by Tipsy


..and he would be 100% wrong. It's like saying the guy who paid someone to shoot his ex-wife didn't hurt anyone. Of course he did - he just didn't pull the trigger himself.

If the guy had been caught pre-1990, he woulda been in the clear. For an interesting analysis of cp law and surrounding hysteria, check this: http://eon.law.harvard.edu/ilaw/Speech/Adler_full.html

Edit: It's interesting to note that the possession law came into being because of the possibility that someone might use CP pics for nefarious purposes. Juts like someone might use pics of dead bodies for the same. Except that's legal. Same with rape fantasy pics. Legal too. And cartoons are legal. It's really quite strange....

[Tipsy]

Originally posted by richard123


If the guy had been caught pre-1990, he woulda been in the clear. For an interesting analysis of cp law and surrounding hysteria, check this: http://eon.law.harvard.edu/ilaw/Speech/Adler_full.html

In the 1700's he would have been allowed to abuse them himself. WTF it has to do with anything that happens now is a little beyond me and just like your point totally irrelevant.

That link posted it firstly FAR too long to read and secondly I would bet is written by somebody who has not had to live with and witness the effects that CP can have on children both at the time and when they reach adult hood. WTF though it's a pointless argument. Amybody arguing that it's OK to view CP because you don't harm the kids is as sick as the people viewing it.

[richard123]

Originally posted by Tipsy
That link posted it firstly FAR too long to read and ...

Ignorance is bliss...

Originally posted by Tipsy
Amybody arguing that it's OK to view CP because you don't harm the kids is as sick as the people viewing it.

I think very few people (if any) would disagree with that. If you took the time to read the stuff professor Adler, you'd be aware of how you are part of all the bullshit that goes on about CP and how you are contributing to the spread of CP. But you never will, so what's the point?

[Sambuka]

1.
OK, firstly CHILD PORN IS FREE!!! I've never heard of any of these porn rings making money (have you?) They are just big traders. The Wonderland club in Italy or Germany had a rule that you had to have 10,000 images to join. The rule was NOT "you have to supply us with orginial content by kidnapping children and raping them)

They are (mostly) all traders, they usually single fathers taking photos of there 10 girl and posting it on the net or shit like that, so no its not "Mostly commerical" its Mostly NOT commercial
(Not to bright are you?)

2.
Do you really think these sick fucks go "ohh great lots of people are downloading the pics, theres BIG demand out there so I'll go do lots of terrible acts to children and supply that demand.

NOPE!

They don't make money out of this, they don't sell this to these queer fucks its all free on the newgroups and IRC. Its not like he payed money to the rapist to go rape these children so he could get the images. The rapist did the deed or was doing the deed anyways and just happend to take some photos to show off.

IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE THESE GUYS FUCK CHILDREN JUST SO THEY CAN TRADE THE IMAGES ON THE NET YOUR A FUCKING IDIOT!

He is coming along AFTER the fact and viewing the photos of something that WOULD OF HAPPEND weather he download the images or NOT.

To say its the same as some guy paying a hitman to kill his ex-wife is just the stupidist thing you've said so far.

I had a friend who once went down this bad path of child porn, he wasn't in a good place mentally/psychially in his life and I found the images through while the computers were networked one day. I told him and he was very very embarressed and I told him he better get rid of them and stop doing that cause I didn't need the police coming and taking both our computers away. He stopped and weeks later I helped him get his life back together and he is now living a healthy productive life.

Looking back on him now he is fine and he has told me he regrets dearly looking at those images as he can't get them 100% out of his head. I know the feeling, I hate seeing gore photos (even a glimpse as I can't get the damn images out of my head for days). They make me feel sick.

I do not believe my friend deserved to be shot for what he did, I do not believe he committed a serious enough crime to deserve the same jail time as a Drunk driver who kills or maims somone for life. My friend DID NOT indirectly RAPE any children, he did not help rape any children and if he wasn't there to download those images those children would still of been raped. If there was zero demand for child porn images on the net and the rapist had noone to trade images with THOSE CHILDREN STILL WOULD OF BEEN RAPED.

THAT IS MY FUCKING POINT!! GET IT!

The simple fact is that these pictures are out there, and these sick pricks do this shit to children wheather someone is there to trade the pictures afterwards or not.

The problem with child porn is that people see it and then LIKE IT and then try it on there own children or kidnap others children and do it. THAT IS THE PROBLEM, they is why it has to stop.

THE PROBLEM IS NOT, that people are downloading it and creating DEMAND and thereby creating a HUGE number of "COMMERICIAL" companies to produce this niche and thereby make millions selling it. NO THAT IS PURE BULLSHIT and your oppions are wrong.

We want to stop it so others don't get the idea and start doing it themselfs. And it sure would help if the US gov closed down all the child porn newsgroups. I think they keep them open so they can get lots of easy arrests without to much work.


Sammy

[hahmike]

sambuka is right on the ball... solid post, solid statements.

[Sambuka]

>>Amybody arguing that it's OK to view CP because you don't >>harm the kids is as sick as the people viewing it.

And just to make sure you understand me, I am NOT arguing that is OK to view CP because your not hurting anyone. What I am arguing is that just because you view some photos of CP it doesn't make you guilty of Raping children. As Tipsy thinks!

People should be punished for viewing CP but they should not be shot or put in jail for 5 years for it.

Sammy

[richard123]

Originally posted by Sambuka
THE PROBLEM IS NOT, that people are downloading it and creating DEMAND and thereby creating a HUGE number of "COMMERICIAL" companies to produce this niche and thereby make millions selling it. NO THAT IS PURE BULLSHIT and your oppions are wrong.

The reason for the possessioin part of law is - as I said above (you might have overlooked my post ) - because of the possibility that someone might use CP pics for nefarious purposes.
It has nothing to do (as you rightly point out) with supply and demand etc. But then again, how can an opinion be wrong?

[Manny The Freak]

Good mom!

[Tipsy]

This guy is funny in a dangerous and rather icky sort of way. But then he usues a totally different Internet from me. One where all the Russian CP sites don't exist and the nastier toplists don't use real CP banners linked to CP paysites.

What a fuckwit.

What's really scary though is the amount of people who will take that point of view. Mind you so do the people who pay for the CP and even many who do that shit to the children in the first place have very similar arguments.

Personally I'd agree 5 years is too steep but then I never argued that point.

WTF though. Like I say a pointless argument and one that people who enjoy viewing that shit and fools will never see so I'm outa this thread. I'll let you people feel sorry for those who abuse children and those who support it in peace. Fucked if I want any further part in it.

[kmanrox]

u think it's funny, im gonna smack the piss outta my mom when i get out of jail... !!!

;-)

[hottshot]

Originally posted by Sambuka
1.
OK, firstly CHILD PORN IS FREE!!! I've never heard of any of these porn rings making money (have you?)

http://www.freep.com/news/nw/kids9_20010809.htm

[2crazy4u]

Castration for anyone who is involved in child porn!

[pimplink]

If he's convicted, the best he can hope for is to be put under special custody. Normally, child sex offenders like him get beaten or male raped the most in prison. Under special custody, he will be segregated with other sick sex offenders.

[Sly_RJ]

Sambuka is dead on. The rest of your judgments are clouded simply because CP is the issue. You're generalizing way too much. It's funny seeing some of you talk about fantasy in this thread, and then in another thread fight that fantasy is a good thing.