![]() |
OMG, as a mom, that makes me want to vomit. Why in the hell did i click that link, I had no idea it would look that real or that sick :(
|
I invented Banning from the industry.
|
Quote:
|
Agreed,shit like that shouldn't be allowed even though it's anime
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm pretty sure in canada some of those might be considered illegal , but it's hard to say , it all has to do with if whomever is judging the pictures figures it is simulated cp I started a thread the other day about westboro baptist church the other day and the fact directnic is their registrar , basically asking what people thought about it. Most people generally agreed it is up to the courts to enforce laws not registrars, and were talking REAL victims here not simulated drawings. I would think most people would generally feel the same way about processing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
anyone has anything to say about toons from The Simpsons or Family Guy fucking?
|
Seems like this is being blown a tad bit out of proportion, and I don't even like these 3D sites. Most of the chicks look over 18 to me. And to slam on sites like this when there are real sites out there that feature girls who look way young doing all sorts of hardcore shit seems a bit... off.
|
Quote:
Pedo = under 12 to me. Not a college, university schoolgirl. |
Quote:
That shit is currently promoted on the biggests TGP/MPG with CCBill.com as the processor. If nobody cares and wait until the justice or the general public to do something about it, more galleries like that, plus the "amateur-half-naked-no-2257-available" that are also borderline. I really don't like the direction this industry is taking. Anyway, I think more and more webmasters in this industry are disconnected from the reality. |
Deliberately creating animation that looks like kids performing sexual acts is wrong and should be illegal in my worthless opinion. :2 cents:
|
Quote:
BUT I have my moral, ethics and can tell if something is right or wrong by myself without the opinion of the government or the fucking laws. In this case, I believe it is our responsibility to not encourage these things, as webmaster of this industry, community or whatever you want to call it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's trying to go-over an already clear law: Child Porn. Any court decision will be based on intention. How is that hard to understand? |
Quote:
By muslim standards a nipple means jail/death. Which standard do we take as a reference ? |
Quote:
I don't really visit forums anymore since 2000-2001, but I'm upset about reactions. |
Quote:
Quote:
how old does this girl look to you? click threw and you'll hear about how "daddy's got a secret." awesome toy blocks on that template btw! ccbill? http://galleries.dirtybabysitter.com...3CCBILL872295/ |
Quote:
Child porn is already illegal in USA. And who cares if it was legal? Is it legal to you? Should we legalize beastiality because it's legal in 2-3 countries? Can we have our own standards without having to wait until the U.S. Justice that is ran by a bunch of... humans? I figure in a few years you won't even be able to tell the difference between reality and fiction. Little girls will be fucked in Flash format on MGP and Tube sites and it will be okay because it will be written "even if it looks 100% real, these pictures are virtual. No 2267 required". Common sense based on existant Child Porn laws. |
Quote:
i thought so :pimp |
Quote:
A don't remember the name of a sponsor... but they had 15-16 years old looking girls. 2257 legal. I don't support this, but I believe the 15-16 is not what the pedo people are looking into. It is the 5-12 of age... which is easily done via 3D models. |
The short of it: It's obviously catering to pedophiles. :mad:
The long of it: It's computer rendered, and hence, not technically pedophilia. :Oh crap |
Quote:
I have read 2 weeks ago in the newspapers that they started creating toon films for children (4-6 years old) with girls of the same age holding cell phones in Britney Spears outfits. Where the fuck are we going? Then we wonder why they all need psychological assistance by age of 10 and fucked the first time at 8 years old in a child-gangbang. |
Quote:
Quote:
ps, what does the big picture YOU see have to do with the topic at hand? is the site you're complaining about marketing to children? how will these 3d models influence the lives of children? |
Quote:
People need to be able to hold onto two separate trains of thought in these types of arguments. One side needs to follow through with the idea of policing thought crimes that have not victims. Again no different then me using very high end special effects to kill a person. It is not real, it can be catering to sick people, there is no victim, and of course killing someone is indeed a existing crime. This is a slope that nobody should be allowed to slip down. (btw tony404 I spoke out against the obscenity text stories as a FYI, even though they were revolting). On the other side of the argument is taking the moral and ethical stance to shun and not allow such material near your sites or your traffic. Just like most of us already do in regards to bestiality, despite its legality. For some they may not see how this is possible but one can take both stances. Otherwise where do we draw these lines and who draws them. What fake crimes shall be legal and what ones shall not. |
i give up. im tired of defending max hc and this 3d model site from you people. i figured people who claim to be in the porn industry would have a little more common sense and see that banning what THEY consider offensive is what the people ATTACKING ALL PORN are doing. They think they're doing whats best for everyone by attacking everything that offends them, even when NO VICTIM EXISTS. Gay Porn = offensive to MANY. Why is your line rational and good and theirs irrational? im sure there are more who would agree that Gay Porn is obscene then not so who gets to decide? Them or you? Everyone thinks their line in the sand is where the line should be but dont realize the laws protecting speech where put in place so one group couldnt censor the other. so one group couldnt say, "how dare you say that about Muhammad. you're going to jail for offending US." i guess ill go back to lurking, reading the "spam me with X sites" threads looking for new sponsors to push.
keep rationalizing your own destruction you narcissistic fucks. ill be watching. :321GFY |
all I can do is shake my head...
morons in this thread bitching, yet some of those same people promote teen content... if you were to draw that teen content it would look identical to some of what was linked to... now, don't get me wrong... I don't promote lolicon or 3d lolicon stuff... I want no part of that... but I just think it's ironic to see people who are making money on very young looking girls here complaining about young looking 3d art... |
Quote:
|
You think the boy in this pic is supposed to be 18? :disgust
http://galleries.incestsex-3d.com/22/010.jpg http://galleries.incestsex-3d.com/22...l?id=proxylist |
Wow
First off All our models are built from ADULT meshes. Not one single image on our site is created from a child mesh. They are all of adult scale. Some of our models are youthful in appearance but still adult scale. When we do double sets both actors are of the same scale, what I mean by that is they are the same size, hieght ect. we do not make the girls half the size to make them look like children. There are allot of 3d site that make obvious depictions of children having sex, both visually and in the description and text, We do not portray our models to be underage, we make it very clear they were drawn to be over 18. So to lump this site in with other cp sites is insulting. I like to be creative a draw a variety of girls, ranging in ages 18 to 28 ish Out of the 340 sets I have on that site, there are maybe 3 to 4 sets that maybe ridding the line of youthfullness but they are still built from an adult mesh. Its all in the person viewing and how they precieve it to be. Thats the great thing about any type of artwork wether it be humonoid or landscape how it is precived is different by every viewer |
If you support banning virtual cp, then you support reduction in masturbation material for pedo's which may lead to increase in real child abuse.
Save the children. Let pedo's masturbate to virtual cp! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What he said. + the site is not that bad to me. I've seen real models looking that young and everybody here applausing and wanting to promote. I.E : http://www.selina18.com/73560966/tour.html Most of you guys are a bunch of hypocrites. |
Quote:
I do agree on this one though = This is unacceptable and should not be related to the adult industry. Unlike the other site in this thread, this is clearly child porn. |
|
|
http://www.selina18-teen.com/wp-cont...orpictures.jpg
The morally police are usually filled with hypocrisy. |
Some of you are definitely confusing fantasy with reality here.
|
This is just PLAIN WRONG... Reporting to ASACP now..
maybe CC-Bill are not aware of this : 2cents |
The legal age of consent in a lot of states is 16. Just throwing that out there. People seem to think it's 18 for every state. It's not.
And people also throw around the term "pedo" too often. A pedo is somebody who lusts after prepubescent children. Not defending or attacking this new niche, just stating some facts people seem to gloss over. |
damn that first page girl looks like she's 12, not good
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is also worth noting that nothing in court's ruling in FSC v. Ashcroft (the "virtual cp" case) prevents a prosecutor from indicting simulated cp as obscene material -- they just can't charge the producer/distributor with producing/distributing cp, because the material does not involve actual underage human beings. If you can indict Karen Fletcher for obscenity in response to her writing and selling cp stories, you can indict an artist for obscenity in response to them creating and selling CP cartoons. I'm not saying that the government necessarily *should* pursue such prosecutions, just that they *can* do so. |
that is messed up
|
does this crap actually convert ? ... even if i was a potential client i would be scare to register my cc on a site like this.... it so close to CP that its look like a trap from the fbi to build a list of potential pedo.
|
It may adhere to the letter of the law but it's definitely going against the spirit of it.
|
Oh men this is terrible!
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123